dimmer return update, a little OT but thought I would share...

[Chuck]

Ok, so after the awful burning up of the dimmer, it took several days
for the seller to finally agree to take the 3 I originally ordered back
(1 burned, 2 unused). Something to keep in mind. Take a look at seller
returns. If they don\'t say \"30 day free returns\" for their policy, look
for someone else! At least regarding items like this. This guy had
returns but seller pays shipping, which I adamantly refused. It took
several days of standing firm once I opened a case along with photos of
the insides of the burned dimmer with a final threat that I would get my
money back on the date eBay was allowed to \"step in.\" That date would
have been this coming Friday. The seller finally agreed. Looks like
he\'s Chinese because he must have asked multiple times if I wanted to
get it repaired or was I sure I didn\'t want a new one. NO, I want to
return them all for full refund and you pay shipping because they are
not as described and I consider them unsafe. After plugging in shipping
estimates today, I can see why he was so concerned. He sent them in a
cushioned bag, but not taking any chances in case he claims damaged upon
return, I was going to return them in a fairly large box... at a cost of
more than $50 US. Wow! Not sure what\'s happened and I guess I have
been out of selling for a while now, but never expected a rate like
that! So, I will reuse his bag, send insured, keep records and
screenshots of everything and he will pay it all. If not, I will have
all records for eBay if/when the time comes. All this because seller
didn\'t have \"free 30 day returns\". By the way, sending them back in his
bag will cost $16.90 insured.

I had a Chinese power supply arrive DOA a month ago. Seller had \"free
30 day returns.\" I started the return process and within a few hours
was the Paypal refund. Before the refund, I had received the link for
the shipping label. When sellers are refunding before you send back the
item, are you still supposed to send it back with the prepaid shipping
label, or not? Up to now, I have sent them back.

Just some info you may find useful... or not.

 

[Peter W.]

More important than anything else you might do would be to leave direct and honest feedback. This may, possibly, help the next potential victim (oops, buyer, that is).

Friends do not let friends buy from China (when there is any possible alternative).

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

 

[Chuck]

On 11/25/20 11:22 AM, Peter W. wrote:

More important than anything else you might do would be to leave direct and honest feedback. This may, possibly, help the next potential victim (oops, buyer, that is).

Friends do not let friends buy from China (when there is any possible alternative).

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

I am considering it and it would be the first time, in the 25 years I
have been registered on eBay, that I left a negative feedback. Really,
this seller should have not haggled on this and refunded immediately
especially after I submitted the pictures. Not being set up in the
correct way, however, meant that he can\'t even have a prepaid label made.

 

[Dave Platt]

I had a Chinese power supply arrive DOA a month ago. Seller had \"free
30 day returns.\" I started the return process and within a few hours
was the Paypal refund. Before the refund, I had received the link for
the shipping label. When sellers are refunding before you send back the
item, are you still supposed to send it back with the prepaid shipping
label, or not? Up to now, I have sent them back.

I think that\'s the fair and honorable thing to do... you\'re honoring
the terms of the refund offer, as the seller is trusting you to do.
Not sending back the product would be a violation of that trust (and
the contract of the sale).

The exception would be if the seller tells you that there\'s no need to
return the bad unit. I\'ve had this happen occasionally, when the unit
in question was either irreparably damaged in shipment (the package
must have gotten caught in a transport-belt gearbox) or where it was
probably not economically feasible to repair it (a replacement battery
for a cellphone which apparently had a bad control chip and wasn\'t
\"seen\" by the phone). The battery vendor just asked that I dispose of
the dead unit properly via an e-waste collection, rather than throwing
it into the trash.

 

[Chuck]

On 11/25/20 1:48 PM, Dave Platt wrote:

I had a Chinese power supply arrive DOA a month ago. Seller had \"free
30 day returns.\" I started the return process and within a few hours
was the Paypal refund. Before the refund, I had received the link for
the shipping label. When sellers are refunding before you send back the
item, are you still supposed to send it back with the prepaid shipping
label, or not? Up to now, I have sent them back.

I think that\'s the fair and honorable thing to do... you\'re honoring
the terms of the refund offer, as the seller is trusting you to do.
Not sending back the product would be a violation of that trust (and
the contract of the sale).

The exception would be if the seller tells you that there\'s no need to
return the bad unit. I\'ve had this happen occasionally, when the unit
in question was either irreparably damaged in shipment (the package
must have gotten caught in a transport-belt gearbox) or where it was
probably not economically feasible to repair it (a replacement battery
for a cellphone which apparently had a bad control chip and wasn\'t
\"seen\" by the phone). The battery vendor just asked that I dispose of
the dead unit properly via an e-waste collection, rather than throwing
it into the trash.

Actually, with the horrible smell that this one dimmer still produces
from the left over residue, I have no choice but to keep the sealed and
ready to ship package outdoors just in a location where rain won\'t
bother it. It would have been a good candidate for just throwing out,
but sending it along with the two unused ones. Just waiting on the
seller\'s return address.

I did have one item I actually tossed a couple of years ago and that
was a replacement mercury vapor ballast for one that failed after many
years. Within a short time, the replacement also failed and smoked up
the outdoor container it was in badly enough that I had to replace that
too along with a new ballast. In that case, the seller just wanted to
see pictures and then told me to throw it away. That sealed ballast,
being outdoors, did trip the breaker when it went bad but not before
smoking up its chassis.

 

[Phil Allison]

Chuck wrote:
============

I am considering it and it would be the first time, in the 25 years I
have been registered on eBay, that I left a negative feedback. Really,
this seller should have not haggled on this and refunded immediately
especially after I submitted the pictures.

** Pics of the damage you caused by stupidity ?

You have been less than honest about what you were *really* doing all along.

What PSU was used ??
What LED lights ?
Did you make a wiring error ?

You sound like an expert at blame shifting.


..... Phil

 

[Chuck]

On 11/25/20 3:30 PM, Phil Allison wrote:

Chuck wrote:
============

I am considering it and it would be the first time, in the 25 years I
have been registered on eBay, that I left a negative feedback. Really,
this seller should have not haggled on this and refunded immediately
especially after I submitted the pictures.

** Pics of the damage you caused by stupidity ?

You have been less than honest about what you were *really* doing all along.

What PSU was used ??
What LED lights ?
Did you make a wiring error ?

You sound like an expert at blame shifting.


..... Phil

Uh, excuse me, but I have already made myself quite clear and won\'t
elaborate further. If you doubt, then order one and have a load drawing
13.8 VDC at 7 A from a linear supply and see what happens in a few
hours. You said before that the 12-24 V was missing information. Who
would ever know that it is only a 12V device because that\'s not what
they advertise. In addition to no heatsinking. I think I\'ve been
clear. I thought you were helping, but now I question YOUR motives.

 

[Phil Allison]

Chuck the Troll puked:
==================

I am considering it and it would be the first time, in the 25 years I
have been registered on eBay, that I left a negative feedback. Really,
this seller should have not haggled on this and refunded immediately
especially after I submitted the pictures.

** Pics of the damage you caused by stupidity ?

You have been less than honest about what you were *really* doing all along.

What PSU was used ??
What LED lights ?
Did you make a wiring error ?

You sound like an expert at blame shifting.

Uh, excuse me, but I have already made myself quite clear and won\'t
elaborate further.

** So now you post two, great big lies.
Now I know you are hiding the truth.

Thanks for removing all doubt.

If you doubt, then order one and have a load drawing
13.8 VDC at 7 A from a linear supply and see what happens in a few
hours. You said before that the 12-24 V was missing information.

** Not what I wrote at all - liar.

> Who would ever know that it is only a 12V device

** That is nothing like what I wrote !!.
-------------------------------------------------------

You are one pig ignorant ass aren\'t you ?


...... Phil

 

[Peter W.]

Chuck:

In short order, you will learn several things about the drongo from down-under:

a) The sun shines from its fundament, and only from its fundament. Whatever else you might see is only a poor substitute for the sun, so do not be mistaken!
b) Were it to behave face-to-face as it does here, it would be dead. Australians are not anywhere near as tolerant as Brits or Americans of that sort of idiocy.
c) It is on very powerful meds. When it takes them properly, it is not a half-bad tech. When it does not, it remains a not-half-bad tech, but all you will see is that other half.

In general, it is best ignored.

 

[Chuck]

On 11/26/20 7:33 AM, Peter W. wrote:

Chuck:

In short order, you will learn several things about the drongo from down-under:

a) The sun shines from its fundament, and only from its fundament. Whatever else you might see is only a poor substitute for the sun, so do not be mistaken!
b) Were it to behave face-to-face as it does here, it would be dead. Australians are not anywhere near as tolerant as Brits or Americans of that sort of idiocy.
c) It is on very powerful meds. When it takes them properly, it is not a half-bad tech. When it does not, it remains a not-half-bad tech, but all you will see is that other half.

In general, it is best ignored.

Took me by surprise, started off good and then, bam, about face, day to
night, whatever. I\'d hate to be his neighbor, family, or even his pet!
In any case, I\'ll no longer see his posts after his tirade.

 

[Phil Allison]

Chuck wrote:
============

Took me by surprise, started off good and then, bam, about face, day to
night, whatever. I\'d hate to be his neighbor, family, or even his pet!
In any case, I\'ll no longer see his posts after his tirade.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
** FYI Mr Shithead:

Peter Weike is a vile, raving lunatic and a public menace on usenet.

The geriatric fool is actually is a jumped up radio ham with mental issues and a huge dose of ASD or autism.

I *was* happy to assist you till I realised you were a dishonest little shit scamming you way through life.

Have a rotten day.


....... Phil

 

[Peter W.]

On that note, every day is a rotten day for the drongo from down-under. It has my sympathy, but not my respect.

 

[Chuck]

On 11/27/20 7:24 AM, Peter W. wrote:

On that note, every day is a rotten day for the drongo from down-under. It has my sympathy, but not my respect.

Looks like he must have responded to my comment since you responded. Do
yourself a favor (maybe?) and plonk him like I did. No point in
introducing more craziness into a world that is already crazy enough!

 

[Don\'t Feed The Troll]

Chuck <chuck445@yahoonospam.com> wrote:

On 11/27/20 7:24 AM, Peter W. wrote:
On that note, every day is a rotten day for the drongo from
down-under. It has my sympathy, but not my respect.

Looks like he must have responded to my comment since you responded.
Do yourself a favor (maybe?) and plonk him like I did. No point in
introducing more craziness into a world that is already crazy enough!

If you check the headers, you\'ll see that Peter W. uses google groups
to post -- which means he has no killfile capability and can\'t have his
newsreader hide his postings.

 

[KenW]

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:21:21 +0000 (UTC), Don\'t Feed The Troll
<dont-feed-the-troll@nowhere.invalid> wrote:

Chuck <chuck445@yahoonospam.com> wrote:
On 11/27/20 7:24 AM, Peter W. wrote:
On that note, every day is a rotten day for the drongo from
down-under. It has my sympathy, but not my respect.

Looks like he must have responded to my comment since you responded.
Do yourself a favor (maybe?) and plonk him like I did. No point in
introducing more craziness into a world that is already crazy enough!

If you check the headers, you\'ll see that Peter W. uses google groups
to post -- which means he has no killfile capability and can\'t have his
newsreader hide his postings.

My Google Filter Message-ID:googlegroups.com


KenW

 

[Phil Allison]

Chuck wrote:

==================

Get off this NG - or I will make you.


.......... love, Phil

 

[Somewhere Over the Rainbow]

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

Chuck wrote:

==================

Get off this NG - or I will make you.

One, you can\'t -- Usenet does not give you that power.

Two, Chuck has killfiled you, so he will not see any of your outbursts
again. That\'s what the \"plonk\"
(https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=plonk) means.

Chuck is able to killfile you because unlike you, who is using that
awful google groups web UI, he uses a real newsreader and so he can add
you to a list (the killfile) in his newsreader to have it automatically
ignore your rants.

 

[Fox\'s Mercantile]

On 11/27/20 4:57 PM, Phil Allison wrote:

Chuck wrote:

==================

Get off this NG - or I will make you.


......... love, Phil

This should be interesting to watch.


--
\"I am a river to my people.\"
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com

 

[Peter W.]

Some things to keep in mind.

The Drongo from down-under is:

a) Alone.
b) Owns nothing other than what is on its back and a few accessories thereto.
c) Neither friends, nor family, nor pets.
d) Only those neighbors that perforce share the flat complex in which it squats.
e) Is very likely older than I am - and therefore there no prospects of anything ever getting any better for it.

As previously noted - a creature to be pitied - not one due any respect.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

 

[Phil Allison]

Peter W. is a Vile POS LIAR wrote:
---------------------------------------------------

** Peter Weike is a vile, raving lunatic and a public menace on usenet.

The geriatric fuckhead is actually a *jumped up radio ham* with mental issues and a huge dose of ASD or autism.

But he is not to be pitied for his condition.

He is to be despised.



...... Phil