For those with LinkedIn accounts.

K

keithr

Guest
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak

Important Alert Regarding Reports of Password Leakage with LinkedIn

______________________________________________________________________________

Over the last few days, there have been reports that 6.5 million
LinkedIn hashed and encrypted passwords have reportedly been leaked.
LinkedIn is home to more than 100 million users, suggesting the alleged
breach is limited to less than 10% of the professional social network’s
user base; however, it will still affect a huge number of users.

LinkedIn mobile app subscribers may be surprised to learn that the
calendar entries on their iPhones or iPads— which may include details
about meeting locations, participants, dial-in information, passwords
and sensitive meeting notes — are transmitted back to LinkedIn’s servers
without their knowledge.

WHAT SHOULD USERS DO AS SOON AS POSSIBLE?

As a good security practice, regardless of whether you have been
affected or not:

ˇ Change Your LinkedIn password immediately –

o Log into your LinkedIn account

o Mouse over your name at the top right of any page in LinkedIn

o Select Settings

o You may be asked to log in, even though you are already logged in

o Click on ‘Change’ new Password

o Follow directions

ˇ If you use the same password for other sites, we strongly
suggest changing it on those sites as well
 
On 7/06/2012 7:57 AM, keithr wrote:
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak

Over the last few days, there have been reports that 6.5 million
LinkedIn hashed and encrypted passwords have reportedly been leaked.
Hashed and encrypted. Hopefully a good hash (sha256 etc).
Pretty much impossible to reconstruct the original password from the
hash. I'd say the threat is negligible.
 
"swanny" <swanny@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:OBRzr.7787$v14.684@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
On 7/06/2012 7:57 AM, keithr wrote:
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak

Over the last few days, there have been reports that 6.5 million
LinkedIn hashed and encrypted passwords have reportedly been leaked.

Hashed and encrypted. Hopefully a good hash (sha256 etc).
Pretty much impossible to reconstruct the original password from the
hash. I'd say the threat is negligible.

Hash browns anyone?
 
"SFD" <sfd@127000.00> wrote in message
news:w3Uzr.7789$v14.3681@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
"swanny" <swanny@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:OBRzr.7787$v14.684@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
On 7/06/2012 7:57 AM, keithr wrote:
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak

Over the last few days, there have been reports that 6.5 million
LinkedIn hashed and encrypted passwords have reportedly been leaked.

Hashed and encrypted. Hopefully a good hash (sha256 etc).
Pretty much impossible to reconstruct the original password from the
hash. I'd say the threat is negligible.

Hash browns anyone?

So someone found the backdoor?
 
On 7/06/2012 9:21 AM, swanny wrote:
On 7/06/2012 7:57 AM, keithr wrote:
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak

Over the last few days, there have been reports that 6.5 million
LinkedIn hashed and encrypted passwords have reportedly been leaked.

Hashed and encrypted. Hopefully a good hash (sha256 etc).
Pretty much impossible to reconstruct the original password from the
hash. I'd say the threat is negligible.

Rainbow Tables.
 
On 7/06/2012 3:18 PM, keithr wrote:
On 7/06/2012 9:21 AM, swanny wrote:
On 7/06/2012 7:57 AM, keithr wrote:
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak

Over the last few days, there have been reports that 6.5 million
LinkedIn hashed and encrypted passwords have reportedly been leaked.

Hashed and encrypted. Hopefully a good hash (sha256 etc).
Pretty much impossible to reconstruct the original password from the
hash. I'd say the threat is negligible.

Rainbow Tables.
Maybe if you have months

--









X-No-Archive: Yes
 
On 7/06/2012 5:32 PM, atec77 wrote:
On 7/06/2012 3:18 PM, keithr wrote:
On 7/06/2012 9:21 AM, swanny wrote:
On 7/06/2012 7:57 AM, keithr wrote:
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak

Over the last few days, there have been reports that 6.5 million
LinkedIn hashed and encrypted passwords have reportedly been leaked.

Hashed and encrypted. Hopefully a good hash (sha256 etc).
Pretty much impossible to reconstruct the original password from the
hash. I'd say the threat is negligible.

Rainbow Tables.
Maybe if you have months
Depends on whether you have a bot net working for you

Apparently the passwords are hashed with unsalted SHA1 - not so good
 
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:38:42 +1000, keithr <keithr@nowhere.com.au>
wrote:

On 7/06/2012 5:32 PM, atec77 wrote:
On 7/06/2012 3:18 PM, keithr wrote:
On 7/06/2012 9:21 AM, swanny wrote:
On 7/06/2012 7:57 AM, keithr wrote:
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak

Over the last few days, there have been reports that 6.5 million
LinkedIn hashed and encrypted passwords have reportedly been leaked.

Hashed and encrypted. Hopefully a good hash (sha256 etc).
Pretty much impossible to reconstruct the original password from the
hash. I'd say the threat is negligible.

Rainbow Tables.
Maybe if you have months


Depends on whether you have a bot net working for you

Apparently the passwords are hashed with unsalted SHA1 - not so good
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-1
Wonder if Yahoo email have same problem most of my spam comes through
Yahoo either directly or through a bot-net compromised IP?
--
Petzl
"The Monarchy is important, not because of the power it wields, but because of the power it denies others."
Winston Churchill
 
On 7/06/2012 7:38 PM, keithr wrote:
On 7/06/2012 5:32 PM, atec77 wrote:
On 7/06/2012 3:18 PM, keithr wrote:
On 7/06/2012 9:21 AM, swanny wrote:
On 7/06/2012 7:57 AM, keithr wrote:
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak

Over the last few days, there have been reports that 6.5 million
LinkedIn hashed and encrypted passwords have reportedly been leaked.

Hashed and encrypted. Hopefully a good hash (sha256 etc).
Pretty much impossible to reconstruct the original password from the
hash. I'd say the threat is negligible.

Rainbow Tables.
Maybe if you have months


Depends on whether you have a bot net working for you

Apparently the passwords are hashed with unsalted SHA1 - not so good
That's now reaching the end of its shelf life. Hopefully they have a
migration plan to introduce a stronger hash, this time with a salt.
 
On 07/06/12 20:16, Petzl wrote:

Wonder if Yahoo email have same problem most of my spam comes through
Yahoo either directly or through a bot-net compromised IP?
Nope, Yahoo and other instant sign-up places are wide open; sign up and
spam away.
 
On 07/06/12 07:57, keithr wrote:
SECURITY ALERT: LinkedIn Password Leak
hahahaha, it wasn't the passwords they were after,but the email
addresses. Just received me first spam to the linkedin address.

Time to remove it from the aliases list.

....................................

Hi,

At SP Casino we have recently had several massive wins at our
Progressive Jackpot Slots including a Canadian player who won $ 1
million at Mega Moolah. ..................
 
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:17:19 +1000, terryc
<newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:

On 07/06/12 20:16, Petzl wrote:

Wonder if Yahoo email have same problem most of my spam comes through
Yahoo either directly or through a bot-net compromised IP?

Nope, Yahoo and other instant sign-up places are wide open; sign up and
spam away.
All Yahoo has to do is limited TO:, CC and BCC to 6 people?
Make them useless to spammers

Good link on how to add salt to SHA-1
http://crackstation.net/hashing-security.htm
--
Petzl
Q: What has Tony Abbott promised Murdoch?
A: A broadband network that will be so slow as to offer no competition to his pay TV interests.
 
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:03:15 +1000, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

Q: What has Tony Abbott promised Murdoch?
A: A broadband network that will be so slow as to offer no competition to his pay TV interests.
Can you prove this Pizzle, or just another of your childish conspiracy
theories?
 
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:45:24 +1000, Polly the Parrott
<flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:03:15 +1000, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

Q: What has Tony Abbott promised Murdoch?
A: A broadband network that will be so slow as to offer no competition to his pay TV interests.

Can you prove this Pizzle, or just another of your childish conspiracy
theories?
Read any Fairfax Paper and judge.
The Economy is doing better than at any time during Howard Liberal.
Better than any county in USa or Europe and how is this reported?
Mines for instance are being touted really good which for our lowest
populated state that maybe, this though is destroying manufacturing
industries in Australia's large population Eastern states.
http://www.world-classminers.com.au/economy
Non-of this is ever mentioned in our Fairfax press
Murdochs only profitable media is Sky and his TV interests
Why the bias what's his deal?
Recently Tony Blair stated what is know about how Mudoch is capable of
changing governments and he uses his press to do it.
example < http://tinyurl.com/d2z7m8g >
Why is Abbott link to his cronies in HSU and FTA only read outside
Murdochs press,
http://www.independentaustralia.net/category/politics/
--
Petzl
Run Abbot,.run Abbott, Run! Run! Run!
Here comes Thomson and he's out for fun,
You'll get by,
Just tell another lie,
Run Abbott, run Abbott,Run! Run! Run!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVdoZNxtL8k
 
On 9/06/2012 5:36 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:45:24 +1000, Polly the Parrott
flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:03:15 +1000, Petzl<petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

Q: What has Tony Abbott promised Murdoch?
A: A broadband network that will be so slow as to offer no competition to his pay TV interests.

Can you prove this Pizzle, or just another of your childish conspiracy
theories?

Read any Fairfax Paper and judge.
The Economy is doing better than at any time during Howard Liberal.
Oh ffs
300 billion in the red now and when gaining office 40 billion in the black
you have no argument fuckstick


--









X-No-Archive: Yes
 
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 17:52:41 +1000, atec77 <"atec77 "@hotmail.com>
wrote:

On 9/06/2012 5:36 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:45:24 +1000, Polly the Parrott
flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:03:15 +1000, Petzl<petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

Q: What has Tony Abbott promised Murdoch?
A: A broadband network that will be so slow as to offer no competition to his pay TV interests.

Can you prove this Pizzle, or just another of your childish conspiracy
theories?

Read any Fairfax Paper and judge.
The Economy is doing better than at any time during Howard Liberal.
Oh ffs
300 billion in the red now and when gaining office 40 billion in the black
you have no argument fuckstick
300billion ? link any where?
How much did Howard sell to get $40 billion?
Commonweath Bank and Funds managment,Major Airports phase 1 & 2,
DASFLEET (Government Cars), Telstra, Department of Administrative
Services, Housing Loans Insurance Corporation, Australian Multimedia
Enterprises Ltd,
--
Petzl
Q: What has Tony Abbott promised Murdoch?
A: A broadband network that will be so slow as to offer no competition to his pay TV interests.
Paul Keating's assessment of Rupert Murdoch as "a big bad bastard"
 
Pretzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Polly the Parrott <flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote
Pretzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote

Q: What has Tony Abbott promised Murdoch?
A: A broadband network that will be so slow as
to offer no competition to his pay TV interests.

Can you prove this Pizzle, or just another
of your childish conspiracy theories?

Read any Fairfax Paper
Pointless. There's a reason the share price is 10% of what it once was.

and judge.
Did that, yours is a bare faced lie.

The Economy is doing better than at any time during Howard Liberal.
Another bare faced pig ignorant lie.

Better than any county in USa or Europe and how is this reported?
Irrelevant to your bare faced lies.

Mines for instance are being touted really good
They are. Its why we didn't even get a recession from the GFC.

which for our lowest populated state that maybe,
No maybe about it.

this though is destroying manufacturing industries
in Australia's large population Eastern states.
http://www.world-classminers.com.au/economy
Hasn't destroyed the car industry, liar.

Non-of this is ever mentioned in our Fairfax press
Because it's a lie.

Murdochs only profitable media is Sky and his TV interests
Another bare faced pig ignorant lie.

Why the bias
Just another of your pig ignorant lies.

what's his deal?
There is no deal. His shit rags have always been shit rags.

Recently Tony Blair stated what is know about
how Mudoch is capable of changing governments
Blair never ever said anything of the sort, liar.

and he uses his press to do it.
Just another bare faced lie.

example < http://tinyurl.com/d2z7m8g
Just because some fool claims something, doesn't make it gospel.

Why is Abbott link to his cronies in HSU and
FTA only read outside Murdochs press,
Just another bare faced lie.

http://www.independentaustralia.net/category/politics/
Just because some fool claims something, doesn't make it gospel.
 
On Jun 9, 5:36 pm, Petzl <pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:45:24 +1000, Polly the Parrott

flatulantdi...@deadspam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:03:15 +1000, Petzl <pet...@gmail.com> wrote:

Q: What has Tony Abbott promised Murdoch?
A: A broadband network that will be so slow as to offer no competition to his pay TV interests.

Can you prove this Pizzle, or just another of your childish conspiracy
theories?

Read any Fairfax Paper and judge.
The Economy is doing better than at any time during Howard Liberal.
Better than any county in USa or Europe and how is this reported?
Mines for instance are being touted really good which for our lowest
populated state that maybe, this though is destroying manufacturing
industries in Australia's large population Eastern states.http://www.world-classminers.com.au/economy
Non-of this is ever mentioned in our Fairfax press


For starters you are quoting Mainstream news media, which has vested
interests,
and is a joke on all sides and really only for the sheep out there. It
is not just Murdoch
it is ALL of them.

If they actually claim that the economy is doing better now than at
any
time during Howard liberal era then they are plain lying, and have
totally lost the plot
the mid 2000s were some of the best economic times in my memory since
the 1970's boom.

Pity the poor retards who believe these papers, invest or make
decisions on this basis and
ultimately lose it all = usually to the banksters who arrange for them
to publish this total crap.


Murdochs only profitable media is Sky and his TV interests
Why the bias what's his deal?
Recently Tony Blair stated what is know about how Mudoch is capable of
changing governments and he uses his press to do it.
example <  http://tinyurl.com/d2z7m8g 
Why is Abbott link to his cronies in HSU and FTA only read outside
Murdochs press,http://www.independentaustralia.net/category/politics/
--
That is true, as long as fucksticks continue to believe mainstream
corporate media
they will continue call the shots. When people think for themselves,
get real
and act accordingly, only then will we have any sort of a future and
stability.



Petzl
Run Abbot,.run Abbott, Run! Run! Run!
Here comes Thomson and he's out for fun,
You'll get by,
Just tell another lie,
Run Abbott, run Abbott,Run! Run! Run!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVdoZNxtL8k


He promises to repeal the carbon tax. For me that makes him the only
electable piece of crap
in the political toilet bowl.
 
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 05:18:36 -0700 (PDT), kreed <kenreed1999@gmail.com>
wrote:

That is true, as long as fucksticks continue to believe mainstream
corporate media they will continue call the shots. When people
think for themselves, get real
and act accordingly, only then will we have any sort of a future and
stability.
That is what one of my signatures inferred. Big threat to this will be
the NBN where everything like interactive TV's will be a norm and
social media or your choice of "news" which you can give uncensored
feedback on. Many other businesses will be built on NBN as well. The
same opposition to the laying of power lines happen in Australia early
20th century.

He promises to repeal the carbon tax. For me that makes him the only
electable piece of crap in the political toilet bowl.
While I agree the carbon tax is a big mistake I am not desperate
enough to believe Abbott in anything. Makes me wonder who does now run
Labor and Liberal they must have better representatives than they
force us to vote for non are for Australia. My only desicision is
which party comes last on my ballot paper or do I just put it in blank
--
Petzl
Q: What has Tony Abbott promised Murdoch?
A: A broadband network that will be so slow as to offer no competition to his pay TV interests.
Paul Keating's assessment of Rupert Murdoch as "a big bad bastard"
 
Pretzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
kreed <kenreed1999@gmail.com> wrote

That is true, as long as fucksticks continue to believe mainstream
corporate media they will continue call the shots. When people
think for themselves, get real and act accordingly, only then will
we have any sort of a future and stability.
That last is completely silly.

That is what one of my signatures inferred.
Like hell it ever did.

Big threat to this will be the NBN where
everything like interactive TV's will be a norm
How odd that it isnt where they have fiber to the home.

and social media or your choice of "news"
which you can give uncensored feedback on.
How odd that it isnt where they have fiber to the home.

Many other businesses will be built on NBN as well.
How odd that it isnt where they have fiber to the home.

The same opposition to the laying of power
lines happen in Australia early 20th century.
Pigs arse it ever did. And that's nothing like the NBN anyway.

The reason we don't need the NBN is that almost all of
us have very decent broadband available if we want it.

He promises to repeal the carbon tax. For me that makes him
the only electable piece of crap in the political toilet bowl.

While I agree the carbon tax is a big mistake I am
not desperate enough to believe Abbott in anything.
No desperation involved and the voters will give Juliar
and her govt the bums rush as comprehensively as they
gave the NSW and QLD govts the bums rush anyway
regardless of what a few fools like you want to see.

Makes me wonder who does now run Labor and Liberal
No one does. Political partys cant work like that, fool.

they must have better representatives than
they force us to vote for non are for Australia.
Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.

My only desicision is which party comes last
on my ballot paper or do I just put it in blank
You have always been, and always will
be, completely and utterly irrelevant.

How you might or might not vote in spades.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top