T
Tricky
Guest
Is there a way of expressing integer literals in anything other than
decimal, without doing overly complicated type conversions?
decimal, without doing overly complicated type conversions?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
K
KJ
Guest
On Mar 28, 11:42 am, Tricky <Trickyh...@gmail.com> wrote:
16#10#
2#10000#
The number before the first # is the radix that you're using, the
numbers between the two ## is the number you're trying to represent.
KJ
Here are a few ways to express the number 16Is there a way of expressing integer literals in anything other than
decimal, without doing overly complicated type conversions?
16#10#
2#10000#
The number before the first # is the radix that you're using, the
numbers between the two ## is the number you're trying to represent.
KJ
A
Andy
Guest
On Mar 28, 11:02 am, KJ <kkjenni...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
decimal. It would be rather confusing (but simple to write!) to have
the radix expressed in the same base as the number (always "10")
Andy
Andy
KJ is correct. I might add that the radix is always expressed inOn Mar 28, 11:42 am, Tricky <Trickyh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there a way of expressing integer literals in anything other than
decimal, without doing overly complicated type conversions?
Here are a few ways to express the number 16
16#10#
2#10000#
The number before the first # is the radix that you're using, the
numbers between the two ## is the number you're trying to represent.
KJ
decimal. It would be rather confusing (but simple to write!) to have
the radix expressed in the same base as the number (always "10")
Andy
Andy
M
Mark McDougall
Guest
Andy wrote:
Regards,
--
Mark McDougall, Engineer
Virtual Logic Pty Ltd, <http://www.vl.com.au>
21-25 King St, Rockdale, 2216
Ph: +612-9599-3255 Fax: +612-9599-3266
Not to mention impossible to implement... think about it...It would be rather confusing (but simple to write!) to have
the radix expressed in the same base as the number (always "10")
Regards,
--
Mark McDougall, Engineer
Virtual Logic Pty Ltd, <http://www.vl.com.au>
21-25 King St, Rockdale, 2216
Ph: +612-9599-3255 Fax: +612-9599-3266
A
Andy
Guest
On Mar 31, 6:37 pm, Mark McDougall <ma...@vl.com.au> wrote:
Not all things simple to write are easy (or even possible) to
implement.
Andy
That's what I meant by '(always "10")'Andy wrote:
It would be rather confusing (but simple to write!) to have
the radix expressed in the same base as the number (always "10")
Not to mention impossible to implement... think about it...
Regards,
--
Mark McDougall, Engineer
Virtual Logic Pty Ltd, <http://www.vl.com.au
21-25 King St, Rockdale, 2216
Ph: +612-9599-3255 Fax: +612-9599-3266
Not all things simple to write are easy (or even possible) to
implement.
Andy