Need driver for Panasonic KX-P1093 and manual

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 01:37:02 +0000, Robert Baer wrote:

> Need driver for Panasonic KX-P1093 and manual

Try... for clues.

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1019530

What does it emulate?
Usual trick, for dot matrix printers, was to switch them to Epson
emulation and treat as basic Epson, although that site indicates some
graphics capability.

Caveat, Pansonic dot matrix didn't feature in my past.
 
On 13/08/2016 12:28 PM, news16 wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 01:37:02 +0000, Robert Baer wrote:

Need driver for Panasonic KX-P1093 and manual

Try... for clues.

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1019530

What does it emulate?
Usual trick, for dot matrix printers, was to switch them to Epson
emulation and treat as basic Epson, although that site indicates some
graphics capability.

Caveat, Pansonic dot matrix didn't feature in my past.
That doesn't always work as expected. One of the problems was that Epson
used their own 'special' stepper motors in their printers with a very
slightly different step angle to the norm. As a consequence a lot of the
alternative brand's emulations of Epson codes resulted in occasional
white strips across the paper. For normal text printing it wasn't a
great issue but it was for graphics..

--

Xeno

First they ignore you,
Then they ridicule you,
Then they fight you,
Then you win.

Mahatma Ghandi
 
responding to
http://www.electrondepot.com/australian/need-driver-for-panasonic-kx-p1093-and-manual-61274-.htm
, Robert Baer wrote:
news16 wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 01:37:02 +0000, Robert Baer wrote:

Need driver for Panasonic KX-P1093 and manual

Try... for clues.

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1019530

What does it emulate?
Usual trick, for dot matrix printers, was to switch them to Epson
emulation and treat as basic Epson, although that site indicates some
graphics capability.

Caveat, Pansonic dot matrix didn't feature in my past.
Thanks. After trying about a dozen Epson and a few IBM drivers, i found the
Epson JX-80 (a color printer) gave the best graphics (still
left something to be desired).
Either one got an infinite amount of garbage (even with printing TWO
characters), or it worked (at half resolution).
Printer in Epson mode or in IBM mode seemed to make zero difference.

Any suggestions for improvement from "half" graphic resolution to full
graphic resolution would be welcome.

Thanks.


--
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top