C
Cursitor Doom
Guest
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 8:57:02 PM UTC-5, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
Thank you. I had no idea that Australia is ultimately responsible for this HIV pandemic. Dr. Francis Boyle clearly identifies the director of the Australian Health Board as the culprit who engineered HIV into SARS which they then gave to their Chinese lackeys to further spin into COVID-19. I guess I never realized this was actually HIV they were giving people. So why can\'t we treat it with the same antiretroviral drugs we use on regular HIV?
Why are we talking about using lights and bleach and all sorts of other nasty drugs to treat this disgusting pandemic? We\'ve had the cure all along and it we didn\'t know it?
BTW, are we going to bomb Australia in retaliation? Maybe we should breed a hybrid between alligators, crocodiles and kangaroos and see what that does for their wide open spaces.
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 1:28:36 PM UTC+11, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 12:57:02 PM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfoWars
\"InfoWars is an American far-right conspiracy theory and fake news website owned by Alex Jones.\"
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 01:36:07 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman
bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 1:28:36 PM UTC+11, Bill Sloman
wrote:
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 12:57:02 PM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom
wrote:
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfoWars
\"InfoWars is an American far-right conspiracy theory and fake
news website owned by Alex Jones.\"
If you\'re going to enclose something in quotes so as to make it look
more authoritative, it\'s generally expected you provide the source
for the claim.
This is a bad look, and the vaccine developers decided that they
had to withdraw the vaccine in consequence.
Yeah, it\'s not a great selling point. Protects against Covid; side
effects: gives you AIDS. :-D
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 21:24:15 -0800 (PST), Rick C
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
BTW, are we going to bomb Australia in retaliation?
Good idea. Let\'s start with Sydney.
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 2:26:47 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 21:24:15 -0800 (PST), Rick C
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
BTW, are we going to bomb Australia in retaliation?
Good idea. Let\'s start with Sydney.
Rick C. was being satirical,
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
As far as I understood (and I am not at all sure here), the HIV test
that gets a false positive is a test for HIV antibodies. If this
vaccine is - as an unintended side-effect - provoking anti-bodies for an
HIV protein, could it then be a step on the road towards a real HIV vaccine?
On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 8:57:02 PM UTC-5, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
Not at all, no such HIV protein fragment is used in the other vaccines, it was just the one experimental vaccine in Australia, and it wasn\'t even necessary for them to use that component. They didn\'t know what they\'re doing.
On 14/12/2020 15:33, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 11:39:02 PM UTC+11, David Brown
wrote:
On 14/12/2020 10:36, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 1:28:36 PM UTC+11, Bill Sloman
wrote:
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 12:57:02 PM UTC+11, Cursitor
Doom wrote:
An antibody that latches onto part of the virus most certainly /can/ be
of use in neutralising the virus - antibodies do not need to react to
all the proteins on the virus shell. But if the protein in question is
only exposed after the virus has entered the cell, then I agree it is of
little use.
The immune system is likely to get exposed to both isolated gp129
and isolated gp41 protein fragments after the virus has shed it\'s
envelope and made its way into the nucleus of the cell it has
infected, and develop antibodies against them, but they aren\'t going
to do anything useful.
snip
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:31:22 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 8:57:02 PM UTC-5, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
Not at all, no such HIV protein fragment is used in the other vaccines, it was just the one experimental vaccine in Australia, and it wasn\'t even necessary for them to use that component. They didn\'t know what they\'re doing.
Perhaps Bill Sloman was advising them.
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:57:44 +0100, David Brown
david...@hesbynett.no> wrote:
[snip]
As far as I understood (and I am not at all sure here), the HIV test
that gets a false positive is a test for HIV antibodies. If this
vaccine is - as an unintended side-effect - provoking anti-bodies for an
HIV protein, could it then be a step on the road towards a real HIV vaccine?
The problem with HIV is that it is a fast-evolving quasi-species, and
nobody has found something to target in HIV that is both essential and
also cannot change without crippling the virus, and so HIV simply
evolves around any treatment or vaccine used so far.
There are some people who don\'t get HIV no matter how often they are
exposed, and the medical world is trying to figure out how these
people achieve their natural immunity.
This guy knows what he\'s talking about:
https://tinyurl.com/yyufast7
Smoking gun or what?
What\'s ridiculous is your sham of pretending to understand a bit of the
science.
Fred Bloggs wrote:
The most active troll in this group (Bill Sloman) wrote:
...
What\'s ridiculous is your sham of pretending to understand a bit of the
science.
That\'s why he doesn\'t post about electronics here, too easy for real,
non-troll regular posters to prove him wrong.
Fred Bloggs wrote:
The most active troll in this group (Bill Sloman) wrote:
What\'s ridiculous is your sham of pretending to understand a bit of the science.