P
Pgonshor
Guest
All I know is it is rated at 120 Watts per channel. These seem to be scarce.
Any info on quality and value? Thanks,
Dave
Any info on quality and value? Thanks,
Dave
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
M
Mark D. Zacharias
Guest
Decent receiver but overpriced at least 100.00 due to that ridiculous and
unreliable "servo face" front panel.
Mark Z.
--
Please reply only to Group. I regret this is necessary. Viruses and spam
have rendered my regular e-mail address useless.
"Pgonshor" <pgonshor@aol.comspoof> wrote in message
news:20040306162927.01740.00001032@mb-m22.aol.com...
unreliable "servo face" front panel.
Mark Z.
--
Please reply only to Group. I regret this is necessary. Viruses and spam
have rendered my regular e-mail address useless.
"Pgonshor" <pgonshor@aol.comspoof> wrote in message
news:20040306162927.01740.00001032@mb-m22.aol.com...
All I know is it is rated at 120 Watts per channel. These seem to be
scarce.
Any info on quality and value? Thanks,
Dave
G
gothika
Guest
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 23:42:02 -0600, "Mark D. Zacharias"
<mzacharias@yis.us> wrote:
It was a well designed and built unit.
The servo front on it never gave me any trouble.
I especially liked that auto-tune biasing feature that used an
internal tone generator to ttest each tape and optimise the bias
setting over each section of the scale for the best performance.
It didn't have the highest highs but from 18Khz on down it was
flawless.
Yes most Luxman is over-priced but so was most of the "high-end" gear
sold back then.
<mzacharias@yis.us> wrote:
I had the KX-102 tape deck at one time years ago.Decent receiver but overpriced at least 100.00 due to that ridiculous and
unreliable "servo face" front panel.
Mark Z.
It was a well designed and built unit.
The servo front on it never gave me any trouble.
I especially liked that auto-tune biasing feature that used an
internal tone generator to ttest each tape and optimise the bias
setting over each section of the scale for the best performance.
It didn't have the highest highs but from 18Khz on down it was
flawless.
Yes most Luxman is over-priced but so was most of the "high-end" gear
sold back then.
M
Mark D. Zacharias
Guest
The little motor which ran the face went bad a lot.
mz
--
Please reply only to Group. I regret this is necessary. Viruses and spam
have rendered my regular e-mail address useless.
"gothika" <Vampyres@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
news:86ll40tkiicj4nen2r5al9h5jnr17g1094@4ax.com...
mz
--
Please reply only to Group. I regret this is necessary. Viruses and spam
have rendered my regular e-mail address useless.
"gothika" <Vampyres@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
news:86ll40tkiicj4nen2r5al9h5jnr17g1094@4ax.com...
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 23:42:02 -0600, "Mark D. Zacharias"
mzacharias@yis.us> wrote:
Decent receiver but overpriced at least 100.00 due to that ridiculous and
unreliable "servo face" front panel.
Mark Z.
I had the KX-102 tape deck at one time years ago.
It was a well designed and built unit.
The servo front on it never gave me any trouble.
I especially liked that auto-tune biasing feature that used an
internal tone generator to ttest each tape and optimise the bias
setting over each section of the scale for the best performance.
It didn't have the highest highs but from 18Khz on down it was
flawless.
Yes most Luxman is over-priced but so was most of the "high-end" gear
sold back then.