I am liked or wanted?

Pulse-Amplitude-Modulatio · Mar 17, 2004

I am a PAM [Pulse Amplitude Modulation] audio magnetic device. PAM is the
digital equivalent of AM.

My Bit-Resolution: unlimited
My Bandwidth: unlimited
My Sample Rate: unlimited
My Headroom: unlimited
My SNR: unlimited
My Dynamic Range: unlimited
My Frequency Response: 1 KHz and higher
My Advantages: Can handle unlimited amount of decibels without
clipping. Can handle high-frequencies [1 KHz and above]. No noise. No
'stammering'. Can amplify an infititely soft signal and make it
infinitely loud.
My Disadvangtages: I am sensitive to the slightest amount of magnetic
interference. An immeasureably weak magnetic disruption occuring from
an immeasreably large distance away can gravely affect me. Magnetic
disturbances at all frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum (from
the lowest physically possible to the highest physically possible)
will do this. If the intereference tone is between 1,000 Hz and 40,000
Hz, I leave it alone. If X (the interfering signal's pitch, that is)
is less than 1,000 Hz, I change it to 1,000 Hz + X Hz. If X is more
than 40,000 Hz, I change it to 40,000 Hz - X Hz.

Please note I only do the X thing with the interfering signals. I
don't do this with the "wanted" signal. I playback "wanted" signals at
1,000 Hz or higher. The "unwanted" or interference is what I "alias"
between 1,000 Hz and 40,000 Hz.

Jerry Avins · Mar 17, 2004

Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Audio Device wrote:

audio magnetic device.

Liar!

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Brad Clarke · Mar 17, 2004

On 16 Mar 2004 18:21:12 -0800, digitalaudiodevice@yahoo.com
(Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Audio Device) wrote:

audio magnetic device. PAM is the
digital equivalent of AM.
Oh look, creativemusicsynth220lover, AKA Radium is back.

Ken Taylor · Mar 17, 2004

"Brad Clarke" <screwthespammers@spam.com> wrote in message
news:54gf50h9nhf9fsi71kpd88oo4dpqbhs91d@4ax.com...

On 16 Mar 2004 18:21:12 -0800, digitalaudiodevice@yahoo.com
(Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Audio Device) wrote:

I am a PAM [Pulse Amplitude Modulation] audio magnetic device. PAM is
the
digital equivalent of AM.
Oh look, creativemusicsynth220lover, AKA Radium is back.

Grade School holidays again???

John Larkin · Mar 17, 2004

What the hell are you talking about?

John

Jim Thompson · Mar 17, 2004

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:46:53 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

What the hell are you talking about?

John

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Pulse-Amplitude-Modulatio · Mar 17, 2004

If X (the interfering signal's pitch, that is)
is less than 1,000 Hz, I change it to 1,000 Hz + X Hz. If X is more
than 40,000 Hz, I change it to 40,000 Hz - X Hz.

C-O-R-R-E-C-T-I-O-N

If the interfering signal is X less than 1,000 Hz, I make it X more than 1,000 Hz.

If the interfering signal is X more than 40,000 Hz, I make it X less than 40,000 Hz.

Matt North · Mar 17, 2004

I dislike you!!

Bob Myers · Mar 18, 2004

"Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Audio Device" <digitalaudiodevice@yahoo.com>
wrote in message news:27a58627.0403161821.54dd9324@posting.google.com...

audio magnetic device. PAM is the
digital equivalent of AM.

My Bit-Resolution: unlimited
My Bandwidth: unlimited
My Sample Rate: unlimited
My Headroom: unlimited
My SNR: unlimited
My Dynamic Range: unlimited

Nonsense, each and every one. For further
details, please devote a few hours' time to a thorough
study of the Gospel According to St. Shannon.

Bob M.

My Frequency Response: 1 KHz and higher
My Advantages: Can handle unlimited amount of decibels without
clipping. Can handle high-frequencies [1 KHz and above]. No noise. No
'stammering'. Can amplify an infititely soft signal and make it
infinitely loud.
My Disadvangtages: I am sensitive to the slightest amount of magnetic
interference. An immeasureably weak magnetic disruption occuring from
an immeasreably large distance away can gravely affect me. Magnetic
disturbances at all frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum (from
the lowest physically possible to the highest physically possible)
will do this. If the intereference tone is between 1,000 Hz and 40,000
Hz, I leave it alone. If X (the interfering signal's pitch, that is)
is less than 1,000 Hz, I change it to 1,000 Hz + X Hz. If X is more
than 40,000 Hz, I change it to 40,000 Hz - X Hz.

Please note I only do the X thing with the interfering signals. I
don't do this with the "wanted" signal. I playback "wanted" signals at
1,000 Hz or higher. The "unwanted" or interference is what I "alias"
between 1,000 Hz and 40,000 Hz.

Doug · Mar 18, 2004

You are Professor Xavier and you are very much disliked because you are
weird and different.

"Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Audio Device" <digitalaudiodevice@yahoo.com>
wrote in message news:27a58627.0403161821.54dd9324@posting.google.com...

audio magnetic device. PAM is the
digital equivalent of AM.

My Bit-Resolution: unlimited
My Bandwidth: unlimited
My Sample Rate: unlimited
My Headroom: unlimited
My SNR: unlimited
My Dynamic Range: unlimited
My Frequency Response: 1 KHz and higher
My Advantages: Can handle unlimited amount of decibels without
clipping. Can handle high-frequencies [1 KHz and above]. No noise. No
'stammering'. Can amplify an infititely soft signal and make it
infinitely loud.
My Disadvangtages: I am sensitive to the slightest amount of magnetic
interference. An immeasureably weak magnetic disruption occuring from
an immeasreably large distance away can gravely affect me. Magnetic
disturbances at all frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum (from
the lowest physically possible to the highest physically possible)
will do this. If the intereference tone is between 1,000 Hz and 40,000
Hz, I leave it alone. If X (the interfering signal's pitch, that is)
is less than 1,000 Hz, I change it to 1,000 Hz + X Hz. If X is more
than 40,000 Hz, I change it to 40,000 Hz - X Hz.

Please note I only do the X thing with the interfering signals. I
don't do this with the "wanted" signal. I playback "wanted" signals at
1,000 Hz or higher. The "unwanted" or interference is what I "alias"
between 1,000 Hz and 40,000 Hz.

Richard Crowley · Mar 18, 2004

No and No.
Plonk

Ken Smith · Mar 18, 2004

In article <72b6c.1463$0h.1197@okepread04>, Doug <dseaman8@cox.net> wrote:
[....]

My Disadvangtages: I am sensitive to the slightest amount of magnetic
interference. An immeasureably weak magnetic disruption occuring from
an immeasreably large distance away can gravely affect me. Magnetic
disturbances at all frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum (from
the lowest physically possible to the highest physically possible)
will do this.
I finally read this bit.

Imagine some very weak magnetic disruption at some fixed distance. This
device is effected by it so it could be used to make at least a 1 bit
measurement of said disruption. This leads to 2 conclusions. (1) There is
no magnetic disruption that is too small to measure, including zero. (2)
This device will be constantly effected by all those zero amplitude
magnetic disruptions and will thus output nothing but noise.

While I'm typing this, I'm looking at my prototype of my very low noise,
low voltage, voltage reference. It produces zero volts with less than 1uV
of offset and 0.1nV/sqrt(Hz) of noise.
--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

N. Thornton · Mar 19, 2004

digitalaudiodevice@yahoo.com (Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Audio Device) wrote in message news:<27a58627.0403161821.54dd9324@posting.google.com>...

audio magnetic device. PAM is the
digital equivalent of AM.

My Bit-Resolution: unlimited
My Bandwidth: unlimited
My Sample Rate: unlimited
My Headroom: unlimited
My SNR: unlimited
My Dynamic Range: unlimited
My Frequency Response: 1 KHz and higher
My Advantages: Can handle unlimited amount of decibels without
clipping. Can handle high-frequencies [1 KHz and above]. No noise. No
'stammering'. Can amplify an infititely soft signal and make it
infinitely loud.
My Disadvangtages: I am sensitive to the slightest amount of magnetic
interference. An immeasureably weak magnetic disruption occuring from
an immeasreably large distance away can gravely affect me. Magnetic
disturbances at all frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum (from
the lowest physically possible to the highest physically possible)
will do this. If the intereference tone is between 1,000 Hz and 40,000
Hz, I leave it alone. If X (the interfering signal's pitch, that is)
is less than 1,000 Hz, I change it to 1,000 Hz + X Hz. If X is more
than 40,000 Hz, I change it to 40,000 Hz - X Hz.

Please note I only do the X thing with the interfering signals. I
don't do this with the "wanted" signal. I playback "wanted" signals at
1,000 Hz or higher. The "unwanted" or interference is what I "alias"
between 1,000 Hz and 40,000 Hz.

Your magnetic properties are a bit of a problem then. An idea is only
as good as its weakest point. The junk that winds up in the signal due
to magnetic noise pickup can be regarded as noise. In other words a
device as you describe does not have no noise.

Have you built one or is this just a thought?

Regards, NT

Richard Henry · Mar 19, 2004

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@violet.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:c3cm6t$6qr$1@blue.rahul.net...

While I'm typing this, I'm looking at my prototype of my very low noise,
low voltage, voltage reference. It produces zero volts with less than 1uV
of offset and 0.1nV/sqrt(Hz) of noise.

Interesting. How did you measure that?

John Woodgate · Mar 19, 2004

I read in sci.electronics.design that Richard Henry <rphenry@home.com>
wrote (in <HAl6c.16672$uh.3424@fed1read02&gt

about 'I am liked or
wanted?', on Thu, 18 Mar 2004:

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@violet.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:c3cm6t$6qr$1@blue.rahul.net...

While I'm typing this, I'm looking at my prototype of my very low noise,
low voltage, voltage reference. It produces zero volts with less than 1uV
of offset and 0.1nV/sqrt(Hz) of noise.

Interesting. How did you measure that?

With an unobtanium-leaf electroscope, of course. How else?

--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

Dennis · Mar 19, 2004

In article <27a58627.0403161821.54dd9324@posting.google.com>,
digitalaudiodevice@yahoo.com says...

I am a PAM [Pulse Amplitude Modulation] audio magnetic device. PAM is the
digital equivalent of AM.

My Bit-Resolution: unlimited
My Bandwidth: unlimited
My Sample Rate: unlimited
My Headroom: unlimited
My SNR: unlimited
My Dynamic Range: unlimited
My Frequency Response: 1 KHz and higher
My Advantages: Can handle unlimited amount of decibels without
clipping. Can handle high-frequencies [1 KHz and above]. No noise. No
'stammering'. Can amplify an infititely soft signal and make it
infinitely loud.
My Disadvangtages: I am sensitive to the slightest amount of magnetic
interference. An immeasureably weak magnetic disruption occuring from
an immeasreably large distance away can gravely affect me. Magnetic
disturbances at all frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum (from
the lowest physically possible to the highest physically possible)
will do this. If the intereference tone is between 1,000 Hz and 40,000
Hz, I leave it alone. If X (the interfering signal's pitch, that is)
is less than 1,000 Hz, I change it to 1,000 Hz + X Hz. If X is more
than 40,000 Hz, I change it to 40,000 Hz - X Hz.

Please note I only do the X thing with the interfering signals. I
don't do this with the "wanted" signal. I playback "wanted" signals at
1,000 Hz or higher. The "unwanted" or interference is what I "alias"
between 1,000 Hz and 40,000 Hz.

Oh, you're so terribly clever! We are so
impressed! You get a big gold star.

John Woodgate · Mar 19, 2004

I read in sci.electronics.design that N. Thornton <bigcat@meeow.co.uk>
wrote (in <a7076635.0403181002.3beb6bec@posting.google.com&gt

about 'I am
liked or wanted?', on Thu, 18 Mar 2004:

Have you built one or is this just a thought?

There is no evidence of any thought at all.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

YD · Mar 19, 2004

On 16 Mar 2004 18:21:12 -0800, digitalaudiodevice@yahoo.com
(Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Audio Device) wrote:

audio magnetic device. PAM is the
digital equivalent of AM.

My Bit-Resolution: unlimited
My Bandwidth: unlimited
My Sample Rate: unlimited
My Headroom: unlimited
My SNR: unlimited
My Dynamic Range: unlimited
My Frequency Response: 1 KHz and higher

What, no groovy bass tracks? Snip the rest, it's useless.

- YD.

--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.

N. Thornton · Mar 20, 2004

John Woodgate <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message news:<fdFChCHZpeWAFwIG@jmwa.demon.co.uk>...

I read in sci.electronics.design that N. Thornton <bigcat@meeow.co.uk
wrote (in <a7076635.0403181002.3beb6bec@posting.google.com&gt about 'I am
liked or wanted?', on Thu, 18 Mar 2004:

Have you built one or is this just a thought?

There is no evidence of any thought at all.

That does seem a little harsh. Seems to me the OP has put some thought
in, come up with some ideas, and missed a point or two, as one would
expect. It does take time to come up with stuff that covers every
little thing. This is the normal learning method.

OP, Tell us more about it.

Regards, NT

John Woodgate · Mar 20, 2004

I read in sci.electronics.design that N. Thornton <bigcat@meeow.co.uk>
wrote (in <a7076635.0403200702.23fe0ca@posting.google.com&gt

about 'I am
liked or wanted?', on Sat, 20 Mar 2004:

John Woodgate <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message news:<fdFChCHZpeW
AFwIG@jmwa.demon.co.uk>...
I read in sci.electronics.design that N. Thornton <bigcat@meeow.co.uk
wrote (in <a7076635.0403181002.3beb6bec@posting.google.com&gt about 'I am
liked or wanted?', on Thu, 18 Mar 2004:

Have you built one or is this just a thought?

There is no evidence of any thought at all.

That does seem a little harsh. Seems to me the OP has put some thought
in, come up with some ideas, and missed a point or two, as one would
expect. It does take time to come up with stuff that covers every
little thing. This is the normal learning method.

OP, Tell us more about it.

THIS:

My Bit-Resolution: unlimited

My Bandwidth: unlimited
My Sample Rate: unlimited
My Headroom: unlimited
My SNR: unlimited
My Dynamic Range: unlimited
My Frequency Response: 1 KHz and higher
My Advantages: Can handle unlimited amount of decibels without
clipping. Can handle high-frequencies [1 KHz and above]. No noise. No
'stammering'. Can amplify an infititely soft signal and make it
infinitely loud.

....shows signs of THOUGHT? You are very merciful!
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

I am liked or wanted?

Pulse-Amplitude-Modulatio

Guest

Jerry Avins

Guest

Brad Clarke

Guest

Ken Taylor

Guest

John Larkin

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Pulse-Amplitude-Modulatio

Guest

Matt North

Guest

Bob Myers

Guest

Doug

Guest

Richard Crowley

Guest

Ken Smith

Guest

N. Thornton

Guest

Richard Henry

Guest

John Woodgate

Guest

Dennis

Guest

John Woodgate

Guest

YD

Guest

N. Thornton

Guest

John Woodgate

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor