Emacs VHDL mode with CTAGS / etags

[Philippe]

Is there anybody out there who still uses CTAGS (or rather: etags) for
VHDL? I was surprised to see how crude it really is. No scoping, the
regular expressions get confused easily, problems with name clashes...

http://www.sigasi.com/content/navigating-through-vhdl-project-emacs-vs-sigasi

have a nice weekend!

--
Philippe
Sigasi

 

[Paul Uiterlinden]

Philippe wrote:

Is there anybody out there who still uses CTAGS (or rather: etags) for
VHDL?

Yes, I use vtags in combination with Nedit or Vim.

I got vtags from
http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vhdl/tools/vtags/, but it seems
not to be accessible from there anymore.

I was surprised to see how crude it really is. No scoping, the
regular expressions get confused easily, problems with name clashes...

Still, it is simple to use and adequate in a lot of cases. And it's free.

--
Paul Uiterlinden
www.aimvalley.nl
e-mail addres: remove the not.

 

[hhanff]

On 13 Mai, 18:12, Paul Uiterlinden <puit...@notaimvalley.nl> wrote:

Philippe wrote:
Is there anybody out there who still uses CTAGS (or rather: etags) for
VHDL?
I just discovered etags a few weeks ago.

Currently I'm working on C code and it really eases the analysis of
foreign code.
Honestly: etags is one of the most important emacs features that I
discovered in the last years I would say.

I'm already looking forward to the next VHDL project where I can give
etags a try...

hhanff

Yes, I use vtags in combination with Nedit or Vim.

I got vtags fromhttp://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vhdl/tools/vtags/, but it seems
not to be accessible from there anymore.

I was surprised to see how crude it really is. No scoping, the
regular expressions get confused easily, problems with name clashes...

Still, it is simple to use and adequate in a lot of cases. And it's free.

--
Paul Uiterlindenwww.aimvalley.nl
e-mail addres: remove the not.

 

[NeedCleverHandle]

On May 13, 7:32 am, Philippe <philippe.f...@gmail.com> wrote:

Is there anybody out there who still uses CTAGS (or rather: etags) for
VHDL? I was surprised to see how crude it really is. No scoping, the
regular expressions get confused easily, problems with name clashes...

http://www.sigasi.com/content/navigating-through-vhdl-project-emacs-v...

have a nice weekend!

--
Philippe
Sigasi

SPAM? Yup, it's spam.

Have a nice day.