On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Hello,
I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys, but not AES
128 bit keys.
I wonder why? Some ideas ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Hello,
I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys, but not AES
128 bit keys.
I wonder why? Some ideas ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Jeroen Belleman
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:56:51 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4k7qk$au1$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Hello,
I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys, but not AES
128 bit keys.
I wonder why? Some ideas ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Jeroen Belleman
Really? most fishsicks today is wrong.
Bunch of idiots at CERN think that by shooting a Mercedes and Ferrari together at 10,000 km/h
will give them insight into how the car\'s electronics work.
Ever faster collisions, God particle, money sucking crap,
only thing those tunnels are good for is bomb shelters. once the US attacks to get hold of the Swiss banks.
Photon is just a mamamatical construction by their religious leader Onestone.
I have spoken.
You do realize that if I wiggle a what you earthlings call \'electron\'; its effect if felt a bit later
anywhere else by all other electrons?
Simply explained for example by seeing that a state of a Le Sage type particle is a transmitter for EM radiation.
Wow, now graffiti and lied have the same speed.
xcuse my rand earthling
Back to the tunnels you go!
(Maybe you\'re trying to chase \'rbowman\' Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:56:51 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4k7qk$au1$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Hello,
I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys, but not AES
128 bit keys.
I wonder why? Some ideas ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Jeroen Belleman
Really? most fishsicks today is wrong.
Bunch of idiots at CERN think that by shooting a Mercedes and Ferrari together at 10,000 km/h
will give them insight into how the car\'s electronics work.
Ever faster collisions, God particle, money sucking crap,
only thing those tunnels are good for is bomb shelters. once the US attacks to get hold of the Swiss banks.
Photon is just a mamamatical construction by their religious leader Onestone.
I have spoken.
You do realize that if I wiggle a what you earthlings call \'electron\'; its effect if felt a bit later
anywhere else by all other electrons?
Simply explained for example by seeing that a state of a Le Sage type particle is a transmitter for EM radiation.
Wow, now graffiti and lied have the same speed.
xcuse my rand earthling
Back to the tunnels you go!
Jan, you\'re losing your touch. You have to target your trolling a bit
better for maximum effect.
out of your rightful ecological niche. He has been making a bid for it
lately, whoever he is. Or maybe he wants to be the new John Fields, but
isn\'t amusing enough.)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
On a sunny day (Sun, 1 May 2022 05:50:02 -0400) it happened Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote in
4df6f520-c7e2-7a54-0309-5ae3249edab8@electrooptical.net>:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:56:51 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4k7qk$au1$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Hello,
I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys, but not AES
128 bit keys.
I wonder why? Some ideas ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Jeroen Belleman
Really? most fishsicks today is wrong.
Bunch of idiots at CERN think that by shooting a Mercedes and Ferrari together at 10,000 km/h
will give them insight into how the car\'s electronics work.
Ever faster collisions, God particle, money sucking crap,
only thing those tunnels are good for is bomb shelters. once the US attacks to get hold of the Swiss banks.
Photon is just a mamamatical construction by their religious leader Onestone.
I have spoken.
You do realize that if I wiggle a what you earthlings call \'electron\'; its effect if felt a bit later
anywhere else by all other electrons?
Simply explained for example by seeing that a state of a Le Sage type particle is a transmitter for EM radiation.
Wow, now graffiti and lied have the same speed.
xcuse my rand earthling
Back to the tunnels you go!
Jan, you\'re losing your touch. You have to target your trolling a bit
better for maximum effect.
out of your rightful ecological niche. He has been making a bid for it
lately, whoever he is. Or maybe he wants to be the new John Fields, but
isn\'t amusing enough.)
You could actually learn something here, earthing
Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 1 May 2022 05:50:02 -0400) it happened Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote in
4df6f520-c7e2-7a54...@electrooptical.net>:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:56:51 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jer...@nospam.please> wrote in <t4k7qk$au1$1...@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jer...@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1...@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
Max <maxt...@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1...@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Hello,
I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys, but not AES
128 bit keys.
I wonder why? Some ideas ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Jeroen Belleman
Really? most fishsicks today is wrong.
Bunch of idiots at CERN think that by shooting a Mercedes and Ferrari together at 10,000 km/h
will give them insight into how the car\'s electronics work.
Ever faster collisions, God particle, money sucking crap,
only thing those tunnels are good for is bomb shelters. once the US attacks to get hold of the Swiss banks.
Photon is just a mamamatical construction by their religious leader Onestone.
I have spoken.
You do realize that if I wiggle a what you earthlings call \'electron\'; its effect if felt a bit later
anywhere else by all other electrons?
Simply explained for example by seeing that a state of a Le Sage type particle is a transmitter for EM radiation.
Wow, now graffiti and lied have the same speed.
xcuse my rand earthling
Back to the tunnels you go!
Jan, you\'re losing your touch. You have to target your trolling a bit
better for maximum effect.
out of your rightful ecological niche. He has been making a bid for it
lately, whoever he is. Or maybe he wants to be the new John Fields, but
isn\'t amusing enough.)
You could actually learn something here, earthing
Earthing is very important, as any English electrician or crystal radio
enthusiast could tell you.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
I actually have a patent in quantum computing, though I haven\'t doneOn Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 4:19:28 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 1 May 2022 05:50:02 -0400) it happened Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote in
4df6f520-c7e2-7a54...@electrooptical.net>:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:56:51 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jer...@nospam.please> wrote in <t4k7qk$au1$1...@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jer...@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1...@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
Max <maxt...@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1...@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Hello,
I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys, but not AES
128 bit keys.
I wonder why? Some ideas ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Jeroen Belleman
Really? most fishsicks today is wrong.
Bunch of idiots at CERN think that by shooting a Mercedes and Ferrari together at 10,000 km/h
will give them insight into how the car\'s electronics work.
Ever faster collisions, God particle, money sucking crap,
only thing those tunnels are good for is bomb shelters. once the US attacks to get hold of the Swiss banks.
Photon is just a mamamatical construction by their religious leader Onestone.
I have spoken.
You do realize that if I wiggle a what you earthlings call \'electron\'; its effect if felt a bit later
anywhere else by all other electrons?
Simply explained for example by seeing that a state of a Le Sage type particle is a transmitter for EM radiation.
Wow, now graffiti and lied have the same speed.
xcuse my rand earthling
Back to the tunnels you go!
Jan, you\'re losing your touch. You have to target your trolling a bit
better for maximum effect.
out of your rightful ecological niche. He has been making a bid for it
lately, whoever he is. Or maybe he wants to be the new John Fields, but
isn\'t amusing enough.)
You could actually learn something here, earthing
Earthing is very important, as any English electrician or crystal radio
enthusiast could tell you.
Here is a good survey article on quantum computing:
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2010/2010.15559.pdf
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen
Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the
local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
>Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
>On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
>> My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys,
but not AES
>> 128 bit keys.
>> I wonder why? Some ideas ?
>Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the
quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex
problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain
already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Hello,
I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys, but not AES
128 bit keys.
I wonder why? Some ideas ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Or maybe we all just need to take Jan\'s stuff at the intended level, i.e. mainly teasing, which makes it fun. He\'s very good at winding up the more solemn folks here, and seems to have a very good time doing it.
Stolid leftists, andipodean loonies, Windows enthusiasts, and Californians seem to make excellent subjects.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
On 2022-05-03 16:16, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen
Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the
local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
>Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
>On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
>> My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys,
but not AES
>> 128 bit keys.
>> I wonder why? Some ideas ?
>Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the
quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving
complex problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain
already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Or maybe we all just need to take Jan\'s stuff at the intended level,
i.e. mainly teasing, which makes it fun. He\'s very good at winding up
the more solemn folks here, and seems to have a very good time doing it.
Stolid leftists, andipodean loonies, Windows enthusiasts, and
Californians seem to make excellent subjects.
I just noticed that my kill list eliminates over 75% of all postings
in this news group, but Jan isn\'t on it. I think he\'s actually a nice
fellow.
Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 2022-04-30 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:46:26 +0200) it happened Jeroen
Belleman
jer...@nospam.please> wrote in <t4jb32$1cuo$1...@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 2022-04-30 08:05, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Nice board:
Engineers develop new control electronics for quantum computers
that improve performance, cut costs
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220429144931.htm
What now Jan? Have you turned into a quantum convert?
Hehe,
well I am still waiting for the kwantuum computah to appear in the
local shop.
There was a recent joke in sci.crypt:
Max <maxt...@gmx.net> wrote in <t4ehp7$13eu$1...@gioia.aioe.org>:
On 28.04.22 00:04, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Hello,
I\'ve a problem cracking 128 bit keys.
My new Quantum Computer can easily crack Twofish 128 bit keys,
but not AES
128 bit keys.
I wonder why? Some ideas ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
But the article shows the problems with the short lifetime of the
quantum state.
As to \'supper computahs\'. Our brain is much better at solving complex
problems.
Not so much silly mamamatical cracking but the bigger view.
IMNSHO.
The quantum jive somehow always reminds me of analog computers,
like many states a capacitor can hold many voltage levels.
In essence we are all quantum coupled, quite possible the brain
already uses it, likely even.
we are just discovering.
I was just wondering. You refute the existence of photons, even though
there is good evidence, and now you talk of quantum coupled brains,
which is balderdash. I think your world view is in need of a spring
cleaning.
Or maybe we all just need to take Jan\'s stuff at the intended level,
i.e. mainly teasing, which makes it fun. He\'s very good at winding up
the more solemn folks here, and seems to have a very good time doing it.
Stolid leftists, andipodean loonies, Windows enthusiasts, and
Californians seem to make excellent subjects.