J
John Doe
Guest
Is it unpatriotic to root for Russia?
How about Ukraine versus Russia in the Olympics?
How about Ukraine versus Russia in the Olympics?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it unpatriotic to root for Russia?
How about Ukraine versus Russia in the Olympics?
John Doe wrote:
Is it unpatriotic to root for Russia?
How about Ukraine versus Russia in the Olympics?
No, you don\'t have to do ANYTHING. Personally, I know that Ukraine
resistance will just get more people killed than necessary, but it DOES
give me pleasure to see Russian tanks and aircraft getting destroyed.
Is it unpatriotic to root for Russia?
How about Ukraine versus Russia in the Olympics?
BWAAAHAHAHAAA!!!
Bill Sloman is an attention-craving chronic liar who cannot be
reasoned with...
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!5U2ooNuM5UP0Ynf/GmOnCg.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Must we root for Ukraine?
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 12:22:23 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t0291v$17b0$2@gioia.aioe.org
References: <t01m68$7ce$1@dont-email.me
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data=\"40288\"; posting-host=\"5U2ooNuM5UP0Ynf/GmOnCg.user.gioia.aioe.org\"; mail-complaints-to=\"abuse@aioe.org\";
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:662130
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t01m68$7ce$1@dont-
email.me:
Is it unpatriotic to root for Russia?
Absolutely is, but you have already been proven an Unamerican
dumbshit, so no surprise that you would pull a stupid move like this as
well.
How about Ukraine versus Russia in the Olympics?
Go look up past olympic event results, umamerican idiot.
John Doe wrote:
Is it unpatriotic to root for Russia?
How about Ukraine versus Russia in the Olympics?
It is so silly now they include sports into the politics.
Makes the whole thing meaningless who is the fastests / best / strongest
/ smartest Maybe we need WW3 just to get some common sense back.
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.
Jan Panteltje wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Is it unpatriotic to root for Russia?
How about Ukraine versus Russia in the Olympics?
It is so silly now they include sports into the politics.
Makes the whole thing meaningless who is the fastests / best / strongest
/ smartest Maybe we need WW3 just to get some common sense back.
Are you from Germany? That\'s backwards. The Olympics are a way for
countries to prove who is the baddest without getting into a war.
It\'s nondestructive competition between adversaries.
Jan Panteltje wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Is it unpatriotic to root for Russia?
How about Ukraine versus Russia in the Olympics?
It is so silly now they include sports into the politics.
Makes the whole thing meaningless who is the fastests / best / strongest
/ smartest Maybe we need WW3 just to get some common sense back.
Are you from Germany?
On a sunny day (Sun, 6 Mar 2022 13:34:28 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote in <t02d94$540$4...@dont-email.me>:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
John Doe wrote:
No, from The Netherlands (country run by US puppet leader).
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 1:02:05 AM UTC+11, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 6 Mar 2022 13:34:28 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe
alway...@message.header> wrote in <t02d94$540$4...@dont-email.me>:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
John Doe wrote:
No, from The Netherlands (country run by US puppet leader).
Mark Rutte doesn\'t look much like a US puppet to anybody saner that Jan Panteltje
(most of the population).
and has lead four
different coalitions. An American who knew enough about Dutch politics to
pull the right strings to keep him in that job for that long would need to
be super-humanly good at a very tricky job.
I have seem some propaganda pieces by little people who know how to use media
editors on a computer. Like the one that claims to have shut down a Russian
helicopter. That\'s not on any major media outlets. The helicopter doesn\'t try
to evade the missile. The camera is perfectly positioned. Looks fake.
On Sunday, 6 March 2022 at 08:41:53 UTC, John Doe wrote:
I have seem some propaganda pieces by little people who know how to use media
editors on a computer. Like the one that claims to have shut down a Russian
helicopter. That\'s not on any major media outlets. The helicopter doesn\'t try
to evade the missile. The camera is perfectly positioned. Looks fake.
Does the BBC main evening TV news programme count as a major media outlet?
Is it possible to take much evasive action in about 1 second?
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 11:57:58 AM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 6 March 2022 at 08:41:53 UTC, John Doe wrote:
I have seem some propaganda pieces by little people who know how to use media
editors on a computer. Like the one that claims to have shut down a Russian
helicopter. That\'s not on any major media outlets. The helicopter doesn\'t try
to evade the missile. The camera is perfectly positioned. Looks fake.
Does the BBC main evening TV news programme count as a major media outlet?
Is it possible to take much evasive action in about 1 second?
Yeah, looks like the people responsible for the missile were filming it. They probably were looking for a good propaganda shot.
I read that Germany has reversed their position and are now sending all manner of weapons to Ukraine. I hope it makes a difference. One of the downsides of having a large force, is exposing yourself to enemy fire. If Ukraine can take out more aircraft, that will hurt Russia very badly and make it harder for them to advance. Without good air cover, it is much easier to attack the ground forces.
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 9:32:20 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 11:57:58 AM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 6 March 2022 at 08:41:53 UTC, John Doe wrote:
I have seem some propaganda pieces by little people who know how to use media
editors on a computer. Like the one that claims to have shut down a Russian
helicopter. That\'s not on any major media outlets. The helicopter doesn\'t try
to evade the missile. The camera is perfectly positioned. Looks fake.
Does the BBC main evening TV news programme count as a major media outlet?
Is it possible to take much evasive action in about 1 second?
Yeah, looks like the people responsible for the missile were filming it.. They probably were looking for a good propaganda shot.
I read that Germany has reversed their position and are now sending all manner of weapons to Ukraine. I hope it makes a difference. One of the downsides of having a large force, is exposing yourself to enemy fire. If Ukraine can take out more aircraft, that will hurt Russia very badly and make it harder for them to advance. Without good air cover, it is much easier to attack the ground forces.
Both are necessary. Stingers for air and Javelins for ground. As i said in another post, they should now have thousands of them, but only reported hundreds of hits. Javelins are reported to have 90% kill rate. So, they should still have 90% unused. What are they waiting for, regarding the siting ducks (tanks) 15 miles north of Kiev.
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:18:13 PM UTC-5, Ed Lee wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 9:32:20 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 11:57:58 AM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 6 March 2022 at 08:41:53 UTC, John Doe wrote:
I have seem some propaganda pieces by little people who know how to use media
editors on a computer. Like the one that claims to have shut down a Russian
helicopter. That\'s not on any major media outlets. The helicopter doesn\'t try
to evade the missile. The camera is perfectly positioned. Looks fake.
Does the BBC main evening TV news programme count as a major media outlet?
Is it possible to take much evasive action in about 1 second?
Yeah, looks like the people responsible for the missile were filming it. They probably were looking for a good propaganda shot.
I read that Germany has reversed their position and are now sending all manner of weapons to Ukraine. I hope it makes a difference. One of the downsides of having a large force, is exposing yourself to enemy fire. If Ukraine can take out more aircraft, that will hurt Russia very badly and make it harder for them to advance. Without good air cover, it is much easier to attack the ground forces.
Both are necessary. Stingers for air and Javelins for ground. As i said in another post, they should now have thousands of them, but only reported hundreds of hits. Javelins are reported to have 90% kill rate. So, they should still have 90% unused. What are they waiting for, regarding the siting ducks (tanks) 15 miles north of Kiev.
Are you volunteering to take a Javelin or two to the tanks and see if you can hit one before they kill you?
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 9:32:20 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 11:57:58 AM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 6 March 2022 at 08:41:53 UTC, John Doe wrote:
I have seem some propaganda pieces by little people who know
how to use media editors on a computer. Like the one that
claims to have shut down a Russian helicopter. That\'s not on
any major media outlets. The helicopter doesn\'t try to evade
the missile. The camera is perfectly positioned. Looks fake.
Does the BBC main evening TV news programme count as a major
media outlet? Is it possible to take much evasive action in about
1 second?
Yeah, looks like the people responsible for the missile were
filming it. They probably were looking for a good propaganda shot.
I read that Germany has reversed their position and are now sending
all manner of weapons to Ukraine. I hope it makes a difference. One
of the downsides of having a large force, is exposing yourself to
enemy fire. If Ukraine can take out more aircraft, that will hurt
Russia very badly and make it harder for them to advance. Without
good air cover, it is much easier to attack the ground forces.
Both are necessary. Stingers for air and Javelins for ground. As i
said in another post, they should now have thousands of them, but
only reported hundreds of hits. Javelins are reported to have 90%
kill rate. So, they should still have 90% unused. What are they
waiting for, regarding the siting ducks (tanks) 15 miles north of
Kiev.
On 06/03/2022 19:18, Ed Lee wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 9:32:20 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 11:57:58 AM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 6 March 2022 at 08:41:53 UTC, John Doe wrote:
I have seem some propaganda pieces by little people who know
how to use media editors on a computer. Like the one that
claims to have shut down a Russian helicopter. That\'s not on
any major media outlets. The helicopter doesn\'t try to evade
the missile. The camera is perfectly positioned. Looks fake.
Does the BBC main evening TV news programme count as a major
media outlet? Is it possible to take much evasive action in about
1 second?
Yeah, looks like the people responsible for the missile were
filming it. They probably were looking for a good propaganda shot.
I read that Germany has reversed their position and are now sending
all manner of weapons to Ukraine. I hope it makes a difference. One
of the downsides of having a large force, is exposing yourself to
enemy fire. If Ukraine can take out more aircraft, that will hurt
Russia very badly and make it harder for them to advance. Without
good air cover, it is much easier to attack the ground forces.
Both are necessary. Stingers for air and Javelins for ground. As i
said in another post, they should now have thousands of them, but
only reported hundreds of hits. Javelins are reported to have 90%
kill rate. So, they should still have 90% unused. What are they
waiting for, regarding the siting ducks (tanks) 15 miles north of
Kiev.
The reports I have read from military analysts is that the Ukrainians
are targeting vehicles at the front of the columns, bottlenecks in the
road (such as bridges), and supply vehicles. There is simply no need to
bother with the vehicles in the middle - if the road in front is
blocked, their fuel supplies (which apparently were limited to start
with) are blown up, and the surrounding landscape is forest and swamp,
then they are not going anywhere. The column has hardly moved in a week
as the soldiers get more and more demoralised and it is dawning on them
that this is not the military exercise, walk-over, or liberation mission
they had been told. It makes sense to keep their missiles for when they
are really needed - Russian advances in other parts of the country have
been more successful.
The Ukrainians may have logistic challenges themselves. European
countries have supplied large numbers of weapons, but it might not be a
simple matter to get these to the front lines.