help: Choosing a MicroController (HAM radio) and some other

R

renjith

Guest
I am looking for a micro-controller to use for my varsity project (ham
radio). I am not a great expert in micro-controllers and am not quite
sure what uC's I should considering. My priorities with choosing the
uC are as follows:

- General: Reliable and some sort of support available for the uC
would be great. Relatively affordable.

- Hardware:
Code Memory - 16-32K
Internal RAM - >256 bytes
UART - At least one
Preferably SPI (in-system programmable)
Preferably DIP version available
Preferably low voltage (5-10V ?)
Preferably >15 I/O pins

The code memory is because I intend to use C and am not yet sure
about the potential length of my program could come to,
whereas the RAM is to store packets that may be larger than 256
bytes that can be dealt with in memory as fast as possible. At
least one UART should be present, though more than one would be
great. An onboard FSK 1200 baud modem chip would be super but
not absolutely needed. A reasonable amount of I/O lines would
be great.

- Programming :in C (for free): This is a must. Maybe I'll
consider other medium-level languages like Visual Basic/etc,
but not assembly. I am familiar with assembly before and I'd
definitely prefer C in any case, probably using assembly only
in certain routines. I'm also looking for a free C compiler
since varsity won't be assisting financially and I'm not exactly
loaded with cash. The PIC would have been a great choice in this
aspect but I won't be using the PIC and 8051 for my project
(regulations).

- Other: A programmer. I'm not highly familiar with uC's, and
for the 8051 and PIC there are lots of programmers available.
What happens when the uC is new/with not a lot of support? Does
the user have to try and design one him/herself? I would like
to choose a uC that has a programmer (schematic) already
available.

I really need to make sure that I chose a reliable microcontroller that
I would be happy with. I would like to look at all possible
uC's available with regard to the above criteria.

Help would be highly appreciated.
Renjith
 
"renjith" <renjith@mailbox.co.za> schreef in bericht
news:1110456194.289703.169290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
I am looking for a micro-controller to use for my varsity project (ham
radio). I am not a great expert in micro-controllers and am not quite
sure what uC's I should considering. My priorities with choosing the
uC are as follows:

- General: Reliable and some sort of support available for the uC
would be great. Relatively affordable.

- Hardware:
Code Memory - 16-32K
Internal RAM - >256 bytes
UART - At least one
Preferably SPI (in-system programmable)
Preferably DIP version available
Preferably low voltage (5-10V ?)
Preferably >15 I/O pins

The code memory is because I intend to use C and am not yet sure
about the potential length of my program could come to,
whereas the RAM is to store packets that may be larger than 256
bytes that can be dealt with in memory as fast as possible. At
least one UART should be present, though more than one would be
great. An onboard FSK 1200 baud modem chip would be super but
not absolutely needed. A reasonable amount of I/O lines would
be great.

- Programming :in C (for free): This is a must. Maybe I'll
consider other medium-level languages like Visual Basic/etc,
but not assembly. I am familiar with assembly before and I'd
definitely prefer C in any case, probably using assembly only
in certain routines. I'm also looking for a free C compiler
since varsity won't be assisting financially and I'm not exactly
loaded with cash. The PIC would have been a great choice in this
aspect but I won't be using the PIC and 8051 for my project
(regulations).

- Other: A programmer. I'm not highly familiar with uC's, and
for the 8051 and PIC there are lots of programmers available.
What happens when the uC is new/with not a lot of support? Does
the user have to try and design one him/herself? I would like
to choose a uC that has a programmer (schematic) already
available.

I really need to make sure that I chose a reliable microcontroller that
I would be happy with. I would like to look at all possible
uC's available with regard to the above criteria.

Help would be highly appreciated.
Renjith
Click to expand...
Well,

Have a look at the Atmel site.
http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/datasheets.asp?family_id=607
The ATmega8 for instance seems to fullfill all your needs. Programming
circuits can be found easily and you can also find a GNU C-compiler for
free.

You can also find similar PIC and 8051 controllers so what strange
regulations make you have to look for others?

petrus bitbyter
 
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:48:46 +0000, petrus bitbyter wrote:

"renjith" <renjith@mailbox.co.za> schreef in bericht
news:1110456194.289703.169290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
I am looking for a micro-controller to use for my varsity project (ham
radio). I am not a great expert in micro-controllers and am not quite
sure what uC's I should considering. My priorities with choosing the
uC are as follows:
Click to expand...
....

You can also find similar PIC and 8051 controllers so what strange
regulations make you have to look for others?
Click to expand...
Because the teacher said so.

Cheers!
Rich
 
I am looking for a micro-controller to use for my varsity project
(ham
radio). I am not a great expert in micro-controllers and am not
quite
sure what uC's I should considering. My priorities with choosing the
uC are as follows:
Click to expand...
Many microcontrollers suit your needs. But I would recommend the
ATmega32. Plenty of flash and RAM for you, DIP package, ISP etc. The
board is supported by numerous free programmers, or you can buy the
official development board (STK500) which is <US$80. C compiler
(avrgcc) is free. I've done several contract projects using exactly
this combination and I'm very happy with it.

BTW, 5V is considered a high-voltage part these days.
 
When did ham radio get to be HAM radio? "Ham" is not an abbreviation.

VY 73
N4TMI

P.S. I know the story about H.A.M. standing for the names of 3 ships, and I
know that it's pure fiction.
 
mc wrote:
When did ham radio get to be HAM radio? "Ham" is not an abbreviation.

VY 73
N4TMI
Click to expand...
How about the story of messrs. Hyman, Almy and Murray?

73!

--

Tauno Voipio, OH2UG
tauno voipio (at) iki fi
 
Thanks a lot petrus and l..., I took a look at the
ATMega series and many of the uC's there seem highly
suitable for my needs. However could you also mention
a list of other possible uC's just for information sake
if you dont mind ? Someone suggested the Motorola 68xxx series
to me which I've also looked at and seem promising but I haven't heard
anyone else mention about it. Thanks a lot for your suggestions and
I'd really appreciate any other feedback.
 
Hi,
Try to "search" the Internet for projects similar to your project.
There are many HAM radio projects utilizing different microcontrollers.
Some use PIC microcontrollers, some AVR, some '51, some ...
A small collection of pages that I have in my "bookmarks" :
http://homepages.compuserve.de/WoBuescher/DL4YHF/pic_key.html
http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/micro/
http://www.myplace.nu/avr/minidds/index.htm
http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/micro/SIGGEN/Siggen.htm
http://www.commlinx.com.au/microcontroller.htm
http://www.qsl.net/ok2tej/elbug/elbuge.html

Best regards,
Jacek.
 
Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@iki.fi.NOSPAM.invalid> wrote:

How about the story of messrs. Hyman, Almy and Murray?
Click to expand...
Here is that story:

http://www.w8eup.org/orgin_of_word_ham.cfm

Interesting, I had no idea where it came from before.


--
Roger J.
 
renjith wrote:

I am looking for a micro-controller to use for my varsity project (ham
radio). I am not a great expert in micro-controllers and am not quite
sure what uC's I should considering. My priorities with choosing the
uC are as follows:

- General: Reliable and some sort of support available for the uC
would be great. Relatively affordable.

- Hardware:
Code Memory - 16-32K
Internal RAM - >256 bytes
UART - At least one
Preferably SPI (in-system programmable)
Preferably DIP version available
Preferably low voltage (5-10V ?)
Preferably >15 I/O pins

The code memory is because I intend to use C and am not yet sure
about the potential length of my program could come to,
whereas the RAM is to store packets that may be larger than 256
bytes that can be dealt with in memory as fast as possible. At
least one UART should be present, though more than one would be
great. An onboard FSK 1200 baud modem chip would be super but
not absolutely needed. A reasonable amount of I/O lines would
be great.

- Programming :in C (for free): This is a must. Maybe I'll
consider other medium-level languages like Visual Basic/etc,
but not assembly. I am familiar with assembly before and I'd
definitely prefer C in any case, probably using assembly only
in certain routines. I'm also looking for a free C compiler
since varsity won't be assisting financially and I'm not exactly
loaded with cash. The PIC would have been a great choice in this
aspect but I won't be using the PIC and 8051 for my project
(regulations).

- Other: A programmer. I'm not highly familiar with uC's, and
for the 8051 and PIC there are lots of programmers available.
What happens when the uC is new/with not a lot of support? Does
the user have to try and design one him/herself? I would like
to choose a uC that has a programmer (schematic) already
available.

I really need to make sure that I chose a reliable microcontroller that
I would be happy with. I would like to look at all possible
uC's available with regard to the above criteria.

Help would be highly appreciated.
Renjith
Click to expand...
I would recommend the 8051 and its variants. Philips make a good range with
various sizes of code and data spaces and all have ISP. There are many free
simulators available and many of the major IDE vendors have evaluation
versions with a 2K or 4K code limit to get you going in C. For bigger
programs you can use the free C compiler SDCC.

Ian
--
Ian Bell
 
In article <1110553481.282472.228970@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "renjith" <renjith@mailbox.co.za> writes:
However could you also mention
a list of other possible uC's just for information sake
if you dont mind ? Someone suggested the Motorola 68xxx series
to me which I've also looked at and seem promising but I haven't heard
anyone else mention about it. Thanks a lot for your suggestions and
I'd really appreciate any other feedback.
Click to expand...
If you are wanting to compare microcontrollers, you could always look at
the Motorola HC08 series. A table of features is at:

http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/taxonomy.jsp?nodeId=016246844976638634

Simon.

--
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Microsoft: The Standard Oil Company of the 21st century
 
renjith wrote:
I am looking for a micro-controller to use for my varsity project (ham
radio). I am not a great expert in micro-controllers and am not quite
sure what uC's I should considering. My priorities with choosing the
uC are as follows:

- General: Reliable and some sort of support available for the uC
would be great. Relatively affordable.

- Hardware:
Code Memory - 16-32K
Internal RAM - >256 bytes
UART - At least one
Preferably SPI (in-system programmable)
Preferably DIP version available
Preferably low voltage (5-10V ?)
Preferably >15 I/O pins

The code memory is because I intend to use C and am not yet sure
about the potential length of my program could come to,
whereas the RAM is to store packets that may be larger than 256
bytes that can be dealt with in memory as fast as possible. At
least one UART should be present, though more than one would be
great. An onboard FSK 1200 baud modem chip would be super but
not absolutely needed. A reasonable amount of I/O lines would
be great.

- Programming :in C (for free): This is a must. Maybe I'll
consider other medium-level languages like Visual Basic/etc,
but not assembly. I am familiar with assembly before and I'd
definitely prefer C in any case, probably using assembly only
in certain routines. I'm also looking for a free C compiler
since varsity won't be assisting financially and I'm not exactly
loaded with cash. The PIC would have been a great choice in this
aspect but I won't be using the PIC and 8051 for my project
(regulations).

- Other: A programmer. I'm not highly familiar with uC's, and
for the 8051 and PIC there are lots of programmers available.
What happens when the uC is new/with not a lot of support? Does
the user have to try and design one him/herself? I would like
to choose a uC that has a programmer (schematic) already
available.

I really need to make sure that I chose a reliable microcontroller that
I would be happy with. I would like to look at all possible
uC's available with regard to the above criteria.

Help would be highly appreciated.
Renjith
Click to expand...
One often overlooked microcontroller is the Zilog Encore Z8. It is a
3.3V process, comes in DIP, supports C (they have a compiler for it,
it's not GCC) and supports source level debugging through a debug pin.
Look at the website. They usually have eval kits (I got one a few years
ago for less than $100) which comes with a processor, some peripherals,
a couple of RS232 ports (one for debugging, one for talking to the thing
through the UART).

I found it quite nice, until I discovered PICs. The main advantage I
find with PICs are that they come in 8 pin, internal clock packages.
Thus, they are that they are incredibly simple to prototype with.

--
Regards,
Robert Monsen

"Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
- Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon,
on why his works on celestial mechanics make no mention of God.
 
renjith wrote:
Thanks a lot petrus and l..., I took a look at the
ATMega series and many of the uC's there seem highly
suitable for my needs.
Click to expand...
You will find plenty of more information on the AVR on the www.avrfreaks.net
website.
Tools:

* AVR Studio - Assembler/Debugger/Simulator/ICE Frontend.
* STK500 - Development Kit/includes an In System Programmer
* JTAGICE Mk II - Low cost emulator, allows you to download code, run, set
breaks and singlstep.
* WinAVR - gcc compiler for the AVR

Some commercial compilers
* IAR
* Imagecraft (Hi Richard!)
* Codevision


--
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
ulf@a-t-m-e-l.com
This message is intended to be my own personal view and it
may or may not be shared by my employer Atmel Nordic AB
 
Robert Monsen wrote:
One often overlooked microcontroller is the Zilog Encore Z8. It is a
3.3V process, comes in DIP, supports C (they have a compiler for it,
it's not GCC) and supports source level debugging through a debug pin.
Look at the website. They usually have eval kits (I got one a few years
ago for less than $100) which comes with a processor, some peripherals,
a couple of RS232 ports (one for debugging, one for talking to the thing
through the UART).

I found it quite nice, until I discovered PICs. The main advantage I
find with PICs are that they come in 8 pin, internal clock packages.
Thus, they are that they are incredibly simple to prototype with.
Click to expand...
So do the Z8 Flash parts ? ( but only recently )
-jg
 
"mc" <mc_no_spam@uga.edu> wrote

When did ham radio get to be HAM radio? "Ham" is not an abbreviation.
Click to expand...
Right, it's an acronym. AIUI, Home Amateur Mechanic was a real magazine
that ran real articles about building your own amateur radios.
 
"Roger Johansson" <no-email@no.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns9616A726CB73A86336@81.174.12.30...
Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@iki.fi.NOSPAM.invalid> wrote:

How about the story of messrs. Hyman, Almy and Murray?

Here is that story:

http://www.w8eup.org/orgin_of_word_ham.cfm

Interesting, I had no idea where it came from before.
Click to expand...
Apparently that's an urban legend.

http://www.ac6v.com/hamlid.htm

"Unfortunately for this story, none of it checks out. A past president
of the ARRL did extensive research in an attempt to confirm this
story. There is nothing in the Congressional record about little station
HAM. There is nothing in contemporary press records. And there
is no record of a Hyman, Almay, or Murray at Harvard at the time
this supposedly happened. This story first surfaced in an amateur
publication in 1948, and doesn't seem likely to die. But it appears
to have no factual basis."
 
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 02:04:20 +0000, Anthony Fremont wrote:

"Unfortunately for this story, none of it checks out. A past president
of the ARRL did extensive research in an attempt to confirm this
story. There is nothing in the Congressional record about little station
HAM. There is nothing in contemporary press records. And there
is no record of a Hyman, Almay, or Murray at Harvard at the time
this supposedly happened. This story first surfaced in an amateur
publication in 1948, and doesn't seem likely to die. But it appears
to have no factual basis."
Click to expand...
Maybe it's just an abbreviation of "hammerchewer"

--
Then there's duct tape ...
(Garrison Keillor)
 
"Tauno Voipio" <tauno.voipio@iki.fi.NOSPAM.invalid> wrote in message
news:kWhYd.529$uc6.274@read3.inet.fi...
mc wrote:
When did ham radio get to be HAM radio? "Ham" is not an abbreviation.

VY 73
N4TMI


How about the story of messrs. Hyman, Almy and Murray?
Click to expand...
Anybody can make up a story. That doesn't make it true. Besides, if it
were true, the names would be definite, and verifiable... as it is, they
vary from version to version.

"Ham radio" is from "ham actor" and refers to the amateur entertainment that
was often broadcast by early radio experimenters. Hams weren't prohibited
from broadcasting until after WWI.
 
"Roger Johansson" <no-email@no.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns9616A726CB73A86336@81.174.12.30...
Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@iki.fi.NOSPAM.invalid> wrote:

How about the story of messrs. Hyman, Almy and Murray?

Here is that story:

http://www.w8eup.org/orgin_of_word_ham.cfm

Interesting, I had no idea where it came from before.
Click to expand...
And you still don't, because as far as I can determine, that story is pure
fantasy. Why would a "Mexican ship" have a name that is almost
unpronounceable in Spanish?

Given the Harvard connection, it sounds as if it might have been made up as
a tall tale by students. But I don't know that. At minimum, does the
Harvard Wireless Club have any records that support it?
 
Given the Harvard connection, it sounds as if it might have been made up
as a tall tale by students. But I don't know that. At minimum, does the
Harvard Wireless Club have any records that support it?
Click to expand...
I should add one more thing.

There may well have been one or more early stations whose operators'
initials were H, A, and M. That doesn't make that the origin of the term
"ham radio." The usually accepted origin is that it comes from "ham actor."

Arguing strongly against the Hyman et al. theory is that nobody wrote "ham"
as an abbreviation ("HAM", "H.A.M."), as far as I can tell, until the 1990s.
It is always "ham radio," not "HAM radio" or "H.A.M. radio," in publications
from more than 10 or 15 years ago.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top