How to get protected against X-ray emitted from the Sun ?...

[a a]

file:///C:/Users/a/Downloads/Solar%20X-Ray%20Imager.html


Solar Flare Classifications

Ranking of a solar flare is based on its x-ray output. Flares are classified according to the order of magnitude of the peak burst intensity (I) measured at the earth in the 0.1 to 0.8 nm wavelength band as follows:
Peak, 0.1 to 0.8 nm band
Class (Watts/square metre)
B I < 10-6
C 10-6 I < 10-5
M 10-5 I < 10-4
X I 10-4
A multiplier is used to indicate the level within each class. For example:

M6 = 6 X 10-5 Watts/square metre

Back to www.spaceweather.com


https://www.spaceweather.com/flareexpl.html


WSA-ENLIL Solar Wind Prediction

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/wsa-enlil-solar-wind-prediction#


https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a010000/a010800/a010833/10109-X-Class-540-MASTER_high.mp4

 

[Martin Brown]

On 06/09/2022 01:58, Fred Bloggs wrote:

On Sunday, September 4, 2022 at 7:59:04 PM UTC-4, a a wrote:
file:///C:/Users/a/Downloads/Solar%20X-Ray%20Imager.html


Solar Flare Classifications

Ranking of a solar flare is based on its x-ray output. Flares are classified according to the order of magnitude of the peak burst intensity (I) measured at the earth in the 0.1 to 0.8 nm wavelength band as follows:
Peak, 0.1 to 0.8 nm band
Class (Watts/square metre)
B I < 10-6
C 10-6 I < 10-5
M 10-5 I < 10-4
X I 10-4
A multiplier is used to indicate the level within each class. For example:

M6 = 6 X 10-5 Watts/square metre

Back to www.spaceweather.com


https://www.spaceweather.com/flareexpl.html


WSA-ENLIL Solar Wind Prediction

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/wsa-enlil-solar-wind-prediction#


https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a010000/a010800/a010833/10109-X-Class-540-MASTER_high.mp4


https://www.nelcoworldwide.com/medical-shielding-products/lead-products/

The OP should bury himself 2m underground in a 1cm thick lead casket.

That ought to work.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

 

[whit3rd]

On Sunday, September 4, 2022 at 4:59:04 PM UTC-7, a a wrote:

Solar Flare Classifications

Ranking of a solar flare is based on its x-ray output. Flares are classified according to the order of magnitude of the peak burst intensity (I) measured at the earth in the 0.1 to 0.8 nm wavelength band as follows:
Peak, 0.1 to 0.8 nm band
Class (Watts/square metre)
B I < 10-6
C 10-6 I < 10-5
M 10-5 I < 10-4
X I 10-4
A multiplier is used to indicate the level within each class.

So, this is about microwatts to a milliwatt of soft X-rays (right about
the vacuum ultraviolet range). I\'d recommend fourteen or fifteen
pounds per square inch of gaseous material (it auto-fills any cracks).

My planet has this coverage, we call it \'atmosphere\'.

 

[server]

On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 22:39:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sunday, September 4, 2022 at 4:59:04 PM UTC-7, a a wrote:

Solar Flare Classifications

Ranking of a solar flare is based on its x-ray output. Flares are classified according to the order of magnitude of the peak burst intensity (I) measured at the earth in the 0.1 to 0.8 nm wavelength band as follows:
Peak, 0.1 to 0.8 nm band
Class (Watts/square metre)
B I < 10-6
C 10-6 I < 10-5
M 10-5 I < 10-4
X I 10-4
A multiplier is used to indicate the level within each class.

So, this is about microwatts to a milliwatt of soft X-rays (right about
the vacuum ultraviolet range). I\'d recommend fourteen or fifteen
pounds per square inch of gaseous material (it auto-fills any cracks).

My planet has this coverage, we call it \'atmosphere\'.

Hiding under the bed adds another 6 dB of soft x-ray shielding.

 

[a a]

On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 07:39:10 UTC+2, whit3rd wrote:

On Sunday, September 4, 2022 at 4:59:04 PM UTC-7, a a wrote:

Solar Flare Classifications

Ranking of a solar flare is based on its x-ray output. Flares are classified according to the order of magnitude of the peak burst intensity (I) measured at the earth in the 0.1 to 0.8 nm wavelength band as follows:
Peak, 0.1 to 0.8 nm band
Class (Watts/square metre)
B I < 10-6
C 10-6 I < 10-5
M 10-5 I < 10-4
X I 10-4
A multiplier is used to indicate the level within each class.
So, this is about microwatts to a milliwatt of soft X-rays (right about
the vacuum ultraviolet range). I\'d recommend fourteen or fifteen
pounds per square inch of gaseous material (it auto-fills any cracks).

My planet has this coverage, we call it \'atmosphere\'.
you are stupid dog

X-ray test means 0.1-0.5s X-ray radiation exposure

in case of coronary mass ejections from the Sun, exposure time can be extended from minutes to hours ( X class CMEs)

So what is mW/s for 1 second exposure gets 3600mW/h for one hour exposure

If you work outdoor, you are exposed to 3.6W X-ray exposure few times in a month
or 20+ times in one year or 20 x 60 times during your life span of 60 years

3.6W x 1200 = 4.32 kW

watch space weather model

https://spaceweather.com/images2022/06sep22/nasamodel.gif

and read about cracks in the magnetosphere

Cracks in Earth\'s Magnetic Shield


Go to Science@NASA home page


Immense cracks in our planet\'s magnetic field can remain open for hours, allowing the solar wind to gush through and power stormy space weather.

https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/03dec_magneticcracks



https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a010000/a010800/a010833/10109-X-Class-540-MASTER_high.mp4


millisievert – microsievert – units of equivalent dose

sievert - radiationIn radiation protection, a sievert is a derived unit of equivalent and effective dose. The sievert represents the equivalent biological effect of depositing a joule of gamma rays energy in a kilogram of human tissue. Unit of sievert is important in radiation protection and was named after the Swedish scientist Rolf Sievert, who did a lot of the early work on dosimetry in radiation therapy.

As was written, the sievert is used for radiation dose quantities such as equivalent dose and effective dose. Equivalent dose (symbol HT) is a dose quantity calculated for individual organs (index T – tissue). The equivalent dose is based on the absorbed dose to an organ, adjusted to account for the effectiveness of the type of radiation. An equivalent dose is given the symbol HT. The SI unit of HT is the sievert (Sv) or but rem (roentgen equivalent man) is still commonly used (1 Sv = 100 rem).

One sievert is a large amount of equivalent dose. A person who has absorbed a whole body dose of 1 Sv has absorbed one joule of energy in each kg of body tissue (in case of gamma rays).

==so for few mW/m2 x 3600 seconds ( cross section of the human\'s body has surface area less than 1m2, 0.5m2 should fit)

1.8J energy received / mass of the body
let\'s assume 60kg

1.8J/60 = 0.03J/kg

One sievert is a large amount of equivalent dose. A person who has absorbed a whole body dose of 1 Sv has absorbed one joule of energy in each kg of body tissue (in case of gamma rays).

Equivalent doses measured in industry and medicine often have usually lower doses than one sievert, and the following multiples are often used:

1 mSv (millisievert) = 1E-3 Sv

1 µSv (microsievert) = 1E-6 Sv

Conversions from the SI units to other units are as follows:

1 Sv = 100 rem
1 mSv = 100 mrem

Examples of Doses in millisieverts

We must note that radiation is all around us. In, around, and above the world we live in. It is a natural energy force that surrounds us, and it is a part of our natural world that has been here since the birth of our planet. In the following points, we try to express enormous ranges of radiation exposure, which can be obtained from various sources.

0.00005 mSv – Sleeping next to someone
0.00009 mSv – Living within 30 miles of a nuclear power plant for a year
0.0001 mSv – Eating one banana
0.0003 mSv – Living within 50 miles of a coal power plant for a year
0.01 mSv – Average daily dose received from natural background
0.02 mSv – Chest X-ray
0.04 mSv – A 5-hour airplane flight
0.60 mSv – mammogram
1 mSv – Dose limit for individual members of the public, total effective dose per annum
3.65 mSv – Average yearly dose received from natural background
5.8 mSv – Chest CT scan
10 mSv – Average yearly dose received from a natural background in Ramsar, Iran
20 mSv – single full-body CT scan
175 mSv – Annual dose from natural radiation on a monazite beach near Guarapari, Brazil.
5 000 mSv – Dose that kills a human with a 50% risk within 30 days (LD50/30) if the dose is received over a very short duration.


----
1.8J/60 = 0.03J/kg = 0.03 Sievert to be adjusted to absortion dose by human\'s organ



Equivalent dose (symbol HT) is a dose quantity calculated for individual organs (index T – tissue). The equivalent dose is based on the absorbed dose to an organ, adjusted to account for the effectiveness of the type of radiation. An equivalent dose is given the symbol HT. The SI unit of HT is the sievert (Sv) or but rem (roentgen equivalent man) is still commonly used (1 Sv = 100 rem).

==
0.03 Sievert = 30mSv

watch table above

---
What matters in operation research and hedging is
Worst-Case-First
so few of us, working in outdoor at the time Coronary Mass Ejections directed to the Earth, cracks the Magnetosphere,
may get exposed to single full-body CT scan dose
few times in a year or 100+ times during one\'s life span,

making cancer to develop easily

so I develop global network of X-ray flux dosimeters., operated by peers, delivering extreme X-ray flux exposure data into live maps app, to generate X-ray flux alerts

 

[whit3rd]

On Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 8:07:31 AM UTC-7, a a wrote:

On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 07:39:10 UTC+2, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, September 4, 2022 at 4:59:04 PM UTC-7, a a wrote:

Solar Flare Classifications

Ranking of a solar flare is based on its x-ray output.

So, this is about microwatts to a milliwatt of soft X-rays (right about
the vacuum ultraviolet range). I\'d recommend fourteen or fifteen
pounds per square inch of gaseous material (it auto-fills any cracks).

My planet has this coverage, we call it \'atmosphere\'.

in case of coronary mass ejections from the Sun, exposure time can be extended from minutes to hours ( X class CMEs)

So what is mW/s for 1 second exposure gets 3600mW/h for one hour exposure

milliwatts per second? That\'s not a correct element of this kind of calculation.
You want to MULTIPLY milliwatts by seconds, to make joules of energy.
Other parts of the calculations are also faulty...

Similarly, you want to multiply the 14 pounds per square inch of atmosphere, by
about 1500 to get pounds per square meter, and the milliwatt per square meter
of low-energy Xrays will have to make it through that mass, about ten tons, of
air to get to a surface-dwelling Earthling.

> If you work outdoor, you are exposed to...

about the same as indoors; your roof isn\'t going to add much to the
28 tons of atmosphere. So, let\'s just lump CME with cosmic rays and phosphorus-40
and every other natural radiation source together, and call it \'background\'.

 

[a a]

On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 19:22:22 UTC+2, whit3rd wrote:

On Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 8:07:31 AM UTC-7, a a wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 07:39:10 UTC+2, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, September 4, 2022 at 4:59:04 PM UTC-7, a a wrote:

Solar Flare Classifications

Ranking of a solar flare is based on its x-ray output.
So, this is about microwatts to a milliwatt of soft X-rays (right about
the vacuum ultraviolet range). I\'d recommend fourteen or fifteen
pounds per square inch of gaseous material (it auto-fills any cracks).

My planet has this coverage, we call it \'atmosphere\'.
in case of coronary mass ejections from the Sun, exposure time can be extended from minutes to hours ( X class CMEs)

So what is mW/s for 1 second exposure gets 3600mW/h for one hour exposure
milliwatts per second? That\'s not a correct element of this kind of calculation.
You want to MULTIPLY milliwatts by seconds, to make joules of energy.
Other parts of the calculations are also faulty...

Similarly, you want to multiply the 14 pounds per square inch of atmosphere, by
about 1500 to get pounds per square meter, and the milliwatt per square meter
of low-energy Xrays will have to make it through that mass, about ten tons, of
air to get to a surface-dwelling Earthling.

If you work outdoor, you are exposed to...

about the same as indoors; your roof isn\'t going to add much to the
28 tons of atmosphere. So, let\'s just lump CME with cosmic rays and phosphorus-40
and every other natural radiation source together, and call it \'background\'.

we risk nothing, joining 1,000 X-ray Geiger Dosimeter Network
to verify worst cases in X-ray flux from the Sun exposure

https://nuclear-power.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/sievert-radiation-definition-definition-min.png

https://www.nuclear-power.com/nuclear-engineering/radiation-protection/equivalent-dose/sievert-unit-of-equivalent-dose/millisievert-microsievert/

I plan to order 100 Geiger dosimeters and donate them to my friends living at distant locations
to generate real-time X-ray exposure maps at Earth\'s ground level

 

[a a]

On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 19:54:21 UTC+2, a a wrote:

On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 19:22:22 UTC+2, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 8:07:31 AM UTC-7, a a wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 07:39:10 UTC+2, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, September 4, 2022 at 4:59:04 PM UTC-7, a a wrote:

Solar Flare Classifications

Ranking of a solar flare is based on its x-ray output.
So, this is about microwatts to a milliwatt of soft X-rays (right about
the vacuum ultraviolet range). I\'d recommend fourteen or fifteen
pounds per square inch of gaseous material (it auto-fills any cracks).

My planet has this coverage, we call it \'atmosphere\'.
in case of coronary mass ejections from the Sun, exposure time can be extended from minutes to hours ( X class CMEs)

So what is mW/s for 1 second exposure gets 3600mW/h for one hour exposure
milliwatts per second? That\'s not a correct element of this kind of calculation.
You want to MULTIPLY milliwatts by seconds, to make joules of energy.
Other parts of the calculations are also faulty...

Similarly, you want to multiply the 14 pounds per square inch of atmosphere, by
about 1500 to get pounds per square meter, and the milliwatt per square meter
of low-energy Xrays will have to make it through that mass, about ten tons, of
air to get to a surface-dwelling Earthling.

If you work outdoor, you are exposed to...

about the same as indoors; your roof isn\'t going to add much to the
28 tons of atmosphere. So, let\'s just lump CME with cosmic rays and phosphorus-40
and every other natural radiation source together, and call it \'background\'.
we risk nothing, joining 1,000 X-ray Geiger Dosimeter Network
to verify worst cases in X-ray flux from the Sun exposure

https://nuclear-power.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/sievert-radiation-definition-definition-min.png

https://www.nuclear-power.com/nuclear-engineering/radiation-protection/equivalent-dose/sievert-unit-of-equivalent-dose/millisievert-microsievert/

I plan to order 100 Geiger dosimeters and donate them to my friends living at distant locations
to generate real-time X-ray exposure maps at Earth\'s ground level
https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radiation-sources-and-doses

Calculate Your Radiation Dose
How to use this calculator

https://www.epa.gov/radiation/calculate-your-radiation-dose

 

[John Walliker]

On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 16:07:31 UTC+1, a a wrote:

What matters in operation research and hedging is
Worst-Case-First
so few of us, working in outdoor at the time Coronary Mass Ejections directed to the Earth, cracks the Magnetosphere,
may get exposed to single full-body CT scan dose
few times in a year or 100+ times during one\'s life span,

making cancer to develop easily

so I develop global network of X-ray flux dosimeters., operated by peers, delivering extreme X-ray flux exposure data into live maps app, to generate X-ray flux alerts

I think you missed the point that the X-rays from CMEs will never reach the surface of the earth at
a level which can be detected with anything that you could possibly afford, let alone do any harm -
even if there are \"cracks\" in the magnetosphere.

The air above you is a very effective shield. Trying to avoid this non-existent threat by hiding
underground for example could actually increase your radiation exposure. Many areas have a lot
of granite in the ground. Radon gas accumulates in cellars and similar places when there is granite
nearby. Over a very long period it can increase the risk of cancer slightly. So can going out in sunlight.
Humans have evolved in a radioactive world. Potassium, for example is radioactive, but if
you try to avoid eating it you will die because it is involved in vital parts of the chemistry that
goes on in your body. Your radiation detectors will easily respond to the radioactivity of a banana,
but they will never see the x-rays from a CME.

John

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Sunday, September 4, 2022 at 7:59:04 PM UTC-4, a a wrote:

file:///C:/Users/a/Downloads/Solar%20X-Ray%20Imager.html


Solar Flare Classifications

Ranking of a solar flare is based on its x-ray output. Flares are classified according to the order of magnitude of the peak burst intensity (I) measured at the earth in the 0.1 to 0.8 nm wavelength band as follows:
Peak, 0.1 to 0.8 nm band
Class (Watts/square metre)
B I < 10-6
C 10-6 I < 10-5
M 10-5 I < 10-4
X I 10-4
A multiplier is used to indicate the level within each class. For example:

M6 = 6 X 10-5 Watts/square metre

Back to www.spaceweather.com


https://www.spaceweather.com/flareexpl.html


WSA-ENLIL Solar Wind Prediction

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/wsa-enlil-solar-wind-prediction#


https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a010000/a010800/a010833/10109-X-Class-540-MASTER_high.mp4

https://www.nelcoworldwide.com/medical-shielding-products/lead-products/