error IC033 ?

[Bogdan, Mocanu]

What is this error that appears when I try to run IC5033 ? How do I
fix it ? Is it that important ?

Code:
[bogdan(at)localhost ~]$ cd lucru
[bogdan(at)localhost lucru]$ icfb&
[1] 5480
[bogdan(at)localhost lucru]$ Incorrectly built binary which accesses
errno or h_errno directly. Needs to be fixed.


Bogdan, Mocanu

 

[Jean-Marc Bourguet]

"Bogdan, Mocanu" <bogdan.mocanu21@googlemail.com> writes:

What is this error that appears when I try to run IC5033 ?

You probably are running on a platform not supported for that release.

How do I fix it ?

Running on a platform which was supported at by IC5033
Running a current release

Is it that important ?

I don't know.

--
Jean-Marc

 

[prime_number]

Bogdan, Mocanu wrote:

What is this error that appears when I try to run IC5033 ? How do I
fix it ? Is it that important ?

Code:
[bogdan(at)localhost ~]$ cd lucru
[bogdan(at)localhost lucru]$ icfb&
[1] 5480
[bogdan(at)localhost lucru]$ Incorrectly built binary which accesses
errno or h_errno directly. Needs to be fixed.


Bogdan, Mocanu

As already said: switch to 5141 ...

Or: create a wrapper script (preferably a bourne shell script)
for the icfb-call:

#!/bin/sh

....

LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL

....

icfb

 

[Riad KACED]

Hi G,

You problem has been discussed in previous posts and I did manage to
find some comments about.
Please read through the following link to understand why it is not
really good to set this variable, even it does solve the problem.
Again, IC5141 would save you that grief and hassle
Here is the link in question:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.cad.cadence/browse_thread/thread/cba0d4ce6d7f9bdb/0871fbe7b9c309ba

Good luck anyway !
Regards,
Riad.

 

[Bogdan, Mocanu]

I totally forgot ! Because I knew about setting that variable :
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL ... but I forgot to re-edit the .bashrc file (I just
COPY - PASTE from my previous installation attempt ) ... And Riad I
already read that topic. It obviously worked. Thanks anyway.



On Oct 29, 8:00 pm, Riad KACED <riad.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi G,

You problem has been discussed in previous posts and I did manage to
find some comments about.
Please read through the following link to understand why it is not
really good to set this variable, even it does solve the problem.
Again, IC5141 would save you that grief and hassle
Here is the link in question:http://groups.google.com/group/comp.cad.cadence/browse_thread/thread/...

Good luck anyway !
Regards,
Riad.