is there a UV mesurement schematic and url , please point th

[Mylinux]

TIA.

 

[will kemp]

In article <blq5fn$2ud6@imsp212.netvigator.com>, Mylinux wrote:

TIA.

two reasons why you've drastically reduced your chances of getting the
answer you want:

1) the entire message is in the Subject: line - that's guaranteed to piss
a lot of people off!

2) you've cross-posted (to a large number of unrelated newsgoups!) - and
that's guaranteed to piss of even more people!

probably not leaving many who could be bothered to reply!

--

 

[Wade Hassler]

will kemp <will@xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote in message news:<slrnbo1phb.2gt.will@chilli.swaggie.net>...

In article <blq5fn$2ud6@imsp212.netvigator.com>, Mylinux wrote:
TIA.

two reasons why you've drastically reduced your chances of getting the
answer you want:

1) the entire message is in the Subject: line - that's guaranteed to piss
a lot of people off!

2) you've cross-posted (to a large number of unrelated newsgoups!) - and
that's guaranteed to piss of even more people!

probably not leaving many who could be bothered to reply!

--

Even good-willed potential respondents will be hampered by the lack of
detail in your request.

 

[Fred Abse]

On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 06:21:53 +0800, Mylinux wrote:

From: "Mylinux" <myLinux@My.com
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200

There seems to be a slight discrepancy here

--
Then there's duct tape ...
(Garrison Keillor)
nofr@sbhevre.pbzchyvax.pb.hx

 

[Tauno Voipio]

"Wade Hassler" <wadeh@neti.saber.net> wrote in message
news:d44d2251.0310060750.7fdb214f@posting.google.com...

will kemp <will@xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote in message
news:<slrnbo1phb.2gt.will@chilli.swaggie.net>...
In article <blq5fn$2ud6@imsp212.netvigator.com>, Mylinux wrote:
TIA.

two reasons why you've drastically reduced your chances of getting the
answer you want:

1) the entire message is in the Subject: line - that's guaranteed to
piss
a lot of people off!

2) you've cross-posted (to a large number of unrelated newsgoups!) - and
that's guaranteed to piss of even more people!

probably not leaving many who could be bothered to reply!

--

Even good-willed potential respondents will be hampered by the lack of
detail in your request.

Homework / study project?

Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio @ iki fi

 

[Mylinux]

Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@iki.fi.SPAMBAIT_REMOVE.invalid> wrote in message
news:K3Agb.500$Tg4.355@read3.inet.fi...

"Wade Hassler" <wadeh@neti.saber.net> wrote in message
news:d44d2251.0310060750.7fdb214f@posting.google.com...
will kemp <will@xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote in message
news:<slrnbo1phb.2gt.will@chilli.swaggie.net>...
In article <blq5fn$2ud6@imsp212.netvigator.com>, Mylinux wrote:
TIA.

two reasons why you've drastically reduced your chances of getting the
answer you want:

1) the entire message is in the Subject: line - that's guaranteed to
piss
a lot of people off!

2) you've cross-posted (to a large number of unrelated newsgoups!) -
and
that's guaranteed to piss of even more people!

probably not leaving many who could be bothered to reply!

--

Even good-willed potential respondents will be hampered by the lack of
detail in your request.

Homework / study project?

no, hobby.

Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio @ iki fi