Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...and they are researchers at the Wuhan virology lab! ALL those claims by Pope Fauci were, at best, WRONG! At worst, they were deliberate misinformation designed to shield the CHICOMs. Video shows them working on bat viruses w/o the necessary protective gear:
https://public.substack.com/p/first-people-sickened-by-covid-19
...and they are researchers at the Wuhan virology lab! ALL those claims by Pope Fauci were, at best, WRONG! At worst, they were deliberate misinformation designed to shield the CHICOMs. Video shows them working on bat viruses w/o the necessary protective gear:
https://public.substack.com/p/first-people-sickened-by-covid-19
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:59:11 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
...and they are researchers at the Wuhan virology lab! ALL those claims by Pope Fauci were, at best, WRONG!
https://public.substack.com/p/first-people-sickened-by-covid-19
The probability that the virus originated within walking distance of ...
Why do so many people aplogize for all atrocities Chinese? I suspect
money is involved.
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 11:21:15â¯AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:59:11 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
...and they are researchers at the Wuhan virology lab! ALL those claims by Pope Fauci were, at best, WRONG!
That\'s silly. The \'multiple people\' interviewed weren\'t privy to any real information sources in China.
It\'s just a wild guess, and not a good one. READ THE ARTICLE for fact-checking, you\'ll
find there\'s no facts from Asia cited.
https://public.substack.com/p/first-people-sickened-by-covid-19
The probability that the virus originated within walking distance of ....
is not addressed, and cannot be calculated.
Virus evolution happens naturally, and there\'s likely many decades of
such evolution in COVID that just hasn\'t left traces. No one knows.
Probably, the \"multiple people\" are folk who seek to attach events
to criminal behavior, and do so (with monotonous regularity) in cases
where no misfeasance is involved.
Why do so many people aplogize for all atrocities Chinese? I suspect
money is involved.
Yeah, some \"news\" sources just keep finding provocative rumors to push.
They get clicks (money-invoved), but never name names (because it\'d be libel) or quote
identifiable sources. Any rumor that gets repeated, has \'multiple sources\'.
It doesn\'t have to be about \"atrocities Chinese\", that\'s Flyguy projecting.
The substack article is now one of the \'multiple sources\' that will be found
for next month\'s repeat of this stale bit of rumorcraft.
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 3:52:58â¯PM UTC-6, whit3rd wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 11:21:15â¯AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:59:11 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Virus evolution happens naturally, and there\'s likely many decades of
such evolution in COVID that just hasn\'t left traces. No one knows.
Probably, the \"multiple people\" are folk who seek to attach events
to criminal behavior, and do so (with monotonous regularity) in cases
where no misfeasance is involved.
Why do so many people aplogize for all atrocities Chinese? I suspect
money is involved.
Yeah, some \"news\" sources just keep finding provocative rumors to push.
They get clicks (money-invoved), but never name names (because it\'d be libel) or quote
identifiable sources. Any rumor that gets repeated, has \'multiple sources\'.
It doesn\'t have to be about \"atrocities Chinese\", that\'s Flyguy projecting.
The substack article is now one of the \'multiple sources\' that will be found
for next month\'s repeat of this stale bit of rumorcraft.
If you believe the virus evolved \"naturally\" I have some beach-front property I want to sell you.
The probability that the virus originated within walking distance of
the lab, but for some other reason than the lab work, is essentially
zero.
On 16/06/2023 19:20, John Larkin wrote:
snip
The probability that the virus originated within walking distance of
the lab, but for some other reason than the lab work, is essentially
zero.
Where better for a foreign agent to release it?
On 16/06/2023 19:20, John Larkin wrote:
snip
The probability that the virus originated within walking distance of
the lab, but for some other reason than the lab work, is essentially
zero.
Where better for a foreign agent to release it?
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 14:19:17 +0100, Clive Arthur <nowaytoday@noway.uk
wrote:
On 16/06/2023 19:20, John Larkin wrote:
snip
The probability that the virus originated within walking distance of
the lab, but for some other reason than the lab work, is essentially
zero.
Where better for a foreign agent to release it?
Nobody had an incentive to release it, and probably nobody was smart
enough to design it. It killed people all over the world.
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 14:19:17 +0100, Clive Arthur <noway...@noway.uk
wrote:
On 16/06/2023 19:20, John Larkin wrote:
snip
The probability that the virus originated within walking distance of
the lab, but for some other reason than the lab work, is essentially
zero.
Where better for a foreign agent to release it?
Nobody had an incentive to release it, and probably nobody was smart enough to design it.
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 3:52:58â¯PM UTC-6, whit3rd wrote:
Yeah, some \"news\" sources just keep finding provocative rumors to push.
They get clicks (money-invoved), but never name names (because it\'d be libel) or quote
identifiable sources. Any rumor that gets repeated, has \'multiple sources\'.
It doesn\'t have to be about \"atrocities Chinese\", that\'s Flyguy projecting.
The substack article is now one of the \'multiple sources\' that will be found
for next month\'s repeat of this stale bit of rumorcraft.
If you believe the virus evolved \"naturally\" I have some beach-front property I want to sell you.