OT: Bush FLOPS the Debate

F

Fred Bloggs

Guest
Despite weeks of extensive coaching it was impossible to "train" Bush to
deviate from his stump speech zingers which he repeated over and over
and over again. It is has now been proven with mathematical certainty:
Bush does not possess enough knowledge to fill a two minute time slot -
on any subject matter expected of a President.
 
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 04:06:48 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:

Despite weeks of extensive coaching it was impossible to "train" Bush to
deviate from his stump speech zingers which he repeated over and over
and over again. It is has now been proven with mathematical certainty:
Bush does not possess enough knowledge to fill a two minute time slot -
on any subject matter expected of a President.

"Unbeknownst to Kerry adviser Mike McCurry, a C-SPAN camera quietly
followed McCurry as he found Kerry adviser Joe Lockhart on Spin Alley
floor and asked him his impression of the debate. Lockhart candidly
said to McCurry , “The consensus is it was a draw.”


That's probably about right. Neither guy was brilliant, and neither
presented himself as stellar presidential material. At least Kerry has
got back to being his normal fish-belly grey with rouged cheeks, a
nice recovery from International Orange.

John
 
I loved it when Bush asked for an extension so he could say

'I know we were attacked by Osama Bin Laden, I know that...."

Well I feel secure in his certainty now! Our pres is a case!

Rocky
 
Rolavine wrote:
Gore
even lost the women's vote which is hard to do. They found him to be
unreliable and inconsistant. Go figure.

Gee, I seem to remember Gore winning the popular vote, and being screwed out of
the election by 91,000+ votes for nader in FL. where the hell were you?
So what?! We use the electoral college, not popular vote to elect the
president.

Gore lost, fair and square.
 
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:18:23 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:

That the debate was a "draw" refers to some kind of statistical median
of voter perception- it does not refer to reality.
Voter perception is the only reality that matters here. Kerry was (per
today's spin) perhaps slightly ahead in this debate, maybe enough to
undo part of the damage Dan Rather inflicted on him.

John
 
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:02:05 -0700, Julie <julie@nospam.com> wrote:

Rolavine wrote:
Gore
even lost the women's vote which is hard to do. They found him to be
unreliable and inconsistant. Go figure.

Gee, I seem to remember Gore winning the popular vote, and being screwed out of
the election by 91,000+ votes for nader in FL. where the hell were you?

So what?! We use the electoral college, not popular vote to elect the
president.

Gore lost, fair and square.

By sending in hundreds of lawyers to fight the validity of absentee
ballots from American military members serving abroad, he lost any
claim to moral indignation, too.

John
 
From: Julie julie@nospam.com

So what?! We use the electoral college, not popular vote to elect the
president.

Gore lost, fair and square.

Yes, I agree, I was just reminding Jdurban that Gore won the popular vote.
Since Jdurban said that Gore didn't take the female vote I questioned it with
that. I suspect that Jdurban is producing facts in his usual process of anal
extrusion.

Rocky
 
From: John Larkin

By sending in hundreds of lawyers to fight the validity of absentee
ballots from American military members serving abroad, he lost any
claim to moral indignation, too.

Oh tell us oh sage how many laywers were sent in by the Republicans? How many
paid organizers and people sent in to disrupt any possible recount? The
military ballots were questioned only in relation to them being in on time, as
this was a recount late ballots could have been counted, but that would have
violated FL's own recount regulations. You righties screw up the facts of
anything to sell your silly POV, reality to you is only something to spin!

What would have been excellent was if Gore and Bush had met and tossed a coin
to decide. Now there would have been a picture of America that would have made
a terrorist think twice about what he was attacking, If they had tossed a coin
that single gesture would have confirmed the superiority of the American People
for all time. It would have made us proud for a decade.

Rocky
 
On 02 Oct 2004 03:33:37 GMT, rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote:

From: John Larkin

By sending in hundreds of lawyers to fight the validity of absentee
ballots from American military members serving abroad, he lost any
claim to moral indignation, too.

Oh tell us oh sage how many laywers were sent in by the Republicans? How many
paid organizers and people sent in to disrupt any possible recount? The
military ballots were questioned only in relation to them being in on time, as
this was a recount late ballots could have been counted, but that would have
violated FL's own recount regulations. You righties screw up the facts of
anything to sell your silly POV, reality to you is only something to spin!
"Every vote counts."

- Al Gore
 
On Friday 01 October 2004 02:09 pm, Product developer did deign to grace us
with the following:

Kerry is an unlikable robotic politician clone ala Gore ala Michael
Dukakis ala George McGovern.
He is as obsolete as the dolts who worship him. Bush wasn't a stellar
act but if you ask who was believable and who wasn't you will also
have the name of the man who will be resoundingly re-elected. Gore
even lost the women's vote which is hard to do. They found him to be
unreliable and inconsistant. Go figure.

Yeah, unfortunately, the sheeple identify with Dubya - they, and he,
have an aggregate IQ that almost reaches multiple digits.

Cheers!
Rich
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rolavine <rolavine@aol.com> wrote
(in <20041001194128.26483.00001945@mb-m07.aol.com>) about 'OT: Bush
FLOPS the Debate', on Fri, 1 Oct 2004:

Good, President Kerry sounds good,
He's been around for some years, as President of CISPR. But this isn't
de facto an electronics group, so people can't be expected to know what
CISPR is.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
Tom Seim wrote:

A larger issue was the deregulation of the accounting industry by
Clinton, permitting them to sell services to the companies they
audited. This was a clear conflict of interest and the ultimate
outcome predictable.
I am not aware that the process of accounting audit is a judgment call-
since where do you get conflict of interest out of that. No one could
accuse you of that- you are a venal and deceitful liar, thief and Bush
campaign operative. Your Reagan was the biggest de-regulator of all time.
 
On Saturday 02 October 2004 08:16 am, Fred Bloggs did deign to grace us with
the following:

Tom Seim wrote:

A larger issue was the deregulation of the accounting industry by
Clinton, permitting them to sell services to the companies they
audited. This was a clear conflict of interest and the ultimate
outcome predictable.

I am not aware that the process of accounting audit is a judgment call-
since where do you get conflict of interest out of that. No one could
accuse you of that- you are a venal and deceitful liar, thief and Bush
campaign operative. Your Reagan was the biggest de-regulator of all time.
Fred, when you start shouting "Liar!", everybody but you knows you've lost.

Take a class in debate, or something.

Good Luck!
Rich
 
"That's the man that tried to kill my Daddy"

"Of course I know Osama bin Laden attacked us. I know that. "

"Of course we're after Saddam Hussein - I mean bin Laden. He's isolated.
Seventy-five percent of his people have been brought to justice. "
"I didn't need anybody to tell me to go to the United Nations. I decided to go
there myself."

"Well, actually you forgot Poland."

"He said Osama bin Laden uses the invasion of Iraq as an excuse to spread
hatred for America. Osama bin Laden isn't going to determine how we defend
ourselves. Osama bin Laden doesn't get to decide. The American people decide. I
decided. "

"Yeah, I understand what it means to be the commander in chief."

I've figured it out, the President is 12 years old!

Rocky
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rolavine <rolavine@aol.com> wrote
(in <20041003130707.03602.00001745@mb-m04.aol.com>) about 'OT: Bush
FLOPS the Debate', on Sun, 3 Oct 2004:

"Yeah, I understand what it means to be the commander in chief."
Wasn't it you that kept writing 'commander AND chief'?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
On Sunday 03 October 2004 11:30 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

The British Parliamentary system, unlike, I think, the US system, puts
a very large premium on being able to perform on one's feet, which is
why we get so many lawyers in parliament; they are the ones who could
have chosen to be actors instead but wanted money as well. I chose to be
an engineer, so I don't get either the adulation or the money. :)-(
But, but, You're _John Woodgate_!

We all see you atop the great pinochle!

All Hail Woodgate!

Cheers!
Rich
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top