B
Boris Mohar
Guest
http://www.drmadcow.net/Article.php?articleid=10
--
Boris Mohar
--
Boris Mohar
M
martin griffith
Guest
On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:44:36 -0400, in sci.electronics.design Boris
Mohar <borism_-void-_@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Those Firefox people wrote software that the user can tweak?
nah, never catch on, Microsoft would have done it/patented it years
ago
martin
"Wales is a big welsh-shaped rain collection device"
Mohar <borism_-void-_@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Impressive
Those Firefox people wrote software that the user can tweak?
nah, never catch on, Microsoft would have done it/patented it years
ago
martin
"Wales is a big welsh-shaped rain collection device"
Guest
On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:44:36 -0400, Boris Mohar
<borism_-void-_@sympatico.ca> wrote:
<borism_-void-_@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Wow! loads pages much faster. Loads faster than Opera !
L
Luhan Monat
Guest
sdeyoreo@hotmail.com wrote:
for the info.
--
Luhan Monat: luhanis(at)yahoo(dot)com
http://members.cox.net/berniekm
"Any sufficiently advanced magick is
indistinguishable from technology."
I'm a die-had Mozilla user. But this is looking interesting. Thanks
for the info.
--
Luhan Monat: luhanis(at)yahoo(dot)com
http://members.cox.net/berniekm
"Any sufficiently advanced magick is
indistinguishable from technology."
L
Luhan Monat
Guest
Luhan Monat wrote:
--
Luhan Monat: luhanis(at)yahoo(dot)com
http://members.cox.net/berniekm
"Any sufficiently advanced magick is
indistinguishable from technology."
Make that 'die-hard': Spell checkers will knot correct sin tax airs.
--
Luhan Monat: luhanis(at)yahoo(dot)com
http://members.cox.net/berniekm
"Any sufficiently advanced magick is
indistinguishable from technology."
E
Erik Walthinsen
Guest
Boris Mohar wrote:
Tweak Network does this for you much more cleanly.
aka https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=327
Tweak Network does this for you much more cleanly.
T
Terry Pinnell
Guest
Boris Mohar <borism_-void-_@sympatico.ca> wrote:
In summary, the recommended changes in about:config are:
1) "network.http.pipelining" should be true.
2) "network.http.proxy.pipelining" should be true.
3) change "network.http.pipelining.maxrequests" to 30.
Now restart your browser.
I'm just trying these myself now, but could someone summarise the
potential *downsides* please? IOW, why are these not defaults, if they
deliver significantly better performance?
--
Terry Pinnell
Hobbyist, West Sussex, UK
In summary, the recommended changes in about:config are:
1) "network.http.pipelining" should be true.
2) "network.http.proxy.pipelining" should be true.
3) change "network.http.pipelining.maxrequests" to 30.
Now restart your browser.
I'm just trying these myself now, but could someone summarise the
potential *downsides* please? IOW, why are these not defaults, if they
deliver significantly better performance?
--
Terry Pinnell
Hobbyist, West Sussex, UK
K
Ken Taylor
Guest
"Bob Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1JqdnSwpCLzI3QvfRVn-pg@comcast.com...
Ken
news:1JqdnSwpCLzI3QvfRVn-pg@comcast.com...
On an ADSL connection the improvement is great!
Ken
P
Paul Hovnanian P.E.
Guest
martin griffith wrote:
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto
aul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Incorrigible punster -- Do not incorrige.
You haven't heard about the Windows hack? Set BUGS=OFF in the registry.
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto
aul@Hovnanian.com------------------------------------------------------------------
Incorrigible punster -- Do not incorrige.
P
PaulCsouls
Guest
On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:43:06 +1200, "Ken Taylor" <ken123@xtra.co.nz>
wrote:
Paul C
wrote:
It's much slower with my 28.8 modem.
Paul C
C
Clifford Heath
Guest
Terry Pinnell wrote:
packets) vs bandwidth. HTTP keep-alive re-uses the same connection when
more than one request is made to a server, and pipelining allows the
subsequent requests to be sent before the first response has been
received. Beware though, because many proxies won't pipeline (though
most will now keep-alive). Speaking as someone who's implemented both.
Clifford Heath.
It's a balance of latency (specifically for the connection establishment
packets) vs bandwidth. HTTP keep-alive re-uses the same connection when
more than one request is made to a server, and pipelining allows the
subsequent requests to be sent before the first response has been
received. Beware though, because many proxies won't pipeline (though
most will now keep-alive). Speaking as someone who's implemented both.
Clifford Heath.
C
Clifford Heath
Guest
Correction. Connection establishment latency is the factor to
consider when tweaking the total number of parallel connections,
which is network.http.max-connections. I was thinking of the
request latency.
consider when tweaking the total number of parallel connections,
which is network.http.max-connections. I was thinking of the
request latency.
J
~^Johnny^~
Guest
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:21:04 -0700, Luhan Monat <x@y.z> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.1
iQA/AwUBQpeuHwIk7T39FC4ZEQKZRwCgqvmZ7kDXekvk5yJUjKHB0OHFgyUAnjUy
QekkpL3KYTpIKFVtOQvBP5m+
=T3hq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-john
wide-open at throttle dot info
~~~~~~~~
Maybe I should ask Radio Shack. They claim they've got answers;
but frankly, if Radio Shack were our provider, we'd _really_ be in
trouble now, wouldn't we?
~~~~~~~~
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:21:04 -0700, Luhan Monat <x@y.z> wrote:
Jest hat their hour two men he off them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.1
iQA/AwUBQpeuHwIk7T39FC4ZEQKZRwCgqvmZ7kDXekvk5yJUjKHB0OHFgyUAnjUy
QekkpL3KYTpIKFVtOQvBP5m+
=T3hq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-john
wide-open at throttle dot info
~~~~~~~~
Maybe I should ask Radio Shack. They claim they've got answers;
but frankly, if Radio Shack were our provider, we'd _really_ be in
trouble now, wouldn't we?
~~~~~~~~