B
Brad Smallridge
Guest
I find the recent discussion of orif very
interesting. What better way to improve a
language by adding rhyming keywords.
But let's turn our attention to the aggregate
command OTHERS. Clearly we could add the word
MOTHERS; that would be a sort of master copy
of an aggragate that would spawn aggregates.
BROTHERS would inherit certain characteristics
from MOTHERS but not necessarilly the entire
bundle.
There isn't much choice in aggregates, not like
any #if #notif directives. So we should definetely
have our DROTHERS.
I also find that sometimes I want to change a few
items in long aggregate list without hunting down
the exact element, so a SMOTHERS would be ideal,
allowing you to change an element without a double
assignment error.
Nesting too might be useful like your SMOTHERS
BROTHERS. If you don't find that useful, well,
Mom always liked you best.
Brad Smallridge
interesting. What better way to improve a
language by adding rhyming keywords.
But let's turn our attention to the aggregate
command OTHERS. Clearly we could add the word
MOTHERS; that would be a sort of master copy
of an aggragate that would spawn aggregates.
BROTHERS would inherit certain characteristics
from MOTHERS but not necessarilly the entire
bundle.
There isn't much choice in aggregates, not like
any #if #notif directives. So we should definetely
have our DROTHERS.
I also find that sometimes I want to change a few
items in long aggregate list without hunting down
the exact element, so a SMOTHERS would be ideal,
allowing you to change an element without a double
assignment error.
Nesting too might be useful like your SMOTHERS
BROTHERS. If you don't find that useful, well,
Mom always liked you best.
Brad Smallridge