S
server
Guest
message unavailable
OT: \\\"Global Warming\\\" scam - carbon not responsible: finally the evidence!...
D
David Eather
Guest
On 16/02/2022 11:36 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
FFS do some math and stop with the conspiracy shit and the shit from
conspiracy web sites.
1.If the world was cooling then the number of record high temperatures
set every year would be rapidly dropping every year.
2.If the world\'s temperature was stable then the number of record high
temperatures would be dropping slowly.
3.If the world\'s temperature was climbing then the number of record high
temperatures would be rising.
Do you not agree that these possibilities/projections are correct?
In fact they are the only possibilities. You can easily simulate these
projections with any random number generator.
Pick any \"average\" you like (within the range of the generator).
Set the Highest record temp to equal the average
initialize a iteration counter and start the simulation
generate a random temperature
is this temperature the record high? if so update the record high
temperature and log the iteration.
When done analyze the pattern of record highs and iterations.
Which of the above three possibilities does it match?
repeat with the average temp going slowly down and slowly going up (1%
per 100 hundred thousand iterations would be reasonable for a planet
simulation but pick whatever you are comfortable with)
Compare this to real world date. Don\'t cherry pick. Grab more than half
a dozen records from around the world that go back over 100 year - the
longer the better.
Which pattern does that match? You have your answer to if global warming
is real.
Even if you think everyone else is in on the scan, you have verifiable
hand written paper records more than 100 years old. Unless you can
believe that these now dead people who made these logs over 100 years
ago were deliberately trying to collude with scientists today by
changing data to affect the results of a science that didn\'t even exist
in there day then you have an answer to if global warming exists. If you
think that the logs were created 100 years ago to deceive us today then
you are simply insane.
Now the other and possibly more pertinent question - do man made carbon
emissions increase global temperature? The answer is:
Who gives a shit! The global temperature is going up that is easily
provable if you ignore the fake science and conspiracy theories*.
It doesn\'t matter why the planet is warming, we will suffer the
consequences. Reducing atmospheric carbon is one of very few ways we can
do anything to lower the temperature on a planetary scale.
Some of you people are like a family shopping in a mall when a deranged
shooter comes in and starts killing. Instead of doing the smart thing
and trying save yourself and your family, you go \"well I didn\'t cause
the problem so I don\'t have to do anything\".
Absolutely true, but you and your kids will bear the consequences.
Don\'t look up!
*do you remember the story of the Washington Pizza joint that had a
basement with kids trapped in it for the amusement of pedophiles? A
story originating with BriteBart (I cant be bothered to check the
correct spelling for them). A guy armed with a gun ran into the place
with the intention to free the kids - good on him for caring, not so
good for his method. FBI had to come and investigate. No kids found and
no basement either. There had NEVER been a basement or imprisoned kids
in the building at all! BriteBart fabricated the whole story and then
hid behind \"we have to protect confidential sources\" while the poor
shumck who believed them is in jail.
I do believe in free press and the need to protect sources (I wish
Australia was more like the US in this regard), but this then requires
the public to be discerning. An unchecked story, that was never even
possible (no basement and no possibility of a basement) from a non
existent \"confidential source\" says everything you need to know about
that news agency and their stories.
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
FFS do some math and stop with the conspiracy shit and the shit from
conspiracy web sites.
1.If the world was cooling then the number of record high temperatures
set every year would be rapidly dropping every year.
2.If the world\'s temperature was stable then the number of record high
temperatures would be dropping slowly.
3.If the world\'s temperature was climbing then the number of record high
temperatures would be rising.
Do you not agree that these possibilities/projections are correct?
In fact they are the only possibilities. You can easily simulate these
projections with any random number generator.
Pick any \"average\" you like (within the range of the generator).
Set the Highest record temp to equal the average
initialize a iteration counter and start the simulation
generate a random temperature
is this temperature the record high? if so update the record high
temperature and log the iteration.
When done analyze the pattern of record highs and iterations.
Which of the above three possibilities does it match?
repeat with the average temp going slowly down and slowly going up (1%
per 100 hundred thousand iterations would be reasonable for a planet
simulation but pick whatever you are comfortable with)
Compare this to real world date. Don\'t cherry pick. Grab more than half
a dozen records from around the world that go back over 100 year - the
longer the better.
Which pattern does that match? You have your answer to if global warming
is real.
Even if you think everyone else is in on the scan, you have verifiable
hand written paper records more than 100 years old. Unless you can
believe that these now dead people who made these logs over 100 years
ago were deliberately trying to collude with scientists today by
changing data to affect the results of a science that didn\'t even exist
in there day then you have an answer to if global warming exists. If you
think that the logs were created 100 years ago to deceive us today then
you are simply insane.
Now the other and possibly more pertinent question - do man made carbon
emissions increase global temperature? The answer is:
Who gives a shit! The global temperature is going up that is easily
provable if you ignore the fake science and conspiracy theories*.
It doesn\'t matter why the planet is warming, we will suffer the
consequences. Reducing atmospheric carbon is one of very few ways we can
do anything to lower the temperature on a planetary scale.
Some of you people are like a family shopping in a mall when a deranged
shooter comes in and starts killing. Instead of doing the smart thing
and trying save yourself and your family, you go \"well I didn\'t cause
the problem so I don\'t have to do anything\".
Absolutely true, but you and your kids will bear the consequences.
Don\'t look up!
*do you remember the story of the Washington Pizza joint that had a
basement with kids trapped in it for the amusement of pedophiles? A
story originating with BriteBart (I cant be bothered to check the
correct spelling for them). A guy armed with a gun ran into the place
with the intention to free the kids - good on him for caring, not so
good for his method. FBI had to come and investigate. No kids found and
no basement either. There had NEVER been a basement or imprisoned kids
in the building at all! BriteBart fabricated the whole story and then
hid behind \"we have to protect confidential sources\" while the poor
shumck who believed them is in jail.
I do believe in free press and the need to protect sources (I wish
Australia was more like the US in this regard), but this then requires
the public to be discerning. An unchecked story, that was never even
possible (no basement and no possibility of a basement) from a non
existent \"confidential source\" says everything you need to know about
that news agency and their stories.
T
The Natural Philosopher
Guest
On 16/02/2022 13:36, Cursitor Doom wrote:
that detailed the piltdown man or \'missing link\' as a clearly
established fact.
I am afraid that the penchant of scholars and academics to copy \'facts\'
from each other was no less prevalent then than it is today.
Especially when compiling encyclopedias.
My own encounter with this was in a totally obscure Wiki article about a
German WWII aircraft engine, where the power expressed in kW only
matched the power expressed in bhp if two digits were transposed.
I altered them, The original author altered them back citing numerous
references, all of which contained the same obvious typo.
I gave up.
In short I admire your scholarship, but it proves sadly nothing more
than the penchant for plagiarism that pervades the scholastic mind.
Check out any book on the dark ages before the 1950s. Compare with books
after that where scientific archaeology reveals something utterly different.
--
âSome people like to travel by train because it combines the slowness of
a car with the cramped public exposure of â¨an airplane.â
Dennis Miller
Sadly me old mucker, I had as a child an copy of an encyclopedia seriesGentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
that detailed the piltdown man or \'missing link\' as a clearly
established fact.
I am afraid that the penchant of scholars and academics to copy \'facts\'
from each other was no less prevalent then than it is today.
Especially when compiling encyclopedias.
My own encounter with this was in a totally obscure Wiki article about a
German WWII aircraft engine, where the power expressed in kW only
matched the power expressed in bhp if two digits were transposed.
I altered them, The original author altered them back citing numerous
references, all of which contained the same obvious typo.
I gave up.
In short I admire your scholarship, but it proves sadly nothing more
than the penchant for plagiarism that pervades the scholastic mind.
Check out any book on the dark ages before the 1950s. Compare with books
after that where scientific archaeology reveals something utterly different.
--
âSome people like to travel by train because it combines the slowness of
a car with the cramped public exposure of â¨an airplane.â
Dennis Miller
C
Cursitor Doom
Guest
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:12:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Yes, and tomorrow\'s books on the Dark Ages will show the original
ancient Britons were actually sub-saharan Africans who were
exterminated by the Anglo Saxons.
No thanks, NP, I\'ll stick with the *old* pre-Agenda books!
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 13:36, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
Sadly me old mucker, I had as a child an copy of an encyclopedia series
that detailed the piltdown man or \'missing link\' as a clearly
established fact.
I am afraid that the penchant of scholars and academics to copy \'facts\'
from each other was no less prevalent then than it is today.
Especially when compiling encyclopedias.
My own encounter with this was in a totally obscure Wiki article about a
German WWII aircraft engine, where the power expressed in kW only
matched the power expressed in bhp if two digits were transposed.
I altered them, The original author altered them back citing numerous
references, all of which contained the same obvious typo.
I gave up.
In short I admire your scholarship, but it proves sadly nothing more
than the penchant for plagiarism that pervades the scholastic mind.
Check out any book on the dark ages before the 1950s. Compare with books
after that where scientific archaeology reveals something utterly different.
Yes, and tomorrow\'s books on the Dark Ages will show the original
ancient Britons were actually sub-saharan Africans who were
exterminated by the Anglo Saxons.
No thanks, NP, I\'ll stick with the *old* pre-Agenda books!
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 12:37:05 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
The link wants you to install the Yandex search engine on your computer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yandex
Yandex a Russian owned company established in the Netherlands.
It looks as if this would then allow you to download all of Cursitor Doom\'s antiquated mis-information in one huge lump. From what Cursitor Doom has posted here before, it is collection of a bunch of stuff that a half-wit like Cursitor Doom can read as justifying his mad conspiracy theory that anthropogenic global warming isn\'t actually happening.
What other crap would come with the Yandex browser isn\'t spelled out, but I wouldn\'t touch it was a barge-pole. The Ukraine doesn\'t like it.
\"On June 1, 2017, Yandex closed its offices in Kyiv and Odessa, Ukraine after the Security Service of Ukraine raided the offices and accused the company of illegally collecting Ukrainian usersâ data and sending it to Russian security agencies.The firm denied any wrongdoing. In May 2017, all Yandex services were banned in Ukraine by Presidential Decree No. 133/2017.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
The link wants you to install the Yandex search engine on your computer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yandex
Yandex a Russian owned company established in the Netherlands.
It looks as if this would then allow you to download all of Cursitor Doom\'s antiquated mis-information in one huge lump. From what Cursitor Doom has posted here before, it is collection of a bunch of stuff that a half-wit like Cursitor Doom can read as justifying his mad conspiracy theory that anthropogenic global warming isn\'t actually happening.
What other crap would come with the Yandex browser isn\'t spelled out, but I wouldn\'t touch it was a barge-pole. The Ukraine doesn\'t like it.
\"On June 1, 2017, Yandex closed its offices in Kyiv and Odessa, Ukraine after the Security Service of Ukraine raided the offices and accused the company of illegally collecting Ukrainian usersâ data and sending it to Russian security agencies.The firm denied any wrongdoing. In May 2017, all Yandex services were banned in Ukraine by Presidential Decree No. 133/2017.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
T
The Natural Philosopher
Guest
On 16/02/2022 14:30, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Dahling we is *all* sub Saharan Africans, we is just \'faded a bit\'.
--
To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:12:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 13:36, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
Sadly me old mucker, I had as a child an copy of an encyclopedia series
that detailed the piltdown man or \'missing link\' as a clearly
established fact.
I am afraid that the penchant of scholars and academics to copy \'facts\'
from each other was no less prevalent then than it is today.
Especially when compiling encyclopedias.
My own encounter with this was in a totally obscure Wiki article about a
German WWII aircraft engine, where the power expressed in kW only
matched the power expressed in bhp if two digits were transposed.
I altered them, The original author altered them back citing numerous
references, all of which contained the same obvious typo.
I gave up.
In short I admire your scholarship, but it proves sadly nothing more
than the penchant for plagiarism that pervades the scholastic mind.
Check out any book on the dark ages before the 1950s. Compare with books
after that where scientific archaeology reveals something utterly different.
Yes, and tomorrow\'s books on the Dark Ages will show the original
ancient Britons were actually sub-saharan Africans who were
exterminated by the Anglo Saxons.
No thanks, NP, I\'ll stick with the *old* pre-Agenda books!
Dahling we is *all* sub Saharan Africans, we is just \'faded a bit\'.
--
To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.
N
newshound
Guest
On 16/02/2022 14:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Going back to \"authentication\", and a bit OT, I was very interested to
discover from reading \"All the President\'s men\" (and the subsequent
film) of just how careful *good* journalists are to obtain independent
verification of \"facts\".
Going back to \"authentication\", and a bit OT, I was very interested to
discover from reading \"All the President\'s men\" (and the subsequent
film) of just how careful *good* journalists are to obtain independent
verification of \"facts\".
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 1:30:27 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Scholars are supposed to cite the literature, but they are also supposed to notice when the literature has got stuff wrong. The literature review in my Ph.D. thesis does include one comment about a German paper which reported experiments which clearly hadn\'t been done as carefully as they might have been.
Probably not. The Anglo Saxons didn\'t invade the UK until after the Roman empire had collapsed, and the Roman records saw the ancient Britons as Celts.. They didn\'t exterminate them, any more than the Anglo-Saxons did (or the Danes who invaded the more northern parts of England a bit later).
> No thanks, NP, I\'ll stick with the *old* pre-Agenda books!
None of which you seem to have read in any detail. You do seem to have a lot in common with Flyguy, who post links to documents which he seems to imagine support his point of view, and don\'t.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:12:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 13:36, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
Sadly me old mucker, I had as a child an copy of an encyclopedia series
that detailed the piltdown man or \'missing link\' as a clearly
established fact.
I am afraid that the penchant of scholars and academics to copy \'facts\'
from each other was no less prevalent then than it is today.
Especially when compiling encyclopedias.
My own encounter with this was in a totally obscure Wiki article about a
German WWII aircraft engine, where the power expressed in kW only
matched the power expressed in bhp if two digits were transposed.
I altered them, The original author altered them back citing numerous
references, all of which contained the same obvious typo.
I gave up.
In short I admire your scholarship, but it proves sadly nothing more
than the penchant for plagiarism that pervades the scholastic mind.
Scholars are supposed to cite the literature, but they are also supposed to notice when the literature has got stuff wrong. The literature review in my Ph.D. thesis does include one comment about a German paper which reported experiments which clearly hadn\'t been done as carefully as they might have been.
Probably not. The Anglo Saxons didn\'t invade the UK until after the Roman empire had collapsed, and the Roman records saw the ancient Britons as Celts.. They didn\'t exterminate them, any more than the Anglo-Saxons did (or the Danes who invaded the more northern parts of England a bit later).
> No thanks, NP, I\'ll stick with the *old* pre-Agenda books!
None of which you seem to have read in any detail. You do seem to have a lot in common with Flyguy, who post links to documents which he seems to imagine support his point of view, and don\'t.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 1:47:43 AM UTC+11, newshound wrote:
Not exactly. Europeans mostly have a few Neanderthal genes, and sub-Saharan Africans don\'t. Further east you see Denisovian genes too.
And Cursitor Doom is the exact antithesis of good journalist - he decides which facts suit his story and ignores everything else that doesn\'t.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Not exactly. Europeans mostly have a few Neanderthal genes, and sub-Saharan Africans don\'t. Further east you see Denisovian genes too.
And Cursitor Doom is the exact antithesis of good journalist - he decides which facts suit his story and ignores everything else that doesn\'t.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
R
Rick C
Guest
On Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 10:02:37 AM UTC-5, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
The fact that Europeans have a Neanderthal in the woodpile doesn\'t mean they aren\'t from the same sub-Saharan African stock as everyone else alive today.
Doh! I saw this subject and didn\'t want to get into what will most certainly a silly discussion very quickly involving the slinging of insults. But here I am. Oh, well.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
The fact that Europeans have a Neanderthal in the woodpile doesn\'t mean they aren\'t from the same sub-Saharan African stock as everyone else alive today.
Doh! I saw this subject and didn\'t want to get into what will most certainly a silly discussion very quickly involving the slinging of insults. But here I am. Oh, well.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
C
Cursitor Doom
Guest
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:39:59 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Ah! You\'ve already been got-at! Once upon a time it was Mesopotamia
before the Globalists decided Africa was more inclusive. So now of
course we all ultimately come from Africa and from one original seed
called \"Eve\" cos it ticks all their boxes. In fact tomorrow\'s Eve will
no doubt be a lesbian!
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 14:30, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:12:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 13:36, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
Sadly me old mucker, I had as a child an copy of an encyclopedia series
that detailed the piltdown man or \'missing link\' as a clearly
established fact.
I am afraid that the penchant of scholars and academics to copy \'facts\'
from each other was no less prevalent then than it is today.
Especially when compiling encyclopedias.
My own encounter with this was in a totally obscure Wiki article about a
German WWII aircraft engine, where the power expressed in kW only
matched the power expressed in bhp if two digits were transposed.
I altered them, The original author altered them back citing numerous
references, all of which contained the same obvious typo.
I gave up.
In short I admire your scholarship, but it proves sadly nothing more
than the penchant for plagiarism that pervades the scholastic mind.
Check out any book on the dark ages before the 1950s. Compare with books
after that where scientific archaeology reveals something utterly different.
Yes, and tomorrow\'s books on the Dark Ages will show the original
ancient Britons were actually sub-saharan Africans who were
exterminated by the Anglo Saxons.
No thanks, NP, I\'ll stick with the *old* pre-Agenda books!
Dahling we is *all* sub Saharan Africans, we is just \'faded a bit\'.
Ah! You\'ve already been got-at! Once upon a time it was Mesopotamia
before the Globalists decided Africa was more inclusive. So now of
course we all ultimately come from Africa and from one original seed
called \"Eve\" cos it ticks all their boxes. In fact tomorrow\'s Eve will
no doubt be a lesbian!
S
server
Guest
Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:bcc89f45-66ff-4363-9127-5419906f618bn@googlegroups.com:
And do not forget the Aboriginals. They are their own \'race\' as
well. \"Australoid\".
news:bcc89f45-66ff-4363-9127-5419906f618bn@googlegroups.com:
And do not forget the Aboriginals. They are their own \'race\' as
well. \"Australoid\".
S
server
Guest
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote in
news:2m4q0hd7fq4opot5rbuumsl4t83tptk6te@4ax.com:
We are ALL \"Out of Africa\".
But Bill is right about what is included in some Europeans, and
that it is not the other way around.
So Africans are pure Africans, but other races around the world
have some other species mixed into their genome.
So you are both right. Bill is in the direction he iterated. And
you are about the original source of Homo-Sapiens.
But THIS source pretty much nails it and it does not come from your
stupid source choice.
The rest of the world\'s anthropologists found \"Mitchondrial Eve\" in
Africa, not Russians. So why listen to their info source?
<https://www.yourgenome.org/stories/evolution-of-modern-humans>
news:2m4q0hd7fq4opot5rbuumsl4t83tptk6te@4ax.com:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:39:59 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 14:30, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:12:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 13:36, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those
like Dave Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one,
despite living a mere tube ride from one of the finest ones in
the world. Here is the evidence for all those who for whatever
reason prefer to simply click on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
Sadly me old mucker, I had as a child an copy of an
encyclopedia series that detailed the piltdown man or \'missing
link\' as a clearly established fact.
I am afraid that the penchant of scholars and academics to copy
\'facts\'
from each other was no less prevalent then than it is today.
Especially when compiling encyclopedias.
My own encounter with this was in a totally obscure Wiki
article about a
German WWII aircraft engine, where the power expressed in kW
only
matched the power expressed in bhp if two digits were
transposed.
I altered them, The original author altered them back citing
numerous references, all of which contained the same obvious
typo.
I gave up.
In short I admire your scholarship, but it proves sadly nothing
more than the penchant for plagiarism that pervades the
scholastic mind.
Check out any book on the dark ages before the 1950s. Compare
with books after that where scientific archaeology reveals
something utterly different.
Yes, and tomorrow\'s books on the Dark Ages will show the
original ancient Britons were actually sub-saharan Africans who
were exterminated by the Anglo Saxons.
No thanks, NP, I\'ll stick with the *old* pre-Agenda books!
Dahling we is *all* sub Saharan Africans, we is just \'faded a
bit\'.
Ah! You\'ve already been got-at! Once upon a time it was
Mesopotamia before the Globalists decided Africa was more
inclusive. So now of course we all ultimately come from Africa and
from one original seed called \"Eve\" cos it ticks all their boxes.
In fact tomorrow\'s Eve will no doubt be a lesbian!
We are ALL \"Out of Africa\".
But Bill is right about what is included in some Europeans, and
that it is not the other way around.
So Africans are pure Africans, but other races around the world
have some other species mixed into their genome.
So you are both right. Bill is in the direction he iterated. And
you are about the original source of Homo-Sapiens.
But THIS source pretty much nails it and it does not come from your
stupid source choice.
The rest of the world\'s anthropologists found \"Mitchondrial Eve\" in
Africa, not Russians. So why listen to their info source?
<https://www.yourgenome.org/stories/evolution-of-modern-humans>
D
David Brown
Guest
On 16/02/2022 16:02, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
And where do you think those Neanderthals and Denisovian, or their
ancestors, came from? Could it have been ... sub-Sahara Africa?
The descent of modern humans was not a simple line - more of a family
web than a family tree - but all lines trace back to Africa.
And where do you think those Neanderthals and Denisovian, or their
ancestors, came from? Could it have been ... sub-Sahara Africa?
The descent of modern humans was not a simple line - more of a family
web than a family tree - but all lines trace back to Africa.
R
Rod Speed
Guest
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 01:30:15 +1100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
Your problem is that we know from ice cores etc that that book\'s original
claim about the CO2 level at the turn of the 20th century is just plain
wrong.
And your beloved Britannica eventually realised
that their earlier printed editions were wrong too.
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:12:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 13:36, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
Sadly me old mucker, I had as a child an copy of an encyclopedia series
that detailed the piltdown man or \'missing link\' as a clearly
established fact.
I am afraid that the penchant of scholars and academics to copy \'facts\'
from each other was no less prevalent then than it is today.
Especially when compiling encyclopedias.
My own encounter with this was in a totally obscure Wiki article about a
German WWII aircraft engine, where the power expressed in kW only
matched the power expressed in bhp if two digits were transposed.
I altered them, The original author altered them back citing numerous
references, all of which contained the same obvious typo.
I gave up.
In short I admire your scholarship, but it proves sadly nothing more
than the penchant for plagiarism that pervades the scholastic mind.
Check out any book on the dark ages before the 1950s. Compare with books
after that where scientific archaeology reveals something utterly
different.
Yes, and tomorrow\'s books on the Dark Ages will show the original
ancient Britons were actually sub-saharan Africans who were
exterminated by the Anglo Saxons.
No thanks, NP, I\'ll stick with the *old* pre-Agenda books!
Your problem is that we know from ice cores etc that that book\'s original
claim about the CO2 level at the turn of the 20th century is just plain
wrong.
And your beloved Britannica eventually realised
that their earlier printed editions were wrong too.
P
Peeler
Guest
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 04:29:18 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:
<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin\'s latest trollshit unread>
--
Tim+ about trolling Rodent Speed:
He is by far the most persistent troll who seems to be able to get under the
skin of folk who really should know better. Since when did arguing with a
troll ever achieve anything (beyond giving the troll pleasure)?
MID: <1421057667.659518815.743467.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:
<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin\'s latest trollshit unread>
--
Tim+ about trolling Rodent Speed:
He is by far the most persistent troll who seems to be able to get under the
skin of folk who really should know better. Since when did arguing with a
troll ever achieve anything (beyond giving the troll pleasure)?
MID: <1421057667.659518815.743467.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
V
Vir Campestris
Guest
On 16/02/2022 14:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> Dahling we is *all* sub Saharan Africans, we is just \'faded a bit\'.
Apart from the odd admix of Neanderthal and Denisovan that is...
Andy
> Dahling we is *all* sub Saharan Africans, we is just \'faded a bit\'.
Apart from the odd admix of Neanderthal and Denisovan that is...
Andy
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 2:25:20 AM UTC+11, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
All human being have much the same genome, but there are minor regional variations. We all have a lot of ancestors, and don\'t share all of them.
> Doh! I saw this subject and didn\'t want to get into what will most certainly a silly discussion very quickly involving the slinging of insults. But here I am. Oh, well.
You might yet learn something.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
All human being have much the same genome, but there are minor regional variations. We all have a lot of ancestors, and don\'t share all of them.
> Doh! I saw this subject and didn\'t want to get into what will most certainly a silly discussion very quickly involving the slinging of insults. But here I am. Oh, well.
You might yet learn something.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 2:32:49 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Mitochondrial Eve was clearly African. The mitochondrial genome is very small and only passed down in the egg. The bulk of the genome is rather larger, and diploid, and reflects both male and female ancestors. There are a lot of them, and some of them aren\'t shared between people on different continents.
The story is rather more complicated than you seem to know, and probably a lot more complicated than you are going to be willing to get your head around. Globalists don\'t come into it.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:39:59 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 14:30, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:12:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 13:36, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.
Sadly me old mucker, I had as a child an copy of an encyclopedia series
that detailed the piltdown man or \'missing link\' as a clearly
established fact.
I am afraid that the penchant of scholars and academics to copy \'facts\'
from each other was no less prevalent then than it is today.
Especially when compiling encyclopedias.
My own encounter with this was in a totally obscure Wiki article about a
German WWII aircraft engine, where the power expressed in kW only
matched the power expressed in bhp if two digits were transposed.
I altered them, The original author altered them back citing numerous
references, all of which contained the same obvious typo.
I gave up.
In short I admire your scholarship, but it proves sadly nothing more
than the penchant for plagiarism that pervades the scholastic mind.
Check out any book on the dark ages before the 1950s. Compare with books
after that where scientific archaeology reveals something utterly different.
Yes, and tomorrow\'s books on the Dark Ages will show the original
ancient Britons were actually sub-saharan Africans who were
exterminated by the Anglo Saxons.
No thanks, NP, I\'ll stick with the *old* pre-Agenda books!
Dahling we is *all* sub Saharan Africans, we is just \'faded a bit\'.
Ah! You\'ve already been got-at! Once upon a time it was Mesopotamia
before the Globalists decided Africa was more inclusive. So now of
course we all ultimately come from Africa and from one original seed
called \"Eve\" cos it ticks all their boxes. In fact tomorrow\'s Eve will
no doubt be a lesbian!
Mitochondrial Eve was clearly African. The mitochondrial genome is very small and only passed down in the egg. The bulk of the genome is rather larger, and diploid, and reflects both male and female ancestors. There are a lot of them, and some of them aren\'t shared between people on different continents.
The story is rather more complicated than you seem to know, and probably a lot more complicated than you are going to be willing to get your head around. Globalists don\'t come into it.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
B
Brian Gaff (Sofa)
Guest
I bet its just one persons evidence though. Anyone who thinks co2 is not a
greenhouse gas needs to look at the history of the planet when there were
more volcanoes.
Brian
--
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
\"Cursitor Doom\" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:gcup0h1snntabuj4866mt84mtopojl153p@4ax.com...
greenhouse gas needs to look at the history of the planet when there were
more volcanoes.
Brian
--
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
\"Cursitor Doom\" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:gcup0h1snntabuj4866mt84mtopojl153p@4ax.com...
Gentlemen,
I *finally* got around to it. For those who don\'t have a local
library, or a decent enough library within reach, or those like Dave
Plowman who are just too bone idle to go to one, despite living a mere
tube ride from one of the finest ones in the world. Here is the
evidence for all those who for whatever reason prefer to simply click
on a link:
https://tinyurl.com/2p8eun5u
There you go: all the leg-work done for you.