JFET mini-comparo--BFT862 not actually unique

P

Phil Hobbs

Guest
I promised a bit of low-noise JFET comparison data.
I looked at 4 BF862s from different reels, three ON Semi parts, the
CPH3910, NSVM2394, and NSVJ3557, and the Fairchild MMBFJ310.

I swapped them in the same QL01 photoreceiver prototype, and found that
all flavours of BF862 (from 4 reels) and two ON Semi parts, the CPH3910
and NSVJ2394 were indistinguishable (within a fraction of a dB out to 1
MHz), while the NSVJ3557 was about a decibel worse and the 310 a good 3
dB off the pace. The circuit is a fancy bootstrap (A_V = 0.9997 out to
1 MHz by actual measurement) with about 22 pF total capacitance on the
gate--11 pF FET C_iss and 11 pF from the photodiode. This makes the
FETs a bit musclebound for the application, because ideally its
capacitance and g_M both go like the area, and the noise voltage goes
like 1/sqrt(g_M). That pushes the optimum in the direction of a bit
more noise and a lot less capacitance.

I have some smaller JFETs on order: BF556A, BF545A, B, and C, so we'll
see when they get here.

However, for present purposes, it looks like we have a good second
source for BF862-compatible JFETs.

I'm not posting the pictures because they wouldn't mean much without the
schematic--there's a LP filter in the box and an external HP filter to
protect the spectrum analyzer input, so on 2 dB/division, the curves
look like inverted 'U's, with the e_N C noise fighting the filter rolloff.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
 
On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 10:34:44 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I promised a bit of low-noise JFET comparison data.
I looked at 4 BF862s from different reels, three ON Semi parts, the
CPH3910, NSVM2394, and NSVJ3557, and the Fairchild MMBFJ310.

I swapped them in the same QL01 photoreceiver prototype, and found that
all flavours of BF862 (from 4 reels) and two ON Semi parts, the CPH3910
and NSVJ2394 were indistinguishable (within a fraction of a dB out to 1
MHz), while the NSVJ3557 was about a decibel worse and the 310 a good 3
dB off the pace. The circuit is a fancy bootstrap (A_V = 0.9997 out to

Almost four 9's. That's impressive.

Thanks for the update.

George h.
1 MHz by actual measurement) with about 22 pF total capacitance on the
gate--11 pF FET C_iss and 11 pF from the photodiode. This makes the
FETs a bit musclebound for the application, because ideally its
capacitance and g_M both go like the area, and the noise voltage goes
like 1/sqrt(g_M). That pushes the optimum in the direction of a bit
more noise and a lot less capacitance.

I have some smaller JFETs on order: BF556A, BF545A, B, and C, so we'll
see when they get here.

However, for present purposes, it looks like we have a good second
source for BF862-compatible JFETs.

I'm not posting the pictures because they wouldn't mean much without the
schematic--there's a LP filter in the box and an external HP filter to
protect the spectrum analyzer input, so on 2 dB/division, the curves
look like inverted 'U's, with the e_N C noise fighting the filter rolloff.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top