Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Synthetic Biology Gets The Gucci Treatment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2023/05/11/synthetic-biology-gets-the-gucci-treatment/
On Sun, 14 May 2023 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
Synthetic Biology Gets The Gucci Treatment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2023/05/11/synthetic-biology-gets-the-gucci-treatment/
I got to this bit and stopped reading:
\"Climate change is already having âwidespread adverse impactsâ that
will only continue to intensify if we donât rapidly slash greenhouse
gas emissions to net zero.\"
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 5:35:27â¯AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2023 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
Synthetic Biology Gets The Gucci Treatment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2023/05/11/synthetic-biology-gets-the-gucci-treatment/
I got to this bit and stopped reading:
\"Climate change is already having âwidespread adverse impactsâ that
will only continue to intensify if we donât rapidly slash greenhouse
gas emissions to net zero.\"
It\'s not actually BS - and the fact that it is not the particular sort of BS to which you are addicted isn\'t of interest to anybody except other deluded addicts of climate change denial propaganda.
Getting bugs to capture CO2 and incorporate it into alcohols is perfectly practical, but the alcohol you get is currently too expensive to be all that competitive in a free market. Larger scale units might do better.
Who needs yet more BS?
You seem to addicted to it, but it has to be the kind of BS curated to your demented taste by the Daily Mail and Russia Today.
--
Bill Sloman, sydney
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 1:56:02â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 5:35:27â¯AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2023 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
Synthetic Biology Gets The Gucci Treatment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2023/05/11/synthetic-biology-gets-the-gucci-treatment/
I got to this bit and stopped reading:
\"Climate change is already having âwidespread adverse impactsâ that
will only continue to intensify if we donât rapidly slash greenhouse
gas emissions to net zero.\"
It\'s not actually BS - and the fact that it is not the particular sort of BS to which you are addicted isn\'t of interest to anybody except other deluded addicts of climate change denial propaganda.
Getting bugs to capture CO2 and incorporate it into alcohols is perfectly practical, but the alcohol you get is currently too expensive to be all that competitive in a free market. Larger scale units might do better.
Who needs yet more BS?
You seem to addicted to it, but it has to be the kind of BS curated to your demented taste by the Daily Mail and Russia Today.
Synfuel for aviation is rapidly becoming big business, and it\'s not just some futuristic wish, it\'s here now. The civil aviation authorities have approved it for mixing with existing petro-fuels and are just now allowing aircraft to fly on 100%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_biofuel
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 4:20:46â¯AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 1:56:02â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 5:35:27â¯AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2023 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
Synthetic Biology Gets The Gucci Treatment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2023/05/11/synthetic-biology-gets-the-gucci-treatment/
I got to this bit and stopped reading:
\"Climate change is already having âwidespread adverse impactsâ that
will only continue to intensify if we donât rapidly slash greenhouse
gas emissions to net zero.\"
It\'s not actually BS - and the fact that it is not the particular sort of BS to which you are addicted isn\'t of interest to anybody except other deluded addicts of climate change denial propaganda.
Getting bugs to capture CO2 and incorporate it into alcohols is perfectly practical, but the alcohol you get is currently too expensive to be all that competitive in a free market. Larger scale units might do better.
Who needs yet more BS?
You seem to addicted to it, but it has to be the kind of BS curated to your demented taste by the Daily Mail and Russia Today.
Synfuel for aviation is rapidly becoming big business, and it\'s not just some futuristic wish, it\'s here now. The civil aviation authorities have approved it for mixing with existing petro-fuels and are just now allowing aircraft to fly on 100%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_biofuel
But it is more expensive than fossil-carbon derived jet fuel. International flights are luxury items, so maybe the airlines can gouge their customers for the difference.
Since claiming to be doing it will make the customers just as happy as actually it, the industry does need to be watched closely.
--
Bill Sloman, sydney
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7:37:57â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 4:20:46â¯AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 1:56:02â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 5:35:27â¯AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2023 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
Synthetic Biology Gets The Gucci Treatment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2023/05/11/synthetic-biology-gets-the-gucci-treatment/
I got to this bit and stopped reading:
\"Climate change is already having âwidespread adverse impactsâ that
will only continue to intensify if we donât rapidly slash greenhouse
gas emissions to net zero.\"
It\'s not actually BS - and the fact that it is not the particular sort of BS to which you are addicted isn\'t of interest to anybody except other deluded addicts of climate change denial propaganda.
Getting bugs to capture CO2 and incorporate it into alcohols is perfectly practical, but the alcohol you get is currently too expensive to be all that competitive in a free market. Larger scale units might do better.
Who needs yet more BS?
You seem to addicted to it, but it has to be the kind of BS curated to your demented taste by the Daily Mail and Russia Today.
Synfuel for aviation is rapidly becoming big business, and it\'s not just some futuristic wish, it\'s here now. The civil aviation authorities have approved it for mixing with existing petro-fuels and are just now allowing aircraft to fly on 100%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_biofuel
But it is more expensive than fossil-carbon derived jet fuel. International flights are luxury items, so maybe the airlines can gouge their customers for the difference.
Since claiming to be doing it will make the customers just as happy as actually it, the industry does need to be watched closely.
Governments and international aviation authority circumvent the \"free market\" fiction with strict regulations on allowable GHG emissions. They finally got the message about the cost of extreme weather being far in excess of the little bit of fallout from people having to pay more to travel.
On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 12:40:18â¯AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7:37:57â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 4:20:46â¯AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 1:56:02â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 5:35:27â¯AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2023 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
Synthetic Biology Gets The Gucci Treatment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2023/05/11/synthetic-biology-gets-the-gucci-treatment/
I got to this bit and stopped reading:
\"Climate change is already having âwidespread adverse impactsâ that
will only continue to intensify if we donât rapidly slash greenhouse
gas emissions to net zero.\"
It\'s not actually BS - and the fact that it is not the particular sort of BS to which you are addicted isn\'t of interest to anybody except other deluded addicts of climate change denial propaganda.
Getting bugs to capture CO2 and incorporate it into alcohols is perfectly practical, but the alcohol you get is currently too expensive to be all that competitive in a free market. Larger scale units might do better..
Who needs yet more BS?
You seem to addicted to it, but it has to be the kind of BS curated to your demented taste by the Daily Mail and Russia Today.
Synfuel for aviation is rapidly becoming big business, and it\'s not just some futuristic wish, it\'s here now. The civil aviation authorities have approved it for mixing with existing petro-fuels and are just now allowing aircraft to fly on 100%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_biofuel
But it is more expensive than fossil-carbon derived jet fuel. International flights are luxury items, so maybe the airlines can gouge their customers for the difference.
Since claiming to be doing it will make the customers just as happy as actually it, the industry does need to be watched closely.
Governments and international aviation authority circumvent the \"free market\" fiction with strict regulations on allowable GHG emissions. They finally got the message about the cost of extreme weather being far in excess of the little bit of fallout from people having to pay more to travel.
Nobody is restricting green house gas emissions at the moment. The fossil carbon extraction lobby has a lot of clout, and it\'s going to take a long time to get them beaten down far enough for actual restrictions on emissions to legislated, and probably quite a bit longer before they get enforced.
tirsdag den 16. maj 2023 kl. 17.06.49 UTC+2 skrev Anthony William Sloman:
On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 12:40:18â¯AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7:37:57â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 4:20:46â¯AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 1:56:02â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 5:35:27â¯AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2023 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
Synthetic Biology Gets The Gucci Treatment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2023/05/11/synthetic-biology-gets-the-gucci-treatment/
I got to this bit and stopped reading:
\"Climate change is already having âwidespread adverse impactsâ that
will only continue to intensify if we donât rapidly slash greenhouse
gas emissions to net zero.\"
It\'s not actually BS - and the fact that it is not the particular sort of BS to which you are addicted isn\'t of interest to anybody except other deluded addicts of climate change denial propaganda.
Getting bugs to capture CO2 and incorporate it into alcohols is perfectly practical, but the alcohol you get is currently too expensive to be all that competitive in a free market. Larger scale units might do better.
Who needs yet more BS?
You seem to addicted to it, but it has to be the kind of BS curated to your demented taste by the Daily Mail and Russia Today.
Synfuel for aviation is rapidly becoming big business, and it\'s not just some futuristic wish, it\'s here now. The civil aviation authorities have approved it for mixing with existing petro-fuels and are just now allowing aircraft to fly on 100%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_biofuel
But it is more expensive than fossil-carbon derived jet fuel. International flights are luxury items, so maybe the airlines can gouge their customers for the difference.
Since claiming to be doing it will make the customers just as happy as actually it, the industry does need to be watched closely.
Governments and international aviation authority circumvent the \"free market\" fiction with strict regulations on allowable GHG emissions. They finally got the message about the cost of extreme weather being far in excess of the little bit of fallout from people having to pay more to travel.
Nobody is restricting green house gas emissions at the moment. The fossil carbon extraction lobby has a lot of clout, and it\'s going to take a long time to get them beaten down far enough for actual restrictions on emissions to legislated, and probably quite a bit longer before they get enforced..
why wait? There\'s a few billion poor people that you can trade places with and start using no fossil fuel today
It might involve being cold and hungry in the dark
On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 12:40:18â¯AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7:37:57â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 4:20:46â¯AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 1:56:02â¯AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 5:35:27â¯AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2023 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
Synthetic Biology Gets The Gucci Treatment
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2023/05/11/synthetic-biology-gets-the-gucci-treatment/
I got to this bit and stopped reading:
\"Climate change is already having âwidespread adverse impactsâ that
will only continue to intensify if we donât rapidly slash greenhouse
gas emissions to net zero.\"
It\'s not actually BS - and the fact that it is not the particular sort of BS to which you are addicted isn\'t of interest to anybody except other deluded addicts of climate change denial propaganda.
Getting bugs to capture CO2 and incorporate it into alcohols is perfectly practical, but the alcohol you get is currently too expensive to be all that competitive in a free market. Larger scale units might do better..
Who needs yet more BS?
You seem to addicted to it, but it has to be the kind of BS curated to your demented taste by the Daily Mail and Russia Today.
Synfuel for aviation is rapidly becoming big business, and it\'s not just some futuristic wish, it\'s here now. The civil aviation authorities have approved it for mixing with existing petro-fuels and are just now allowing aircraft to fly on 100%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_biofuel
But it is more expensive than fossil-carbon derived jet fuel. International flights are luxury items, so maybe the airlines can gouge their customers for the difference.
Since claiming to be doing it will make the customers just as happy as actually it, the industry does need to be watched closely.
Governments and international aviation authority circumvent the \"free market\" fiction with strict regulations on allowable GHG emissions. They finally got the message about the cost of extreme weather being far in excess of the little bit of fallout from people having to pay more to travel.
Nobody is restricting green house gas emissions at the moment. The fossil carbon extraction lobby has a lot of clout, and it\'s going to take a long time to get them beaten down far enough for actual restrictions on emissions to legislated, and probably quite a bit longer before they get enforced.
You don\'t have to read much of John Larkin\'s or Cursitor Doom\'s to realise how much money they spend on deluding the gullible general public.
Politicians may be less gullible, but lobbyists employs even more persuasive tools.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney