Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which country/ies?did you know phil its illegal to tape a phone call with out the other
persons consent
no one wrote:
did you know phil its illegal to tape a phone call with out the other
persons consent
Which country/ies?
You can record it without consent, but you can't use the result in a court.australia, thats why they say : this call is being monitored
no one wrote:
did you know phil its illegal to tape a phone call with out the other
persons consent
Which country/ies?
You can record it without consent, but you can't use the result in a
court.
"Phil Allison"
"Clifford Heath"
You can record it without consent, but you can't use the result in a
court.
** Oh you certainly can.
The purpose of the exclusion in the various state acts for persons
recording their OWN conversations is so that if a dispute arises over
what was or was not said or agreed you have proof available to use in
court if necessary.
Also, in any situation where criminal threats are involved, such a
recording is just what the police need to be given to them to use as
proof.
The basic idea is that the right to privacy does not extend to cover
people telling lies or making threats.
That's interesting, so would you know if the situation someone else
mentioned about recording a conversation with police or any commisioned
official is the same?
"terryc"
no one wrote:
did you know phil its illegal to tape a phone call with out the other
persons consent
Which country/ies?
** It ain't always illegal in Australia or anywhere else I know of.
Each Australian state has it own laws regarding " listening devices " -
but all of them permit the situation where the person making the recording
is one of the principal parties to the conversation and the purpose is
only to protect the legitimate interests of the person.
.... Phil
That's interesting, so would you know if the situation someone else"Clifford Heath"
You can record it without consent, but you can't use the result in a
court.
** Oh you certainly can.
The purpose of the exclusion in the various state acts for persons
recording their OWN conversations is so that if a dispute arises over
what was or was not said or agreed you have proof available to use in
court if necessary.
Also, in any situation where criminal threats are involved, such a
recording is just what the police need to be given to them to use as
proof.
The basic idea is that the right to privacy does not extend to cover
people telling lies or making threats.
.... Phil
Though the more senior people appear to have a better grasp of the law"Geoff C"
"Phil Allison"
"Clifford Heath"
You can record it without consent, but you can't use the result in a
court.
** Oh you certainly can.
The purpose of the exclusion in the various state acts for persons
recording their OWN conversations is so that if a dispute arises over
what was or was not said or agreed you have proof available to use in
court if necessary.
Also, in any situation where criminal threats are involved, such a
recording is just what the police need to be given to them to use as
proof.
The basic idea is that the right to privacy does not extend to cover
people telling lies or making threats.
That's interesting, so would you know if the situation someone else
mentioned about recording a conversation with police or any commisioned
official is the same?
** Nothing to do with any state listening devices acts.
Filming or recording the police going about their work is considered to be
" interfering with police " - according to them. And they don't like it.
Arse covering.australia, thats why they say : this call is being monitored for training
purposes , if you do not wish this call to be monitored , let us know after
being on hold etc.....
Hahahah, he bluffed you well and truly. You can record anything thatalso the police will tell you that , , i got pulled over , and at the same
time the cop reached my car , he saw me with my fone and thought i was
going to record the incident, which he said was illegal with out my
consent..
Hahahah, he bluffed you well and truly. You can record anything that takes
place in a public place, cop or no cops.
It is what you do with it afterwards that is legally constrained.
Well, that's what the police may think. The legislation in NSW talks"terryc"
Hahahah, he bluffed you well and truly. You can record anything that takes
place in a public place, cop or no cops.
** Doing anything that " interferes" with the police going about their
business is illegal - in a public place or
otherwise. For example, witnesses to a crime or serious accident may become
very wary of speaking with police if some character is standing a few yards
away filming them. So that is " interfering ".
The issue is not whether it's private, but whether there is a reasonableAlso, many private conversations occur in public places - hence it is
illegal to record them if YOU are not one of the parties to that
conversation.
It began when businesses started complying with the new privacy act.no one wrote:
australia, thats why they say : this call is being monitored for
training purposes , if you do not wish this call to be monitored , let
us know after being on hold etc.....
Arse covering.
** Making them do that is most certainly " hindering police " .Hahahah, he bluffed you well and truly. You can record anything that
takes
place in a public place, cop or no cops.
** Doing anything that " interferes" with the police going about their
business is illegal - in a public place or
otherwise. For example, witnesses to a crime or serious accident may
become
very wary of speaking with police if some character is standing a few
yards
away filming them. So that is " interfering ".
If a witness doesn't want to be filmed, the police can always take them
somewhere else.
I doubt a court would uphold the view that it amounted to hindering.
** Pure sophistry - they are one and the same.Also, many private conversations occur in public places - hence it is
illegal to record them if YOU are not one of the parties to that
conversation.
The issue is not whether it's private, but whether there is a reasonable
expecation that it will not be overheard.
If someone's standing there with a camera and microphone, then there is
clearly no such reasonable expectation.
** Nonsense.It began when businesses started complying with the new privacy act.
** Oh what bullshit.A recorded conversation may contain private data, and the act requires
that the tell you about all private data the gather,
What about intent? Any concern about the lack of it?"Stupider than anyone Else on Earth"
Hahahah, he bluffed you well and truly. You can record anything that
takes
place in a public place, cop or no cops.
** Doing anything that " interferes" with the police going about their
business is illegal - in a public place or
otherwise. For example, witnesses to a crime or serious accident may
become
very wary of speaking with police if some character is standing a few
yards
away filming them. So that is " interfering ".
If a witness doesn't want to be filmed, the police can always take them
somewhere else.
** Making them do that is most certainly " hindering police " .
I doubt a court would uphold the view that it amounted to hindering.
** No doubt exists whatsoever that Sylvia is insane.
Also, many private conversations occur in public places - hence it is
illegal to record them if YOU are not one of the parties to that
conversation.
The issue is not whether it's private, but whether there is a reasonable
expecation that it will not be overheard.
** Pure sophistry - they are one and the same.
If someone's standing there with a camera and microphone, then there is
clearly no such reasonable expectation.
** The camera, when spotted, causes the conversation to stop - and that is
hindering police.
If someone's standing there, even with an unspotted camera, there is noIf not spotted, it is blatantly illegal to record the conversation.
They may take measures, but that doesn't make the conduct unlawful, norSo following the police around with a video camera equipped with a
microphone is highly illegal and they will take strong measures to stop you.
** The camera, when spotted, causes the conversation to stop - and that
is
hindering police.
If not spotted, it is blatantly illegal to record the conversation.
If someone's standing there, even with an unspotted camera,
So following the police around with a video camera equipped with a
microphone is highly illegal and they will take strong measures to stop
you.
They may take measures, but that doesn't make the conduct unlawful, nor
the police response lawful.
no one wrote:
australia, thats why they say : this call is being monitored for
training purposes , if you do not wish this call to be monitored , let us
know after being on hold etc.....
Arse covering.
also the police will tell you that , , i got pulled over , and at the
same time the cop reached my car , he saw me with my fone and thought i
was going to record the incident, which he said was illegal with out
my consent..
Hahahah, he bluffed you well and truly. You can record anything that takes
place in a public place, cop or no cops. It is what you do with it
afterwards that is legally constrained.
no one wrote:
australia, thats why they say : this call is being monitored for
training purposes , if you do not wish this call to be monitored , let us
know after being on hold etc.....
Arse covering.
also the police will tell you that , , i got pulled over , and at the
same time the cop reached my car , he saw me with my fone and thought i
was going to record the incident, which he said was illegal with out
my consent..
Hahahah, he bluffed you well and truly. You can record anything that takes
place in a public place, cop or no cops. It is what you do with it
afterwards that is legally constrained.