Gross violation of Scientific Ethics, abuse to Peer Review p

A

AJAY SHARMA

Guest
Gross violation of Scientific Ethics, abuse to Peer Review publication
system and misuse of Name of CERN in News Groups. BY Dr Alexander
Inpain ( he claims he is in CERN), Email rambus2005@yahoo.com

It is being submitted in the interest of progress of Science /Phyics

Theme: My research papers published in international journals and
CONFERENCES after PEER REVIEW confirms that Einstein’s Sep 1905
derivation leads to inconsistent prediction under some conditions.
When body emits light energy, ITS MASS MUST INCREASE.

Part I
Rebuttal (on internet News Groups) of Dr Inpain of CERN ( as he
claims) ABSOLUTELY support my work, if he puts angle phi equal to 89 (
as I have done in my paper)
In his NOTE eq.(1.5) is
K0- K1 = L(γ -1)-Lβ γ cos Ό (1.5)
Then and put angle ( phi ) equal to 89 degree (cos89 = 0.01745).
Equation (1.5) becomes
K0- K1 = Lv2/2c2 - Lβ γ[ 0.01745]
Einstein worked in classical conditions and hence applying Binomial
Theorem

Mb-Ma ( ∆m ) = L/c2 –2Lv/c [0.01745]
= L/c2 –0.0345L/cv ( 1.5 )
Now if you see my paper
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology”.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
It is same equation as eq.(13) i.e.
Mb-Ma ( ∆m ) = – 0.03490L/cv + L/c2
(13)
So it is sheer folly of rambas2005@yahoo.com, that his conclusions
support my work BUT HE DOES NOT REALISE THE SAME.

or Ma (after emission of light energy) = –0.03490L/cv – L/c2+
Mb ( before emission )
Thus under this conditions, according to Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper
when light energy is emitted , its mass increases
rambas2005@yahoo.com ( NAMELESS , PLACELESS ) has written about 500
posts showing his own folly, compelling me to write this.
Author/Editor/Referees are all correct.
Part II
Scientific bodies and Internet Groups must take stern actions against
individuals who are working against the SCIENTIFIC sprits. So this
letter is being posted at Webs, sent to CERN authorities, scientific
bodies, Universities etc.

AJAY SHARMA 29 Sep 2006.
physicsajay@rediffmail.com

References of Einstein’s work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

Part II
References of Ajay Sharma’s work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology”.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference, OXFORD
ENGLAND
5. Sharma, A Collegium Logicum Volume 9, pp. 58-62 Springer-Verlag,
Germany (2006)
6. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

7. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
1. This paper
”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology”.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
2. The paper
2. The past , present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
3. A. Sharma, Concepts of Physics, Vol. III No. 4 (2006) 345-373
In parts it is published and is UNDER PUBLICATION in various others
journals.

----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
 
On 29 Sep 2006 00:28:12 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com>
wrote:

Gross violation of Scientific Ethics, abuse to Peer Review publication
system and misuse of Name of CERN in News Groups. BY Dr Alexander
Inpain ( he claims he is in CERN), Email rambus2005@yahoo.com

It is being submitted in the interest of progress of Science /Phyics

Theme: My research papers published in international journals and
CONFERENCES after PEER REVIEW confirms that Einstein’s Sep 1905
derivation leads to inconsistent prediction under some conditions.
When body emits light energy, ITS MASS MUST INCREASE.
---
So who gives a shit?

This is alt.electronics, not sci.physics, where your article
belongs. Why don't you take it over there and see how well it
stands up to "peer review"?


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
 
John Fields wrote:
On 29 Sep 2006 00:28:12 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com
wrote:

Gross violation of Scientific Ethics, abuse to Peer Review publication
system and misuse of Name of CERN in News Groups. BY Dr Alexander
Inpain ( he claims he is in CERN), Email rambus2005@yahoo.com

It is being submitted in the interest of progress of Science /Phyics

Theme: My research papers published in international journals and
CONFERENCES after PEER REVIEW confirms that Einstein's Sep 1905
derivation leads to inconsistent prediction under some conditions.
When body emits light energy, ITS MASS MUST INCREASE.

---
So who gives a shit?

This is alt.electronics, not sci.physics, where your article
belongs. Why don't you take it over there and see how well it
stands up to "peer review"?


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
----------
E=mc2 is very general even taught at chook.
There are many member in the group other than you as well.
Had it been your personal group I have would have not posted here.
AJAY SHARMA
 
On 2006-09-29, AJAY SHARMA <devianju@gmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:

E=mc2 is very general even taught at chook.
There are many member in the group other than you as well.
yeah E-Mc^2 is well known, but doubt many of the participoants here can
understand all that other mathematics you posted.

Bye.
Jasen
 
On 29 Sep 2006 10:55:16 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com>
wrote:


----------
E=mc2 is very general even taught at chook.
There are many member in the group other than you as well.
Had it been your personal group I have would have not posted here.
OK, take it from the rest of us: GO AWAY. You're a crackpot, and a
troll. Next post I see, generates a report to your ISP.
 
On 29 Sep 2006 10:55:16 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com>
wrote:

John Fields wrote:
On 29 Sep 2006 00:28:12 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com
wrote:

Gross violation of Scientific Ethics, abuse to Peer Review publication
system and misuse of Name of CERN in News Groups. BY Dr Alexander
Inpain ( he claims he is in CERN), Email rambus2005@yahoo.com

It is being submitted in the interest of progress of Science /Phyics

Theme: My research papers published in international journals and
CONFERENCES after PEER REVIEW confirms that Einstein's Sep 1905
derivation leads to inconsistent prediction under some conditions.
When body emits light energy, ITS MASS MUST INCREASE.

---
So who gives a shit?

This is alt.electronics, not sci.physics, where your article
belongs. Why don't you take it over there and see how well it
stands up to "peer review"?


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
----------
E=mc2 is very general even taught at chook.
There are many member in the group other than you as well.
Had it been your personal group I have would have not posted here.
AJAY SHARMA
---
Well, I never went to 'chook', so I wouldn't know, but that's not
the point.

This group is for the discussion of things electronic, not for the
lambasting of Einstein. Nor is it for the thinly disguised purpose
of selling your book, which makes the "article" SPAM.

So, whether it's my group or not, your original post was off-topic
and should have been posted eleswhere.

Just out of curiosity, why _did_ you post it here?



--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
 
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:22:51 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Nor is it for the thinly disguised purpose
of selling your book, which makes the "article" SPAM.

So, whether it's my group or not, your original post was off-topic
and should have been posted eleswhere.

Just out of curiosity, why _did_ you post it here?
me thinks you answered your own question... <g>

Personally, I know the OP has been makign these posts for years now,
whereever and whenever he can. he qualifies as a first class nut case!
 
PeterD wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:22:51 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Nor is it for the thinly disguised purpose
of selling your book, which makes the "article" SPAM.

So, whether it's my group or not, your original post was off-topic
and should have been posted eleswhere.

Just out of curiosity, why _did_ you post it here?



me thinks you answered your own question... <g

Personally, I know the OP has been makign these posts for years now,
whereever and whenever he can. he qualifies as a first class nut case!
------------------
Is it your personal forum ?
If so I will never post.
It is public if you dont like don't read it is simple.
You may know me personaly but I don't.
AJAY SHARMA
 
On 30 Sep 2006 22:35:31 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com>
wrote:


------------------
Is it your personal forum ?
Oh, so you think it's yours?

If so I will never post.
THANK YOU. Good bye.

It is public if you dont like don't read it is simple.
Uh, is this the best you can do?

You may know me personaly but I don't.
I know you don't know you, personally or otherwise. You also don't
have a good grasp of English.

AJAY SHARMA
Who has promised to never post again, but won't live up to that
promise!
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top