Not Impressed with this New Format

Guest
I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.
 
chemelec@hotmail.com wrote:

I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.
To what are you referring?

Are you one of those people that *thinks* of an orange and assumes everyone
around you knows what you are on about ?

Gibbo
 
chemelec posted:

<< I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.
We sort of have something in common...... I think it is a waste of space to
post a comment that is incomplete for facts, such as yours.

Bye!
 
On 11 Dec 2004 10:41:03 -0800, chemelec@hotmail.com wrote:

I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.

Bye!

John
 
chemelec@hotmail.com wrote:

I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.
Fron your headers, I assume you're referring to google groups.

Why not use a proper new server and avoid their new lousy interface ?


Graham
 
On 11 Dec 2004 18:49:45 GMT, dbowey@aol.com (Dbowey) wrote:

chemelec posted:

I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.


We sort of have something in common...... I think it is a waste of space to
post a comment that is incomplete for facts, such as yours.
Indeed? I find all *your* posts a waste of space. It's obvious he's
talking about Google, FFS.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
 
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:18:20 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

On 11 Dec 2004 10:41:03 -0800, chemelec@hotmail.com wrote:

I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.


Bye!
I don't think you know who you're dissin' here, John. This guy is a
great designer and a real mine of useful info on the more exotic
aspects of electronics.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
 
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 01:34:38 +0000, Paul Burridge
<pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:18:20 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

On 11 Dec 2004 10:41:03 -0800, chemelec@hotmail.com wrote:

I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.


Bye!

I don't think you know who you're dissin' here, John. This guy is a
great designer and a real mine of useful info on the more exotic
aspects of electronics.
I said "Bye" in the most cheerful and hearty way possible. But I don't
recall a lot of posts by "chemelec", much less a mineful of same.

John
 
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 01:32:37 +0000, Paul Burridge
<pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

On 11 Dec 2004 18:49:45 GMT, dbowey@aol.com (Dbowey) wrote:

chemelec posted:

I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.


We sort of have something in common...... I think it is a waste of space to
post a comment that is incomplete for facts, such as yours.

Indeed? I find all *your* posts a waste of space. It's obvious he's
talking about Google, FFS.

Hi, Paul, welcome back. I can see you're in your "insult everybody and
make a public jackass out of myself" phase, so I guess you're due for
the "humble groveling" mode next.

It's nice that there are still some people around that you can depend
on.

John
 
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:31:35 GMT, "Mhound" <argyle1nospam@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Did a google search for chemelec, and then his name (Gary xxxxxxx) which
shows up in the chemelec search, and I find dozens of posts in different
similar forums.

M
If he posts a lot, he should consider subscribing to a good news
server and running a good reader like Agent.

John
 
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:31:35 GMT, "Mhound" <argyle1nospam@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Did a google search for chemelec, and then his name (Gary xxxxxxx) which
shows up in the chemelec search, and I find dozens of posts in different
similar forums.

M
I gues it's this one: http://www3.telus.net/chemelec/

- YD.

--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.
 
The artist formerly known as YD wrote:

| I gues it's this one: http://www3.telus.net/chemelec/
|
| - YD.

OMG those animated gifs are *so* 1997!

--
MT

To reply directly, take every occurrence of the letter 'y' out of my
address.
 
mark thomas wrote:
The artist formerly known as YD wrote:

I gues it's this one: http://www3.telus.net/chemelec/

- YD.

OMG those animated gifs are *so* 1997!
Well, he is a bearded Canadian after all. :-])
--
ciao Ban
Bordighera, Italy
 
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:45:22 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

I said "Bye" in the most cheerful and hearty way possible. But I don't
recall a lot of posts by "chemelec", much less a mineful of same.
He's more website-orientated. Check out the link Mark's posted lower
down the thread.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top