lineread() arguments

[fogh]

Hi All,

Could anyone tell me what the second argument to lineread() is ?

The arglist() gives me a second argument of type symbol, but the
documentation I found covers only the first argument.

NB: For this matter, answers by email are OK. (take the from: filed of
this message, just remove the underscore from the adressee name , and
keep only the last 2 bits in the domain name.)

 

[Andrew Beckett]

Hi Frederic,

It's a private argument. I don't think it's actually used externally, but it
is related to the support for the SKILL++ mode in the parser.

So don't use it, it's not documented, and not intended for customer use.

To be honest, even though I know what the argument is for, I can't really
see any good use for it now.

Andrew.

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:36:00 +0100, fogh
<cad_support@skipthisandunderscores.catena.nl> wrote:

Hi All,

Could anyone tell me what the second argument to lineread() is ?

The arglist() gives me a second argument of type symbol, but the
documentation I found covers only the first argument.

NB: For this matter, answers by email are OK. (take the from: filed of
this message, just remove the underscore from the adressee name , and
keep only the last 2 bits in the domain name.)

--
Andrew Beckett
Senior Technical Leader
Custom IC Solutions
Cadence Design Systems Ltd

 

[fogh]

Thanks Andrew,

parsing SKILL++ grammar is indeed not the bad use I had in mind.

Andrew Beckett wrote:

Hi Frederic,

It's a private argument. I don't think it's actually used externally, but it
is related to the support for the SKILL++ mode in the parser.

So don't use it, it's not documented, and not intended for customer use.

To be honest, even though I know what the argument is for, I can't really
see any good use for it now.

Andrew.

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:36:00 +0100, fogh
cad_support@skipthisandunderscores.catena.nl> wrote:


Hi All,

Could anyone tell me what the second argument to lineread() is ?

The arglist() gives me a second argument of type symbol, but the
documentation I found covers only the first argument.

NB: For this matter, answers by email are OK. (take the from: filed of
this message, just remove the underscore from the adressee name , and
keep only the last 2 bits in the domain name.)