Enhanced Stats, Profiles & "Public" Info On Newsgroups Poste

Guest
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news groups,
the total number of posts over a certain period of time.

This could be supplemented with other difficult to compile but public
stats and search information.

The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio,
for example.

The average number of responses and number of different names received
by a poster's OP posts.

The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.

A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on
topic.

A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to
see if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed
out.

If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.


Bret Cahill
 
On Aug 31, 1:59 pm, BretCah...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news groups,
the total number of posts over a certain period of time.

This could be supplemented with other difficult to compile but public
stats and search information.

The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio,
for example.

The average number of responses and number of different names received
by a poster's OP posts.

The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.

A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on
topic.

A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to
see if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed
out.

If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.

Bret Cahill
Such as Patriot Games, right?
 
On Aug 31, 2:09 pm, triba_la_r...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 1:59 pm, BretCah...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news groups,
the total number of posts over a certain period of time...
This could be supplemented with other difficult to compile but public
stats and search information...
If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.
-
Such as Patriot Games, right?
....

*PATRIOT GAMES* (a.k.a. Bob Milby Jr.)
*IS* AN *OFFICIAL* USENET K00K!
(Was: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, July 2008)

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/browse_thread/thread/e7770cf76216ca40/ee1a3d704b569384?hl=en&lnk=st&q=WINNERS!+Usenet+Kook+Awards%2C+July+2008++group%3Aalt.usenet.kooks#ee1a3d704b569384

<wrang...@caballista.org> wrote:
"20th Century Fox Fanfare"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z54ynmUPZ5c
The time has come to announce the winners of the July 2008 Usenet Kook
Awards. Envelopes, please!
...
PALMJOB PADDLE
-
Congratulations, Patriot Games! In a squeaker, the voters of AUK
decided that you were the one most spanked by the regulars of your
home group this past month. Now, take this pillow. I doubt any of
the chairs are quite soft enough for you.
...
The Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler of alt.usenet.kooks
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Alt.usenet.kooks
http://tinyurl.com/AUKFAQ
====
YOU DESERVE IT, BOB!

-Tom Sr.
 
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news groups,
the total number of posts over a certain period of time.

This could be supplemented with other difficult to compile but public
stats and search information.

The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio,
for example.

The average number of responses and number of different names received
by a poster's OP posts.

The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.

A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on
topic.

A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to
see if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed
out.

If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.

Such as Patriot Games, right?
Outing rightards might be the most spectacular application but there
are a lot of non political idiots who fancy themselves as having
something to say.


Bret Cahill
 
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news groups,
the total number of posts over a certain period of time.

This could be supplemented with other difficult to compile but public
stats and search information.

The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio,
for example.

The average number of responses and number of different names received
by a poster's OP posts.

The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.

A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on
topic.

A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to
see if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed
out.

If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.

Harder to quantify
It's as easy to quantify OPs and BEs as total activity which Google
does now.

the silly little children who do nothing like
puerile coat trailings
A search box will quickly identify all your BEs and, at a glance,
anyone can quickly determine that you have nothing to say.


Bret Cahill
 
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news
groups, the total number of posts over a certain period of time.
This could be supplemented with other difficult to
compile but public stats and search information.
The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio, for example.
The average number of responses and number of different names
received by a poster's OP posts.
The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.
A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on topic.
A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to see
if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed out.
If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.

Harder to quantify

It's as easy to quantify OPs and BEs as total activity which Google does now.

Yes, but that alone is no use.
That's why a serch tool needs to be added:

I'd type in "Rod Speed" in the BE box and get all your posts that
ended branchs.

If those posts are devoid of content other than your usual,

"Nope."

"Never happen"

"Nuke"

"No way."

They I'ld post it here and everyone would know you are as worthless as
Al Gore in a dust devil.

You have to analyse what gets posted in
an OP
Another search tool would list all your OPs.

.. . .


A search box will quickly identify all your BEs and, at a glance,
anyone can quickly determine that you have nothing to say.

You dont need google to do that.
It would speed things up.


Bret Cahill
 
On Aug 31, 5:24 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news
groups, the total number of posts over a certain period of time.
This could be supplemented with other difficult to
compile but public stats and search information.
The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio, for example.
The average number of responses and number of different names
received by a poster's OP posts.
The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.
A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on topic.
A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to see
if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed out.
If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.
Harder to quantify
It's as easy to quantify OPs and BEs as total activity which Google does now.

Yes, but that alone is no use. You have to analyse what gets posted in
an OP because some clearly just quote shit from elsewhere and thats
nothing like as useful as actually having something useful to say etc.

In spades with BEs which are often just mindless shit everyone just ignores like with 'gp's currently.

the silly little children who do nothing like puerile coat trailings
A search box will quickly identify all your BEs and, at a glance,
anyone can quickly determine that you have nothing to say.

You dont need google to do that. And fuck all use google to read usenet anyway.
You want to have sex with everyone who uses google to read usenet?
 
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news
groups, the total number of posts over a certain period of time.
This could be supplemented with other difficult to
compile but public stats and search information.
The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio, for example.
The average number of responses and number of different names
received by a poster's OP posts.
The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.
A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on topic.
A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to see
if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed out.
If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.
Harder to quantify
It's as easy to quantify OPs and BEs as total activity which Google does now.
Yes, but that alone is no use.
That's why a serch tool needs to be added:

I'd type in "Rod Speed" in the BE box and get all your posts that ended branchs.

Thats nothing like your original
From the OP of this thread:

"A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to
see if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed
out.

"If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech
discussion."

And google wont be bothering to implement that sort of search anyway.
They might come up with something even better.

You have to analyse what gets posted in an OP

Another search tool would list all your OPs.

Thats nothing like your original
From the OP:

"A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP
posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on
topic."

.. . .

A search box will quickly identify all your BEs and, at a glance,
anyone can quickly determine that you have nothing to say.

You dont need google to do that.

It would speed things up.

And hardly anyone would bother to do that
Let each decide.


Bret Cahill
 
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news
groups, the total number of posts over a certain period of time.
This could be supplemented with other difficult to
compile but public stats and search information.
The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio, for example.
The average number of responses and number of
different names received by a poster's OP posts.
The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.
A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on topic.
A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to see
if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed out.
If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.
Harder to quantify
It's as easy to quantify OPs and BEs as total activity which Google does now.
Yes, but that alone is no use.
That's why a serch tool needs to be added:
I'd type in "Rod Speed" in the BE box and get all your posts that ended branchs.
Thats nothing like your original
From the OP of this thread:
"A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to see
if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed out.

Just seeing the BE doesnt allow you to see if its a flame out,
Why wouldn't it?

you need the context to do that.
You can always look that up.

And real discussion aint about 'won a debate' either.
You just say that because you always lose every debate.

You are the biggest loser on newsgroups.

Everyone thinks you are an idiot.


Bret Cahill
 
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news
groups, the total number of posts over a certain period of time.
This could be supplemented with other difficult to
compile but public stats and search information.
The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio, for example.
The average number of responses and number of
different names received by a poster's OP posts.
The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.
A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on topic.
A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to see
if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed out.
If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.
Harder to quantify
It's as easy to quantify OPs and BEs as total activity which Google does now.
Yes, but that alone is no use.
That's why a serch tool needs to be added:
I'd type in "Rod Speed" in the BE box and get all your posts that ended branchs.
Thats nothing like your original
From the OP of this thread:
"A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to see if
the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed out.
Just seeing the BE doesnt allow you to see if its a flame out,

Why wouldn't it?

Because you need to see what a flame is in response to.
Why?

you need the context to do that.

You can always look that up.

If you're going to do that, your 'search box' is completely useless.
That's what the search box is for.


Bret Cahill
 
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:09:04 -0700 (PDT), triba_la_Cucaracha@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Aug 31, 1:59 pm, BretCah...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news groups,
the total number of posts over a certain period of time.
This could be supplemented with other difficult to compile but public
stats and search information.
The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio,
for example.
The average number of responses and number of different names received
by a poster's OP posts.
The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.
A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on
topic.
A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to
see if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed
out.
If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.
Such as Patriot Games, right?
Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!
 
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:59:05 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
wrote:
The average number of responses and number of different names received
by a poster's OP posts.
That won't be as meaningful as you're hoping....
 
The average number of responses and number of different names received
by a poster's OP posts.

That won't be as meaningful as you're hoping....
You are just _hoping_ no one will think it meaningful.


Bret Cahill
 
Google already gives out posting activity of posters on news groups,
the total number of posts over a certain period of time.
This could be supplemented with other difficult to compile but public
stats and search information.
The number of OP posts as well as the number of OP/total posts ratio,
for example.
The average number of responses and number of different names received
by a poster's OP posts.
The number of BE (branch endings) as well ast the BE/total posts.
A search box could be included to pull up all of a poster's OP posts,
and all the posts in a selected group to show the OP posts are on
topic.
A search box could be included to pull up all a poster's BE posts to
see if the the branch ended because the poster won a debate or flamed
out.
If a poster is flaming out in 95% of his posts then everyone will be
able to quickly see he has nothing to contribute to a tech discussion.
Such as Patriot Games, right?

Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!
Why would an openly bigoted -- except for hiding behind a handle --
poster _not_ want to be known as an end of branch flamer?


Bret Cahill
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top