http://groups.google.nl/groups?hl=nl&lr=&threadm=2shjv0lnb67

P

Peter, PE1ECM

Guest
Thanks for response.

Basically you're right.
However, my problem is that, even when I average the TI mode ( x 100 ,
x 1k , x 10 k etc ) the stability resolution ( though considerably
improving compared to single shot )lags remarkably behind the
Frequency and Period Modes ( which modes, as said, perform outstanding
with better than e-11 ).

E.g. : while averaging a 100 Khz signal ( e-11 locked to frequency
standard ) in the TI mode 10k ( = gate time = 4 sec ) the observed
5370A jitter is +/- 160 pS, which is not really too bad but for one
reason or another this is far worse than a 1 Sec gated Period
measurement ( differs > 4 magnitudes but, since the absolute 5370A
jitter is > 20 pS, this magnitude comparison doesn't make sense ).

BTW : Measuring 10 Mhz and above, the 5370A jitters only ( even in
single shot mode ) only 20-40 pS which is perfectly within the specs.

So, I still wonder what makes the TI measurement mode differently from
the Period measurent mode ?
I was so naive to presume that both ( TI and PERIOD modes ) were
counting during gate open time in the same way, only from/to different
point on the waveform.

Is my guess correct that the ( 5370A ) TI and Periode counting systems
are NOT based on the very same mechanism ?

Thanks for any further comments.

Peter van Daalen.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top