D
Daniel Haude
Guest
Hi. I mislaid my copy. Will pay $10 plus postage. Thanks. --Daniel
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why?Good try. Intel is offering $10K
It had an interview with founder Gordon Moore- presumably the one that"PeteS" <ps@fleetwoodmobile.com> wrote in message
news:1113483281.514225.52340@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Good try. Intel is offering $10K
Why?
Presumably a historic Intel product announcement like the 4004/8008/8080?
hmmm, tried Ebay?.Hi. I mislaid my copy. Will pay $10 plus postage. Thanks. --Daniel
The original "Moore's Law" article."PeteS" <ps@fleetwoodmobile.com> wrote in message
news:1113483281.514225.52340@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Good try. Intel is offering $10K
Why?
Presumably a historic Intel product announcement like the 4004/8008/8080?
That's where he said that computer power will double every ten years, and 64K ofOn Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:35:26 GMT, "Kryten"
kryten_droid_obfusticator@ntlworld.com> wrote:
"PeteS" <ps@fleetwoodmobile.com> wrote in message
news:1113483281.514225.52340@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Good try. Intel is offering $10K
Why?
Presumably a historic Intel product announcement like the 4004/8008/8080?
The original "Moore's Law" article.
...Jim Thompson
Just imagine if somebody would now remember how he read it with greatGood try. Intel is offering $10K
Why?
Presumably a historic Intel product announcement like the 4004/8008/8080?
The original "Moore's Law" article.
Had your humorus removed?Dirk Bruere at Neopax <d...@neopax.com> wrote:
That's where he said that computer power will double
every ten years,
Make that "number of transistors on a chip" and "every two
years" (later revised to 18 months, IIRC).
and 64K of memory will be more than
anyone will ever need.
Bill Gates, re: the IBM PC, not Moore, and "640K."
They are buying up all the copies in order to destroy the evidence.
printing plates again. For a lot less you could make a replica usingHello Jim,
Good try. Intel is offering $10K
Why?
Presumably a historic Intel product announcement like the 4004/8008/8080?
The original "Moore's Law" article.
Just imagine if somebody would now remember how he read it with great
interest and then used that copy to light his wood stove back then.
It seems crazy to me. For USD10k you could replicate it, i.e. make the
Well, it doesn't matter; that will have rendered him 'armless.Had your humorus removed?
You could also do that for the "Blue Mauritius" stamp that is supposedlyIt seems crazy to me. For USD10k you could replicate it, i.e. make the
printing plates again. For a lot less you could make a replica using
modern methods.
commercial company to invest in a museum object these days.Hello John,
It seems crazy to me. For USD10k you could replicate it, i.e. make
the printing plates again. For a lot less you could make a replica
using modern methods.
You could also do that for the "Blue Mauritius" stamp that is
supposedly worth millions. But then it's not an original.
Indeed. It depends on what they want it for. It seems a bit odd for a
Agreed.It seems crazy to me. For USD10k you could replicate it, i.e. make the
printing plates again. For a lot less you could make a replica using
modern methods.
Moore himself wants it, according to what I heard on NPR on Monday night.I read in sci.electronics.design that Joerg
notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote (in
1sA7e.3490$dT4.3193@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com> about 'Need April 1965
issue of Electronics Magazine.', on Thu, 14 Apr 2005:
Hello John,
It seems crazy to me. For USD10k you could replicate it, i.e. make
the printing plates again. For a lot less you could make a replica
using modern methods.
You could also do that for the "Blue Mauritius" stamp that is
supposedly worth millions. But then it's not an original.
Indeed. It depends on what they want it for. It seems a bit odd for a
commercial company to invest in a museum object these days.
Yep, and they're being stolen from libraries. The local (to where I amJohn Woodgate (jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk) writes:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Joerg
notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote (in
1sA7e.3490$dT4.3193@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com> about 'Need April 1965
issue of Electronics Magazine.', on Thu, 14 Apr 2005:
Hello John,
It seems crazy to me. For USD10k you could replicate it, i.e. make
the printing plates again. For a lot less you could make a replica
using modern methods.
You could also do that for the "Blue Mauritius" stamp that is
supposedly worth millions. But then it's not an original.
Indeed. It depends on what they want it for. It seems a bit odd for a
commercial company to invest in a museum object these days.
Moore himself wants it, according to what I heard on NPR on Monday night.
It has nothing to do with wanting to know what he wrote back then, it's
everything to have the artifact in hand. I think the NPR piece said he'd
lost his copy, or lent it to someone. The cost goes up because so
many did not keep their copy.
I don't long for any of my old toys, and my wife still has herAll kinds of kids give away their toys and comic books when they grow
up (or their parents get rid of them), and then decades later they
want those memories back. But years later, the quantity is way
down because people have broken them, and thrown them away, so
those who want them have to compete. But since it's the memories
they want, substitutes do not work.
Here it is:Hi:
Somewhere in my archives I do have a photocopy of the Moore article.
I'll check back here once I find it.
Tomcee
Daniel Haude wrote:
Hi. I mislaid my copy. Will pay $10 plus postage. Thanks. --Daniel
Note the use of one-inch wafers. Monocrystalline silicon was so rareOn 15 Apr 2005 07:17:02 -0700, the renowned tomcees_math@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hi:
Somewhere in my archives I do have a photocopy of the Moore article.
I'll check back here once I find it.
Tomcee
Daniel Haude wrote:
Hi. I mislaid my copy. Will pay $10 plus postage. Thanks. --Daniel
Here it is:
ftp://download.intel.com/research/silicon/moorespaper.pdf
Please send the 7 EUR ...
And my stripper who reads the news is sarcastic.Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:
dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote:
Dirk Bruere at Neopax <d...@neopax.com> wrote:
That's where he said that computer power will double
every ten years,
Make that "number of transistors on a chip" and "every two
years" (later revised to 18 months, IIRC).
and 64K of memory will be more than
anyone will ever need.
Bill Gates, re: the IBM PC, not Moore, and "640K."
They are buying up all the copies in order to destroy the evidence.
Had your humorus removed?
--
Dirk
Sorry, missed it. My newsreader strips sarcasm.
I just don't know why people place such value on earthly things. We.... But since it's the memories
they want, substitutes do not work.
I see that, like modern gurus, he did not attempt to look more than 10yrs intoOn Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:35:28 -0400, Spehro Pefhany
speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:
On 15 Apr 2005 07:17:02 -0700, the renowned tomcees_math@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hi:
Somewhere in my archives I do have a photocopy of the Moore article.
I'll check back here once I find it.
Tomcee
Daniel Haude wrote:
Hi. I mislaid my copy. Will pay $10 plus postage. Thanks. --Daniel
Here it is:
ftp://download.intel.com/research/silicon/moorespaper.pdf
Please send the 7 EUR ...
Note the use of one-inch wafers. Monocrystalline silicon was so rare
in those days that there was a debate within Intel as to whether to
use uniform circular wafers, or irregular ones.