J
John Larkin
Guest
or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
John
bit of fluff?
John
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Happened a LONG time ago. Are you just noticing ?or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
John
With the exception of "Pease Porridge", yes.or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
John
And even his column is pretty sad. When's the last time Pease hasOn Thu, 01 Apr 2004 12:24:59 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
John
With the exception of "Pease Porridge", yes.
But Bob ran dry years ago. Now he mostly talks blather or publishes aOn Thu, 01 Apr 2004 12:24:59 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
John
With the exception of "Pease Porridge", yes.
Well, I just like the guy. The problem is, National has wrung him outOn Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:48:43 GMT, Bob Stephens
stephensyomamadigital@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 12:24:59 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
John
With the exception of "Pease Porridge", yes.
But Bob ran dry years ago. Now he mostly talks blather or publishes a
lot of hero-worshiping letters from readers, and occasionally says
"RIGHT ON! - rap"
It must be a pain coming up with something every month. The editorials
are equally bad, except they're written by journalism majors.
John
Don't do yourself down John, you're not totally useless.or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
Jim, you shouldn't expect meat in porridge ;-)On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:48:43 GMT, Bob Stephens
stephensyomamadigital@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 12:24:59 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
John
With the exception of "Pease Porridge", yes.
And even his column is pretty sad. When's the last time Pease has
written a column with real technical "meat" in it?
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:
or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
Don't do yourself down John, you're not totally useless.
Tim
Maybe it comes from paying peanuts and issuing bad checks, and notDesign Briefs or Ideas (whatever they call it) is the best part but getting
skimpy there as well. First thing I look at but sadly sometimes the only thing.
Tony
Whew, that's pretty strong, what's the story?Maybe it comes from paying peanuts and issuing bad checks,
and not replacing them?
Well the one I attended in Los Angeles was *LAME* . I've seen a couple ofHey, I liked that show.
I attended one here in Phoenix. Very low on Pease-comedic content,On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 03:25:46 GMT, PaulCsouls wrote:
Hey, I liked that show.
Well the one I attended in Los Angeles was *LAME* . I've seen a couple of
webcast ones that were much more like what I expected from the pre show
hype.
Bob
BANG.On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:12:36 +0100, Tim Auton
tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:
or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
Don't do yourself down John, you're not totally useless.
Tim
Well, I may be a bit of pretty fluff, but at least I don't say
fatheaded bilge like
JOHN LARKIN
The Authority on Emerging Technologies for Design Solutions
If I ever do, please shoot me.
John
Missed. Try again Monday."John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote in
message news:81qp605gmrvr1hk1lehc35a4c2he7cbbd1@4ax.com...
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:12:36 +0100, Tim Auton
tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:
or has Electronic Design magazine gradually degraded into a useless
bit of fluff?
Don't do yourself down John, you're not totally useless.
Tim
Well, I may be a bit of pretty fluff, but at least I don't say
fatheaded bilge like
JOHN LARKIN
The Authority on Emerging Technologies for Design Solutions
If I ever do, please shoot me.
John
BANG.
Charles
From a TV cartoon seen as a kid, two hombres standingBANG.
Missed. Try again Monday.
Lessee, I did a IFD, Penton (whichever magazine that is, I always getSpehro Pefhany wrote...
Maybe it comes from paying peanuts and issuing bad checks,
and not replacing them?
Whew, that's pretty strong, what's the story?
Or movie, "The Quick and the Dead"?BANG.
Missed. Try again Monday.
From a TV cartoon seen as a kid, two hombres standing
face-to-face, "I rarely miss at this range."
BHAM, smoke obscures the scene, clears to find the two
hombres still standing face-to-face, "You missed."
Thanks,
- Win
whill_at_picovolt-dot-com
I totally agree. There is nothing more boring than listening to aOn Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:10:38 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:
very long on blatant sales pitches.
That's what I expect. The technical low down on their new parts and
some application examples. I need that information to get an idea on
what's 'out there' when I'm thinking about a design. I sat through an
Analog Devices shpeel at the ESC and it looked like one of those
commercials on PBS. Who do they think goes to these things investors?