Model number and / or pic IS required

P

Phil Allison

Guest
"Mark Harrarse Lying Criminal Retard"

I have an old Philips 15W unit with a rounded cubical base and four
straight parallel tubes coming out that join at the ends to form the
ionisation path.
Click to expand...

** That sounds like a magnetic ballast fluoro lamp with replaceable compact
tube.

Not the same thing at all as the **electronic ballast** 240 volt CFLs that
we are all being forced to use these days.


It's been running fine in the dunny for more than 15 years.
Click to expand...

** An outdoor dunny light gets used maybe 25 minutes a day - would have
clocked up only 2000 - 3000 hours in 15 years.

Magnetic ballasts go on for ever and the tubes are of quite different and
much longer life design compared to electronic ballast BC and ES type CFLs.

No comparison exists.


The base measures 40mm cubed and has "Electronic" written on the side,
total length is 20cm.
Click to expand...

** Is there a ***standard BC or ES fitting ** on the fucking thing or not
??

Model number and / or pic IS required.

But obviously is NEVER EVER coming from a rabid fucking nut case &
criminal piece of trolling shit like YOU.

FOAD ASAP.



.... Phil
 
I'm really, really sorry Phil for misleading you about
a totally fictitious CFL unit while you conduct your
spirit quest/mission for the ideal CFL unit...you see
I only made up the story so I could get more attention
from you once more....it's been so long since you rarked
up a storm and used such nasty words to me.

BUT..... the reality of the situation is this:

Phil, like I give a crap about what you think about CFL's. It exists,
it's quite old, it was very expensive at the time and dates from the
mid 90's as that's about the time I went to Uni, which, I might add,
I successfully completed, unlike other failed maths students whose
name begins with P and ends in N, I could mention.
 
Mark Harriss wrote:
I'm really, really sorry Phil for misleading you about
a totally fictitious CFL unit while you conduct your
spirit quest/mission for the ideal CFL unit...you see
I only made up the story so I could get more attention
from you once more....it's been so long since you rarked
up a storm and used such nasty words to me.

BUT..... the reality of the situation is this:

Phil, like I give a crap about what you think about CFL's. It exists,
it's quite old, it was very expensive at the time and dates from the
mid 90's as that's about the time I went to Uni, which, I might add,
I successfully completed, unlike other failed maths students whose
name begins with P and ends in N, I could mention.
Click to expand...
Anyway Phil, why do you keep posting new topics?, are you trying to
build evidence of internet harassment?. BWahahahahahahah
 
On Thu, 6 May 2010 22:47:06 +1000, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:

"Mark Harrarse Lying Criminal Retard"

I have an old Philips 15W unit with a rounded cubical base and four
straight parallel tubes coming out that join at the ends to form the
ionisation path.


** That sounds like a magnetic ballast fluoro lamp with replaceable compact
tube.

Not the same thing at all as the **electronic ballast** 240 volt CFLs that
we are all being forced to use these days.
Click to expand...
They did make CFLs with replaceable tubes in the mid 90s, I've got a 20W
model that uses an 18W Philips lamp, Condor brand electronic ballast made
in China.

Pics: http://grrr.id.au/cfl.html

Grant.
--
http://bugs.id.au/
 
Grant wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 22:47:06 +1000, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:

"Mark Harrarse Lying Criminal Retard"

I have an old Philips 15W unit with a rounded cubical base and four
straight parallel tubes coming out that join at the ends to form the
ionisation path.

** That sounds like a magnetic ballast fluoro lamp with replaceable compact
tube.

Not the same thing at all as the **electronic ballast** 240 volt CFLs that
we are all being forced to use these days.

They did make CFLs with replaceable tubes in the mid 90s, I've got a 20W
model that uses an 18W Philips lamp, Condor brand electronic ballast made
in China.

Pics: http://grrr.id.au/cfl.html

Grant.
Click to expand...
That's the exact tube assembly mine has but it's not detachable.
 
"Grant" <omg@grrr.id.au>

They did make CFLs with replaceable tubes in the mid 90s,
Click to expand...

** Irrelevant to the simple question the Harrarse Retard is REFUSING to
answer.



..... Phil
 
On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:09:21 +1000, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:

"Grant" <omg@grrr.id.au

They did make CFLs with replaceable tubes in the mid 90s,


** Irrelevant to the simple question the Harrarse Retard is REFUSING to
answer.
Click to expand...
Your flamage, I'm not joining in.


More OT: someone out there looked at my image page from MSIE 6, yes I saw the
missing file and copied it over, thanks for making it stick out in the logfile
with all those refreshes ;)

Grant.
--
http://bugs.id.au/
 
Phil Allison wrote:
"Grant" <omg@grrr.id.au

They did make CFLs with replaceable tubes in the mid 90s,


** Irrelevant to the simple question the Harrarse Retard is REFUSING to
answer.
Click to expand...

But philthy you don't have the right to ask seeing you do blow for
all and sundry
.... Philthy
Click to expand...
 
atec7 7 > wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:
"Grant" <omg@grrr.id.au

They did make CFLs with replaceable tubes in the mid 90s,


** Irrelevant to the simple question the Harrarse Retard is REFUSING
to answer.


But philthy you don't have the right to ask seeing you do blow for all
and sundry
Click to expand...
Phil has a carefully constructed reality and if anyone diverges from it,
Phil has a temper tantrum as he's unable to cope. As we can see he point
blank refuses to accept any evidence to the contrary and pushing the
point will further will result in tears and angry denial for him. He's
already shifting the goalposts in an effort to keep up with new facts
that contradict his fantasy.
 
Mark Harriss wrote:
atec7 7 > wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:
"Grant" <omg@grrr.id.au

They did make CFLs with replaceable tubes in the mid 90s,


** Irrelevant to the simple question the Harrarse Retard is REFUSING
to answer.


But philthy you don't have the right to ask seeing you do blow for
all and sundry



Phil has a carefully constructed reality and if anyone diverges from it,
Phil has a temper tantrum as he's unable to cope. As we can see he point
blank refuses to accept any evidence to the contrary and pushing the
point will further will result in tears and angry denial for him. He's
already shifting the goalposts in an effort to keep up with new facts
that contradict his fantasy.
Well aware of his foibles
Click to expand...
He still sucks and often fails to win arguments ( blinders do that)
must be a "poofter" trying to move the posts and being so obvious
about it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top