--
That's why I am asking if it's normal. I will have a VHF and UHF input and
--
That's what I am trying to figure out!
capacitively coupled?
an.2004.06.05.03.24.52.610000@noemail.net...Does the 'hot' loop by the input connection? It may be coupled across. RF
--
Both earths meet with the Output earth but only the VHF signal connection"Matt" <matt@noemail.net> wrote in message
news
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 13:14:56 +1000, atec wrote:
Test it and see , although I would be expecting a connection , perhaps
the electrons jump the gap ?.
That's what I am trying to figure out!
Maybe others have an idea.
Thanks.
Does the 'hot' loop by the input connection? It may be coupled across. RF
does funny things once you get to UHF and above - an open circuit need not
be an open circuit.
Ken
an.2004.06.05.22.14.20.656000@noemail.net...been mentioned, coupling is enough at UHF to get a connection - a direct,On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 16:46:56 +1200, Ken Taylor wrote:
"Matt" <matt@noemail.net> wrote in message
news
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 13:14:56 +1000, atec wrote:
Test it and see , although I would be expecting a connection ,
perhaps
the electrons jump the gap ?.
That's what I am trying to figure out!
Maybe others have an idea.
Thanks.
Does the 'hot' loop by the input connection? It may be coupled across.
RF
does funny things once you get to UHF and above - an open circuit need
not
be an open circuit.
Ken
Both earths meet with the Output earth but only the VHF signal connection
meets with the Output signal connection. The UHF signal connection doesn't
connect to anything at all on the board.
But does the track run past the input track, or the VHF connection? As has
Oh so a actual 'hot' connection doesn't need to be made? I installed it
--
gets the point across. Does someone know exactly whereI figured that my VHF/UHF combo antenna wasn't pulling in UHF very well,"A bit pointy"
SBS transmits from for Melbourne? And where is Matt that you need a 43
element?? Bigger is better, I suppose, but you'll need to be pretty accurate
with the direction of the UHF antenna, as 'atec' says.
The really cheap diplexers rely on the capacitance and inductance of
and as you know the damn thing will require VERY specific aiming or it"A bit pointy"
SBS transmits from for Melbourne? And where is Matt that you need a 43
element?? Bigger is better, I suppose, but you'll need to be pretty accurate
with the direction of the UHF antenna, as 'atec' says.
Ken
Well Im thinking very much a layman , so very layman terms ..
--
Ken Taylor wrote:
"A bit pointy"
where
SBS transmits from for Melbourne? And where is Matt that you need a 43
element?? Bigger is better, I suppose, but you'll need to be pretty
accurate
with the direction of the UHF antenna, as 'atec' says.
Ken
Well Im thinking very much a layman , so very layman terms ..
and as you know the damn thing will require VERY specific aiming or it
wont hear much at all.
I wasn't having a shot, I liked the imagery.
Yes I think it is that way; capacitively coupled. I spoke to a friend and
an.2004.06.08.22.54.51.562000@noemail.net...Not necessarily, but it *is* more likely to be reduced by path losses. Is
The roof is tiled and brick on the outside. So it has to go through brick