LED decoder with CoolRunner II

[Flemming Hansen]

Hi,

In a school project I'm going to make 7 segment LED decoder with CoolRunner
II xc2c32a. There will be 3 inputs and 3 outputs to the CoolRunner. An
enable signal will enable the LEDs, CS to select the LED, and a 4 bit data.
I made the following VHDL code:

library IEEE;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_ARITH.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_UNSIGNED.ALL;

---- Uncomment the following library declaration if instantiating
---- any Xilinx primitives in this code.
--library UNISIM;
--use UNISIM.VComponents.all;

entity LED_decoder is
Port ( E : in std_logic;
CS : in std_logic_vector(1 downto 0);
DATA : in std_logic_vector(3 downto 0);
LED1 : out std_logic_vector(6 downto 0);
LED2 : out std_logic_vector(6 downto 0);
LED3 : out std_logic_vector(6 downto 0));
end LED_decoder;

architecture Behavioral of LED_decoder is

begin
--DEC-to-seven-segment decoder
--
-- *** Common Anode
--
-- 0
-- ---
-- 5 | | 1
-- --- <- 6
-- 4 | | 2
-- ---
-- 3
--
process (E, CS, DATA)
begin
if (E='1') then
if(CS="01") then
case DATA is

when "0001" => LED1 <= "1111001"; --1
when "0010" => LED1 <= "0100100"; --2
when "0011" => LED1 <= "0110000"; --3
when "0100" => LED1 <= "0011001"; --4
when "0101" => LED1 <= "0010010"; --5
when "0110" => LED1 <= "0000010"; --6
when "0111" => LED1 <= "1111000"; --7
when "1000" => LED1 <= "1111111"; --8
when "1001" => LED1 <= "0010000"; --9
when others => LED1 <= "1000000"; --0
end case;

elsif(CS="10") then
case DATA is
when "0001" => LED2 <= "1111001"; --1
when "0010" => LED2 <= "0100100"; --2
when "0011" => LED2 <= "0110000"; --3
when "0100" => LED2 <= "0011001"; --4
when "0101" => LED2 <= "0010010"; --5
when "0110" => LED2 <= "0000010"; --6
when "0111" => LED2 <= "1111000"; --7
when "1000" => LED2 <= "1111111"; --8
when "1001" => LED2 <= "0010000"; --9
when others => LED2 <= "1000000"; --0
end case;
elsif(CS="11") then
case DATA is
when "0001" => LED3 <= "1111001"; --1
when "0010" => LED3 <= "0100100"; --2
when "0011" => LED3 <= "0110000"; --3
when "0100" => LED3 <= "0011001"; --4
when "0101" => LED3 <= "0010010"; --5
when "0110" => LED3 <= "0000010"; --6
when "0111" => LED3 <= "1111000"; --7
when "1000" => LED3 <= "1111111"; --8
when "1001" => LED3 <= "0010000"; --9
when others => LED3 <= "1000000"; --0
end case;
end if;
else
LED1 <= "1111111";
LED2 <= "1111111";
LED3 <= "1111111";
end if;
end process;
end Behavioral;

I get a warnin message that says that 7-bit latch for signal LED1, LED2 and
LED3. Syntax check says that the code is ok. But in Post-Fit VHDL Model
simulation with ModelSim there are some errors, I mean some undefined and
unexpected values. Any suggestion on what the cause could be? Or any
suggestion or examples for a code to the job?

Thanx in advance

 

[jens]

You're missing a condition for the remaining possible values of CS,
which is creating the latch. I would recommend using default
assignments- move the LEDx <= "1111111" assignments to the beginning of
the process (outside of the if statement) and remove them from the end,
and that should get rid of the latch.

Your "8" might look a little dark too.

 

[Brian Drummond]

On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:38:51 +0100, "Flemming Hansen"
<dsl34257@cybercity.dk> wrote:

Hi,

In a school project I'm going to make 7 segment LED decoder with CoolRunner
II xc2c32a. There will be 3 inputs and 3 outputs to the CoolRunner. An
enable signal will enable the LEDs, CS to select the LED, and a 4 bit data.
I made the following VHDL code:

library IEEE;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_ARITH.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_UNSIGNED.ALL;

One question for your tutor;

why are schools STILL teaching the use of non-standard libraries?

- Brian

 

[Mike Treseler]

Brian Drummond wrote:

why are schools STILL teaching the use of non-standard libraries?

Schools depend on low cost tools from brands X and A.
Tutorials from these vendors use non-standard libraries.
Example code from these vendors use non-standard libraries.
This newsgroup is a rare source of good examples.

-- Mike Treseler

 

[Brian Drummond]

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:35:12 -0800, "Mike Treseler"
<mike_treseler@comcast.net> wrote:

Brian Drummond wrote:
why are schools STILL teaching the use of non-standard libraries?

Schools depend on low cost tools from brands X and A.
Tutorials from these vendors use non-standard libraries.
Example code from these vendors use non-standard libraries.
This newsgroup is a rare source of good examples.

That's reasonable. It is something of a chore to make a vendor example
numeric_std clean, and sometimes I don't bother either.

Though often enough they have blindly included std_logic_arith for a
module that doesn't even do any arithmetic, like a register! In that
case I'll simply delete the Library/Use clause; if the compiler doesn't
complain, nothing else will.

I suppose the answer is to apply gentle pressure to the vendors ...
would reporting use of non-std libraries be an inappropriate use of
WebCase?

- Brian

 

[Mike Treseler]

Brian Drummond wrote:

Though often enough they have blindly included std_logic_arith for a
module that doesn't even do any arithmetic, like a register! In that
case I'll simply delete the Library/Use clause; if the compiler doesn't
complain, nothing else will.

Yes. I do this:

library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
-- use ieee.std_logic_arith
use ieee.numeric_std.all;

Then I do a sim compiles from my editor
to jump right to the next offending line

I suppose the answer is to apply gentle pressure to the vendors ...
would reporting use of non-std libraries be an inappropriate use of
WebCase?

A web case including a corrected version
of the example might get noticed and
maybe even used.

-- Mike Treseler