Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For you; no.If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with somethig to say?
Bret Cahill
Git 'em, Rod, git 'em.If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with nothing to say,
is it any better than having zero readership of people with somethig to say?
You'll end up completely blind if you dont watch out, child.
It's pretty much the same, ain't it?If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with somethig to say?
For you; no.
But are they _quality_ responses.The more responses you receive
If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with something to say?
Irrelevant if they don't say it.Almost everyone has something to say,
If your posts are content-free, does it matter how many peopleIf you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with somethig to say?
Bret Cahill
Put out the shoe and the idiots fall over themselves trying to get
their feet to get.
If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with somethig to say?
If your posts are content-free, does it matter how many people
respond?
Why would anyone (except maybe a sock puppeteer with nothing to say)
respond to a content-free post?
You stepped right into that one.
Why would anyone (except maybe a sock puppeteer with nothing to say)If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with somethig to say?
If your posts are content-free, does it matter how many people
respond?
"Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap"Put out the shoe and the idiots fall over themselves trying to get
their feet to get.
If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with somethig to say?
If your posts are content-free, does it matter how many people
respond?
Why would anyone (except maybe a sock puppeteer with nothing to say)
respond to a content-free post?
You stepped right into that one.
---Why do you post to sci.electronics.basics when you have nothing to say
about electronics?
Anyone can gooooooogle your name(s) and see you never had any
interaction [outside the sock puppetry] with anyone else on anything
related to science or technology.
Anyone can gooooooogle your name(s) and see you never had anyPut out the shoe and the idiots fall over themselves trying to get
their feet to get.
If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with somethig to say?
If your posts are content-free, does it matter how many people
respond?
Why would anyone (except maybe a sock puppeteer with nothing to say)
respond to a content-free post?
You stepped right into that one.
Why do you post to sci.electronics.basics when you have nothing to say
about electronics?
Are you outing yourself or just projecting again?Why do you post to sci.electronics.basics when you have nothing to say
about electronics?
Anyone can gooooooogle your name(s) and see you never had any
interaction [outside the sock puppetry] with anyone else on anything
related to science or technology.
More evasion and lies?
Do sock puppets count as readership?The question was:
Check sci.electronics.design.Still another example of a delusional trying to deny the public
record.
Put out the shoe and the idiots fall over themselves trying to get
their feet to get.
If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with somethig to say?
If your posts are content-free, does it matter how many people
respond?
Why would anyone (except maybe a sock puppeteer with nothing to say)
respond to a content-free post?
You stepped right into that one.
Why do you post to sci.electronics.basics when you have nothing to say
about electronics?
Anyone can gooooooogle your name(s) and see you never had any
interaction [outside the sock puppetry] with anyone else on anything
related to science or technology.
I can write in various styles, but always under the same name.The real givaway is you lack the ability to write in different
styles.
Let's talk about oscilloscopes. Or anything else of substance.If you ever want to make it in science fiction you will have to
develop your characters better.
I bet you snip your life a lot, too.Why do you post to sci.electronics.basics when you have nothing to say
about electronics?
Anyone can gooooooogle your name(s) and see you never had any
interaction [outside the sock puppetry] with anyone else on anything
related to science or technology.
More evasion and lies?
Are you outing yourself or just projecting again?
The question was:
Do sock puppets count as readership?
I never got an answer to that question.
Bret Cahill
---Why do you post to sci.electronics.basics when you have nothing to say
about electronics?
Anyone can gooooooogle your name(s) and see you never had any
interaction [outside the sock puppetry] with anyone else on anything
related to science or technology.
More evasion and lies?
Are you outing yourself or just projecting again?
No, the question was:The question was:
Do sock puppets count as readership?
---If you get a lot of responses under different handles, all with
nothing to say, is it any better than having zero readership of people
with somethig to say?
---On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:44:28 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
wrote:
Why do you post to sci.electronics.basics when you have nothing to say
about electronics?
Anyone can gooooooogle your name(s) and see you never had any
interaction [outside the sock puppetry] with anyone else on anything
related to science or technology.
More evasion and lies?
Are you outing yourself or just projecting again?
The question was:
Do sock puppets count as readership?
I never got an answer to that question.
Bret Cahill
I bet you snip your life a lot, too.
You are arguing that nobody should ever respond to your posts. OK, IThe real givaway is you lack the ability to write in different
styles.
I can write in various styles,
Moron 1.11 style, moron 1.12 style. . . ._very_ nuanced.
but always under the same name.
The only other explanation is there is some kind of group think
problem. This could also explains why you, et. al., have no patent
numbers or anything else to document that you even exist.
Herd animals are not known for creativity.
If you ever want to make it in science fiction you will have to
develop your characters better.
Let's talk about oscilloscopes.
Yes, let's talk about why don't you stick to oscilloscope threads?
What are you doing here?
I put out the shoe and like a criminal returning to the scene of the
crime, you appear to want to put your foot into it.
That's just stoopid.
Or anything else of substance.
It's irrational to post to a thread that you believe lacks substance.
As long as you appear to be irrational, then no one other than sock
puppets or idiots will ever believe you have ever accomplished
_anything_.
The only explanation is you are endulging in a fantsy world.
Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
---The real givaway is you lack the ability to write in different
styles.
I can write in various styles,
Moron 1.11 style, moron 1.12 style. . . ._very_ nuanced.
but always under the same name.
The only other explanation is there is some kind of group think
problem. This could also explains why you, et. al., have no patent
numbers or anything else to document that you even exist.
---Herd animals are not known for creativity.
---If you ever want to make it in science fiction you will have to
develop your characters better.
Let's talk about oscilloscopes.
Yes, let's talk about why don't you stick to oscilloscope threads?
What are you doing here?
---I put out the shoe and like a criminal returning to the scene of the
crime, you appear to want to put your foot into it.
---Or anything else of substance.
It's irrational to post to a thread that you believe lacks substance.
---As long as you appear to be irrational, then no one other than sock
puppets or idiots will ever believe you have ever accomplished
_anything_.
Moron 1.11 style, moron 1.12 style. . . ._very_ nuanced.The real givaway is you lack the ability to write in different
styles.
I can write in various styles,
The only other explanation is there is some kind of group thinkbut always under the same name.
Yes, let's talk about why don't you stick to oscilloscope threads?If you ever want to make it in science fiction you will have to
develop your characters better.
Let's talk about oscilloscopes.
It's irrational to post to a thread that you believe lacks substance.Or anything else of substance.