OT.. Covid Vaccine??...

[Dean Hoffman]

Some good news maybe.
<https://nypost.com/2020/09/14/scientists-discover-antibody-that-neutralizes-virus-that-causes-coronavirus/>

 

[server]

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:47:18 -0500, Dean Hoffman
<dh0496@windstream.net> wrote:

Some good news maybe.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/14/scientists-discover-antibody-that-neutralizes-virus-that-causes-coronavirus/

This is fun:

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/growing-body-research-indicates-many-confirmed-covid-19-cases-might-not

2^40 is a pretty big number.

Just one more example of how much nonsense this virus has created.

And how bad the reported population infection curves may be.

Even the reported C19 death rates are likely nonsense.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/31/stunning-cdcgov-update-on-covid19-us-deaths-overestimated-by-177/





--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard

 

[Ricketty C]

On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 11:01:02 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:47:18 -0500, Dean Hoffman
dh0496@windstream.net> wrote:

Some good news maybe.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/14/scientists-discover-antibody-that-neutralizes-virus-that-causes-coronavirus/


This is fun:

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/growing-body-research-indicates-many-confirmed-covid-19-cases-might-not

2^40 is a pretty big number.

Just one more example of how much nonsense this virus has created.

A disproportionate amount of the nonsense comes from this group and in particular, you. Why don\'t you stop the nonsense and post something about electronics. At least then you don\'t embarrass yourself every other post.

And how bad the reported population infection curves may be.

Even the reported C19 death rates are likely nonsense.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/31/stunning-cdcgov-update-on-covid19-us-deaths-overestimated-by-177/

I don\'t know how anyone with a functioning brain can not understand that in a pandemic like this data won\'t be perfect. It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness. Is there anything you can do to improve the situation rather than just carping about the reports of how things aren\'t perfect?

We have reached 200,000 \"reported\" deaths from this disease in the US and nearly a million world wide deaths with no end in sight. I don\'t know how any rational person can be in denial this is a real disease with real repercussions.

Some time back people laughed that Fauci predicted 200,000 deaths by fall. Looks like he was an optimist. The US is still banging them out around 900 a day. So in less than two months... about election time, there will be 250,000 dead in the US. You can doubt the exact numbers all you want but this disease won\'t go away just because you want to ignore it.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[whit3rd]

On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 8:01:02 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

> https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/growing-body-research-indicates-many-confirmed-covid-19-cases-might-not

Nah, just some bafflegab about things that aren\'t easy to pin down, and not significant in
terms of the present problems.

> 2^40 is a pretty big number.

Actually, if I had to pick a \'big number\' I\'d use... four. It\'s more than half (log scale, you know)
an order of magnitude, and... excessive requirements aren\'t good design strategy.

> Just one more example of how much nonsense this virus has created.

A virus creates symptoms; incomprehension creates nonsense.

> And how bad the reported population infection curves may be.

Reports are not \'may be\' items, they\'re your only hope of understanding a pandemic; you
can\'t be limited to your own eyes and ears, after all.

> Even the reported C19 death rates are likely nonsense.

Wishful thinking doesn\'t change a death to a <fill in this blank>.

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 11:01:02 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:47:18 -0500, Dean Hoffman
dh0...@windstream.net> wrote:

Some good news maybe.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/14/scientists-discover-antibody-that-neutralizes-virus-that-causes-coronavirus/
This is fun:

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/growing-body-research-indicates-many-confirmed-covid-19-cases-might-not

2^40 is a pretty big number.

Just one more example of how much nonsense this virus has created.

And how bad the reported population infection curves may be.

Even the reported C19 death rates are likely nonsense.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/31/stunning-cdcgov-update-on-covid19-us-deaths-overestimated-by-177/

Well- would you look at these \"credentials\":

Credentials
California Massage Certificate, Aames School of Massage, Oakland, CA. (1974).
B.A., Psychology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA. (1975).
Source: [1]

Background
Willis Eschenbach is a regular speaker at the Heartland Institute\'s International Conference on Climate Change, where he is described as a “carpenter and house builder” as well as an “amateur scientist..” [17]

Eschenbach has previously worked as a Construction Manager at Taunovo Bay Resort in Fiji, Sport Fishing guide in Alaska, and more recently as an Accounts/IT Senior Manager with South Pacific Oil. [1]

He is also a blogger at climate change denial blog Watts Up With That (WUWT), and his work is often referenced by Steve McIntyre\'s Climate Audit despite his having no credentials in any scientific field. [19]

In addition to his commentary on climate change, Eschenbach has a “modest proposal” for nuclear waste disposal: dropping hazardous materials to the bottom of the ocean in “low-tech […] nuclear lawn darts” and then “bury them and forget about them.” [22]

Sounds like a test of just how much idiocy the American public will accept.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 8:47:27 AM UTC-4, Dean Hoffman wrote:

Some good news maybe.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/14/scientists-discover-antibody-that-neutralizes-virus-that-causes-coronavirus/

The story is not about the antibody, it\'s about the advantage of getting yourself transformed into a mouse or hamster.

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:42:44 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 11:01:02 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:47:18 -0500, Dean Hoffman
dh0...@windstream.net> wrote:

Some good news maybe.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/14/scientists-discover-antibody-that-neutralizes-virus-that-causes-coronavirus/
This is fun:

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/growing-body-research-indicates-many-confirmed-covid-19-cases-might-not

2^40 is a pretty big number.

Just one more example of how much nonsense this virus has created.

And how bad the reported population infection curves may be.

Even the reported C19 death rates are likely nonsense.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/31/stunning-cdcgov-update-on-covid19-us-deaths-overestimated-by-177/

Well- would you look at these \"credentials\":

Credentials
California Massage Certificate, Aames School of Massage, Oakland, CA. (1974).
B.A., Psychology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA. (1975).
Source: [1]

Background
Willis Eschenbach is a regular speaker at the Heartland Institute\'s International Conference on Climate Change, where he is described as a “carpenter and house builder” as well as an “amateur scientist.” [17]

Eschenbach has previously worked as a Construction Manager at Taunovo Bay Resort in Fiji, Sport Fishing guide in Alaska, and more recently as an Accounts/IT Senior Manager with South Pacific Oil. [1]

He is also a blogger at climate change denial blog Watts Up With That (WUWT), and his work is often referenced by Steve McIntyre\'s Climate Audit despite his having no credentials in any scientific field. [19]

In addition to his commentary on climate change, Eschenbach has a “modest proposal” for nuclear waste disposal: dropping hazardous materials to the bottom of the ocean in “low-tech […] nuclear lawn darts” and then “bury them and forget about them.” [22]

I\'ve always thought that nuke waste should be encapsulated in concrete
and dropped into a deep subduction zone. You wouldn\'t see it again for
millions of years. It would hit the bottom and sink into the mud in
minutes.

Sounds like a test of just how much idiocy the American public will accept.

So if someone that you don\'t like links to The New York Times and to
Oxford University and to Harvard or to the other sources in this
article, you then assume they are all bogus.

That saves a lot of thinking. How Slomanesque.

 

[whit3rd]

On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 2:24:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:42:44 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 11:01:02 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:47:18 -0500, Dean Hoffman
dh0...@windstream.net> wrote:

Some good news maybe.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/14/scientists-discover-antibody-that-neutralizes-virus-that-causes-coronavirus/
This is fun:

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/growing-body-research-indicates-many-confirmed-covid-19-cases-might-not

2^40 is a pretty big number.

Just one more example of how much nonsense this virus has created.

And how bad the reported population infection curves may be.

Even the reported C19 death rates are likely nonsense.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/31/stunning-cdcgov-update-on-covid19-us-deaths-overestimated-by-177/

Well- would you look at these \"credentials\":

Credentials
California Massage Certificate, Aames School of Massage, Oakland, CA. (1974).
B.A., Psychology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA. (1975).
Source: [1]

Background
Willis Eschenbach is a regular speaker at the Heartland Institute\'s International Conference on Climate Change, where he is described as a “carpenter and house builder” ...
Sounds like a test of just how much idiocy the American public will accept.

So if someone that you don\'t like links to The New York Times and to
Oxford University and to Harvard or to the other sources in this
article, you then assume they are all bogus.

Oh, no, the links ARE NOT BOGUS. That doesn\'t mean they point at anything worth
reading.

Critical reading often means you have to know that the author is a sock puppet, or a sage.
Or a nutcase. Heard any good Nostradamus jokes lately?

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 7:24:45 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:42:44 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 11:01:02 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:47:18 -0500, Dean Hoffman
dh0...@windstream.net> wrote:

<snip>

In addition to his commentary on climate change, Eschenbach has a “modest proposal” for nuclear waste disposal: dropping hazardous materials to the bottom of the ocean in “low-tech […] nuclear lawn darts” and then “bury them and forget about them.” [22]

I\'ve always thought that nuke waste should be encapsulated in concrete
and dropped into a deep subduction zone. You wouldn\'t see it again for
millions of years. It would hit the bottom and sink into the mud in
minutes.

And be accessible to a terrorist with a submarine for a few tens of thousands of years.
How Larkinesque.

Sounds like a test of just how much idiocy the American public will accept.

So if someone that you don\'t like links to The New York Times and to
Oxford University and to Harvard or to the other sources in this
article, you then assume they are all bogus.

If they are miscontrueing the data they link to the post can still be bogus..

> That saves a lot of thinking. How Slomanesque.

The economy on thinking involved is exhibited every day by John Larkin. If he were willing to invest a little more thought into what he posted, he might be aware that this does mischaracterise what I post. As it is, all that he is aware of is that I don\'t flatter John Larkin at every possible opportunity which is what he expects and demands - anything less than fulsome flattery is \"droning insult\".

John Larkin thinks that what Anthony Watts post is worth re-posting, despite the fact that it is all bought-and-paid-for anti-science propaganda.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchants_of_Doubt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Watts_(blogger)

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Anthony_Watts

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney