OBVIOUS

[FEerguy9]

It is OBVIOUS. (eer)


Eer is obvious.

I have battled with experts for many years about it, and taken deserved lumps
for my lack of math to back it up.

But, eer is just plain obvious. To miss it would be a shame - we NEED it.

We can collect energy from the sun, the wind, waves, tides, etc.

We can STORE that energy - and there is such an unlimited supply of sources,
that losses are not a problem.

We have technology for electric cars, and electricity has long been our way of
distributing energy for other energy needs.


Frank

 

[Russell Shaw]

FEerguy9 wrote:

It is OBVIOUS. (eer)

Eer is obvious.

I have battled with experts for many years about it, and taken deserved lumps
for my lack of math to back it up.

But, eer is just plain obvious. To miss it would be a shame - we NEED it.

We can collect energy from the sun, the wind, waves, tides, etc

We can STORE that energy - and there is such an unlimited supply of sources,
that losses are not a problem.

And how would you run a 150MW rock crusher on solar power or batteries?

We have technology for electric cars, and electricity has long been our way of
distributing energy for other energy needs.

 

[Paul Burridge]

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:43:26 +1100, Russell Shaw
<rjshaw@iprimus.com.au> wrote:

FEerguy9 wrote:
It is OBVIOUS. (eer)

Eer is obvious.

I have battled with experts for many years about it, and taken deserved lumps
for my lack of math to back it up.

But, eer is just plain obvious. To miss it would be a shame - we NEED it.

We can collect energy from the sun, the wind, waves, tides, etc

We can STORE that energy - and there is such an unlimited supply of sources,
that losses are not a problem.

And how would you run a 150MW rock crusher on solar power

Situate it on Mercury.
--

My opinion is worth what you've paid for it.

 

[Russell Shaw]

Paul Burridge wrote:

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:43:26 +1100, Russell Shaw
rjshaw@iprimus.com.au> wrote:


FEerguy9 wrote:

It is OBVIOUS. (eer)

Eer is obvious.

I have battled with experts for many years about it, and taken deserved lumps
for my lack of math to back it up.

But, eer is just plain obvious. To miss it would be a shame - we NEED it.

We can collect energy from the sun, the wind, waves, tides, etc

We can STORE that energy - and there is such an unlimited supply of sources,
that losses are not a problem.

And how would you run a 150MW rock crusher on solar power

Situate it on Mercury.

Won't need to crush rocks when they're molten

 

[FEerguy9]

FEerguy9 wrote:
It is OBVIOUS. (eer)

Eer is obvious.

I have battled with experts for many years about it, and taken deserved
lumps
for my lack of math to back it up.

But, eer is just plain obvious. To miss it would be a shame - we NEED it.

We can collect energy from the sun, the wind, waves, tides, etc

We can STORE that energy - and there is such an unlimited supply of
sources,
that losses are not a problem.

And how would you run a 150MW rock crusher on solar power or batteries?

I wouldn't.

I'd be happy with cars.


Frank

We have technology for electric cars, and electricity has long been our way
of
distributing energy for other energy needs.