F
Fred Bloggs
Guest
5 min. video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-NTRBdbfW8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-NTRBdbfW8
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Even Fox News Weather Is Presenting Balanced Treatment Of Global Warming...
C
Cursitor Doom
Guest
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 08:41:13 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:
Nothing balanced at all. Just more BS. Nothing even mentioned about
alternative hypotheses. You actually believe all this crap?
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:
5 min. video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-NTRBdbfW8
Nothing balanced at all. Just more BS. Nothing even mentioned about
alternative hypotheses. You actually believe all this crap?
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 3:20:31â¯AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Cursitor Doom\'s \"alternative hypotheses\" seem to start with the proposition that the entire climate science academic community has been lying through their teeth since Charles Keeling started publishing continuous data on atmospheric CO2 levels back in 1958.
https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/
This is just a demented conspiracy theory. Calling it an alternative hypothesis is dignifying lunacy.
He may know which crap he wants to believe, but he what he needs is psychiatric examination. That kind of irrational delusion suggests a serious mental disorder.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 08:41:13 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
5 min. video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-NTRBdbfW8
Nothing balanced at all. Just more BS. Nothing even mentioned about alternative hypotheses. You actually believe all this crap?
Cursitor Doom\'s \"alternative hypotheses\" seem to start with the proposition that the entire climate science academic community has been lying through their teeth since Charles Keeling started publishing continuous data on atmospheric CO2 levels back in 1958.
https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/
This is just a demented conspiracy theory. Calling it an alternative hypothesis is dignifying lunacy.
He may know which crap he wants to believe, but he what he needs is psychiatric examination. That kind of irrational delusion suggests a serious mental disorder.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney