N
Nomen Nescio
Guest
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Or is it art?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
E
Epsilon
Guest
Nomen Nescio wrote:
grab you?
You could ask a Queensland policeperson. How does up to 20 years in jailhttp://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
grab you?
J
Jason James
Guest
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down on youhttp://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
F
F Murtz
Guest
Jason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down on you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
J
Jason James
Guest
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
be part of or more so, easily identified in such a thing. Someone has used
alteration software to modify the original shot.
Jason
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Lets face it,...its porn, now I cant see those people portrayed, wanting toJason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down on
you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
be part of or more so, easily identified in such a thing. Someone has used
alteration software to modify the original shot.
Jason
F
F Murtz
Guest
Jason James wrote:
ever point the participants were making at the time.
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down on
you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
Lets face it,...its porn, now I cant see those people portrayed, wanting to
be part of or more so, easily identified in such a thing. Someone has used
alteration software to modify the original shot.
Jason
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
ever point the participants were making at the time.
J
Jason James
Guest
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
tks Jason
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
OK,....do you have the original link or website?Jason James wrote:
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down
on
you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
Lets face it,...its porn, now I cant see those people portrayed, wanting
to
be part of or more so, easily identified in such a thing. Someone has
used
alteration software to modify the original shot.
Jason
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
tks Jason
L
L.A.T.
Guest
"Jason James" <ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
Me too. That's not pornography, it's adolescent stupidity. No, perhaps I
over-dignify it. It might raise a snigger in the middle grades in primary
school.
Who on earth had the time and inclination to produce it? From her stony
expression, I don't think Mum was all that keen.
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
but I know it when I se it.""F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down
on
you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
Lets face it,...its porn, now I cant see those people portrayed, wanting
to
be part of or more so, easily identified in such a thing. Someone has
used
alteration software to modify the original shot.
Jason
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
OK,....do you have the original link or website?
tks Jason
Someone famous or powerful once famously said "I can't define pornography
Me too. That's not pornography, it's adolescent stupidity. No, perhaps I
over-dignify it. It might raise a snigger in the middle grades in primary
school.
Who on earth had the time and inclination to produce it? From her stony
expression, I don't think Mum was all that keen.
F
Fast Freddy
Guest
F Murtz wrote:
http://www.kqed.org/arts/programs/spark/profile.jsp?essid=24056
here you go, google for Anna Maltz, one size fits all.No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
http://www.kqed.org/arts/programs/spark/profile.jsp?essid=24056
Y
Y?
Guest
This image has been floating around the web for years."Jason James" <ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
OK,....do you have the original link or website?
tks Jason
Sacha Baron-Cohen wore one on Rove when he was spruiking the Bruno movie.
http://www.stretcher.org/archives/r6_a/2004_02_11_r6_archive.php
It's not new, It's not altered and it's not porn.
Y.
S
Sylvia Else
Guest
On 4/02/2010 5:09 PM, Y? wrote:
I've submitted it to the ACMA. Perhaps they'll get it classified.
Sylvia.
Except possibly in the eyes of a Task Force Argos officer."Jason James"<ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
OK,....do you have the original link or website?
tks Jason
This image has been floating around the web for years.
Sacha Baron-Cohen wore one on Rove when he was spruiking the Bruno movie.
http://www.stretcher.org/archives/r6_a/2004_02_11_r6_archive.php
It's not new, It's not altered and it's not porn.
I've submitted it to the ACMA. Perhaps they'll get it classified.
Sylvia.
A
Atheist Chaplain
Guest
"Jason James" <ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
--
[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of
Scientology International]
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your
Christ." Gandhi
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
http://www.kqed.org/arts/programs/spark/profile.jsp?essid=24056"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down
on
you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
Lets face it,...its porn, now I cant see those people portrayed, wanting
to
be part of or more so, easily identified in such a thing. Someone has
used
alteration software to modify the original shot.
Jason
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
OK,....do you have the original link or website?
tks Jason
--
[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of
Scientology International]
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your
Christ." Gandhi
A
Atheist Chaplain
Guest
"Jason James" <ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b697b2d$0$89653$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
you realy do live a sheltered existence.
--
[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of
Scientology International]
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your
Christ." Gandhi
news:4b697b2d$0$89653$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
THATS PORN!!"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down on
you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
Lets face it,...its porn,
you realy do live a sheltered existence.
--
[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of
Scientology International]
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your
Christ." Gandhi
J
Jason James
Guest
"L.A.T." <tt92@ispdr.net.au> wrote in message
news:vFman.5461$pv.3837@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Jason
news:vFman.5461$pv.3837@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Wonder why,...maybe it's porn wrapped in cotton-wool?"Jason James" <ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down
on
you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
Lets face it,...its porn, now I cant see those people portrayed,
wanting to
be part of or more so, easily identified in such a thing. Someone has
used
alteration software to modify the original shot.
Jason
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
OK,....do you have the original link or website?
tks Jason
Someone famous or powerful once famously said "I can't define pornography
but I know it when I se it."
Me too. That's not pornography, it's adolescent stupidity. No, perhaps I
over-dignify it. It might raise a snigger in the middle grades in primary
school.
Who on earth had the time and inclination to produce it? From her stony
expression, I don't think Mum was all that keen.
Jason
B
Ban
Guest
"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:00161bf2$0$2284$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
And I hope they show up at the door of this pervert OP!
ciao Ban
news:00161bf2$0$2284$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
THX Syl,On 4/02/2010 5:09 PM, Y? wrote:
"Jason James"<ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages
and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
OK,....do you have the original link or website?
tks Jason
This image has been floating around the web for years.
Sacha Baron-Cohen wore one on Rove when he was spruiking the Bruno movie.
http://www.stretcher.org/archives/r6_a/2004_02_11_r6_archive.php
It's not new, It's not altered and it's not porn.
Except possibly in the eyes of a Task Force Argos officer.
I've submitted it to the ACMA. Perhaps they'll get it classified.
Sylvia.
And I hope they show up at the door of this pervert OP!
ciao Ban
S
Sylvia Else
Guest
On 4/02/2010 6:39 PM, Ban wrote:
that it's not porn (and in particularly, not child pornography), or
they'll submit it to the Classification Board. In the latter case I'd be
surprised if it received an RC classification, which means that
regardless of what a Task Force Argos officer might think, possession
and downloading would not be unlawful, and the OP is unlikely to see
anyone arrive at his door over it.
Sylvia.
I think you mistake my purpose. Either the ACMA will themselves conclude"Sylvia Else"<sylvia@not.at.this.address> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:00161bf2$0$2284$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
On 4/02/2010 5:09 PM, Y? wrote:
"Jason James"<ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages
and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
OK,....do you have the original link or website?
tks Jason
This image has been floating around the web for years.
Sacha Baron-Cohen wore one on Rove when he was spruiking the Bruno movie.
http://www.stretcher.org/archives/r6_a/2004_02_11_r6_archive.php
It's not new, It's not altered and it's not porn.
Except possibly in the eyes of a Task Force Argos officer.
I've submitted it to the ACMA. Perhaps they'll get it classified.
Sylvia.
THX Syl,
And I hope they show up at the door of this pervert OP!
ciao Ban
that it's not porn (and in particularly, not child pornography), or
they'll submit it to the Classification Board. In the latter case I'd be
surprised if it received an RC classification, which means that
regardless of what a Task Force Argos officer might think, possession
and downloading would not be unlawful, and the OP is unlikely to see
anyone arrive at his door over it.
Sylvia.
F
F Murtz
Guest
Jason James wrote:
pornography // n."L.A.T."<tt92@ispdr.net.au> wrote in message
news:vFman.5461$pv.3837@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Jason James"<ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended down
on
you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
Lets face it,...its porn, now I cant see those people portrayed,
wanting to
be part of or more so, easily identified in such a thing. Someone has
used
alteration software to modify the original shot.
Jason
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
OK,....do you have the original link or website?
tks Jason
Someone famous or powerful once famously said "I can't define pornography
but I know it when I se it."
Me too. That's not pornography, it's adolescent stupidity. No, perhaps I
over-dignify it. It might raise a snigger in the middle grades in primary
school.
Who on earth had the time and inclination to produce it? From her stony
expression, I don't think Mum was all that keen.
Wonder why,...maybe it's porn wrapped in cotton-wool?
Jason
Are you sexually excited by this picture? the definition of porn
1 the explicit description or exhibition of sexual activity in literature, films, etc., intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.
If you are aroused by this photo may be it is, but I doubt any one else is.
J
Jason James
Guest
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b6a87ab$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
the definition of porn >
similar, that would accept this picture,..come back and talk to me.
Jason
news:4b6a87ab$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
It's starting to look like you are, having broached the subject.Jason James wrote:
"L.A.T."<tt92@ispdr.net.au> wrote in message
news:vFman.5461$pv.3837@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Jason James"<ass@ass.com> wrote in message
news:4b699ef9$0$89643$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b699193@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b693e91$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Jason James wrote:
"Nomen Nescio"<nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
Well,..have a couple of dozen temperence society types descended
down
on
you
and tried to tear you a new one?
It's photo-shop porn,......did you have to be told that?
Jason
Where does photoshop come in, it is just dress ups.
Lets face it,...its porn, now I cant see those people portrayed,
wanting to
be part of or more so, easily identified in such a thing. Someone has
used
alteration software to modify the original shot.
Jason
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages
and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for
what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
OK,....do you have the original link or website?
tks Jason
Someone famous or powerful once famously said "I can't define
pornography
but I know it when I se it."
Me too. That's not pornography, it's adolescent stupidity. No, perhaps I
over-dignify it. It might raise a snigger in the middle grades in
primary
school.
Who on earth had the time and inclination to produce it? From her stony
expression, I don't think Mum was all that keen.
Wonder why,...maybe it's porn wrapped in cotton-wool?
Jason
Are you sexually excited by this picture?
the definition of porn >
Pig's tit,...when you can direct me to a publicaly available magaizine orpornography // n.
1 the explicit description or exhibition of sexual activity in
literature, films, etc., intended to stimulate erotic rather than
aesthetic or emotional feelings.
If you are aroused by this photo may be it is, but I doubt any one else
is.
similar, that would accept this picture,..come back and talk to me.
Jason
S
Starbuck
Guest
who cares its nothing to do with tv
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:2ae0a372debe25b149506966dc3c2abe@dizum.com...
http://pinkwatch.tumblr.com/post/318796911
Or is it art?
G
George W Frost
Guest
"Fast Freddy" <fredff@zynuts.org> wrote in message
news:hkdo3p$5e0$1@news.eternal-september.org...
news:hkdo3p$5e0$1@news.eternal-september.org...
Yeah and watch the movie and all the good bits are fuzzed outF Murtz wrote:
No they have not,that picture is not new it has been around for ages and
from what I remember the outfits were knitted just as they are for what
ever point the participants were making at the time.
here you go, google for Anna Maltz, one size fits all.
http://www.kqed.org/arts/programs/spark/profile.jsp?essid=24056