Guest
Hi
Please help me to confirm if my knowledge on rcx and Fire & Ice is
correct.
When rcx is done using the standard options(without field solver),
extraction is done in 2d mode and hence we can safely? say that Fire &
Ice extraction is more accurate since it extracts in 3d(2.5d?) mode.
However, if field solver is turned on, rcx would be more accurate than
Fire and Ice because field solver gives a true 3d extraction whereas
Fire and Ice does not give a true 3d extraction. Its 3d extraction mode
is at best describe as 2.5d.
Am I correct or am I totally off the point? Kindly comment, thanks.
Products which I have in mind :
ASSURA rcx : ver 3.1.3
Fire & Ice QXT : 3.2
Best regards
Quek
Please help me to confirm if my knowledge on rcx and Fire & Ice is
correct.
When rcx is done using the standard options(without field solver),
extraction is done in 2d mode and hence we can safely? say that Fire &
Ice extraction is more accurate since it extracts in 3d(2.5d?) mode.
However, if field solver is turned on, rcx would be more accurate than
Fire and Ice because field solver gives a true 3d extraction whereas
Fire and Ice does not give a true 3d extraction. Its 3d extraction mode
is at best describe as 2.5d.
Am I correct or am I totally off the point? Kindly comment, thanks.
Products which I have in mind :
ASSURA rcx : ver 3.1.3
Fire & Ice QXT : 3.2
Best regards
Quek