E
Eeyore
Guest
Paul Burke wrote:
Why would anyone even use assembler these days for this kind of thing ?
Graham
The PL/M compiler means I never have to consider them anyway.Eeyore wrote:
TI has one of the MSP430s that could be purpose made for this app too. Shame I'm
not familiar with them.
Get familiar, free up your brain from juggling with memory spaces and
pointer snafus.
MSPGCC ?UARTs and timers are much nicer too. MSPGCC works well,
3.6V isn't a problem here in fact. The same applies to the NXP 89LPC part too.and doesn't cost a lot, and C will (may?) make porting easier (even if
you've written your app in assembler). The BIG downside is it's 3.6V max
and no 5V compliant IO.
Why would anyone even use assembler these days for this kind of thing ?
Graham