Flyguy and fire-bombing....

[Anthony William Sloman]

Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with an accident report about an ultralight aircraft that had caught on fire. essentially because it\'s owner had abused the batteries.

I suggested that it would make sense to dump an overheating battery pack before it caught on fire.

Flyguy over-simplified this into a recommendation that the pilot dumped burning batteries.

He seems to have decided that batteries can only have two states \"okay\" or \"on fire\".

In reality, batteries always self-discharge to some extent, so they are always a bit warmer than ambient.

This doesn\'t get to be a problem until the self-heating gets to a point where it starts increasing the self-discharge rate.

At some point the battery can eventually go into thermal runaway, when the battery temperature starts rising rapidly and the battery pack can eventually catch on fire.

If you monitor the internal temperature of the battery pack, you can recognise when this is starting to happen - long before the battery catches on fire - and dump the batteries.

If you make sure that battery pack breaks up as you dump it, it won\'t get as hot and may never ever catch on fire.

So it shouldn\'t look like a bunch of fire bombs before it hits the ground.

If you pick up on the temperature rise early enough, the individual cells should never get hot enough to catch on fire once they have been spread out enough not to warm up their neighbors.

All this is much to complicated for Flyguy to process, though I have explained it from time to time. It may be that he really is a stupid as he looks, or he may not feel the need to put in the effort required to realise that he\'s being an idiot.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Edward Hernandez]

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:11:45 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t1cath$gii$2@dont-email.me>.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow it\'s own rules that it uses to troll other posters.

Gt6wIuSyRh8L

 

[John Doe]

Poor liddle Eddie got spanked and just can\'t get over it.

Unless Eddie is nym-shifting, it has never posted anything NORMAL
except when it got a severe spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

Is Eddie a nym-shifting troll, or a newbie netcop wannabe?

See also...
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don\'t get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.szaf.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx04.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Flyguy and fire-bombing.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <404775b0-f5a0-4021-82d1-47618698307dn@googlegroups.com> <t1cath$gii$2@dont-email.me
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <xfj_J.880522$2c1.790720@usenetxs.com
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:26:05 UTC
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:26:05 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1385
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:663800 free.spam:17652

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:11:45 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t1cath$gii$2@dont-email.me>.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow it\'s own rules that it uses to troll other posters.

Gt6wIuSyRh8L

 

[Edward Hernandez]

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:44:26 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t1cgba$uad$4@dont-email.me>).

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe\'s post ratio
to USENET has been 54.1% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

Kl1AXo+a4ehj

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Tuesday, March 22, 2022 at 10:11:52 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:

Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with an accident report about an ultralight aircraft that had caught on fire. essentially because it\'s owner had abused the batteries.

I suggested that it would make sense to dump an overheating battery pack before it caught on fire.

Flyguy over-simplified this into a recommendation that the pilot dumped burning batteries.

He seems to have decided that batteries can only have two states \"okay\" or \"on fire\".

In reality, batteries always self-discharge to some extent, so they are always a bit warmer than ambient.

This doesn\'t get to be a problem until the self-heating gets to a point where it starts increasing the self-discharge rate.

At some point the battery can eventually go into thermal runaway, when the battery temperature starts rising rapidly and the battery pack can eventually catch on fire.

If you monitor the internal temperature of the battery pack, you can recognise when this is starting to happen - long before the battery catches on fire - and dump the batteries.

If you make sure that battery pack breaks up as you dump it, it won\'t get as hot and may never ever catch on fire.

So it shouldn\'t look like a bunch of fire bombs before it hits the ground.

If you pick up on the temperature rise early enough, the individual cells should never get hot enough to catch on fire once they have been spread out enough not to warm up their neighbors.

All this is much to complicated for Flyguy to process, though I have explained it from time to time. It may be that he really is a stupid as he looks, or he may not feel the need to put in the effort required to realise that he\'s being an idiot.

Bill is a blatant troll...

I\'m sure that it makes John Doe happy to think that. He\'s in the same league of blatant anonymous trolls as Flyguy, and shares Flyguy\'s habit of postiing his fatuous delusions as if they were facts. His problem - like Flyguy - is that he\'s nothing but a troll. He doesn\'t know anything about electronic design, and mostly posts right-wing political nonsense that has nothing to do with electronic design.

My opinion is that he\'s mainly an obnoxious creep, but that\'s just my opinion.

<I snipped the rest of his recycled insults - they weren\'t worth posting when he originally came up with them>

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with an accident report about an ultralight aircraft that had caught on fire. essentially because it\'s owner had abused the batteries.

I suggested that it would make sense to dump an overheating battery pack before it caught on fire.

Flyguy over-simplified this into a recommendation that the pilot dumped burning batteries.

He seems to have decided that batteries can only have two states \"okay\" or \"on fire\".

In reality, batteries always self-discharge to some extent, so they are always a bit warmer than ambient.

This doesn\'t get to be a problem until the self-heating gets to a point where it starts increasing the self-discharge rate.

At some point the battery can eventually go into thermal runaway, when the battery temperature starts rising rapidly and the battery pack can eventually catch on fire.

If you monitor the internal temperature of the battery pack, you can recognise when this is starting to happen - long before the battery catches on fire - and dump the batteries.

If you make sure that battery pack breaks up as you dump it, it won\'t get as hot and may never ever catch on fire.

So it shouldn\'t look like a bunch of fire bombs before it hits the ground..

If you pick up on the temperature rise early enough, the individual cells should never get hot enough to catch on fire once they have been spread out enough not to warm up their neighbors.

All this is much to complicated for Flyguy to process, though I have explained it from time to time. It may be that he really is a stupid as he looks, or he may not feel the need to put in the effort required to realise that he\'s being an idiot.

--
SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Hey SNIPPERMAN, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said? You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.

Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a certified, licensed pilot (false), which can be easily checked with the FAA (again, you refused). I further suggested that you contact YOUR OWN aviation authority, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, CASA (https://www.casa.gov.au/). You, of course, REFUSED.

Your pursuit of IGNORANCE is unrivaled on SED (except, perhaps, by DecayedBrainMatter).

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 3:16:19 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:

On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with an accident report about an ultralight aircraft that had caught on fire. essentially because it\'s owner had abused the batteries.

I suggested that it would make sense to dump an overheating battery pack before it caught on fire.

Flyguy over-simplified this into a recommendation that the pilot dumped burning batteries.

He seems to have decided that batteries can only have two states \"okay\" or \"on fire\".

In reality, batteries always self-discharge to some extent, so they are always a bit warmer than ambient.

This doesn\'t get to be a problem until the self-heating gets to a point where it starts increasing the self-discharge rate.

At some point the battery can eventually go into thermal runaway, when the battery temperature starts rising rapidly and the battery pack can eventually catch on fire.

If you monitor the internal temperature of the battery pack, you can recognise when this is starting to happen - long before the battery catches on fire - and dump the batteries.

If you make sure that battery pack breaks up as you dump it, it won\'t get as hot and may never ever catch on fire.

So it shouldn\'t look like a bunch of fire bombs before it hits the ground.

If you pick up on the temperature rise early enough, the individual cells should never get hot enough to catch on fire once they have been spread out enough not to warm up their neighbors.

All this is much to complicated for Flyguy to process, though I have explained it from time to time. It may be that he really is a stupid as he looks, or he may not feel the need to put in the effort required to realise that he\'s being an idiot.

Hey Sloman, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said? You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.

\"If you monitor the internal temperature of the battery pack, you can recognise when this is starting to happen - long before the battery catches on fire - and dump the batteries. \"

That is different from what you posted. I\'ll leave you to work out how.

> Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a certified, licensed pilot (false), which can be easily checked with the FAA (again, you refused).

You are an anonymous troll. You have outed yourself as Tom Seim, but that may be an assumed identity. I didn\'t actually say you weren\'t a licensed pilot - I merely pointed out that somebody as stupid as you regularly prove yourself to be (see above) wouldn\'t last long if they tried to fly an aircraft.

> I further suggested that you contact YOUR OWN aviation authority, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, CASA (https://www.casa.gov.au/). You, of course, REFUSED.

Why would I bother?

> Your pursuit of IGNORANCE is unrivaled on SED (except, perhaps, by DecayedBrainMatter).

I certainly find a lot of ignorance here. I don\'t actually pursue it, but when it does get thrust in my face I do name it for what it is. Decadent Linux User Numero Uno doesn\'t get all that much wrong, whereas you can\'t even spell his name right (or mine for that matter). Like every other idiot you excuse yourself because you are making a joke, but only an idiot like you makes the same feeble joke time and time again.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[corvid]

On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:

On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my
own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with
an accident report

Hey SNIPPERMAN, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?

You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.

You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT
onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced
UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.

We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but
you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a
certified, licensed pilot (false),

Hardware is certified, Airmen are Certificated. Drivers are licensed.

 

[Flyguy]

On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 10:31:28 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 3:16:19 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with an accident report about an ultralight aircraft that had caught on fire. essentially because it\'s owner had abused the batteries.

I suggested that it would make sense to dump an overheating battery pack before it caught on fire.

Flyguy over-simplified this into a recommendation that the pilot dumped burning batteries.

He seems to have decided that batteries can only have two states \"okay\" or \"on fire\".

In reality, batteries always self-discharge to some extent, so they are always a bit warmer than ambient.

This doesn\'t get to be a problem until the self-heating gets to a point where it starts increasing the self-discharge rate.

At some point the battery can eventually go into thermal runaway, when the battery temperature starts rising rapidly and the battery pack can eventually catch on fire.

If you monitor the internal temperature of the battery pack, you can recognise when this is starting to happen - long before the battery catches on fire - and dump the batteries.

If you make sure that battery pack breaks up as you dump it, it won\'t get as hot and may never ever catch on fire.

So it shouldn\'t look like a bunch of fire bombs before it hits the ground.

If you pick up on the temperature rise early enough, the individual cells should never get hot enough to catch on fire once they have been spread out enough not to warm up their neighbors.

All this is much to complicated for Flyguy to process, though I have explained it from time to time. It may be that he really is a stupid as he looks, or he may not feel the need to put in the effort required to realise that he\'s being an idiot.

Hey Sloman, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said? You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.
\"If you monitor the internal temperature of the battery pack, you can recognise when this is starting to happen - long before the battery catches on fire - and dump the batteries. \"
That is different from what you posted. I\'ll leave you to work out how.
Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a certified, licensed pilot (false), which can be easily checked with the FAA (again, you refused).
You are an anonymous troll. You have outed yourself as Tom Seim, but that may be an assumed identity. I didn\'t actually say you weren\'t a licensed pilot - I merely pointed out that somebody as stupid as you regularly prove yourself to be (see above) wouldn\'t last long if they tried to fly an aircraft.

Hey Dickhead, then I am NOT anonymous, you fucking idiot. And, YES you did say that, you liar.

I further suggested that you contact YOUR OWN aviation authority, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, CASA (https://www.casa.gov.au/). You, of course, REFUSED.
Why would I bother?

To educate your sorry ass, you fool.

Your pursuit of IGNORANCE is unrivaled on SED (except, perhaps, by DecayedBrainMatter).
I certainly find a lot of ignorance here. I don\'t actually pursue it, but when it does get thrust in my face I do name it for what it is. Decadent Linux User Numero Uno doesn\'t get all that much wrong, whereas you can\'t even spell his name right (or mine for that matter). Like every other idiot you excuse yourself because you are making a joke, but only an idiot like you makes the same feeble joke time and time again.

The hell you don\'t - you go out of your way to be ignorant, like not talking to CASA, you dumb shit.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:53:18 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:

On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my
own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with
an accident report

Hey SNIPPERMAN, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?
You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.
You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT
onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced
UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.
We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

That accident, Einstein, was in NEW ZEALAND!

Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but
you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a
certified, licensed pilot (false),
Hardware is certified, Airmen are Certificated. Drivers are licensed.

Sorry, but the FAA CERTIFIES pilots and LICENSES them. I do have a CERTIFICATE attesting to same.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 2:01:32 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:53:18 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:
On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my
own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with
an accident report

Hey Sloman, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?
You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.

He did. He also seems to think that nobody would even think about dumping the batteries until after they had caught on fire, which is remarkably dumb.

You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT
onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced
UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.

We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

That accident, Einstein, was in NEW ZEALAND!

Nothing I wrote was specific to any one country. Dumping over-heating batteries before they catch on fire - ideally early enough so that they are never going to catch on fire - is always a good idea, provided that you don\'t actually dump them onto somebody.

Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but
you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a
certified, licensed pilot (false),

Actually I didn\'t, but his reading comprehension is specialised in seeing what he wants to see.

Hardware is certified, Airmen are Certificated. Drivers are licensed.

Sorry, but the FAA CERTIFIES pilots and LICENSES them. I do have a CERTIFICATE attesting to same.

An anonymous troll can make all kinds of claims. Perhaps the certificate has a date on it? Maybe it\'s even still valid, even though it clearly shouldn\'t be.

Putting an idiot in control of even a light aircraft endangers all the people he might crash it onto.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:40:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 2:01:32 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:53:18 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:
On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my
own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with
an accident report

Hey Sloman, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?
You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.
He did. He also seems to think that nobody would even think about dumping the batteries until after they had caught on fire, which is remarkably dumb.
You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT
onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced
UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.

We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

That accident, Einstein, was in NEW ZEALAND!
Nothing I wrote was specific to any one country. Dumping over-heating batteries before they catch on fire - ideally early enough so that they are never going to catch on fire - is always a good idea, provided that you don\'t actually dump them onto somebody.
Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but
you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a
certified, licensed pilot (false),
Actually I didn\'t, but his reading comprehension is specialised in seeing what he wants to see.
Hardware is certified, Airmen are Certificated. Drivers are licensed.

Sorry, but the FAA CERTIFIES pilots and LICENSES them. I do have a CERTIFICATE attesting to same.
An anonymous troll can make all kinds of claims. Perhaps the certificate has a date on it? Maybe it\'s even still valid,

Hey SNIPPERMAN, YOU are the troll that makes \"all kinds of claims,\" I deal with FACTS. My certificate DOES have an issue date on it, and once it is issued it is valid unless it is revoked.

even though it clearly shouldn\'t be.

More lies by SNIPPERMAN as he has NOTHING on which to base this lie. What SNIPPERMAN DOESN\'T know is that I have FAR MORE flight hours than your typical private pilot, at 5,000. This is even more than commercial pilots which may list 20,000 hours or more because MOST of their \"flying\" is actually done by an autopilot - they are NOT flying AT ALL!

Putting an idiot in control of even a light aircraft endangers all the people he might crash it onto.

Yeah, SNIPPERMAN, you should NEVER consider becoming a pilot!!!!!!

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 3:57:53 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:40:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 2:01:32 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:53:18 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:
On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my
own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with
an accident report

Hey Sloman, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?
You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.
He did. He also seems to think that nobody would even think about dumping the batteries until after they had caught on fire, which is remarkably dumb.
You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT
onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced
UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.

We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

That accident, Einstein, was in NEW ZEALAND!
Nothing I wrote was specific to any one country. Dumping over-heating batteries before they catch on fire - ideally early enough so that they are never going to catch on fire - is always a good idea, provided that you don\'t actually dump them onto somebody.
Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but
you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a
certified, licensed pilot (false),

Actually I didn\'t, but his reading comprehension is specialised in seeing what he wants to see.

Hardware is certified, Airmen are Certificated. Drivers are licensed.

Sorry, but the FAA CERTIFIES pilots and LICENSES them. I do have a CERTIFICATE attesting to same.

He\'s more likely to have been certified as a lunatic, but he wouldn\'t tell us about that.

An anonymous troll can make all kinds of claims. Perhaps the certificate has a date on it? Maybe it\'s even still valid, even though it clearly shouldn\'t be.

Hey SLOMAN, YOU are the troll that makes \"all kinds of claims\".

I\'m sure that it makes you happy to claim that, but it doesn\'t happen to be true.

> I deal with FACTS. My certificate DOES have an issue date on it, and once it is issued it is valid unless it is revoked.

Flyguy likes to think that he deals with \"facts\" but he \"deals\" with the ones he doesn\'t like by ignoring them.

> More lies by Sloman as he has NOTHING on which to base this lie.

Not that Flyguy can be bothered to identify which observation he doesn\'t like. Flyguy\'s idiocy gets paraded here at regular intervals, but he doesn\'t seem to realise quite how obvious his idiocy is.

> What Sloman DOESN\'T know is that I have FAR MORE flight hours than your typical private pilot, at 5,000.

You may assert this, but nobody knows whether you are telling the truth.

> This is even more than commercial pilots which may list 20,000 hours or more because MOST of their \"flying\" is actually done by an autopilot - they are NOT flying AT ALL!

If you kept flying for long enough you could clock up that many hours. If I remember rightly, even a private pilot in Australia has to clock up a minimum number of hours per year to maintain their certification.

Putting an idiot in control of even a light aircraft endangers all the people he might crash it onto.

Yeah, Sloman, you should NEVER consider becoming a pilot!!!!!!

In your ever-so-expert and only moderately demented opinion.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[corvid]

On 3/29/22 20:01, Flyguy wrote:

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:53:18 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:
On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire
bomb my own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up
with an accident report

Hey SNIPPERMAN, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?
You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.
You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from
AIRCRAFT onto very parched, record drought country that has
experienced UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.

Which is better dropped onto that parched terrain, burning batteries or
whole burning airplanes? Maybe you just want to ensure that the people
onboard have no escape?

We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

That accident, Einstein, was in NEW ZEALAND!

So what? Is that the accident report you offered?

Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation,
but you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I
am not a certified, licensed pilot (false),
Hardware is certified, Airmen are Certificated. Drivers are
licensed.

Sorry, but the FAA CERTIFIES pilots and LICENSES them. I do have a
CERTIFICATE attesting to same.

References aren\'t so easy to find, but here are a couple:

https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/

https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/pilot_records_database/
Who is eligible to access the PRD?
* The responsible person ...
* The authorized user ...
* The pilot — an individual certificated by the FAA at the Commercial,
Airline Transport Pilot, or Remote Pilot level

FAA web pages for the general public will sometimes use \"license\" to
ease-in newcomers, as here:
https://www.faa.gov/pilots/become/

 

[Flyguy]

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 10:34:00 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 3:57:53 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:40:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 2:01:32 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:53:18 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:
On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org
wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my
own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with
an accident report

Hey Sloman, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?
You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.
He did. He also seems to think that nobody would even think about dumping the batteries until after they had caught on fire, which is remarkably dumb.
You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT
onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced
UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.

We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

That accident, Einstein, was in NEW ZEALAND!
Nothing I wrote was specific to any one country. Dumping over-heating batteries before they catch on fire - ideally early enough so that they are never going to catch on fire - is always a good idea, provided that you don\'t actually dump them onto somebody.
Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but
you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a
certified, licensed pilot (false),

Actually I didn\'t, but his reading comprehension is specialised in seeing what he wants to see.

Hardware is certified, Airmen are Certificated. Drivers are licensed.

Sorry, but the FAA CERTIFIES pilots and LICENSES them. I do have a CERTIFICATE attesting to same.
He\'s more likely to have been certified as a lunatic, but he wouldn\'t tell us about that.

An anonymous troll can make all kinds of claims. Perhaps the certificate has a date on it? Maybe it\'s even still valid, even though it clearly shouldn\'t be.

Hey SLOMAN, YOU are the troll that makes \"all kinds of claims\".

I\'m sure that it makes you happy to claim that, but it doesn\'t happen to be true.
I deal with FACTS. My certificate DOES have an issue date on it, and once it is issued it is valid unless it is revoked.
Flyguy likes to think that he deals with \"facts\" but he \"deals\" with the ones he doesn\'t like by ignoring them.

More lies by Sloman as he has NOTHING on which to base this lie.

Not that Flyguy can be bothered to identify which observation he doesn\'t like. Flyguy\'s idiocy gets paraded here at regular intervals, but he doesn\'t seem to realise quite how obvious his idiocy is.

What Sloman DOESN\'T know is that I have FAR MORE flight hours than your typical private pilot, at 5,000.

You may assert this, but nobody knows whether you are telling the truth.
This is even more than commercial pilots which may list 20,000 hours or more because MOST of their \"flying\" is actually done by an autopilot - they are NOT flying AT ALL!
If you kept flying for long enough you could clock up that many hours. If I remember rightly, even a private pilot in Australia has to clock up a minimum number of hours per year to maintain their certification.

Hey SNIPPERMAN, you just reeled off a whole SHIT LOAD of lies, but let\'s just deal with the last one: PROVE \"even a private pilot in Australia has to clock up a minimum number of hours per year to maintain their certification..\" And quote the SPECIFICATE regulation, you idiot.

Putting an idiot in control of even a light aircraft endangers all the people he might crash it onto.

Yeah, Sloman, you should NEVER consider becoming a pilot!!!!!!

In your ever-so-expert and only moderately demented opinion.

--
SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 10:16:38 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:

On 3/29/22 20:01, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:53:18 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:
On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire
bomb my own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up
with an accident report

Hey SNIPPERMAN, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?
You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.
You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from
AIRCRAFT onto very parched, record drought country that has
experienced UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.
Which is better dropped onto that parched terrain, burning batteries or
whole burning airplanes? Maybe you just want to ensure that the people
onboard have no escape?
We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

That accident, Einstein, was in NEW ZEALAND!
So what? Is that the accident report you offered?

SO WHAT??? You didn\'t even get the right FUCKING COUNTRY, you FLAMING ASSHOLE!!!!!!

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 3:16:02 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 10:34:00 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 3:57:53 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:40:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 2:01:32 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:53:18 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:
On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee..org
wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire bomb my
own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up with
an accident report

Hey Sloman, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?

You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.

He did. He also seems to think that nobody would even think about dumping the batteries until after they had caught on fire, which is remarkably dumb.

You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from AIRCRAFT onto very parched, record drought country that has experienced UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.

We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

That accident, Einstein, was in NEW ZEALAND!

Nothing I wrote was specific to any one country. Dumping over-heating batteries before they catch on fire - ideally early enough so that they are never going to catch on fire - is always a good idea, provided that you don\'t actually dump them onto somebody.

Now, I tried to educate your sorry ass in the rules of aviation, but you, being the brain-dead person you are, said things like I am not a certified, licensed pilot (false),

Actually I didn\'t, but his reading comprehension is specialised in seeing what he wants to see.

Hardware is certified, Airmen are Certificated. Drivers are licensed.

Sorry, but the FAA CERTIFIES pilots and LICENSES them. I do have a CERTIFICATE attesting to same.

He\'s more likely to have been certified as a lunatic, but he wouldn\'t tell us about that.

An anonymous troll can make all kinds of claims. Perhaps the certificate has a date on it? Maybe it\'s even still valid, even though it clearly shouldn\'t be.

Hey SLOMAN, YOU are the troll that makes \"all kinds of claims\".

I\'m sure that it makes you happy to claim that, but it doesn\'t happen to be true.

I deal with FACTS. My certificate DOES have an issue date on it, and once it is issued it is valid unless it is revoked.

Flyguy likes to think that he deals with \"facts\" but he \"deals\" with the ones he doesn\'t like by ignoring them.

More lies by Sloman as he has NOTHING on which to base this lie.

Not that Flyguy can be bothered to identify which observation he doesn\'t like. Flyguy\'s idiocy gets paraded here at regular intervals, but he doesn\'t seem to realise quite how obvious his idiocy is.

What Sloman DOESN\'T know is that I have FAR MORE flight hours than your typical private pilot, at 5,000.

You may assert this, but nobody knows whether you are telling the truth..

This is even more than commercial pilots which may list 20,000 hours or more because MOST of their \"flying\" is actually done by an autopilot - they are NOT flying AT ALL!

If you kept flying for long enough you could clock up that many hours. If I remember rightly, even a private pilot in Australia has to clock up a minimum number of hours per year to maintain their certification.

Hey Sloman, you just reeled off a whole SHIT LOAD of lies, but let\'s just deal with the last one: PROVE \"even a private pilot in Australia has to clock up a minimum number of hours per year to maintain their certification.\" And quote the SPECIFICATE regulation, you idiot.

He probably meant the specific regulation, but why would I bother? When I was an undergraduate, one of my fellow students was studying engineering as part of a plan to be come a commercial pilot, and building up flying hours in his spare time. I\'m just reporting what I remember of our conversations on the subject. He also kept a collection of newspaper clippings about private pilots who had ended up dead after flight accidents. There were quite a few of them. That was sixty years ago. Private pilots do seem to keep on crashing. His sister was an air hostess, and she once let me look into the cockpit of the plane that was flying me home to Tasmania on an end-of-term break. She seemed to think that I\'d want to, and I was polite enough to act as if I did.

Putting an idiot in control of even a light aircraft endangers all the people he might crash it onto.

Yeah, Sloman, you should NEVER consider becoming a pilot!!!!!!

In your ever-so-expert and only moderately demented opinion.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 3:17:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:

On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 10:16:38 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:
On 3/29/22 20:01, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 8:53:18 AM UTC-7, corvid wrote:
On 3/28/22 21:16, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-7,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
Flyguy has this nasty habit of claiming that I want to fire
bomb my own country.

There was a thread about electric aircraft, and Flyguy came up
with an accident report

Hey SNIPPERMAN, how is what YOU said DIFFERENT from what I said?
You said that wings have to be chopped off to drop batteries.
You think it is a good idea to drop BURNING BATTERIES from
AIRCRAFT onto very parched, record drought country that has
experienced UNPRECEDENTED WILDFIRES.
Which is better dropped onto that parched terrain, burning batteries or
whole burning airplanes? Maybe you just want to ensure that the people
onboard have no escape?
We saw pictures of the accident site. Green, grassy land.

That accident, Einstein, was in NEW ZEALAND!
So what? Is that the accident report you offered?
SO WHAT??? You didn\'t even get the right FUCKING COUNTRY, you FLAMING ASSHOLE!!!!!!

Flyguy of course thinks that the batteries have to be on fire before anybody would dump them. That\'s a rather more relevant error, but not one that he\'s gong to recognise.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[corvid]

On 3/30/22 22:43, Anthony William Sloman wrote:

Flyguy of course thinks that the batteries have to be on fire before
anybody would dump them. That\'s a rather more relevant error, but
not one that he\'s gong to recognise.

That isn\'t what I get out of it. He recognizes that they shouldn\'t be
dumped if they *are* on fire. The airplane must remain flying until
the fire goes out.

 

[corvid]

On 3/29/22 22:33, Anthony William Sloman wrote:

What Sloman DOESN\'T know is that I have FAR MORE flight hours than
your typical private pilot, at 5,000.

You may assert this, but nobody knows whether you are telling the
truth.

It\'s bullshit. He will include 4,900 hours of remedial training with a
flight instructor, backseat observer, simulator time, lots of other stuff.