Joule Thief inductor cores

Guest
What material is ideal for low-power Joule Thief inductor cores?

Ferrite, or powdered iron? Is an air gap desired, or not?

I saw an ad for a "high permeability" toroid but the material was not specified; besides, how high is high, anyway?

Thanks,

Michael
 
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:24:26 PM UTC-5, mrda...@gmail.com wrote:
What material is ideal for low-power Joule Thief inductor cores?

Ferrite, or powdered iron? Is an air gap desired, or not?

I saw an ad for a "high permeability" toroid but the material was not specified; besides, how high is high, anyway?

Thanks,

Michael

Knowing little about magnetic's, I'd say no gap.. its a transformer.
And the material choice depends on the frequency. Higher freq -> higher resistivity. (the higher resistivity ferrites also have lower permeability.)

In practice just grab what ever toroid is around.

George H.
 
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 3:07:59 PM UTC-8, George Herold wrote:
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:24:26 PM UTC-5, mrda...@gmail.com wrote:

What material is ideal for low-power Joule Thief inductor cores?



Ferrite, or powdered iron? Is an air gap desired, or not?



I saw an ad for a "high permeability" toroid but the material was not specified; besides, how high is high, anyway?



Thanks,



Michael



Knowing little about magnetic's, I'd say no gap.. its a transformer.

And the material choice depends on the frequency. Higher freq -> higher resistivity. (the higher resistivity ferrites also have lower permeability.)



In practice just grab what ever toroid is around.



George H.

Ok thanks!
 
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:16:27 PM UTC-8, Tim Wescott wrote:

....

In practice just grab what ever toroid is around.



Uhhh...



Without doing the analysis myself I can't say, but you want to check to

see how much flux is building up in the critter, and make your decisions

accordingly. I haven't memorized which switching topology wants what,

but some benefit from a gapped inductor, and some don't.



It depends on whether the energy is being stored in the core between half-

cycles (in which case you want a gap) or getting transferred to the load

at the same instant that it's going into the primary. The former stores

the energy in the flux, and benefits from a gapped core, because an air

gap can store way more energy than ferrite. The latter can have a plain

ol' ungapped core.



--



Tim Wescott

Wescott Design Services

http://www.wescottdesign.com

Ok thanks!

I tried building one a couple of years ago, and when it didn't work I thought it was because I had the wrong kind of core... (from a choke?)

Michael
 
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:07:59 -0800, George Herold wrote:

On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:24:26 PM UTC-5, mrda...@gmail.com wrote:
What material is ideal for low-power Joule Thief inductor cores?

Ferrite, or powdered iron? Is an air gap desired, or not?

I saw an ad for a "high permeability" toroid but the material was not
specified; besides, how high is high, anyway?

Thanks,

Michael

Knowing little about magnetic's, I'd say no gap.. its a transformer.
And the material choice depends on the frequency. Higher freq -> higher
resistivity. (the higher resistivity ferrites also have lower
permeability.)

In practice just grab what ever toroid is around.

Uhhh...

Without doing the analysis myself I can't say, but you want to check to
see how much flux is building up in the critter, and make your decisions
accordingly. I haven't memorized which switching topology wants what,
but some benefit from a gapped inductor, and some don't.

It depends on whether the energy is being stored in the core between half-
cycles (in which case you want a gap) or getting transferred to the load
at the same instant that it's going into the primary. The former stores
the energy in the flux, and benefits from a gapped core, because an air
gap can store way more energy than ferrite. The latter can have a plain
ol' ungapped core.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
 
"Tim Wescott" >
It depends on whether the energy is being stored in the core between half-
cycles

** Means stored for later release - and "later" = maybe 20uS later.

(in which case you want a gap) or getting transferred to the load
at the same instant that it's going into the primary. The former stores
the energy in the flux, and benefits from a gapped core, because an air
gap can store way more energy than ferrite.

** Air does not store magnetic energy, so the gap can be any non magnetic
material or even a vacuum.

Energy IS stored in the magnetic field, according to E = L/2 x I squared.

( Note the similarity with capacitors were E = C/2 x V squared )

Gapping the core reduces the L value but allows I to increase by a similar
amount - but since I is squared, energy goes up enormously.


.... Phil
 
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 8:16:27 PM UTC-5, Tim Wescott wrote:
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:07:59 -0800, George Herold wrote:



On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:24:26 PM UTC-5, mrda...@gmail.com wrote:

What material is ideal for low-power Joule Thief inductor cores?



Ferrite, or powdered iron? Is an air gap desired, or not?



I saw an ad for a "high permeability" toroid but the material was not

specified; besides, how high is high, anyway?



Thanks,



Michael

Knowing little about magnetic's, I'd say no gap.. its a transformer.
And the material choice depends on the frequency. Higher freq -> higher
resistivity. (the higher resistivity ferrites also have lower
permeability.)

In practice just grab what ever toroid is around.

Uhhh...


Without doing the analysis myself I can't say, but you want to check to
see how much flux is building up in the critter, and make your decisions
accordingly. I haven't memorized which switching topology wants what,
but some benefit from a gapped inductor, and some don't.

It depends on whether the energy is being stored in the core between half-
cycles (in which case you want a gap) or getting transferred to the load
at the same instant that it's going into the primary. The former stores
the energy in the flux, and benefits from a gapped core, because an air
gap can store way more energy than ferrite. The latter can have a plain
ol' ungapped core.

Oops, thanks for the correction Tim. I sometimes think I shold just keep my mouth shut. But I can also learn, if I say somethng stupid.

George H.
--



Tim Wescott

Wescott Design Services

http://www.wescottdesign.com
 
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:24:26 -0800 (PST), mrdarrett@gmail.com wrote:

What material is ideal for low-power Joule Thief inductor cores?

Ferrite, or powdered iron? Is an air gap desired, or not?

I saw an ad for a "high permeability" toroid but the material was not specified; besides, how high is high, anyway?

Thanks,

Michael

What "Joule Thief?" That circuit dates back to vacuum toobs and is
called a "blocking oscillator."

I would suspect it would be more efficient with a non gapped core, but
as you see from web examples, it isn't very finicky about the
inductor. As for core material, that is dependent on frequency of
operation. Up to about 20 KHZ laminated steel cores and powdered iron
above 20, above 50, and ferrites rule. (there will always be
exceptions to that general statement)

I've been using inductor cores salvaged from CFL's for boost
converters working at 100 KHZ...

Very old TV sets used blocking oscillators with laminated steel cores
to provide vertical deflection. If they lost their sync signal, they
kept oscillating - important to the CRT circuits because the phosphors
would burn if the electron beam stopped moving.
 
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9:29:56 AM UTC-8, Tim Wescott wrote:
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:29:26 -0800, mrdarrett wrote:



On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:16:27 PM UTC-8, Tim Wescott wrote:



...



In practice just grab what ever toroid is around.







Uhhh...







Without doing the analysis myself I can't say, but you want to check to



see how much flux is building up in the critter, and make your

decisions



accordingly. I haven't memorized which switching topology wants what,



but some benefit from a gapped inductor, and some don't.







It depends on whether the energy is being stored in the core between

half-



cycles (in which case you want a gap) or getting transferred to the

load



at the same instant that it's going into the primary. The former

stores



the energy in the flux, and benefits from a gapped core, because an air



gap can store way more energy than ferrite. The latter can have a

plain



ol' ungapped core.







--







Tim Wescott



Wescott Design Services



http://www.wescottdesign.com





Ok thanks!



I tried building one a couple of years ago, and when it didn't work I

thought it was because I had the wrong kind of core... (from a choke?)



The wrong kind of core would probably just make things inefficient; it'd

have to be really bad to make the thing refuse to work entirely.



I think the dotted end of the coil is wrong in the Wikipedia article. If

you put the dot next to the collector and next to the base, then you have

a Hartley oscillator that uses the stray capacitance of the transistor

and coil to establish "resonance" (in quotes because it's not _very_

resonant).



--



Tim Wescott

Wescott Design Services

http://www.wescottdesign.com

Oh neato! Thanks!

An autotransformer should work fine too, right?

The J110 jfet seems to be obsolete. I'm reading the specs on the J111 but am not sure what the continuous drain current is. Is it 20 mA (Idss)?

http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/J1/J111.pdf

Michael
 
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 1:44:18 PM UTC-8, petrus bitbyter wrote:

....

Some manufacturers consider de J110 obsolete. Some others still offer them.

The SMD variant seems to be widely available. Look at Mouser and RS for

instance.



petrus bitbyter

Thanks
 
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:29:26 -0800, mrdarrett wrote:

On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:16:27 PM UTC-8, Tim Wescott wrote:

...

In practice just grab what ever toroid is around.



Uhhh...



Without doing the analysis myself I can't say, but you want to check to

see how much flux is building up in the critter, and make your
decisions

accordingly. I haven't memorized which switching topology wants what,

but some benefit from a gapped inductor, and some don't.



It depends on whether the energy is being stored in the core between
half-

cycles (in which case you want a gap) or getting transferred to the
load

at the same instant that it's going into the primary. The former
stores

the energy in the flux, and benefits from a gapped core, because an air

gap can store way more energy than ferrite. The latter can have a
plain

ol' ungapped core.



--



Tim Wescott

Wescott Design Services

http://www.wescottdesign.com


Ok thanks!

I tried building one a couple of years ago, and when it didn't work I
thought it was because I had the wrong kind of core... (from a choke?)

The wrong kind of core would probably just make things inefficient; it'd
have to be really bad to make the thing refuse to work entirely.

I think the dotted end of the coil is wrong in the Wikipedia article. If
you put the dot next to the collector and next to the base, then you have
a Hartley oscillator that uses the stray capacitance of the transistor
and coil to establish "resonance" (in quotes because it's not _very_
resonant).

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
 
On 2014-02-05, Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> wrote:
The wrong kind of core would probably just make things inefficient; it'd
have to be really bad to make the thing refuse to work entirely.

I think the dotted end of the coil is wrong in the Wikipedia article. If
you put the dot next to the collector and next to the base, then you have
a Hartley oscillator that uses the stray capacitance of the transistor
and coil to establish "resonance" (in quotes because it's not _very_
resonant).

The joule thief is not resonant, it's a blocking oscilator. it starts
by VCC flowing throught the base winding into the base and blocks when
collector current stops increasing or the core saturates.

--
For a good time: install ntp

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
 
<mrdarrett@gmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:142a41cc-b02f-4677-9b3b-b3488216090e@googlegroups.com...
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9:29:56 AM UTC-8, Tim Wescott wrote:
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:29:26 -0800, mrdarrett wrote:



On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:16:27 PM UTC-8, Tim Wescott wrote:



...



In practice just grab what ever toroid is around.







Uhhh...







Without doing the analysis myself I can't say, but you want to check
to



see how much flux is building up in the critter, and make your

decisions



accordingly. I haven't memorized which switching topology wants what,



but some benefit from a gapped inductor, and some don't.







It depends on whether the energy is being stored in the core between

half-



cycles (in which case you want a gap) or getting transferred to the

load



at the same instant that it's going into the primary. The former

stores



the energy in the flux, and benefits from a gapped core, because an
air



gap can store way more energy than ferrite. The latter can have a

plain



ol' ungapped core.







--







Tim Wescott



Wescott Design Services



http://www.wescottdesign.com





Ok thanks!



I tried building one a couple of years ago, and when it didn't work I

thought it was because I had the wrong kind of core... (from a choke?)



The wrong kind of core would probably just make things inefficient; it'd

have to be really bad to make the thing refuse to work entirely.



I think the dotted end of the coil is wrong in the Wikipedia article. If

you put the dot next to the collector and next to the base, then you have

a Hartley oscillator that uses the stray capacitance of the transistor

and coil to establish "resonance" (in quotes because it's not _very_

resonant).



--



Tim Wescott

Wescott Design Services

http://www.wescottdesign.com


Oh neato! Thanks!

An autotransformer should work fine too, right?

The J110 jfet seems to be obsolete. I'm reading the specs on the J111 but
am not sure what the continuous drain current is. Is it 20 mA (Idss)?

http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/J1/J111.pdf

Michael

Some manufacturers consider de J110 obsolete. Some others still offer them.
The SMD variant seems to be widely available. Look at Mouser and RS for
instance.

petrus bitbyter
 
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:25:05 PM UTC-8, David Eather wrote:
....
Look for joule thief on this site



http://www.talkingelectronics.com/te_interactive_index.html



lot of information

Wow sure is, thanks!

It's a shame he only covered BJTs tho.
 
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:24:26 +1000, <mrdarrett@gmail.com> wrote:

What material is ideal for low-power Joule Thief inductor cores?

Ferrite, or powdered iron? Is an air gap desired, or not?

I saw an ad for a "high permeability" toroid but the material was not
specified; besides, how high is high, anyway?

Thanks,

Michael

Look for joule thief on this site

http://www.talkingelectronics.com/te_interactive_index.html

lot of information
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top