Fabulous 60s Girl Gone Bonkers - Lots of CK722s

[Watson A.Name - \"Watt Su]

This seller has many CK722s and similar on Ebay, so many that I won't
bother to list them. Just do a search for fabulous60sgirl and you
should get a whole bunch.

I think it's kind of self defeating to auction off a bunch of the same
thing at once, especially if it's a collectible since each auction
competes against the others. The prices are diluted by the competition.
It would be better to offer a few at a time. But then some sellers
aren't too bright, I've noticed. :-O

Oh, and some sellers are greedy and want as much money as quick as
possible. That's probably this situation.



--
@@F@r@o@m@@O@r@a@n@g@e@@C@o@u@n@t@y@,@@C@a@l@,@@w@h@e@r@e@@
###Got a Question about ELECTRONICS? Check HERE First:###
http://users.pandora.be/educypedia/electronics/databank.htm
My email address is whitelisted. *All* email sent to it
goes directly to the trash unless you add NOSPAM in the
Subject: line with other stuff. alondra101 <at> hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers. Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
@@t@h@e@@a@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@m@e@e@t@@t@h@e@@E@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@

 

[c a l a n d e]

Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun, the Dark Remover" wrote:

This seller has many CK722s and similar on Ebay, so many that I won't
bother to list them. Just do a search for fabulous60sgirl and you
should get a whole bunch.

I think it's kind of self defeating to auction off a bunch of the same
thing at once, especially if it's a collectible since each auction
competes against the others. The prices are diluted by the competition.
It would be better to offer a few at a time. But then some sellers
aren't too bright, I've noticed. :-O

Oh, and some sellers are greedy and want as much money as quick as
possible. That's probably this situation.



--
@@F@r@o@m@@O@r@a@n@g@e@@C@o@u@n@t@y@,@@C@a@l@,@@w@h@e@r@e@@
###Got a Question about ELECTRONICS? Check HERE First:###
http://users.pandora.be/educypedia/electronics/databank.htm
My email address is whitelisted. *All* email sent to it
goes directly to the trash unless you add NOSPAM in the
Subject: line with other stuff. alondra101 <at> hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers. Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
@@t@h@e@@a@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@m@e@e@t@@t@h@e@@E@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@

I noticed that this same seller had previously listed the same CK722
transistors, ending with no bids. I don't know much about the market for
these type of transistors but I would agree that multiple listing is not
a good idea. You give a mixed message of these transistors being "Rare"
but to list so many gives the impression that you may have a few
hundred, which means it's not that rare at all.

 

[Watson A.Name - \"Watt Su]

"c a l a n d e" <r86calande@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:YTuAe.2044$dU3.629@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun, the Dark Remover" wrote:

This seller has many CK722s and similar on Ebay, so many that I
won't
bother to list them. Just do a search for fabulous60sgirl and you
should get a whole bunch.

I think it's kind of self defeating to auction off a bunch of the
same
thing at once, especially if it's a collectible since each auction
competes against the others. The prices are diluted by the
competition.
It would be better to offer a few at a time. But then some sellers
aren't too bright, I've noticed. :-O

Oh, and some sellers are greedy and want as much money as quick as
possible. That's probably this situation.

--

I noticed that this same seller had previously listed the same CK722
transistors, ending with no bids. I don't know much about the market
for
these type of transistors but I would agree that multiple listing is
not
a good idea. You give a mixed message of these transistors being
"Rare"
but to list so many gives the impression that you may have a few
hundred, which means it's not that rare at all.

Seller presumed that buyers are willing to pay $10 for them, which may
not be the case. They didn't put the date code in the auction. The one
picture I looked at closely had a date code of 611, Nov of 56. That's
very late and not so rare, and not so vintage, The collectors want
older date codes from 54 and earlier. My guess is that these would go
for less than ten bucks, maybe only 5 or 6.

 

[Watson A.Name - \"Watt Su]

"Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun, the Dark Remover"" <NOSPAM@dslextreme.com>
wrote in message news:11d7c4gh9r93id9@corp.supernews.com...

"c a l a n d e" <r86calande@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:YTuAe.2044$dU3.629@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun, the Dark Remover" wrote:

This seller has many CK722s and similar on Ebay, so many that I
won't
bother to list them. Just do a search for fabulous60sgirl and
you
should get a whole bunch.

I think it's kind of self defeating to auction off a bunch of the
same
thing at once, especially if it's a collectible since each auction
competes against the others. The prices are diluted by the
competition.
It would be better to offer a few at a time. But then some
sellers
aren't too bright, I've noticed. :-O

Oh, and some sellers are greedy and want as much money as quick as
possible. That's probably this situation.


--

I noticed that this same seller had previously listed the same CK722
transistors, ending with no bids. I don't know much about the market
for
these type of transistors but I would agree that multiple listing is
not
a good idea. You give a mixed message of these transistors being
"Rare"
but to list so many gives the impression that you may have a few
hundred, which means it's not that rare at all.

Seller presumed that buyers are willing to pay $10 for them, which may
not be the case. They didn't put the date code in the auction. The
one
picture I looked at closely had a date code of 611, Nov of 56. That's
very late and not so rare, and not so vintage, The collectors want
older date codes from 54 and earlier. My guess is that these would go
for less than ten bucks, maybe only 5 or 6.

Well, I guess I was right. Nobody bid on these CK722s.


Ebay Item #

7530178033

7530178094

7530178266

There may be a few others that didn't get a bid.

Another case of the seller trying to force the market? Or too many
"rare" items of the same type flooding the market? Or what.