Model train electronics...

[Rick C]

On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 12:53:10 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:

On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-8, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 at 00:44:30 UTC, David Eather wrote:
On 17/12/2021 5:28 am, bitrex wrote:
The foamers have come to the conclusion that a reason their tracks get
\"dirty\" and cause power drop-outs is in large part due to nickel oxides
deposited on the nickel silver rail surface from micro-arcing and
microscopic pitting caused by the pick-up wheels.

So they look for a surface coating or cleaner that reduces micro-arcing
(if that really is the main reason) but doesn\'t affect traction too
much; anhydrous isopropyl is thought inappropriate because it leaves the
rail surface too dry after it evaporates, some swear by mineral spirits,
I guess some use a thin coating of automatic transmission fluid.

Is it possible to rather reduce the micro-arcing at the source through
some kind of snubbing or is that not really feasible wrt the process
described.

I cant see any reason why a snubber across the tracks (and maybe one in
the engine for good measure) wouldn\'t work a treat.
I can\'t see a track snubber helping.
Or you can skip power transmission thru the rails altogether and have on-board batteries with radio control:
https://www.s-cab.com/
You can have multiple locomotives operate simultaneously on the same track.

That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another trip. I guess you need someplace to put the batteries. Diesel trains don\'t have hopper cars anymore. They don\'t even have cabooses. The caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors pressure in the air hose.

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe. They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the only real issue will be where to put the battery.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[ke...@kjwdesigns.com]

On Friday, 31 December 2021 at 09:01:01 UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
....

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe. They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the only real issue will be where to put the battery.

....
The commercial units are a bit more sophisticated than that with full superhet 2.4GHz receivers and an H-bridge to operate the motor. The smallest are about 1cm square and about 2mm thick. Additional output channels are often available for controlling lights etc.

The battery is a space issue in the smaller scales such but the smallest single cell at a bit larger than the receiver can often be squeezed in.

http://www.micronradiocontrol.co.uk/rx_dt_land_v5.html

Multiple trains can be run on the same track without resorting to this approach using Digital Command Control (DCC) where the track is fed a coded signal that is used to provide both power and data.

kw

 

[Jeroen Belleman]

On 2021-12-31 18:42, ke...@kjwdesigns.com wrote:

On Friday, 31 December 2021 at 09:01:01 UTC-8,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote: ...
Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine
control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU
plus the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I
believe. They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I
expect the only real issue will be where to put the battery.

... The commercial units are a bit more sophisticated than that with
full superhet 2.4GHz receivers and an H-bridge to operate the motor.
The smallest are about 1cm square and about 2mm thick. Additional
output channels are often available for controlling lights etc.

[...]

http://www.micronradiocontrol.co.uk/rx_dt_land_v5.html

Where does it say that these are superhets?

Jeroen Belleman

 

[ke...@kjwdesigns.com]

On Friday, 31 December 2021 at 09:55:35 UTC-8, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
....

http://www.micronradiocontrol.co.uk/rx_dt_land_v5.html

Where does it say that these are superhets?

....
These days nobody would implement anything other than a superhet in an IC. The requirements for frequency accuracy and emissions mean that super-regenerative receivers are not appropriate. The receivers do typically use either zero IF with I/Q demodulation or a low IF in the couple of hundred kHz region as that can avoid the need for external LC or ceramic filters.

I think this is the data sheet for the receivers I linked to:

https://www.digikey.sg/htmldatasheets/production/836363/0/0/1/cyrf6936.html

kw

 

[Flyguy]

On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 9:01:01 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:

On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 12:53:10 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-8, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 at 00:44:30 UTC, David Eather wrote:
On 17/12/2021 5:28 am, bitrex wrote:
The foamers have come to the conclusion that a reason their tracks get
\"dirty\" and cause power drop-outs is in large part due to nickel oxides
deposited on the nickel silver rail surface from micro-arcing and
microscopic pitting caused by the pick-up wheels.

So they look for a surface coating or cleaner that reduces micro-arcing
(if that really is the main reason) but doesn\'t affect traction too
much; anhydrous isopropyl is thought inappropriate because it leaves the
rail surface too dry after it evaporates, some swear by mineral spirits,
I guess some use a thin coating of automatic transmission fluid.

Is it possible to rather reduce the micro-arcing at the source through
some kind of snubbing or is that not really feasible wrt the process
described.

I cant see any reason why a snubber across the tracks (and maybe one in
the engine for good measure) wouldn\'t work a treat.
I can\'t see a track snubber helping.
Or you can skip power transmission thru the rails altogether and have on-board batteries with radio control:
https://www.s-cab.com/
You can have multiple locomotives operate simultaneously on the same track.
That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another trip. I guess you need someplace to put the batteries. Diesel trains don\'t have hopper cars anymore. They don\'t even have cabooses. The caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors pressure in the air hose.

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe. They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the only real issue will be where to put the battery.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

The link provided details all of this. The batteries are rechargeable lithium\'s and recharging can be done on any electrified portion of the track. Control is by RF, again shown in the link. It is more expensive than the old way but eliminates a lot of problems. And if you are a serious hobbyist the cost is irrelevant.

 

[Rick C]

On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:40:19 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:

On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 9:01:01 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 12:53:10 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-8, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 at 00:44:30 UTC, David Eather wrote:
On 17/12/2021 5:28 am, bitrex wrote:
The foamers have come to the conclusion that a reason their tracks get
\"dirty\" and cause power drop-outs is in large part due to nickel oxides
deposited on the nickel silver rail surface from micro-arcing and
microscopic pitting caused by the pick-up wheels.

So they look for a surface coating or cleaner that reduces micro-arcing
(if that really is the main reason) but doesn\'t affect traction too
much; anhydrous isopropyl is thought inappropriate because it leaves the
rail surface too dry after it evaporates, some swear by mineral spirits,
I guess some use a thin coating of automatic transmission fluid..

Is it possible to rather reduce the micro-arcing at the source through
some kind of snubbing or is that not really feasible wrt the process
described.

I cant see any reason why a snubber across the tracks (and maybe one in
the engine for good measure) wouldn\'t work a treat.
I can\'t see a track snubber helping.
Or you can skip power transmission thru the rails altogether and have on-board batteries with radio control:
https://www.s-cab.com/
You can have multiple locomotives operate simultaneously on the same track.
That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another trip. I guess you need someplace to put the batteries. Diesel trains don\'t have hopper cars anymore. They don\'t even have cabooses. The caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors pressure in the air hose.

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe. They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the only real issue will be where to put the battery.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
The link provided details all of this. The batteries are rechargeable lithium\'s and recharging can be done on any electrified portion of the track. Control is by RF, again shown in the link. It is more expensive than the old way but eliminates a lot of problems. And if you are a serious hobbyist the cost is irrelevant.

The link is of a design using modules rather than an integrated design. But they manage to cram it into an HO gauge so I guess it\'s not all that large. It would seem they charge through the rails? I guess you can do that with a stationary unit and not have the problem with the tarnish impacting the connection.

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Flyguy]

On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 8:51:17 PM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:

On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:40:19 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 9:01:01 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 12:53:10 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-8, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 at 00:44:30 UTC, David Eather wrote:
On 17/12/2021 5:28 am, bitrex wrote:
The foamers have come to the conclusion that a reason their tracks get
\"dirty\" and cause power drop-outs is in large part due to nickel oxides
deposited on the nickel silver rail surface from micro-arcing and
microscopic pitting caused by the pick-up wheels.

So they look for a surface coating or cleaner that reduces micro-arcing
(if that really is the main reason) but doesn\'t affect traction too
much; anhydrous isopropyl is thought inappropriate because it leaves the
rail surface too dry after it evaporates, some swear by mineral spirits,
I guess some use a thin coating of automatic transmission fluid.

Is it possible to rather reduce the micro-arcing at the source through
some kind of snubbing or is that not really feasible wrt the process
described.

I cant see any reason why a snubber across the tracks (and maybe one in
the engine for good measure) wouldn\'t work a treat.
I can\'t see a track snubber helping.
Or you can skip power transmission thru the rails altogether and have on-board batteries with radio control:
https://www.s-cab.com/
You can have multiple locomotives operate simultaneously on the same track.
That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another trip. I guess you need someplace to put the batteries. Diesel trains don\'t have hopper cars anymore. They don\'t even have cabooses. The caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors pressure in the air hose.

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe. They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the only real issue will be where to put the battery.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
The link provided details all of this. The batteries are rechargeable lithium\'s and recharging can be done on any electrified portion of the track.. Control is by RF, again shown in the link. It is more expensive than the old way but eliminates a lot of problems. And if you are a serious hobbyist the cost is irrelevant.
The link is of a design using modules rather than an integrated design. But they manage to cram it into an HO gauge so I guess it\'s not all that large. It would seem they charge through the rails? I guess you can do that with a stationary unit and not have the problem with the tarnish impacting the connection.

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

They are no different from your Tesla - it doesn\'t charge while you\'re driving, either.

 

[Rick C]

On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:57:30 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:

On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 8:51:17 PM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:40:19 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 9:01:01 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail..com wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 12:53:10 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-8, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 at 00:44:30 UTC, David Eather wrote:
On 17/12/2021 5:28 am, bitrex wrote:
The foamers have come to the conclusion that a reason their tracks get
\"dirty\" and cause power drop-outs is in large part due to nickel oxides
deposited on the nickel silver rail surface from micro-arcing and
microscopic pitting caused by the pick-up wheels.

So they look for a surface coating or cleaner that reduces micro-arcing
(if that really is the main reason) but doesn\'t affect traction too
much; anhydrous isopropyl is thought inappropriate because it leaves the
rail surface too dry after it evaporates, some swear by mineral spirits,
I guess some use a thin coating of automatic transmission fluid.

Is it possible to rather reduce the micro-arcing at the source through
some kind of snubbing or is that not really feasible wrt the process
described.

I cant see any reason why a snubber across the tracks (and maybe one in
the engine for good measure) wouldn\'t work a treat.
I can\'t see a track snubber helping.
Or you can skip power transmission thru the rails altogether and have on-board batteries with radio control:
https://www.s-cab.com/
You can have multiple locomotives operate simultaneously on the same track.
That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another trip. I guess you need someplace to put the batteries. Diesel trains don\'t have hopper cars anymore. They don\'t even have cabooses. The caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors pressure in the air hose.

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe. They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the only real issue will be where to put the battery.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
The link provided details all of this. The batteries are rechargeable lithium\'s and recharging can be done on any electrified portion of the track. Control is by RF, again shown in the link. It is more expensive than the old way but eliminates a lot of problems. And if you are a serious hobbyist the cost is irrelevant.
The link is of a design using modules rather than an integrated design. But they manage to cram it into an HO gauge so I guess it\'s not all that large. It would seem they charge through the rails? I guess you can do that with a stationary unit and not have the problem with the tarnish impacting the connection.

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
They are no different from your Tesla - it doesn\'t charge while you\'re driving, either.

Your reading comprehension is pretty poor, eh? That is in no way responsive to what I was saying.

--

Rick C.

--- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
--- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Martin Brown]

On 31/12/2021 17:00, Rick C wrote:

On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 12:53:10 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-8, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 at 00:44:30 UTC, David Eather
wrote:
On 17/12/2021 5:28 am, bitrex wrote:
The foamers have come to the conclusion that a reason their
tracks get \"dirty\" and cause power drop-outs is in large part
due to nickel oxides deposited on the nickel silver rail
surface from micro-arcing and microscopic pitting caused by
the pick-up wheels.

So they look for a surface coating or cleaner that reduces
micro-arcing (if that really is the main reason) but doesn\'t
affect traction too much; anhydrous isopropyl is thought
inappropriate because it leaves the rail surface too dry
after it evaporates, some swear by mineral spirits, I guess
some use a thin coating of automatic transmission fluid.

Is it possible to rather reduce the micro-arcing at the
source through some kind of snubbing or is that not really
feasible wrt the process described.

I cant see any reason why a snubber across the tracks (and
maybe one in the engine for good measure) wouldn\'t work a
treat.
I can\'t see a track snubber helping.
Or you can skip power transmission thru the rails altogether and
have on-board batteries with radio control: https://www.s-cab.com/
You can have multiple locomotives operate simultaneously on the
same track.

That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train
having to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection
could be wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged
into the fuel tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s
ready for another trip. I guess you need someplace to put the
batteries. Diesel trains don\'t have hopper cars anymore. They don\'t
even have cabooses. The caboose is a red light fastened to the last
car. I think it monitors pressure in the air hose.

There are some electric ones with internal batteries to smooth out any
dead spots on moveable tracks too.

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine
control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU
plus the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I
believe. They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I
expect the only real issue will be where to put the battery.

Radio control is used on some smaller scale steam powered locos.

https://www.rctrains.co.uk

Models too small to actually pull a bogey with a man on it. It is a
cottage industry in the UK making controllers for this narrow gauge.
They are small scale live steam with a spirit burner boiler.

Live steam enthusiasts tend to have limited electronics skills.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

 

[Dan Purgert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Rick C wrote:

That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having
to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be
wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel
tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another

This works on large scales (like what\'s used in gardens), not so much on
the smaller ones that people tend to have inside though. Mostly a case
of size than anything.

trip. I guess you need someplace to put the batteries. Diesel trains
don\'t have hopper cars anymore. They don\'t even have cabooses. The

I\'m assuming by \"hopper\", you mean the tenders that steam locomotives
had, right?

caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors
pressure in the air hose.

Amongst other things related to location (e.g. \"I passed the beacon
here past the switch, it\'s safe to stop now\").

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine
control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus
the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe.
They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the
only real issue will be where to put the battery.

Not really, no. It\'s even \"fun\" finding space to cram the
microcontroller in (when using DCC).




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5n3y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|_|_|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
|O|O|O|

 

[Rick C]

On Monday, January 3, 2022 at 9:04:27 AM UTC-5, Dan Purgert wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Rick C wrote:
That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having
to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be
wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel
tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another
This works on large scales (like what\'s used in gardens), not so much on
the smaller ones that people tend to have inside though. Mostly a case
of size than anything.

Not following. What exactly is \"this\" that doesn\'t work? What specifically won\'t work in small gauge trainsets?

trip. I guess you need someplace to put the batteries. Diesel trains
don\'t have hopper cars anymore. They don\'t even have cabooses. The
I\'m assuming by \"hopper\", you mean the tenders that steam locomotives
had, right?
caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors
pressure in the air hose.
Amongst other things related to location (e.g. \"I passed the beacon
here past the switch, it\'s safe to stop now\").

Maybe on newer equipment. I worked for the railroad around 1980. It wasn\'t much more than a light then.

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine
control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus
the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe.
They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the
only real issue will be where to put the battery.
Not really, no. It\'s even \"fun\" finding space to cram the
microcontroller in (when using DCC).

Did you not see the web page someone posted a link to? The complete (bulky) electronics and battery fit inside an HO gauge engine.

--

Rick C.

--+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
--+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Dan Purgert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Rick C wrote:

On Monday, January 3, 2022 at 9:04:27 AM UTC-5, Dan Purgert wrote:
Rick C wrote:
That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having
to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be
wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel
tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another
This works on large scales (like what\'s used in gardens), not so much on
the smaller ones that people tend to have inside though. Mostly a case
of size than anything.

Not following. What exactly is \"this\" that doesn\'t work? What
specifically won\'t work in small gauge trainsets?

Sorry, I appear to have trashed half the thought there. \"Plugging them
in\" works for bigger scales (where say a 2mm barrel jack wouldn\'t be too
big. The small stuff people use indoors would be a bit too fine for
repeated use like that.

[...]
caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors
pressure in the air hose.
Amongst other things related to location (e.g. \"I passed the beacon
here past the switch, it\'s safe to stop now\").

Maybe on newer equipment. I worked for the railroad around 1980. It
wasn\'t much more than a light then.

Yeah, Back in the 80s it was the light and the air pressure. Now it has
the telemetry stuff -- though I\'m not sure \"when\" that was introduced.

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine
control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus
the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe.
They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the
only real issue will be where to put the battery.
Not really, no. It\'s even \"fun\" finding space to cram the
microcontroller in (when using DCC).

Did you not see the web page someone posted a link to? The complete
(bulky) electronics and battery fit inside an HO gauge engine.

No, I must\'ve missed that post. I\'ll have to dig back in the thread. I
have seen people do that in HO steam locomotives (in the generally empty
tender), or in \"dummy\" diesel locomotives though.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=y2Cq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|_|_|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
|O|O|O|

 

[Dan Purgert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Dan Purgert wrote:

Rick C wrote:
Did you not see the web page someone posted a link to? The complete
(bulky) electronics and battery fit inside an HO gauge engine.

No, I must\'ve missed that post. I\'ll have to dig back in the thread. I
have seen people do that in HO steam locomotives (in the generally empty
tender), or in \"dummy\" diesel locomotives though.

Think I found it -- for \'s-cab.com\' ? That pic at the very bottom looks
like they\'ve pulled out all of the weights (if there were any in the
body to begin with - given the \"toy\" couplers in the picture, it
might\'ve been a budget model that only had a couple of ounces of iron in
the fuel tank to begin with).

My experience in HO scale diesel locomotives are not very expansive -- I
only have a couple (and the \"expensive\" option at that) wherein they
have extra weights right over the wheel / gear towers -- roughly
equating to 1/2 of that circuit board not fitting at all

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=msgu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|_|_|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
|O|O|O|

 

[Rick C]

On Monday, January 3, 2022 at 11:45:52 AM UTC-5, Dan Purgert wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Rick C wrote:
On Monday, January 3, 2022 at 9:04:27 AM UTC-5, Dan Purgert wrote:
Rick C wrote:
That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having
to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be
wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel
tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another
This works on large scales (like what\'s used in gardens), not so much on
the smaller ones that people tend to have inside though. Mostly a case
of size than anything.

Not following. What exactly is \"this\" that doesn\'t work? What
specifically won\'t work in small gauge trainsets?
Sorry, I appear to have trashed half the thought there. \"Plugging them
in\" works for bigger scales (where say a 2mm barrel jack wouldn\'t be too
big. The small stuff people use indoors would be a bit too fine for
repeated use like that.

I don\'t know why a 1/8 inch (3 mm) \"phone\" jack is widely used in earphone and mic apps in laptops, and phones. That\'s not a market where they are babied. Here\'s a link to many sizes of connectors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coaxial_power_connector

caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors
pressure in the air hose.
Amongst other things related to location (e.g. \"I passed the beacon
here past the switch, it\'s safe to stop now\").

Maybe on newer equipment. I worked for the railroad around 1980. It
wasn\'t much more than a light then.
Yeah, Back in the 80s it was the light and the air pressure. Now it has
the telemetry stuff -- though I\'m not sure \"when\" that was introduced.


Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine
control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus
the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe.
They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the
only real issue will be where to put the battery.
Not really, no. It\'s even \"fun\" finding space to cram the
microcontroller in (when using DCC).

Did you not see the web page someone posted a link to? The complete
(bulky) electronics and battery fit inside an HO gauge engine.
No, I must\'ve missed that post. I\'ll have to dig back in the thread. I
have seen people do that in HO steam locomotives (in the generally empty
tender), or in \"dummy\" diesel locomotives though.

--

Rick C.

-+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Rick C]

On Monday, January 3, 2022 at 12:12:10 PM UTC-5, Dan Purgert wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dan Purgert wrote:
Rick C wrote:
Did you not see the web page someone posted a link to? The complete
(bulky) electronics and battery fit inside an HO gauge engine.

No, I must\'ve missed that post. I\'ll have to dig back in the thread. I
have seen people do that in HO steam locomotives (in the generally empty
tender), or in \"dummy\" diesel locomotives though.
Think I found it -- for \'s-cab.com\' ? That pic at the very bottom looks
like they\'ve pulled out all of the weights (if there were any in the
body to begin with - given the \"toy\" couplers in the picture, it
might\'ve been a budget model that only had a couple of ounces of iron in
the fuel tank to begin with).

My experience in HO scale diesel locomotives are not very expansive -- I
only have a couple (and the \"expensive\" option at that) wherein they
have extra weights right over the wheel / gear towers -- roughly
equating to 1/2 of that circuit board not fitting at all

The circuit board(s) can be made much smaller. They use multiple boards to reduce the design work, but an MCU can be used to consolidate some of the functions making the electronics much smaller.

--

Rick C.

-++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[ke...@kjwdesigns.com]

On Monday, 3 January 2022 at 18:21:06 UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
....

My experience in HO scale diesel locomotives are not very expansive -- I
only have a couple (and the \"expensive\" option at that) wherein they
have extra weights right over the wheel / gear towers -- roughly
equating to 1/2 of that circuit board not fitting at all
The circuit board(s) can be made much smaller. They use multiple boards to reduce the design work, but an MCU can be used to consolidate some of the functions making the electronics much smaller.
....

The receivers I linked to in a previous post are small (~1cm sq). They can be fitted even into N-gauge (9mm track gauge) and similar (009, HoN30...).

The MCU and a frequency synthesized receiver all fit into one device that needs very few external components.

https://www.digikey.sg/htmldatasheets/production/836363/0/0/1/cyrf6936.html

The complete receiver:
http://www.micronradiocontrol.co.uk/rx_dt_land_v5.html#dt_rx41d_v5

Here is a video showing it being installed including battery in an 009 locomotive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hodstXk9mmc

kw

 

[Dan Purgert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Rick C wrote:

On Monday, January 3, 2022 at 11:45:52 AM UTC-5, Dan Purgert wrote:
Sorry, I appear to have trashed half the thought there. \"Plugging them
in\" works for bigger scales (where say a 2mm barrel jack wouldn\'t be too
big. The small stuff people use indoors would be a bit too fine for
repeated use like that.

I don\'t know why a 1/8 inch (3 mm) \"phone\" jack is widely used in
earphone and mic apps in laptops, and phones. That\'s not a market
where they are babied. Here\'s a link to many sizes of connectors.

The jacks themselves are quite robust; but the models themselves really
aren\'t - I mean, we\'re talking detail parts that are 0.010\" (0.25mm) in
a lot of cases.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=3nWn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|_|_|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
|O|O|O|

 

[Flyguy]

On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 1:26:05 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:

On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:57:30 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 8:51:17 PM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:40:19 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 9:01:01 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 12:53:10 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-8, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 at 00:44:30 UTC, David Eather wrote:
On 17/12/2021 5:28 am, bitrex wrote:
The foamers have come to the conclusion that a reason their tracks get
\"dirty\" and cause power drop-outs is in large part due to nickel oxides
deposited on the nickel silver rail surface from micro-arcing and
microscopic pitting caused by the pick-up wheels.

So they look for a surface coating or cleaner that reduces micro-arcing
(if that really is the main reason) but doesn\'t affect traction too
much; anhydrous isopropyl is thought inappropriate because it leaves the
rail surface too dry after it evaporates, some swear by mineral spirits,
I guess some use a thin coating of automatic transmission fluid.

Is it possible to rather reduce the micro-arcing at the source through
some kind of snubbing or is that not really feasible wrt the process
described.

I cant see any reason why a snubber across the tracks (and maybe one in
the engine for good measure) wouldn\'t work a treat.
I can\'t see a track snubber helping.
Or you can skip power transmission thru the rails altogether and have on-board batteries with radio control:
https://www.s-cab.com/
You can have multiple locomotives operate simultaneously on the same track.
That\'s what I was thinking. It would be more like a real train having to stop at a filling point to get fuel. The power connection could be wireless, or it could emulate a fuel hose and be plugged into the fuel tank on the engine. Charge up the battery and it\'s ready for another trip. I guess you need someplace to put the batteries. Diesel trains don\'t have hopper cars anymore. They don\'t even have cabooses. The caboose is a red light fastened to the last car. I think it monitors pressure in the air hose.

Is there space in the locomotive for a battery or two? The engine control could be RF which could be very small, a single 8 pin MCU plus the RF receiver which can be a single transistor and a coil I believe. They probably already have the remote RF and MCU unit. I expect the only real issue will be where to put the battery.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
The link provided details all of this. The batteries are rechargeable lithium\'s and recharging can be done on any electrified portion of the track. Control is by RF, again shown in the link. It is more expensive than the old way but eliminates a lot of problems. And if you are a serious hobbyist the cost is irrelevant.
The link is of a design using modules rather than an integrated design. But they manage to cram it into an HO gauge so I guess it\'s not all that large. It would seem they charge through the rails? I guess you can do that with a stationary unit and not have the problem with the tarnish impacting the connection.

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
They are no different from your Tesla - it doesn\'t charge while you\'re driving, either.
Your reading comprehension is pretty poor, eh? That is in no way responsive to what I was saying.

--

Rick C.

--- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
--- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Mine is fine, but yours SUCKS! Go reread the material - it is all in there.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:43:44 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:

On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 1:26:05 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:57:30 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 8:51:17 PM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:40:19 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 9:01:01 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 12:53:10 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-8, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 at 00:44:30 UTC, David Eather wrote:
On 17/12/2021 5:28 am, bitrex wrote:

<snip>

They are no different from your Tesla - it doesn\'t charge while you\'re driving, either.
Your reading comprehension is pretty poor, eh? That is in no way responsive to what I was saying.

Mine is fine, but yours SUCKS! Go reread the material - it is all in there.

Flyguy is great at reading material and deciding that it says exactly what he wants it to say.

He\'s got excellent self-indulgent reading comprehension. He\'s less good at comprehending what the text actually says. I\'ve been noticing this for a few months now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

If you are too dim to comprehend what the text is actually saying, you can be dim enough to think it supports your point of view, even when it doesn\'t.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 12:40:07 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:43:44 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 1:26:05 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:57:30 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 8:51:17 PM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 11:40:19 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 9:01:01 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 12:53:10 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-8, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 at 00:44:30 UTC, David Eather wrote:
On 17/12/2021 5:28 am, bitrex wrote:
snip
They are no different from your Tesla - it doesn\'t charge while you\'re driving, either.
Your reading comprehension is pretty poor, eh? That is in no way responsive to what I was saying.

Mine is fine, but yours SUCKS! Go reread the material - it is all in there.
Flyguy is great at reading material and deciding that it says exactly what he wants it to say.

He\'s got excellent self-indulgent reading comprehension. He\'s less good at comprehending what the text actually says. I\'ve been noticing this for a few months now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

If you are too dim to comprehend what the text is actually saying, you can be dim enough to think it supports your point of view, even when it doesn\'t.

--
SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

The ONLY thing SNIPPERMAN is great at is SNIPPING! He clearly can\'t read, either.