last_value

[Account1]

Hi,

The last_value attribute is synthesizable?

Could you suggest a link about the synthesizable subset of vhdl?

Thanks
Attila

 

[Thomas Stanka]

Hi Account1,

Account1 schrieb:

The last_value attribute is synthesizable?

What gate would you like the synthesiser to use, in order to synthesis
signal'lastvalue?
If you have a good idea, you should discus this issue with tool
vendors.

Could you suggest a link about the synthesizable subset of vhdl?

ieee 1076.6. Unfortunately you need to be member of ieee to have free
access to this document.

bye Thomas

 

[Mike Treseler]

Account1 wrote:

The last_value attribute is synthesizable?

Don't know. Try it and see, but signal attributes like
last_value have traditionally been weak points for synthesis.

I prefer to describe logic using the present value of
variables and leave the signals for port maps.
....
last_n_v := n_v;
n_v := n_v + 1;
....

Could you suggest a link about the synthesizable subset of vhdl?

My short answer is:
Do use a synchronous process.
Don't use "wait for".
Do start with some known-good examples.

My long answer is the template examples here:
http://home.comcast.net/~mike_treseler/

ieee 1076.6 is an applicable standard,
but that is more a collection of compliant cases
than a best practices document for designers.
I have never seen an IP core claiming ieee 1076.6 compliance.
I'm not sure how that could be proven and if
it were, the IP might still have other problems.


-- Mike Treseler

 

[Jason Agron]

Unfortunately, there is no standard synthesizable subset of VHDL
(especially for attributes which are essentially compiler directires),
however individual synthesis tools will have such standards. For
instance Xilinx defines the subset for XST in a file called the "XST
User's Guide" that can be found here...

http://toolbox.xilinx.com/docsan/xilinx82/books/docs/xst/xst.pdf

-Jason


Account1 wrote:

Hi,

The last_value attribute is synthesizable?

Could you suggest a link about the synthesizable subset of vhdl?

Thanks
Attila

 

[Jim Lewis]

Short answer:
No.

Long answer:
IEEE 1076.6-2004 is the current VHDL RTL synthesis standard.
Unfortunately many vendors have not implemented it yet.
Usually this is a function of their users asking them to.
So start asking.

'last_value is not supported in user code. However, it is
supported in the functions ieee.std_logic_1164.rising_edge
and ieee.std_logic_1164.falling_edge.

There may be vendors who do support it in user code,
however, that does not mean it will be portable between
vendors. In fact, historically speaking, Mentor's Autologic
synthesis tool either supported or required 'last_value.

WRT 1076.6, there is much work that could be done on attributes.
I think the best way to get this done is to express interest to
your vendors that this needs to be done and then form a working
group under DASC (www.dasc.org). I have some experience with
this and if there is interest, I could help out with the process
things.

What did you want to use 'last_value for?

Cheers,
Jim

P.S.
There is also 1076.6-1999 which many vendors have implemented -
primarily since the standard was written so that most vendors
would be compliant - it was intended to give model writers
a standard to which they could claim compliance.

Hi,

The last_value attribute is synthesizable?

Could you suggest a link about the synthesizable subset of vhdl?

Thanks
Attila

 

[Account1]

I'd like to use to test rising/falling edge of a signal.
I think it should be synthesizable because std_logic_1164.rising_edge() uses
this attribute. I assume when I can use std_logic_1164.rising_edge() I can
use "last_value" also

Im not familiar with synthesis (now), I just want write a package which
items are synthesizable also. I prefer using attributes instead of using
functions from "std_logic_1164".

Thanks
Attila




"Jim Lewis" <jim@synthworks.com> wrote in message
news:12p2sqbr0l9na7f@corp.supernews.com...

Short answer:
No.

Long answer:
IEEE 1076.6-2004 is the current VHDL RTL synthesis standard.
Unfortunately many vendors have not implemented it yet.
Usually this is a function of their users asking them to.
So start asking.

'last_value is not supported in user code. However, it is
supported in the functions ieee.std_logic_1164.rising_edge
and ieee.std_logic_1164.falling_edge.

There may be vendors who do support it in user code,
however, that does not mean it will be portable between
vendors. In fact, historically speaking, Mentor's Autologic
synthesis tool either supported or required 'last_value.

WRT 1076.6, there is much work that could be done on attributes.
I think the best way to get this done is to express interest to
your vendors that this needs to be done and then form a working
group under DASC (www.dasc.org). I have some experience with
this and if there is interest, I could help out with the process
things.

What did you want to use 'last_value for?

Cheers,
Jim

P.S.
There is also 1076.6-1999 which many vendors have implemented -
primarily since the standard was written so that most vendors
would be compliant - it was intended to give model writers
a standard to which they could claim compliance.


Hi,

The last_value attribute is synthesizable?

Could you suggest a link about the synthesizable subset of vhdl?

Thanks
Attila

 

[Jim Lewis]

'event is synthesizable. 'last_value is not necessarily
portable in synthesis (if it is supported at all).
For edge detection of a clock for synthesis in user code
with an "if" statement, I recommend using either rising_edge
or if you must roll your own then: clk = '1' and clk'event.

'last_value allows one to be "for-sure for-sure", however,
for clocks this should not be necessary. Clocks are sacred
and if they go to 'X' after they start up, something is very
wrong and if this is a possibility, having one centralized
assertion to kill the simulation would be sufficient and
more efficient than having each register clock edge check and
see if it is a valid edge. For example:

Clk_watcher: process
begin
wait until is_x(Clk) ;
if now > CLK_START_UP_TIME then
report "clock is X" severity failure ;
end if ;
end process ;

Note, I would only do this if there was something in the clock
circuitry that gave it the possibility of going to X.

I'd like to use to test rising/falling edge of a signal.
I think it should be synthesizable because std_logic_1164.rising_edge() uses
this attribute. I assume when I can use std_logic_1164.rising_edge() I can
use "last_value" also

False assumption.
There is lots in the standard packages that is not synthesized,
but instead, simply known. Some of this is accomplished by
using vendor specific attributes.

Im not familiar with synthesis (now), I just want write a package which
items are synthesizable also. I prefer using attributes instead of using
functions from "std_logic_1164".
Start simple. There is no reason to write a package early on.

Learn the basics of synthesizable code first.

Cheers,
Jim

 

[Rob Dekker]

"Account1" <test@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7f9fd$4591bf23$5665c095$20717@news.chello.hu...

I'd like to use to test rising/falling edge of a signal.
I think it should be synthesizable because std_logic_1164.rising_edge() uses this attribute. I assume when I can use
std_logic_1164.rising_edge() I can use "last_value" also

There are at least a good number of synthesis (and other RTL) tools that will allow 'last_value in an event expression.
In an event expression, a 'last_value on the tested event signal IS synthesizable and will essentiall synthesize into an inverter.

So, if you write your own rising_edge/falling_edge functions (I would not know why you want to do that, but any way), then most
tools should be able to synthesize these from your code (without the need for a pragma or so).

Im not familiar with synthesis (now), I just want write a package which items are synthesizable also. I prefer using attributes
instead of using functions from "std_logic_1164".

If you prefer attributes, then do NOT write a package with functions.

Simply write the clk'event and clk='1' style expressions where you need them.

If you prefer functions, then use the 1164 functions.

Either way, there should not be a need to write your own edge-detection functions.

Rob

 

[Thomas Stanka]

Rob Dekker schrieb:

"Account1" <test@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7f9fd$4591bf23$5665c095$20717@news.chello.hu...
I'd like to use to test rising/falling edge of a signal.
I think it should be synthesizable because std_logic_1164.rising_edge() uses this attribute. I assume when I can use
std_logic_1164.rising_edge() I can use "last_value" also

There are at least a good number of synthesis (and other RTL) tools that will allow 'last_value in an event expression.
In an event expression, a 'last_value on the tested event signal IS synthesizable and will essentiall synthesize into an inverter.

Which is _not_ the logic I would expect in most case using
'last_value.

The OP likes to detect all edges on a signal. I guess he likes to have
synchronous detection of a edge on an asynchronous signal which won't
be easy synthesisable with the 'last_value.
Of course the synthesis tool could use a shift-latch which is opend at
each edge storing the last value of an asynchronous signal but this
would be error-prone due to race conditions.

BTW This task is easy done with shift register and an xor.

bye Thomas

 

[KJ]

"Account1" <test@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7f9fd$4591bf23$5665c095$20717@news.chello.hu...

I'd like to use to test rising/falling edge of a signal.
Test for what? It's going to be hard to beat "if rising_edge(signal)

then..." or "if falling_edge(signal) then..." for clarity of purpose so in
what way are you helping yourself with your own homegrown 'test'?

I think it should be synthesizable because std_logic_1164.rising_edge()
uses this attribute. I assume when I can use std_logic_1164.rising_edge()
I can use "last_value" also
As Mike pointed out in his original post, 'try it'

Im not familiar with synthesis (now), I just want write a package which
items are synthesizable also. I prefer using attributes instead of using
functions from "std_logic_1164".
Why? Is there some problem with using a tested an accepted standard

package?

KJ