Does Bad Karma Have an Expiration Date?

R

Rick C

Guest
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.

7 years, same as for 30 day delinquent credit card payments I'd imagine
 
Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in news:c28de5d4-7121-
4803-b75e-f364b04ecc1c@googlegroups.com:

Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.

Instant Karma never expires, but the recipient of it definitely does.
Many times sooner than one likes.
 
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.

Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs
 
On 7/21/19 7:10 PM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering.  Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.


Sure--today, if you like.  Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Did anyone tell Jim Thompson?
 
On Sunday, 21 July 2019 22:50:28 UTC+1, Rick C wrote:
> Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.

Bad cars do. But some escape their karma, eg the Hoffmann.
 
On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 9:10:42 AM UTC+10, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.


Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Sounds like an expensive solution. Particularly when you have to also believe in the people who claim to currently represent Jesus Christ (who may not have much to do with the person who gets depicted as getting the religion going).

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.


Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together.
(I don't have a good link or paper to recommend.)
I'm wondering if you've heard of this idea, and what you think of it?
and if I trust you find the question offensive.


(Hmm, maybe the current crop of agnostics and atheists will be consigned
to the dust bin of human evolution. :^)
George, confirmed agnostic, Herold
 
On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 12:56:08 PM UTC-4, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
mandag den 22. juli 2019 kl. 18.49.01 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:38:57 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:

On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.


Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together.
(I don't have a good link or paper to recommend.)
I'm wondering if you've heard of this idea, and what you think of it?
and if I trust you find the question offensive.


I agree. Religion is one of the things that a tribe or culture can
rally around, and creats a common morality that makes civilization
work better. The Ten Commandments, and Jesus's approach to life, make
for a pretty good legal and moral structure.

And it is easier to get the unwashed masses to obey the rules of you
convince them that God made the rules and God will see if they break
them even if they think no one else does, rather than try to explain
why and how sticking to the rules are best for everyone

You are talking about Animal Farm, right? That was a pretty good book even if not *the* "Good Book".

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 12:56:08 PM UTC-4, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
mandag den 22. juli 2019 kl. 18.49.01 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:38:57 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:

On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.


Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together.
(I don't have a good link or paper to recommend.)
I'm wondering if you've heard of this idea, and what you think of it?
and if I trust you find the question offensive.


I agree. Religion is one of the things that a tribe or culture can
rally around, and creats a common morality that makes civilization
work better. The Ten Commandments, and Jesus's approach to life, make
for a pretty good legal and moral structure.

And it is easier to get the unwashed masses to obey the rules of you
convince them that God made the rules and God will see if they break
them even if they think no one else does, rather than try to explain
why and how sticking to the rules are best for everyone

Hmm I can think of a lot of ways it could help that doesn't involve large
groups of people... but just your own little tribe of hunter-gatherers.

George H.
 
On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 12:49:01 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:38:57 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:

On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.


Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together.
(I don't have a good link or paper to recommend.)
I'm wondering if you've heard of this idea, and what you think of it?
and if I trust you find the question offensive.


I agree. Religion is one of the things that a tribe or culture can
rally around, and creats a common morality that makes civilization
work better. The Ten Commandments, and Jesus's approach to life, make
for a pretty good legal and moral structure.

Yeah you can see the influence in some civilizations. But I think if it's
an evolutionary thing... like we have some genes/ adaptions that make us
(.. I don't know the right words here... ) 'more likely' to adopt a
'religious' outlook.. then that may have made those humans more successful,
they got along and trusted each other more.
(In times beofre we had civilizations.)

Anyway I find it an interesting idea.

George H.
--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics
 
mandag den 22. juli 2019 kl. 18.49.01 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:38:57 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:

On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.


Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together.
(I don't have a good link or paper to recommend.)
I'm wondering if you've heard of this idea, and what you think of it?
and if I trust you find the question offensive.


I agree. Religion is one of the things that a tribe or culture can
rally around, and creats a common morality that makes civilization
work better. The Ten Commandments, and Jesus's approach to life, make
for a pretty good legal and moral structure.

And it is easier to get the unwashed masses to obey the rules of you
convince them that God made the rules and God will see if they break
them even if they think no one else does, rather than try to explain
why and how sticking to the rules are best for everyone
 
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:38:57 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
<gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:

On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.


Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together.
(I don't have a good link or paper to recommend.)
I'm wondering if you've heard of this idea, and what you think of it?
and if I trust you find the question offensive.

I agree. Religion is one of the things that a tribe or culture can
rally around, and creats a common morality that makes civilization
work better. The Ten Commandments, and Jesus's approach to life, make
for a pretty good legal and moral structure.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics
 
On 7/22/2019 1:01 PM, George Herold wrote:
....
Yeah you can see the influence in some civilizations. But I think if it's
an evolutionary thing... like we have some genes/ adaptions that make us
(.. I don't know the right words here... ) 'more likely' to adopt a
'religious' outlook.. then that may have made those humans more successful,
they got along and trusted each other more.
(In times beofre we had civilizations.)

Well, pre-civil-izations didn't have religions with a personal god.
I.e., a god that cared what they did. Their "religions" deified things
in nature (the god of wind, rain, etc). See "The Evolution of God".
Humans may have evolved since then to prefer a personal god, but
civilization is not that old and evolution is slow.
 
On Tuesday, July 23, 2019 at 2:49:01 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:38:57 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:

On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.


Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.

Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together..
(I don't have a good link or paper to recommend.)
I'm wondering if you've heard of this idea, and what you think of it?
and if I trust you find the question offensive.


I agree. Religion is one of the things that a tribe or culture can
rally around, and creates a common morality that makes civilization
work better. The Ten Commandments, and Jesus's approach to life, make
for a pretty good legal and moral structure.

It is one of the ways that a tribe or culture could propagate a common morality.

It doesn't work all that well, since there seems to be a built-in tendency to demonise other tribes and cultures.

You can leave out the irrational elements, and justify much the same common morality on rational grounds, which lets you get rid of some of the sillier religious embargos, and leaves you with a common core of rules that work for all sane people.

Trump's prejudices against Mexican and Muslims probably aren't inspired by any religious conviction, but rather the fact that they play well with the US religious right, which provides a current illustration of the down side of religion as a bonding mechanism. History offers a lot of others.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On 23/7/19 2:38 am, George Herold wrote:
On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.
Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.
Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together.

The evolution of gods is less to do with need (though we do need ethical
frameworks) but more to do with the external expression of abstract
thought, i.e. writing. Pre-literate societies tend to be animistic, but
as writing allows the development of abstract categories, we create
them. So for example we see horses, and we see animals with horns, and
we can cross over the two ideas to suppose the existence of unicorns.

In the exact same way we cross over ideas of creation, of person-hood,
of justice and mercy, and you come up with a supposition of the Alpha
and Omega. It's intrinsic in the increase of sentience, and would happen
in a similar way on any alien planetary species (I find this a bit
depressing!).

The existence of writing allows these suppositions to take on a life of
their own and to be promulgated beyond the individual. The absence of
any positive confirmation doesn't stop folk wishing for certainty from
wasting their lives believing such nonsense, and of course it creates a
culture that cushions them from the absence of evidence.

Clifford Heath.
 
On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 7:12:14 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:
On 23/7/19 2:38 am, George Herold wrote:
On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.
Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.
Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together.

The evolution of gods is less to do with need (though we do need ethical
frameworks) but more to do with the external expression of abstract
thought, i.e. writing. Pre-literate societies tend to be animistic, but
as writing allows the development of abstract categories, we create
them. So for example we see horses, and we see animals with horns, and
we can cross over the two ideas to suppose the existence of unicorns.

In the exact same way we cross over ideas of creation, of person-hood,
of justice and mercy, and you come up with a supposition of the Alpha
and Omega. It's intrinsic in the increase of sentience, and would happen
in a similar way on any alien planetary species (I find this a bit
depressing!).

The existence of writing allows these suppositions to take on a life of
their own and to be promulgated beyond the individual. The absence of
any positive confirmation doesn't stop folk wishing for certainty from
wasting their lives believing such nonsense, and of course it creates a
culture that cushions them from the absence of evidence.

Clifford Heath.

OK, I guess this idea*.. is that God is more about just doing
good. On the individual level, if I first do good when I meet
you, (cooperate first in the simplistic tit for tat exchange.)
That's best... can you select for that?

George H.
*I'm at least 1/2 making this up, but aren't we a people
that help others first? Maybe God is so baked in now
that we take doing good for granted.
 
On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 8:20:09 PM UTC-4, George Herold wrote:
On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 7:12:14 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:
On 23/7/19 2:38 am, George Herold wrote:
On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:10:42 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 7/21/19 5:50 PM, Rick C wrote:
Just wondering. Saw that line in a TV show, the Mentalist.
Sure--today, if you like. Repent and believe in Jesus Christ.
Grin, Hey Phil, (speaking of religion) I've been sorta interested
in this idea that religion might be in some ways an evolutionary
adaption in humans, to the problem of how to get along and live together.

The evolution of gods is less to do with need (though we do need ethical
frameworks) but more to do with the external expression of abstract
thought, i.e. writing. Pre-literate societies tend to be animistic, but
as writing allows the development of abstract categories, we create
them. So for example we see horses, and we see animals with horns, and
we can cross over the two ideas to suppose the existence of unicorns.

In the exact same way we cross over ideas of creation, of person-hood,
of justice and mercy, and you come up with a supposition of the Alpha
and Omega. It's intrinsic in the increase of sentience, and would happen
in a similar way on any alien planetary species (I find this a bit
depressing!).

The existence of writing allows these suppositions to take on a life of
their own and to be promulgated beyond the individual. The absence of
any positive confirmation doesn't stop folk wishing for certainty from
wasting their lives believing such nonsense, and of course it creates a
culture that cushions them from the absence of evidence.

Clifford Heath.

OK, I guess this idea*.. is that God is more about just doing
good. On the individual level, if I first do good when I meet
you, (cooperate first in the simplistic tit for tat exchange.)
That's best... can you select for that?

George H.
*I'm at least 1/2 making this up, but aren't we a people
that help others first? Maybe God is so baked in now
that we take doing good for granted.

So you define "good" as doing for others? Isn't it important to do good for yourself?

Do you really think "doing good" is a result of "God" or religion? That's a huge assumption.

--

Rick C.

-- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 4:38:49 PM UTC-4, Bob Engelhardt wrote:
On 7/22/2019 1:01 PM, George Herold wrote:
...
Yeah you can see the influence in some civilizations. But I think if it's
an evolutionary thing... like we have some genes/ adaptions that make us
(.. I don't know the right words here... ) 'more likely' to adopt a
'religious' outlook.. then that may have made those humans more successful,
they got along and trusted each other more.
(In times beofre we had civilizations.)


Well, pre-civil-izations didn't have religions with a personal god.
I.e., a god that cared what they did. Their "religions" deified things
in nature (the god of wind, rain, etc). See "The Evolution of God".
Humans may have evolved since then to prefer a personal god, but
civilization is not that old and evolution is slow.

Yeah, (I don't know much about the idea... it's hard to follow the
language in the few papers I tried to read.)
If you start with the idea that a cooperating group is going
to outperform a group that doesn't cooperate as much. And then
ask what else might go along with selecting for that....

I have this unrelated mechanism, what if evolution is driven
by making a few critical fast decisions per lifetime?

George H.
 
On 23/7/19 10:20 am, George Herold wrote:
On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 7:12:14 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:
The evolution of gods is less to do with need (though we do need ethical
frameworks) but more to do with the external expression of abstract
thought, i.e. writing. Pre-literate societies tend to be animistic, but
as writing allows the development of abstract categories, we create
them. So for example we see horses, and we see animals with horns, and
we can cross over the two ideas to suppose the existence of unicorns.

In the exact same way we cross over ideas of creation, of person-hood,
of justice and mercy, and you come up with a supposition of the Alpha
and Omega. It's intrinsic in the increase of sentience, and would happen
in a similar way on any alien planetary species (I find this a bit
depressing!).

The existence of writing allows these suppositions to take on a life of
their own and to be promulgated beyond the individual. The absence of
any positive confirmation doesn't stop folk wishing for certainty from
wasting their lives believing such nonsense, and of course it creates a
culture that cushions them from the absence of evidence.

Clifford Heath.

OK, I guess this idea*.. is that God is more about just doing
good. On the individual level, if I first do good when I meet
you, (cooperate first in the simplistic tit for tat exchange.)
That's best... can you select for that?

We had no reason not to kill each other on first sight until we started
to benefit from the enlargement of our society beyond the family, tribe,
village, etc. Some people still subvert ethical norms, so we extended
the idea of just "doing good" to include omniscience and eternal
consequences. It's all pure invention and manipulative bullying.

> ... aren't we a people that help others first?

We've learned to do that, but it's not innate.

Maybe God is so baked in now
that we take doing good for granted.

It's perhaps still baked-in where you live in the USA, but in more
intellectually advanced countries it's rapidly being baked out. Fewer
that 50% of the UK now professes any religion, for example, and the flow
in Australia is even more advanced than that, I believe. It works
because we now understand that social ethics does not require religion,
and in fact cannot continue to advance beyond a certain point in the
presence of religion, which creates too many opportunities for abuse (as
has been amply demonstrated!)

Clifford Heath.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top