Mere Amplification Won't Change the GOP's Low SNR

B

Bret Cahill

Guest
The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.

The problem isn't that the Repugliar signal isn't strong enough. The
problem is that the noise from the creationists, birthers, gun
nutters, AGW conspiracy theorists, bigots, "market" economists and
various other wackadoodles and winger dingers is drowning out their
signal.

Mere amplification ain't gonna change the GOP's low SNR.

The moderates on the bench should have joined in the decision.

www.bretcahill.com
 
Bret Cahill wrote:
The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.

The problem isn't that the Repugliar signal isn't strong enough. The
problem is that the noise from the creationists, birthers, gun
nutters, AGW conspiracy theorists, bigots, "market" economists and
various other wackadoodles and winger dingers is drowning out their
signal.

Mere amplification ain't gonna change the GOP's low SNR.

The moderates on the bench should have joined in the decision.

www.bretcahill.com
 
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:45:23 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:

The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.
Or maybe they think the Bill of Rights prevents the government from
restricting free speech.

John
 
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in
news:eek:dful5pocir63d4uk938en2qpnena3356m@4ax.com:

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:45:23 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:

The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.

Or maybe they think the Bill of Rights prevents the government from
restricting free speech.
That's *adorable*!

Really.
 
Fred Weiss <fredweiss@papertig.com> wrote in news:cd15862c-a190-40c8-afce-
2e16c28d9be3@g1g2000yqi.googlegroups.com:

On Jan 26, 11:45 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:

The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.

There is absolutely nothing in their decision which suggests that.
You expected them to "suggest" that in their opinion?

But
here you engage in the same "wackadoodle" conspiracy theory that you
then turn around and accuse your opponents of.

The moderates on the bench should have joined in the decision.

Of course. But they are not "moderates". They are mostly leftists who
want to extend the power of the gov't over our lives and they know
that by giving a greater voice to its victims it might restrain that
process.
Interesting that five activist judges can overturn a century of law and
precedent, but in your mind, its the dissenters who are the "bad" people.
We can tell you think they're bad because you call them "lefists," which is
merely the epithet a rightard uses for someone who disagrees with him.

It never fails to amaze me that a rightard like yourself is so quick to
defend the people who are picking your pocket.

Fred Weiss
 
On Jan 26, 11:45 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:

The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.
There is absolutely nothing in their decision which suggests that. But
here you engage in the same "wackadoodle" conspiracy theory that you
then turn around and accuse your opponents of.

The moderates on the bench should have joined in the decision.
Of course. But they are not "moderates". They are mostly leftists who
want to extend the power of the gov't over our lives and they know
that by giving a greater voice to its victims it might restrain that
process.

Fred Weiss
 
Bret Cahill wrote:
The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.

The problem isn't that the Repugliar signal isn't strong enough. The
problem is that the noise from the creationists, birthers, gun
nutters, AGW conspiracy theorists, bigots, "market" economists and
various other wackadoodles and winger dingers is drowning out their
signal.

Mere amplification ain't gonna change the GOP's low SNR.

The moderates on the bench should have joined in the decision.

www.bretcahill.com
 
The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.

There is absolutely nothing in their decision which suggests that.
There is plenty in their other decisions that suggests that they are
censors when it comes to free speech to discuss corporations.

www.bretcahill.com
 
Bret Cahill wrote:
The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.

There is absolutely nothing in their decision which suggests that.

There is plenty in their other decisions that suggests that they are
censors when it comes to free speech to discuss corporations.
Why not take your beef to the Supreme Court? Be sure to pepper your
language with the stuff you typically use here.
 
Bret Cahill wrote:
The corp. shills on the Scalito Court think they can help out the GOP
by amplifying the political message of their corp. paymasters.

The problem isn't that the Repugliar signal isn't strong enough. The
problem is that the noise from the creationists, birthers, gun
nutters, AGW conspiracy theorists, bigots, "market" economists and
various other wackadoodles and winger dingers is drowning out their
signal.

Mere amplification ain't gonna change the GOP's low SNR.

The moderates on the bench should have joined in the decision.

www.bretcahill.com
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top