OT Alec \\\"The Jerk\\\" Baldwin kills one and injures another with a firearm...

On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 6:51:21 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 3:19:27 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:37:06 -0700 (PDT),
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:

On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 12:13:48 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:57:43 -0700 (PDT),
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:

On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 1:27:17 AM UTC-4, Rick C wrote:
This is interesting

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/09/crops-under-solar-panels-can-be-a-win-win/

They report that not only do crops grow better using less water for the amount of food produced the solar panels stay cooler improving their electrical production. True win-win.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Study was conducted in arid area of southwest where literally anything is an improvement. It is not a general recommendation.

The solar cells can power water sprayers.

The water is a more valuable commodity than the electricity it takes to run irrigation pumps, and they really want to be using drip irrigation in places like this, and drip is low power.It probably drove the idea of using the panels for shading in the first place, although a lot stuff doesn\'t do well in shade. Notice they didn\'t mention any of the economics, but the crummy vegetable crop isn\'t going to make up for the loss of revenue due to greatly reduced panel density.
Modern agriculture is heading for catastrophic collapse in so many ways. They have HUGE problems. Here is a story about their plastics problem:
https://www.greenbiz.com/article/how-can-agriculture-solve-its-1-billion-plastic-problem
These plastic products are absolutely essential, but it\'s getting unsustainable.

There\'s gloom and destruction everywhere you look. Enjoy.

Some fathead Dem candidate said that driving cars will \"destroy the
planet\" as he boarded his private plane.
Driving electric cars would be fine. Aircraft are more of a problem. There really aren\'t enough private planes to create a problem, but international tourism probably has to go.

Hey Bozo, those \"electric\" cars are really fancy coal-fired vehicles. We will NEVER have so-called carbon neutral electric power.

https://www.monbiot.com/books/heat/

George Monbiot pointed this out back in 2006, and it still seems to be true.

A new generation of more bulbous aircraft with enough room for liquid hydrogen fuel - rather lower energy density than liquid hydrocarbons - might save the tourist industry, but it would take a while and a great deal of expensive development.

Liquid hydrogen requires tanks over FOUR TIMES as large as jet fuel. This makes is UNUSEABLE as an aircraft fuel.

Global Warming has become Climate Change has become Climate Crisis.
What\'s next?
Extra-destructive hurricanes in the Caribbean ...

More climate alarmist bullshit.
 
On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 1:10:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 6:51:21 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 3:19:27 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:37:06 -0700 (PDT), bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 12:13:48 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:57:43 -0700 (PDT), bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 1:27:17 AM UTC-4, Rick C wrote:

<snip>

Some fathead Dem candidate said that driving cars will \"destroy the planet\" as he boarded his private plane.

Driving electric cars would be fine. Aircraft are more of a problem. There really aren\'t enough private planes to create a problem, but international tourism probably has to go.

Those \"electric\" cars are really fancy coal-fired vehicles. We will NEVER have so-called carbon neutral electric power.

Gnatguy doesn\'t seem to have heard of solar cells and wind turbines, and isn\'t aware that the electric power they generate is now cheaper than the power you can get by burning fossil carbon.

Presumably back when his brain of capable of absorbing new information this might not have been true, and he now can\'t overwrite the obsolete data.,

https://www.monbiot.com/books/heat/

George Monbiot pointed this out back in 2006, and it still seems to be true.

A new generation of more bulbous aircraft with enough room for liquid hydrogen fuel - rather lower energy density than liquid hydrocarbons - might save the tourist industry, but it would take a while and a great deal of expensive development.

Liquid hydrogen requires tanks over FOUR TIMES as large as jet fuel. This makes is UNUSEABLE as an aircraft fuel.

With planes that look like ones we have,

Global Warming has become Climate Change has become Climate Crisis.
What\'s next?

Extra-destructive hurricanes in the Caribbean ...

More climate alarmist bullshit.

The fossil carbon extraction industry is spending a lot on spreading lying propaganda to this effect. Gnatguy is gullible enough to believe it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Friday, 6 September 2019 at 07:27:17 UTC+2, Ricky wrote:
This is interesting

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/09/crops-under-solar-panels-can-be-a-win-win/

They report that not only do crops grow better using less water for the amount of food produced the solar panels stay cooler improving their electrical production. True win-win.
stop your Tesla fake

crops don\'t grow in UV shaded spaces
 
GnatTurd <maggot2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:11852a59-07cd-47c0-8fab-1b109d4ba828n@googlegroups.com:

The bottom line is that you DON\'T treat terrorists like
law-abiding nations. ANY debt to Iran was to the FORMER
government. When the terrorist overthrew that government ALL
agreements with that government were made NULL AND VOID.

You are an abject idiot and you wouldn\'t know what a bottom line was
if it bit you in the ass, much less what \"the bottom line\" is for this
topic.

You self imposed NULL AND VOID upon your own brain seven years ago,
TrumpPutz.
 
On Friday, 16 September 2022 at 16:24:36 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

ieee.org, stop your fake

--New Scientist has no status of scientific journal publishing peer reviewed scientific/research papers

so give up your spam

---\"Vaccines cut covid spread\" - medRXifgchghfhfg - suggests

\"suggest\" is not a correct term in science

so go away spammer, go away with your daily fake
 
On Friday, 16 September 2022 at 03:02:01 UTC-7, a a wrote:
On Friday, 6 September 2019 at 07:27:17 UTC+2, Ricky wrote:
This is interesting

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/09/crops-under-solar-panels-can-be-a-win-win/

They report that not only do crops grow better using less water for the amount of food produced the solar panels stay cooler improving their electrical production. True win-win.
stop your Tesla fake

crops don\'t grow in UV shaded spaces

Plants don\'t need UV light. Just red and blue. They\'ll do just fine.
 
On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 00:19:19 UTC+2, ke...@kjwdesigns.com wrote:
On Friday, 16 September 2022 at 03:02:01 UTC-7, a a wrote:
On Friday, 6 September 2019 at 07:27:17 UTC+2, Ricky wrote:
This is interesting

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/09/crops-under-solar-panels-can-be-a-win-win/

They report that not only do crops grow better using less water for the amount of food produced the solar panels stay cooler improving their electrical production. True win-win.
stop your Tesla fake

crops don\'t grow in UV shaded spaces
Plants don\'t need UV light. Just red and blue. They\'ll do just fine.
fake
just shade your flowers at the indoor window

plants grown outdoor need UV, as grown in natural environment
\"Do plants need UVA and UVB light? The answer to this question is yes. The ultraviolet (UV) spectrum is divided into two parts: ultraviolet-A (UVA) and ultraviolet-B (UVB). Plants use both of these parts of the spectrum for different purposes. UVA is a part of the visible light spectrum that we see as white or yellowish light. It is a component of sunlight and is not filtered by clouds or the atmosphere. UVA is used by plants for photosynthesis and other cellular functions. UVB is the part of the spectrum that is filtered out by the atmosphere and clouds.


https://www.growertoday.com/uva-uvb-lights-for-plants/
 
On Saturday, September 10, 2022 at 3:45:15 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:02:00 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, September 9, 2022 at 10:48:04 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022 07:06:03 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 12:13:28 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 08:38:13 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 11:08:39 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 08:01:20 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 10:47:45 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 07:35:23 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 10:24:07 AM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, September 9, 2022 at 12:15:03 AM UTC+10, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 19:16:23 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

<snip>

Gimme a break. Every single Republican president since Eisenhower to the present, has railed against the Russian threat.

And were right.

It does seem to have been a self-fulfilling prophecy.

> I generally prefer people who are right.

More, precisely, far-right.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 9:11:11 AM UTC-7, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
GnatTurd <maggot...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:11852a59-07cd-47c0...@googlegroups.com:
The bottom line is that you DON\'T treat terrorists like
law-abiding nations. ANY debt to Iran was to the FORMER
government. When the terrorist overthrew that government ALL
agreements with that government were made NULL AND VOID.
You are an abject idiot and you wouldn\'t know what a bottom line was
if it bit you in the ass, much less what \"the bottom line\" is for this
topic.

You self imposed NULL AND VOID upon your own brain seven years ago,
TrumpPutz.

Do you get stoned to write this shit? It sure sounds like it.
 
On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 6:48:42 PM UTC-4, a a wrote:
On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 00:19:19 UTC+2, ke...@kjwdesigns.com wrote:
On Friday, 16 September 2022 at 03:02:01 UTC-7, a a wrote:
On Friday, 6 September 2019 at 07:27:17 UTC+2, Ricky wrote:
This is interesting

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/09/crops-under-solar-panels-can-be-a-win-win/

They report that not only do crops grow better using less water for the amount of food produced the solar panels stay cooler improving their electrical production. True win-win.
stop your Tesla fake

crops don\'t grow in UV shaded spaces
Plants don\'t need UV light. Just red and blue. They\'ll do just fine.
fake
just shade your flowers at the indoor window

plants grown outdoor need UV, as grown in natural environment
\"Do plants need UVA and UVB light? The answer to this question is yes. The ultraviolet (UV) spectrum is divided into two parts: ultraviolet-A (UVA) and ultraviolet-B (UVB). Plants use both of these parts of the spectrum for different purposes. UVA is a part of the visible light spectrum that we see as white or yellowish light. It is a component of sunlight and is not filtered by clouds or the atmosphere. UVA is used by plants for photosynthesis and other cellular functions. UVB is the part of the spectrum that is filtered out by the atmosphere and clouds.


https://www.growertoday.com/uva-uvb-lights-for-plants/

\"UVA is a part of the visible light spectrum that we see as white or yellowish light.\"

How can you trust any web page that says UV light is visible? Such a fundamental mistake makes everything from this source suspect.

Also, why are you resurrecting a three year old thread?

--

Rick C.

-+-- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 14:11:06 UTC+2, Ricky wrote:

Crops under solar panels can be a fake-fake

how much do you charge @ElonMusk @Tesla
for marketing spam on Usenet ?
 
WHO head offers upbeat view of state of pandemic: ‘The world has never been in a better position to end it’


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/who-head-offers-upbeat-view-of-state-of-pandemic-the-world-has-never-been-in-a-better-position-to-end-it-11663166440?mod=mw_latestnews
 
On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 7:40:20 AM UTC-4, a a wrote:
WHO head offers upbeat view of state of pandemic: ‘The world has never been in a better position to end it’


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/who-head-offers-upbeat-view-of-state-of-pandemic-the-world-has-never-been-in-a-better-position-to-end-it-11663166440?mod=mw_latestnews

That\'s because most of the vulnerables have been killed off.
 
On Thursday, 15 September 2022 at 15:43:19 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 7:40:20 AM UTC-4, a a wrote:
WHO head offers upbeat view of state of pandemic: ‘The world has never been in a better position to end it’


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/who-head-offers-upbeat-view-of-state-of-pandemic-the-world-has-never-been-in-a-better-position-to-end-it-11663166440?mod=mw_latestnews
That\'s because most of the vulnerables have been killed off.
exactly
He who has not died has become immune
 
On Friday, 16 September 2022 at 00:41:11 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Fred, stop fooling poor people

--And the vaccination rate in most others is not high enough to stop spread with any reasonable reproduction characteristic.

Covid spread has nothing to do with any vacccination rate

Just look
at USA, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

highest vaccination rates and highest spread rates
 
On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 03:31:06 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:

excellent
go into prison to spread your fake
 
On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 16:09:55 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
#fakebylowbrainer

--ieee.org, stop your fake

---New Scientist has no status of scientific journal publishing peer reviewed scientific/research papers

-so give up your spam

----\"Vaccines cut covid spread\" - medRXifgchghfhfg - suggests

-\"suggest\" is not a correct term in science

-so go away spammer, go away with your daily fake
 
On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 12:16:02 AM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 16:09:55 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

---New Scientist has no status of scientific journal publishing peer reviewed scientific/research papers

But is was reporting a result that had been published in a peer-reviewed scientific paper.

----\"Vaccines cut covid spread\" - medRXivdoi.org/jbj9 - suggests

-\"suggest\" is not a correct term in science.

In fact it is widely used. A a clearly doesn\'t read any science at all. He\'s probably another of Tom S.\'s nyms.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top