Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

F

fitz

Guest
Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

(click link)

http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everything.htm

Enjoy,

Fitz
 
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:24:33 -0800 (PST), fitz <zeusrdx@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

(click link)

http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everything.htm

Enjoy,

Fitz
Click to expand...
The speed of gravity has been experimentally shown to be close to c.

John
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:24:33 -0800 (PST), fitz <zeusrdx@yahoo.com
wrote:

Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

(click link)

http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everything.htm

Enjoy,

Fitz




The speed of gravity has been experimentally shown to be close to c.
Click to expand...

While the speed of stupidity is near infinity! ;-)


--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
 
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:15:45 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:24:33 -0800 (PST), fitz <zeusrdx@yahoo.com
wrote:

Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

(click link)

http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everything.htm

Enjoy,

Fitz




The speed of gravity has been experimentally shown to be close to c.


While the speed of stupidity is near infinity! ;-)
Click to expand...
The speed of gravity has been pointed out to this guy before. He's
like Brett, won't let reality influence his theories.

John
 
On Feb 24, 10:13 am, John Larkin
<jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:24:33 -0800 (PST), fitz <zeus...@yahoo.com
wrote:

Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

(click link)

http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everyt...

Enjoy,

Fitz

The speed of gravity has been experimentally shown to be close to c.

John
Click to expand...
John, do you have a reference for that? or an experiement name? I
remember talking with a LIGO guy several years ago and I asked, "What
if gravity doesn't travel at c?" He said, "of course it does" but
didn't mention any experimental proof.

George H.
 
"fitz" <zeusrdx@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e7c3ace2-2a81-4a0a-8304-e2bba1caeff5@l19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

(click link)

http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everything.htm

Enjoy,
Click to expand...
Does this theory also include the existence of gravitons? Does gravity have
dual properties of particles and waves?

If gravity is a distortion of space-time caused by mass and observed as an
acceleration, and if it does not itself have mass, then it would not be
limited by the speed of light. But also would it not be unable to send
information faster than c? Perhaps the fact that we can observe the effects
of gravity from objects that are so far away that they are from the
beginning of time hints that gravity moves faster than light, but perhaps
this is just because the initial space-time distortion is just changing in
a predictable way.

As objects with mass were created they made their own distortions of
space-time which were gravitational effects. ISTM that the pattern of
distortion and gravity would simply follow the distribution of massive
objects, and the only changes in gravity would occur when there is a
conversion of mass from/to energy.

I'm not sure what point, if any, I'm making with these statements. Just
some things to think about.

Paul
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:15:45 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:24:33 -0800 (PST), fitz <zeusrdx@yahoo.com
wrote:

Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

(click link)

http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everything.htm

Enjoy,

Fitz




The speed of gravity has been experimentally shown to be close to c.


While the speed of stupidity is near infinity! ;-)

The speed of gravity has been pointed out to this guy before. He's
like Brett, won't let reality influence his theories.
Click to expand...

Well, their skulls 'are' made from depleted Uranium. :)


--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
 
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:53:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold
<ggherold@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 24, 10:13 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:24:33 -0800 (PST), fitz <zeus...@yahoo.com
wrote:

Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

(click link)

http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everyt...

Enjoy,

Fitz

The speed of gravity has been experimentally shown to be close to c.

John

John, do you have a reference for that? or an experiement name? I
remember talking with a LIGO guy several years ago and I asked, "What
if gravity doesn't travel at c?" He said, "of course it does" but
didn't mention any experimental proof.

George H.
Click to expand...
I read an article recently about it, and I think I posted a link for
fitz a month ago maybe. It had to do with observing the path of light
as Jupiter swung past or something like that. I recall that the
measured value was something like C +-20%, with the obvious correct
value being C.

Oh, here it is:

http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2003/gravity/


It's interesting to consider the dynamics of things like fast
binaries, or supernova explosions, given a velocity of gravity of C.
That will make simulations all that much messier.

I wonder if any conceivable terrestrial experiment could measure this.

Who do you know at LIGO? Rolf? Jay?

John
 
On Feb 24, 5:59 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:53:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold





ggher...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 24, 10:13 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:24:33 -0800 (PST), fitz <zeus...@yahoo.com
wrote:

Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything

(click link)

http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everyt....

Enjoy,

Fitz

The speed of gravity has been experimentally shown to be close to c.

John

John, do you have a reference for that?  or an experiement name?  I
remember talking with a LIGO guy several years ago and I asked, "What
if gravity doesn't travel at c?"  He said, "of course it does" but
didn't mention any experimental proof.

George H.

I read an article recently about it, and I think I posted a link for
fitz a month ago maybe. It had to do with observing the path of light
as Jupiter swung past or something like that. I recall that the
measured value was something like C +-20%, with the obvious correct
value being C.

Oh, here it is:

http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2003/gravity/

It's interesting to consider the dynamics of things like fast
binaries, or supernova explosions, given a velocity of gravity of C.
That will make simulations all that much messier.

I wonder if any conceivable terrestrial experiment could measure this.

Who do you know at LIGO? Rolf? Jay?

John- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Click to expand...
That's great John Thanks! It's cool that Jupiter was involved... (the
first speed of light measurment mentioned at the end of the article.)
It wouldn't bother me if gravity was a bit slower than light.

Ken Libbrecht at Cal Tech, brought us the diode laser experiment. (He
also is part of Ligo) I got to go out there, do some work, and see
some of the LIGO stuff.

George H.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top