ETI-702

[yaputya]

Any old-timers out there that can help me with an old 10.525GHz doppler
radar project?
It was published in ETI as the ETI-702 around May 1975 and used the CL8960
module from Philips.
I built the thing way back when and have just found it again in a box of old
electronic bits.
The article from ETI would be much appreciated.

 

[F Murtz]

yaputya wrote:

Any old-timers out there that can help me with an old 10.525GHz doppler
radar project?
It was published in ETI as the ETI-702 around May 1975 and used the CL8960
module from Philips.
I built the thing way back when and have just found it again in a box of old
electronic bits.
The article from ETI would be much appreciated.



Copies of these magazines are usually held by the state library in nsw

and maybee libraries in other places.

 

[Phil Allison]

"yaputya"

Any old-timers out there that can help me with an old 10.525GHz doppler
radar project?
It was published in ETI as the ETI-702 around May 1975 and used the CL8960
module from Philips.
I built the thing way back when and have just found it again in a box of
old electronic bits.
The article from ETI would be much appreciated.

** Silicon Chip have all the back issues and can do a reprint for you.

Costs $12, if that is not to much for your finances.


..... Phil

 

[yaputya]

"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:afgjrfF9hbmU1@mid.individual.net...

"yaputya"

Any old-timers out there that can help me with an old 10.525GHz doppler radar project?
It was published in ETI as the ETI-702 around May 1975 and used the CL8960 module from Philips.
I built the thing way back when and have just found it again in a box of old electronic bits.
The article from ETI would be much appreciated.


** Silicon Chip have all the back issues and can do a reprint for you.

Costs $12, if that is not to much for your finances.


.... Phil

I really only need the schematic and component overlay.
$12 is a rip-off, SC should put all the old ETI's online for free like Popular Science have done.
http://www.popsci.com/archives

 

[Phil Allison]

"yaputya"

Any old-timers out there that can help me with an old 10.525GHz doppler
radar project?
It was published in ETI as the ETI-702 around May 1975 and used the
CL8960 module from Philips.
I built the thing way back when and have just found it again in a box of
old electronic bits.
The article from ETI would be much appreciated.


** Silicon Chip have all the back issues and can do a reprint for you.

Costs $12, if that is not to much for your finances.


I really only need the schematic and component overlay.

** Yawnnnnn........

$12 is a rip-off,

** Shameful - Leo should be spanked to within an inch of his life ...

SC should put all the old ETI's online for free like Popular Science have
done.
http://www.popsci.com/archives

** How stupid - ETI was never a mag that SC published.

PLUS - at $12 for a reprint, individually hand copied and mailed to your
home address, it is a clear money loser for SC.

But that sort of bloody obvious fact wouldn't bother a born piece of sub
human shit like you.

FOAD, painfully.




..... Phil

 

[yaputya]

"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:afhqlkFhe4nU1@mid.individual.net...

"yaputya"


Any old-timers out there that can help me with an old 10.525GHz doppler radar project?
It was published in ETI as the ETI-702 around May 1975 and used the CL8960 module from Philips.
I built the thing way back when and have just found it again in a box of old electronic bits.
The article from ETI would be much appreciated.


** Silicon Chip have all the back issues and can do a reprint for you.

Costs $12, if that is not to much for your finances.


I really only need the schematic and component overlay.


** Yawnnnnn........


$12 is a rip-off,


** Shameful - Leo should be spanked to within an inch of his life ...

That wouldn't take much these days.

SC should put all the old ETI's online for free like Popular Science have done.
http://www.popsci.com/archives


** How stupid - ETI was never a mag that SC published.

SC is the only entity that can 'legally' put the ETI archives online, since they
'obtained' the rights when Federal Publishing axed EA.
So if SC won't do it themselves, they should let someone else have a go.
BTW
One bloke -Marty- at http://www.retro-riders.com/tech/magz/ used to scan
*any* project article in any of the electronics mags and put 'em up somewhere
on his site for download. And he never charged a cent. He didn't make them public,
you sent him an email for a particular article and he would scan it and send you
the URL by email. Unfortunately the net police seem to have got to him and closed him down.

PLUS - at $12 for a reprint, individually hand copied and mailed to your home address, it is a clear money loser for SC.

They charge $15 for O/S mailing.

So why do they bother if it's such a Phil er such a loser? Just give the job of scanning the
ETI projects to someone who will put them online for nix, like Popular Science did.

Anyway, SC are still photocopying and snail-mailing instead of scanning and
e-mailing. Wake up Leo, it is 2012!

Oh dear.....
Phil the foulmouthed faggot couldn't have taken his pills yet today.......

But that sort of bloody obvious fact wouldn't bother a born piece of sub human shit like you.

FOAD, painfully.
.... Phil

 

[yaputya]

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FKEks.564$Ow3.174@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...

yaputya wrote:
Any old-timers out there that can help me with an old 10.525GHz doppler
radar project?
It was published in ETI as the ETI-702 around May 1975 and used the CL8960
module from Philips.
I built the thing way back when and have just found it again in a box of old
electronic bits.
The article from ETI would be much appreciated.



Copies of these magazines are usually held by the state library in nsw and maybee libraries in other places.

Thanks, but I'm about 10,000 miles from NSW.

 

[Phil Allison]

"yaputya"

"Phil Allison"

** Silicon Chip have all the back issues and can do a reprint for you.

Costs $12, if that is not to much for your finances.


$12 is a rip-off,


** Shameful - Leo should be spanked to within an inch of his life ...

That wouldn't take much these days.

** You are an utter arse.

SC should put all the old ETI's online for free like Popular Science
have done.
http://www.popsci.com/archives


** How stupid - ETI was never a mag that SC published.

SC is the only entity that can 'legally' put the ETI archives online,
since they
'obtained' the rights when Federal Publishing axed EA.
So if SC won't do it themselves, they should let someone else have a go.

** SC do not have full copyright over all the material published in ETI and
EA mags - the contributed articles for example were published under
"copyright license" which extends to supplying reprints by likely not to re-
publication on the net.

In any case, SC have a very good idea of the current level of interest in
such a thing and well know it is so small that the effort is not worth it.

PLUS - at $12 for a reprint, individually hand copied and mailed to
your home address, it is a clear money loser for SC.


They charge $15 for O/S mailing.

** Costs more to mail overseas and is time consuming too.

So why do they bother if it's such a Phil er such a loser?

** It's a service to readers.

Just give the job of scanning the
ETI projects to someone who will put them online for nix, like Popular
Science did.

** Copyright issues and the lack of interest make it a non starter.

Anyway, SC are still photocopying and snail-mailing instead of scanning
and
e-mailing. Wake up Leo, it is 2012!

** Many people prefer a paper copy - cos they may not have email or a
suitable printer at home.

Scanning an article takes longer than photocopying and the results are
often poor too.

BTW:

Here is Australia, we have a name for people who want everything for next to
nothing and expect others to serve their every whim for free. We call people
like you " bludgers".

Fuck off - bludger.




..... Phil

 

[yaputya]

"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:afja2iFs4lvU1@mid.individual.net...

"yaputya"
"Phil Allison"

** Silicon Chip have all the back issues and can do a reprint for you.

Costs $12, if that is not to much for your finances.


$12 is a rip-off,


** Shameful - Leo should be spanked to within an inch of his life ...

That wouldn't take much these days.


** You are an utter arse.

Funny, coming from a faggot like you.

SC should put all the old ETI's online for free like Popular Science have done.
http://www.popsci.com/archives


** How stupid - ETI was never a mag that SC published.

SC is the only entity that can 'legally' put the ETI archives online, since they
'obtained' the rights when Federal Publishing axed EA.
So if SC won't do it themselves, they should let someone else have a go.


** SC do not have full copyright over all the material published in ETI and EA mags - the contributed articles for example were
published under "copyright license" which extends to supplying reprints by likely not to re- publication on the net.

For fucks sake, we are talking about stuff published nearly 40 years ago!!!!!
Nobody who contributed articles way back then is going to give a fuck about
having them published on the internet now - you really are in dreamworld!

In any case, SC have a very good idea of the current level of interest in such a thing and well know it is so small that the
effort is not worth it.

Exactly. So why not just let someone else do the job of scanning the ETI projects
and putting them online for nix, like Popular Science did.

PLUS - at $12 for a reprint, individually hand copied and mailed to your home address, it is a clear money loser for SC.


They charge $15 for O/S mailing.

** Costs more to mail overseas and is time consuming too.

Coz they don't bloody scan and email - it would cost the same then.
For fucks sake, how much time does it take to find a magazine, walk
back to the scanner, scan it and then send it as an attchment to an email?
10 minutes tops, unless you are a blithering idiot.

So why do they bother if it's such a Phil er such a loser?

** It's a service to readers.

It's a ripoff at $12-$15 for a few photocpies.

Just give the job of scanning the
ETI projects to someone who will put them online for nix, like Popular Science did.

** Copyright issues and the lack of interest make it a non starter.

Copyright! What bullshit - the project authors would be glad to see their
stuff preserved online. At the moment you cannot access any ETI archives.
Lack of interest is not relevant - just let someone do it for nix.
If SC are losing money providing the service, then JUST GIVE IT TO
SOMEONE WHO WILL DO IT FOR NOTHING! Then they won't lose
any more money will they, Einstein???

Anyway, SC are still photocopying and snail-mailing instead of scanning and
e-mailing. Wake up Leo, it is 2012!


** Many people prefer a paper copy - cos they may not have email or a suitable printer at home.

You are an idiot.

Scanning an article takes longer than photocopying and the results are often poor too.

Maybe your results are poor, understandable, however any competent person
can get good results operating a scanner. Do you think the staff at SC are as
stupid as you?

BTW:

Here is Australia, we have a name for people who want everything for next to nothing and expect others to serve their every whim
for free. We call people like you " bludgers".

'Here in Australia' - you really are a stupid wanker! I was born in Australia and
lived there for 45 years. Unlike you, I graduated from Sydney Uni - you were
kicked out/forced to quit because of some shameful faggot behaviour, it is said.

And 'WE', it is 'WE' now is it? ROTFLMFHO!!! You are alone here, wake up!
You are one of the most despised people on the 'net.
You are hated by hundreds, probably thousands in the groups and forums
that you have polluted, including aus.electronics.
(Just google 'Phil Allison psycho' for starters and you'll see that 'we' is really
just one poor deluded wanker called Phil.)

Fuck off - bludger.

You really are a pathetic loser!
Be honest here - have you ever downloaded a music file for free that was subject
to copyright? Hypocrite!!!

Anyway, I bought the ETI magazine and built the ETI-702 back in the '70s.
So I have already paid for it, you fool.

 

[Phil Allison]

"yaputya"

** You are an utter arse.


** SC do not have full copyright over all the material published in ETI
and EA mags
- the contributed articles for example were published under "copyright
license"
which extends to supplying reprints by likely not to re- publication on
the net.

For fucks sake, we are talking about stuff published nearly 40 years
ago!!!!!

** Absolutely WRONG !!

In the case of EA mag, it is as little as 10 years ago and for ETI about 13
years ago.

Nobody who contributed articles way back then is going to give a fuck
about
having them published on the internet now

** Get your dates right and the story is very different.

Arsehole.

In any case, SC have a very good idea of the current level of interest in
such a thing and well know it is so small that the effort is not worth
it.

Exactly. So why not just let someone else do the job of scanning the ETI
projects
and putting them online for nix, like Popular Science did.

** That is simply a dopey pipe dream of yours - fuckwit.

Popular Science is a very different publication to EA and ETI and you are
making a false comparison.

** It's a service to readers.

It's a ripoff at $12-$15 for a few photocpies.

** You are COLOSSAL FUCKING MORON.

Copyright! What bullshit - the project authors would be glad to see their
stuff preserved online. At the moment you cannot access any ETI archives.
Lack of interest is not relevant - just let someone do it for nix.

** Pure fantasy that there IS any such a person and the copyright issue is
very real.

Here is Australia, we have a name for people who want everything for next
to nothing and expect others to serve their every whim for free. We call
people like you " bludgers".

'Here in Australia' - you really are a stupid wanker! I was born in
Australia and
lived there for 45 years.

** Really ?

Unlike you, I graduated from Sydney Uni ...

** Really ?

In what subject was that then, " Pure and Applied Bullshit " ??

Cos that is the only thing you have any talent at.

You are very clearly a demented narcissist and a first class bludger.

Fuck off.



..... Phil

 

[yaputya]

"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:aflmm8Fe5d5U1@mid.individual.net...

"yaputya"

You are hated by hundreds, probably thousands in the groups and forums
that you have polluted, including aus.electronics.
(Just google 'Phil Allison psycho' for starters and you'll see that 'we' is really
just one poor deluded wanker called Phil.)


Phil avoided and snipped THE QUESTION....
Be honest here - have you ever downloaded a music file for free that was subject
to copyright? If so you're just a hypocrital bludger!!!


Anyway, I bought the ETI magazine and built the ETI-702 back in the '70s.
So I have already paid for it.

Nobody who contributed articles way back then is going to give a fuck about
having them published on the internet now

** Get your dates right and the story is very different.

Bullshit.
No contributor from AE or ETI has the slightest chance of making anything from
the stuff published 40,30,20 or 10 years ago. The projects are way out of date.
They would rather see their stuff archived on the net.

Arsehole.

You are pre-occupied with arseholes, must be a faggot.

In any case, SC have a very good idea of the current level of interest in such a thing and well know it is so small that the
effort is not worth it.

Exactly. So why not just let someone else do the job of scanning the ETI projects
and putting them online for nix, like Popular Science did.

** That is simply a dopey pipe dream of yours - fuckwit.

Why not, you faggot? You cannot put up a logical reason, can you???

Popular Science is a very different publication to EA and ETI and you are making a false comparison.

Scanning and putting the ETI archive online has nothing to do with
whether ETI is similar to Popular Science or not.

** It's a service to readers.

It's a ripoff at $12-$15 for a few photocpies.


** You are COLOSSAL FUCKING MORON.

Phil has no logical arguement, so his foul mouth kicks in and makes him look stupid.
He is a dropout, a loser who couldn't even get through the first year of uni.

Copyright! What bullshit - the project authors would be glad to see their
stuff preserved online. At the moment you cannot access any ETI archives.
Lack of interest is not relevant - just let someone do it for nix.

** Pure fantasy that there IS any such a person and the copyright issue is very real.

Sure, faggot. Then please explain exactly who does hold the copyright then.
SC? Federal Publishing? Murray Publishing? You really haven't got a fucking clue, have you?

Here is Australia, we have a name for people who want everything for next to nothing and expect others to serve their every whim
for free. We call people like you " bludgers".

'Here in Australia' - you really are a stupid wanker! I was born in Australia and
lived there for 45 years.

** Really ?

Absolutely.
Unlike you, I graduated from Sydney Uni - you were kicked out/forced to
quit because of some shameful faggot behaviour, it is said.

Unlike you, I graduated from Sydney Uni ...

** Really ?

Absolutely.

In what subject was that then, " Pure and Applied Bullshit " ??

Science (Physics) and Engineering (Electrical) double degree....unlike
you who couldn't even last one year.....were you just too stupid
or was it because of some shameful faggot behaviour that you were
kicked out of/forced to quit Sydney Uni?

 

[Phil Allison]

"yaputya"

"Phil Allison"
You are hated by hundreds, probably thousands in the groups and forums ..

** Something I am quite proud of, actually.

Cos every one of those folk was a brain dead, trolling POS - just like
you.

So far, I have effectively shut down two NGs and kicked most of the trolls
off another.

Phil avoided and snipped THE QUESTION....

** That is not and never was the question.

But FYI , U-tube aside, I have never downloaded any music or movies.

Anyway, I bought the ETI magazine and built the ETI-702 back in the '70s.
So I have already paid for it.

** You are missing the point - fuckwit.

The people who still hold copyright ( myself included) would be entitled to
an extra fee if the material were ever republished on the net. Send an email
to Leo about it if you want all the details.

** Get your dates right and the story is very different.

No contributor from AE or ETI has the slightest chance of making anything
from
the stuff published 40,30,20 or 10 years ago.

** You are sooooo wrong - yet again.

One of my projects ( Miniosc) is still being sold as a kit by Altronics and
all nine of them of them are still perfectly viable designs for home
construction.

Exactly. So why not just let someone else do the job of scanning the ETI
projects
and putting them online for nix, like Popular Science did.

** That is simply a dopey pipe dream of yours - fuckwit.

Why not, you faggot?

** It's your mad assertion so YOU get to prove it.

I won't be holding my breath waiting.

Popular Science is a very different publication to EA and ETI and you are
making a false comparison.

Scanning and putting the ETI archive online has nothing to do with
whether ETI is similar to Popular Science or not.

** Try learning to read - fuckwit.

YOU made the erroneous comparison over and over.

** Pure fantasy that there IS any such a person and the copyright issue
is very real.

Sure, faggot. Then please explain exactly who does hold the copyright
then.
SC? Federal Publishing? Murray Publishing?

** The authors of nearly all the contributed projects and articles still
hold copyright - cos EA, ETI and SC never asked them to sign a contract
transferring copyright to them.

'Here in Australia' - you really are a stupid wanker! I was born in
Australia and
lived there for 45 years.

** Really ?

Unlike you, I graduated from Sydney Uni ...

** Really ?

In what subject was that then, " Pure and Applied Bullshit " ??

Cos that is the only thing you have any talent at..


Science (Physics) and Engineering (Electrical) double degree.

** Really ?

And when was it you had your first mental breakdown ??

And when were you deported from Australia ??

you who couldn't even last one year.....

** Oh, I was there for longer than that.

Doing the Honours courses in science and engineering.

Never failed any exams and left entirely of my own volition.

BTW:

There were a huge number of ARSEHOLES at Sydney Uni - among the student
body and the staff.

A pig arrogant cunthead like you would have blended in very nicely.




..... Phil

 

[yaputya]

"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:aflus6FfqajU1@mid.individual.net...

"yaputya"
"Phil Allison"
You are hated by hundreds, probably thousands in the groups and forums ..

** Something I am quite proud of, actually.

Cos every one of those folk was a brain dead, trolling POS - just like you.

So far, I have effectively shut down two NGs and kicked most of the trolls off another.

Translation - fucked up two NGs with mindless insulting troll posts.

Phil avoided and snipped THE QUESTION....

** That is not and never was the question.

But FYI , U-tube aside, I have never downloaded any music or movies.

Nobody believes you.

 

[Phil Allison]

"yaputyaa = cunt

So far, I have effectively shut down two NGs and kicked most of the
trolls off another.

Translation -

** You have no fucking idea.

See how much activity there is on "aus.hi-fi" or " alt.audio.pro.live-sound"
in the last few years.

What were once troll infested shit holes are now ghost towns.

This NG is not far behind.

Cunts beware.



..... Phil

 

[yaputya]

"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:aflus6FfqajU1@mid.individual.net...

"yaputya"

Anyway, I bought the ETI magazine and built the ETI-702 back in the '70s.
So I have already paid for it.


** You are missing the point - fuckwit.

The people who still hold copyright ( myself included) would be entitled to an extra fee if the material were ever republished on
the net. Send an email to Leo about it if you want all the details.

You are so out of touch with the real world.
For a start, there are hundreds of people who contributed to EA and ETI,
you will never track them down to send them their "entitelments".
Secondly, your stuff and and everyone elses project contributions to
EA and ETI can be put on the web by anyone in the world. I have seen stuff from
SC republished on various OS electronics forums etc. and they are still in
business!
So all your waffle about getting paid if the EA/ETI archive was made available
for free is unenforcable and patently ridiculous.

** Get your dates right and the story is very different.

No contributor from AE or ETI has the slightest chance of making anything from
the stuff published 40,30,20 or 10 years ago.

** You are sooooo wrong - yet again.

One of my projects ( Miniosc) is still being sold as a kit by Altronics and all nine of them of them are still perfectly viable
designs for home construction.

Big deal. That's about the only project that still is a kit.
Oh, and please answer this Einstein....
Altronics are still selling a kit, are you getting paid for that ?
If someone wanted to build the Miniosc, would they simply go
to Altronics and buy the kit (you get nothing) or would they
get a reprint from SC and make their own (you still get nothing).
If the EA archive was online you would still get nothing, but SC
would be saving money (you said so yourself).

Scanning and putting the ETI archive online has nothing to do with
whether ETI is similar to Popular Science or not.

** Try learning to read - fuckwit.

YOU made the erroneous comparison over and over.


** Pure fantasy that there IS any such a person and the copyright issue is very real.

Sure, faggot. Then please explain exactly who does hold the copyright then.
SC? Federal Publishing? Murray Publishing?


** The authors of nearly all the contributed projects and articles still hold copyright - cos EA, ETI and SC never asked them to
sign a contract transferring copyright to them.

True, but the contributors aren't makin any money out of the current
arrangements, the projects are largely of historical significance and
anyone violating this pissweak example of copyright would be ROTFL
if you tried to take them to court.
It's called pissing into the wind and you are very good at it, it seems.

BTW I have a Mini Oscillator!! I bought it when Dick Smith was getting
out of the kit business and selling off all the kits in the stores.
It only cost $5, worth that in parts alone. But I built it anyway and still use
it - it's handy but you still need a CRO to see what the uncalibrated
thing is actually putting out. Especially as there is no weak battery indication.

Funny thing is the DSE K-7339 Assembly Manual that came with the
kit doesn't mention any "Phil Allison" at all!!!! It says the circuit "derives
from the Low Distortion Oscillator in Feb/Mar 1989 EA, and
it occurred to us that an even simpler version was possible."
Now I don't doubt that Phil designed the "Son of LDO" but he didn't
get any credit in the DSE kit. And he didn't get any money from the
sale of that kit, either.

 

[yaputya]

"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:aflus6FfqajU1@mid.individual.net...

"yaputya"

Unlike you, I graduated from Sydney Uni ...

** Really ?

In what subject was that then, " Pure and Applied Bullshit " ??

Science (Physics) and Engineering (Electrical) double degree.

** Really ?

And when was it you had your first mental breakdown ??

I got through uni and the rest of my life without one.
Looks clearly like you had one which caused you to drop out of uni, though.

And when were you deported from Australia ??
Australian citizens cannot be deported - you are so fucking stupid sometimes.

you who couldn't even last one year.....


** Oh, I was there for longer than that.

Sure, what 18 months before your mental breakdown? How long was it then?

Doing the Honours courses in science and engineering.

Oh really?????
You enrolled in an Honours course in science and engineering, did you?
These days an Honours year is available in some faculties for 'upgrading'
a pass degree. Back in the '70s however, you just did the normal bachelor
course and got a 'First Class Honours, Second Class Honours' based on
your final year. So what is this bullshit about 'Doing the Honours courses
in science and engineering' if you never even got close to a final year ???????

See notes about Sydney Uni Honours below...

Never failed any exams and left entirely of my own volition.

You probably missed so many exams due to your mental breakdown that
you only attended a couple of them anyway.

BTW:

There were a huge number of ARSEHOLES at Sydney Uni - among the student body and the staff.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoid_personality_disorder
"Paranoid personality disorder is a mental disorder characterized by paranoia
and a pervasive, long-standing suspiciousness and generalized mistrust of others.
Individuals with this personality disorder may be hypersensitive, easily feel slighted,
and habitually relate to the world by vigilant scanning of the environment for clues
or suggestions that may validate their fears or biases.

A pig arrogant cunthead like you would have blended in very nicely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoid_personality_disorder

A faggot like you would have been very upset at Sydney Uni Engineering in the '70s.
Rule #1 in the SUEUA was: NO POOFTERS
So was rule#2 etc.......


The truth about Sydney Uni Honors courses...
http://sydney.edu.au/science/cstudent/pg/research/honours/index.shtml
"Honours in the Faculty of Science is a widely recognised and highly regarded additional
year of undergraduate study available to students who have recently completed their undergraduate degree."

http://sydney.edu.au/engineering/it/current_students/undergrad/honours/grades.shtml
"The degree that a student is eligible for when starting Honours is a Pass degree.
The work done in the Honours year can be thought of as an 'upgrade' of this degree.
If a student fails the Honours year, it simply means that the student is left with the Pass degree
- no class of Honours is awarded."

http://sydney.edu.au/engineering/civil/current/undergraduate/thesis.shtml
"The University awards honours at graduation to students who achieved a high level
of academic performance throughout their degree, including a significant research component
of the research thesis."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor%27s_degree#Australia
In Australia the degree is awarded with honours to students who have achieved a higher level
of performance in a fourth year, one beyond a typical bachelor's degree.
Some bachelor's degrees include an honours program as part of a four-year degree
(i.e., engineering or psychology).

 

[yaputya]

"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:afn08kFmc9sU1@mid.individual.net...

"yaputyaa = cunt


So far, I have effectively shut down two NGs and kicked most of the trolls off another.

Translation - fucked up two NGs with mindless insulting troll posts.



** You have no fucking idea.

See how much activity there is on "aus.hi-fi" or " alt.audio.pro.live-sound" in the last few years.

What were once troll infested shit holes are now ghost towns.

This NG is not far behind.

Cunts beware.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoid_personality_disorder
"Paranoid personality disorder is a mental disorder characterized by paranoia
and a pervasive, long-standing suspiciousness and generalized mistrust of others.
Individuals with this personality disorder may be hypersensitive, easily feel slighted,
and habitually relate to the world by vigilant scanning of the environment for clues
or suggestions that may validate their fears or biases.

 

[Phil Allison]

"yaputya = LIAR "

"Phil Allison"
"yaputya"

Anyway, I bought the ETI magazine and built the ETI-702 back in the
'70s.
So I have already paid for it.


** You are missing the point - fuckwit.

The people who still hold copyright ( myself included) would be entitled
to an extra fee if the material were ever republished on the net. Send an
email to Leo about it if you want all the details.


For a start, there are hundreds of people who contributed to EA and ETI,
you will never track them down to send them their "entitelments".

** Or to simply ask for their permission to republish on the net.

Big problem.

Secondly, your stuff and and everyone elses project contributions to
EA and ETI can be put on the web by anyone in the world.

** Not legally and that is irrelevant to the SC situation.

So all your waffle about getting paid if the EA/ETI archive was made
available
for free is unenforcable ...

** Against SC magazine, it would be enforceable.

You rabid half wit.

** Get your dates right and the story is very different.

No contributor from AE or ETI has the slightest chance of making
anything from
the stuff published 40,30,20 or 10 years ago.

** You are sooooo wrong - yet again.

One of my projects ( Miniosc) is still being sold as a kit by Altronics
and all nine of them of them are still perfectly viable designs for home
construction.

Big deal. That's about the only project that still is a kit.

** Makes it a pretty cool design - eh.

Altronics are still selling a kit, are you getting paid for that ?

** The hobby magzines do not ask for any ROYALTIES nor can any author get
them from a kit supplier.

You have fucking NO idea how the business works.

If someone wanted to build the Miniosc, would they simply go
to Altronics and buy the kit (you get nothing) or would they
get a reprint from SC and make their own (you still get nothing).

** They get a reprint with the kit, standard practice and part of the
original deal when contributing.

If the EA archive was online you would still get nothing,

** I could veto the re-publication on the net of my projects by SC.

Then publish them on a website myself, as I hold copyright.

Royalties and copyright are separate issues - fuckwit.

** The authors of nearly all the contributed projects and articles still
hold copyright cos EA, ETI and SC never asked them to sign a contract
transferring copyright to them.

True, but the contributors aren't makin any money out of the current
arrangements,

** Irrelevant to the copyright issue.

You have no idea how it works - fuckwit .

BTW I have a Mini Oscillator!! I bought it when Dick Smith was getting
out of the kit business and selling off all the kits in the stores.
It only cost $5, worth that in parts alone. But I built it anyway and
still use
it - it's handy but you still need a CRO to see what the uncalibrated
thing is actually putting out.

** You have ears don't you ?

It was designed for audio testing - fuckwit.

Especially as there is no weak battery indication.

** The unit works perfectly with only 6.2 volts coming from the battery,
then goes into slight distortion below that.

If you can hear any distortion, the batt is flat.

Fuckwit.

Funny thing is the DSE K-7339 Assembly Manual that came with the
kit doesn't mention any "Phil Allison" at all!!!!

** Most authors wanted their names removed by kit suppliers to stop raving
idiots like YOU contacting them with stupid questions and asking for remote
diagnoses of their OWN mistakes.

Fuckwit.


..... Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

"yaputya is a LIAR "
"Phil Allison"

"yaputya"

Unlike you, I graduated from Sydney Uni ...

** Really ?

In what subject was that then, " Pure and Applied Bullshit " ??

Science (Physics) and Engineering (Electrical) double degree.

** Really ?

And when was it you had your first mental breakdown ??

I got through uni and the rest of my life without one.

** But you are having one right now.

You are bullshitting so hard you may drop dead any minute.

And when were you deported from Australia ??

Australian citizens cannot be deported

** But you are not one.

Doing the Honours courses in science and engineering.

Oh really?????

** Yep.

You enrolled in an Honours course in science and engineering, did you?

** Yep, right from day one.

Entry to the special honours level courses was based on a student' s HSC
exam results, you had to be in the top 100 in both Math and Physics ( the
first level courses) to have a chance.

This was the deal at Sydney Uni in the early 1970s.



.... Phil

 

[Jeßus]

On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:01:34 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au>
wrote:

"yaputyaa = cunt


So far, I have effectively shut down two NGs and kicked most of the
trolls off another.

Translation -


** You have no fucking idea.

See how much activity there is on "aus.hi-fi" or " alt.audio.pro.live-sound"
in the last few years.

What were once troll infested shit holes are now ghost towns.

Phallison, practically every newsgroup is in decline - and has been
for years now - has nothing to do with your fantasies whatsoever.