Global 54 HCQ studies. 40 show high effectiveness, while late treatment shows mixed results....

T

Tony Stewart

Guest
https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.
 
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
<tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.
Click to expand...

Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.
 
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
<tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.
Click to expand...

Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.
 
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
<tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.
Click to expand...

Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.
 
On Wed. 15 Jul.-20 8:39 p.m., boB wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.


Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.
Click to expand...

There seems to be a Catch-22 and HCQ is no longer permitted in the
Standard of Care in both USA and Canada for prophylactic treatment
(prevention of worse symptoms) USA has 32 million pills stockpiled and
Canada has similar large numbers.

Evidently, I found that the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority (BARDA) with ties to Big Pharma requested FDA to disapprove
emergency use of HCQ, then Association of American Physicians and
Surgeons (AAPS) has filed a lawsuit against the heads of the FDA, HHS
and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)
over what they call “irrational interference” to limit the use of
hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating COVID-19 patients.

https://www.fdanews.com/.../197519-doctors-sue-fda-hhs...

The negative studies were biased to fail or too late. also yesterday

Whitehouse now urges FDA to reconsider.

https://www.sify.com/.../wh-urges-fda-to-reconsider-hcq...
 
On Wed. 15 Jul.-20 8:39 p.m., boB wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.


Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.
Click to expand...

There seems to be a Catch-22 and HCQ is no longer permitted in the
Standard of Care in both USA and Canada for prophylactic treatment
(prevention of worse symptoms) USA has 32 million pills stockpiled and
Canada has similar large numbers.

Evidently, I found that the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority (BARDA) with ties to Big Pharma requested FDA to disapprove
emergency use of HCQ, then Association of American Physicians and
Surgeons (AAPS) has filed a lawsuit against the heads of the FDA, HHS
and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)
over what they call “irrational interference” to limit the use of
hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating COVID-19 patients.

https://www.fdanews.com/.../197519-doctors-sue-fda-hhs...

The negative studies were biased to fail or too late. also yesterday

Whitehouse now urges FDA to reconsider.

https://www.sify.com/.../wh-urges-fda-to-reconsider-hcq...
 
On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 8:05:19 PM UTC-4, Anthony Stewart wrote:
On Wed. 15 Jul.-20 8:39 p.m., boB wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.


Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.




There seems to be a Catch-22 and HCQ is no longer permitted in the
Standard of Care in both USA and Canada for prophylactic treatment
(prevention of worse symptoms) USA has 32 million pills stockpiled and
Canada has similar large numbers.

Evidently, I found that the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority (BARDA) with ties to Big Pharma requested FDA to disapprove
emergency use of HCQ, then Association of American Physicians and
Surgeons (AAPS) has filed a lawsuit against the heads of the FDA, HHS
and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)
over what they call “irrational interference” to limit the use of
hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating COVID-19 patients.

https://www.fdanews.com/.../197519-doctors-sue-fda-hhs...

The negative studies were biased to fail or too late. also yesterday

Whitehouse now urges FDA to reconsider.

https://www.sify.com/.../wh-urges-fda-to-reconsider-hcq...
Click to expand...

\"The AAPS, a non-profit organization based in Tucson, Arizona, has a “few thousand” members, according to executive director Jane Orient. It opposes mandatory vaccination, previously waged a campaign against healthcare reforms introduced by former President Barack Obama, and has been pushing back against state restrictions on use of hydroxychloroquine as a preventive therapy for the coronavirus.\"

The AAPS is highly politicized group, not science based at all, and has a history of being wrong about everything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons

The judges will probably dismiss their flimsy case on summary judgment.

They\'re just another bunch of parasites looking to fleece donors. There\'s so much of that going on these days.
 
On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 8:05:19 PM UTC-4, Anthony Stewart wrote:
On Wed. 15 Jul.-20 8:39 p.m., boB wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.


Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.




There seems to be a Catch-22 and HCQ is no longer permitted in the
Standard of Care in both USA and Canada for prophylactic treatment
(prevention of worse symptoms) USA has 32 million pills stockpiled and
Canada has similar large numbers.

Evidently, I found that the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority (BARDA) with ties to Big Pharma requested FDA to disapprove
emergency use of HCQ, then Association of American Physicians and
Surgeons (AAPS) has filed a lawsuit against the heads of the FDA, HHS
and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)
over what they call “irrational interference” to limit the use of
hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating COVID-19 patients.

https://www.fdanews.com/.../197519-doctors-sue-fda-hhs...

The negative studies were biased to fail or too late. also yesterday

Whitehouse now urges FDA to reconsider.

https://www.sify.com/.../wh-urges-fda-to-reconsider-hcq...
Click to expand...

\"The AAPS, a non-profit organization based in Tucson, Arizona, has a “few thousand” members, according to executive director Jane Orient. It opposes mandatory vaccination, previously waged a campaign against healthcare reforms introduced by former President Barack Obama, and has been pushing back against state restrictions on use of hydroxychloroquine as a preventive therapy for the coronavirus.\"

The AAPS is highly politicized group, not science based at all, and has a history of being wrong about everything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons

The judges will probably dismiss their flimsy case on summary judgment.

They\'re just another bunch of parasites looking to fleece donors. There\'s so much of that going on these days.
 
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:05:14 -0400, Tony Stewart
<tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed. 15 Jul.-20 8:39 p.m., boB wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.


Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.




There seems to be a Catch-22 and HCQ is no longer permitted in the
Standard of Care in both USA and Canada for prophylactic treatment
(prevention of worse symptoms) USA has 32 million pills stockpiled and
Canada has similar large numbers.

Evidently, I found that the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority (BARDA) with ties to Big Pharma requested FDA to disapprove
emergency use of HCQ, then Association of American Physicians and
Surgeons (AAPS) has filed a lawsuit against the heads of the FDA, HHS
and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)
over what they call “irrational interference” to limit the use of
hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating COVID-19 patients.

https://www.fdanews.com/.../197519-doctors-sue-fda-hhs...

The negative studies were biased to fail or too late. also yesterday

Whitehouse now urges FDA to reconsider.

https://www.sify.com/.../wh-urges-fda-to-reconsider-hcq...
Click to expand...

Yep. I only heard about the positive study (studies ?) on the
MEDCRAM YouTube channe. Early on in the pandemic, he shows why HCQ
\"should\" work and did some followups of some of the studies including
the positive one(s). But it included the addition of zinc at least
which would make sense.

But, it wasn\'t a cure-all... Helped early on in reducing hospital
stays. I\'m betting we don\'t hear any more about this.

Best to just try and not get the virus if possible.
 
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:05:14 -0400, Tony Stewart
<tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed. 15 Jul.-20 8:39 p.m., boB wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.


Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.




There seems to be a Catch-22 and HCQ is no longer permitted in the
Standard of Care in both USA and Canada for prophylactic treatment
(prevention of worse symptoms) USA has 32 million pills stockpiled and
Canada has similar large numbers.

Evidently, I found that the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority (BARDA) with ties to Big Pharma requested FDA to disapprove
emergency use of HCQ, then Association of American Physicians and
Surgeons (AAPS) has filed a lawsuit against the heads of the FDA, HHS
and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)
over what they call “irrational interference” to limit the use of
hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating COVID-19 patients.

https://www.fdanews.com/.../197519-doctors-sue-fda-hhs...

The negative studies were biased to fail or too late. also yesterday

Whitehouse now urges FDA to reconsider.

https://www.sify.com/.../wh-urges-fda-to-reconsider-hcq...
Click to expand...

Yep. I only heard about the positive study (studies ?) on the
MEDCRAM YouTube channe. Early on in the pandemic, he shows why HCQ
\"should\" work and did some followups of some of the studies including
the positive one(s). But it included the addition of zinc at least
which would make sense.

But, it wasn\'t a cure-all... Helped early on in reducing hospital
stays. I\'m betting we don\'t hear any more about this.

Best to just try and not get the virus if possible.
 
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:05:14 -0400, Tony Stewart
<tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed. 15 Jul.-20 8:39 p.m., boB wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:32:22 -0400, Tony Stewart
tony.sunnysky@gmail.com> wrote:

https://c19study.com/


The countries that used this drug with their regime of treatments,
statistically correlated with about an order of magnitude lower rates
than countries who rejected it.

54 studies with 100% results if used to reduce risks or if infected and
used early all prevented death. Still not a gold standard test but
certainly favourable to outcomes and low cost.


The studies that failed appear to be bad guesses and failed, either
being used too late or too high a dose or used CQ instead of HCQ.

Dr. Zalenski reported it had to be started within 7 days of infection or
earlier.


Yes, it can help somewhat.

As I understand, it needs to be used WITH zinc to be significantly
effective. Even then though, it\'s not a cureall. And can have bad
side effects if not careful.




There seems to be a Catch-22 and HCQ is no longer permitted in the
Standard of Care in both USA and Canada for prophylactic treatment
(prevention of worse symptoms) USA has 32 million pills stockpiled and
Canada has similar large numbers.

Evidently, I found that the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority (BARDA) with ties to Big Pharma requested FDA to disapprove
emergency use of HCQ, then Association of American Physicians and
Surgeons (AAPS) has filed a lawsuit against the heads of the FDA, HHS
and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)
over what they call “irrational interference” to limit the use of
hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treating COVID-19 patients.

https://www.fdanews.com/.../197519-doctors-sue-fda-hhs...

The negative studies were biased to fail or too late. also yesterday

Whitehouse now urges FDA to reconsider.

https://www.sify.com/.../wh-urges-fda-to-reconsider-hcq...
Click to expand...

Yep. I only heard about the positive study (studies ?) on the
MEDCRAM YouTube channe. Early on in the pandemic, he shows why HCQ
\"should\" work and did some followups of some of the studies including
the positive one(s). But it included the addition of zinc at least
which would make sense.

But, it wasn\'t a cure-all... Helped early on in reducing hospital
stays. I\'m betting we don\'t hear any more about this.

Best to just try and not get the virus if possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top